Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. School shooting UK style

School shooting UK style

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
htmltutorialquestionannouncementlearning
72 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Munchies_Matt

    But what is behind the 'bat shit crazy'?

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Slacker007
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    Mental disorders of all kinds. Disorders that require serious medical attention. Now, how do we get these people that attention, whether they want help or not. By the way, I do believe in forced medical help for the seriously ill. To be clear, I am not disagreeing with you. I think we are both on the same page, more or less.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Munchies_Matt

      A car, truck etc as used in Nice a year or so back?

      Richard DeemingR Offline
      Richard DeemingR Offline
      Richard Deeming
      wrote on last edited by
      #59

      At a distance? You'd need a self-driving truck, and the ability to modify its programming. And it would need to be a damn big truck to take out hundreds of people.


      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Slacker007

        Mental disorders of all kinds. Disorders that require serious medical attention. Now, how do we get these people that attention, whether they want help or not. By the way, I do believe in forced medical help for the seriously ill. To be clear, I am not disagreeing with you. I think we are both on the same page, more or less.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Munchies_Matt
        wrote on last edited by
        #60

        But there are many supposedly sane people who seem to snap. What is the trigger? Take school kids, it is a stressful time of life, a lot of difficult issues to deal with, but they arent clinically insane (and yes, those who are should be forcibly locked up and cared for, the UK has been deeply negligent in this in the last 30 years). An interesting subtle shift in the UK recently, lead in large part by William and Harry, sons of Princess Diana, both have fought on the frontline in Afghanistan, and have experience of PTSD among fellow soldiers, has been towards greater acceptance and openness of mental issues. Hopefully by getting this into the open we can deal with it in a much more effective way. (As a true anti royalilst I am pleased to see them actually doing something useful for a change. :) )

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

          At a distance? You'd need a self-driving truck, and the ability to modify its programming. And it would need to be a damn big truck to take out hundreds of people.


          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Munchies_Matt
          wrote on last edited by
          #61

          No, you plough into a crowd, and those 30 ft in front of you are soon to get it. And yes, it was a big truck that killed what was it, 80 people in Nice?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Munchies_Matt

            But there are many supposedly sane people who seem to snap. What is the trigger? Take school kids, it is a stressful time of life, a lot of difficult issues to deal with, but they arent clinically insane (and yes, those who are should be forcibly locked up and cared for, the UK has been deeply negligent in this in the last 30 years). An interesting subtle shift in the UK recently, lead in large part by William and Harry, sons of Princess Diana, both have fought on the frontline in Afghanistan, and have experience of PTSD among fellow soldiers, has been towards greater acceptance and openness of mental issues. Hopefully by getting this into the open we can deal with it in a much more effective way. (As a true anti royalilst I am pleased to see them actually doing something useful for a change. :) )

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Slacker007
            wrote on last edited by
            #62

            The kid who did the last shooting (and most of the other shooters), was on a lot of radars and no one did shit. I say, stop talking about the kid/shooter and start talking about what we do as a society with people like the kid. IMHO, the kid/shooter actually plays a very small part in all of this compared to what we should be doing as a society with crazy people.

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Slacker007

              The kid who did the last shooting (and most of the other shooters), was on a lot of radars and no one did shit. I say, stop talking about the kid/shooter and start talking about what we do as a society with people like the kid. IMHO, the kid/shooter actually plays a very small part in all of this compared to what we should be doing as a society with crazy people.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Munchies_Matt
              wrote on last edited by
              #63

              Slacker007 wrote:

              stop talking about the kid/shooter and start talking about what we do as a society with people like the kid

              Absolutely, 100% agree. Schools especially need to have the mechanisms to catch this before it blows uup.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Munchies_Matt

                You can attempt all the patronising mockery you want, you are wrong, can;t find the data that supports your argument and refuse to accept the fact that murder is the result of social/mental issues. Another attempted murder by knife in the UK: Horrific video shows stabbed teenager lying in blood-soaked clothes | Daily Mail Online[^] "A wave of violent crime has hit the UK recently with eight people dying in London in one week in March alone after a spate of stabbings and shootings" Yes, illegal guns are used in the UK.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #64

                Gun violence is murder, suicide, accidents. Mental illness and reduction of gun violence and suicide: bringing epidemiologic research to policy[^]

                Quote:

                Policymaking at the interface of gun violence prevention and mental illness should be based on epidemiologic data concerning risk to improve the effectiveness, feasibility, and fairness of policy initiatives.

                Guns, knives and pesticides: reducing access to lethal means[^]

                Quote:

                Firearms: Jurisdictions with restrictive firearms legislation and lower firearms ownership tend to have lower levels of gun violence. Measures include bans, licensing schemes, minimum ages for buyers, background checks and safe storage requirements. Such measures have been successfully implemented in countries such as Austria and Brazil and in a number of states in the United States of America. Introducing national legislation can be complicated, but much can be done at local level. Stiffer enforcement, amnesties and improved security for state supplies of firearms are some of the other promising approaches. Multifaceted strategies are also needed to reduce demand for guns – diverting vulnerable youth from gang membership, for instance.

                NEJM - Guns and Suicide in the United States[^]

                Quote:

                Why might the availability of firearms increase the risk of suicide in the United States? First, many suicidal acts — one third to four fifths of all suicide attempts, according to studies — are impulsive. Among people who made near-lethal suicide attempts, for example, 24% took less than 5 minutes between the decision to kill themselves and the actual attempt, and 70% took less than 1 hour.2

                Impulsivity is the same in homicide. And on, and on. But you disagree with these people because you googled some statistics, right? Forget NEJM or the WHO, you cite the Daily Mai

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  The evidence says reducing access to guns reduces the lethality of impulsivity. Take away the gun; less likely to complete the homicide or suicide. But just like GW, you “don’t believe” data.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jschell
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #65

                  Sablerz wrote:

                  The evidence says reducing access to guns reduces the lethality of impulsivity.

                  And what study was that exactly?

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    I don’t think you understand correlation vs causation. Zambia has 50 times the guns and bullets and 50 times the murder rate. Therefore it’s the guns. That’s your dumb arguments, but in reverse. My position is easy to find on Google. My guess is you already did but want me to post specific articles for you to nit pick. Nah. That’s not how the scientific literature works. You can easily find consensus opinions yourself. Later gator!

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jschell
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #66

                    Sablerz wrote:

                    You can easily find consensus opinions yourself. Later gator!

                    Confirmational bias you mean? My perception over the years is that the subject is extremely difficult to study. But you seem to be referring to something very specific. So what is it?

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J jschell

                      Sablerz wrote:

                      You can easily find consensus opinions yourself. Later gator!

                      Confirmational bias you mean? My perception over the years is that the subject is extremely difficult to study. But you seem to be referring to something very specific. So what is it?

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #67

                      Confirmation, bias, sure. Decrease in suicide rates after a change of policy reducing access to firearms in adolescents: a naturalistic epidemiological study. - PubMed - NCBI[^] Law, Ethics, and Conversations between Physicians and Patients about Firearms in the Home. - PubMed - NCBI[^] State Firearm Laws and Interstate Firearm Deaths From Homicide and Suicide in the United States: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Data by County. - PubMed - NCBI[^] That's like, five seconds worth of searching on pubmed because I know what I'm going to find. Go ahead and special plead your familiarity with the literature and call it misrepresentative or selective because you've googled it occasionally.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J jschell

                        Sablerz wrote:

                        The evidence says reducing access to guns reduces the lethality of impulsivity.

                        And what study was that exactly?

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #68

                        Oh, hi, would you like to make any more identical replies to messages in this thread?

                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          [^] First result, start reading the references. You’re lazy

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jschell
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #69

                          Sablerz wrote:

                          First result, start reading the references. You’re lazy

                          Did you understand the study? First it has nothing to do with actually restricting firearms and most certainly nothing to do with measuring the result of doing that. Second it is a mental health study, it is subject to the same problems with others of that type such as the fact that it is based on a survey. Not what people do, but rather what they claim they would do.

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J jschell

                            Sablerz wrote:

                            First result, start reading the references. You’re lazy

                            Did you understand the study? First it has nothing to do with actually restricting firearms and most certainly nothing to do with measuring the result of doing that. Second it is a mental health study, it is subject to the same problems with others of that type such as the fact that it is based on a survey. Not what people do, but rather what they claim they would do.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #70

                            Can you even be bothered to stick to one message in a thread?

                            jschell wrote:

                            Second it is a mental health study, it is subject to the same problems with others of that type

                            What are you, an expert on mental health studies too?

                            J 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Can you even be bothered to stick to one message in a thread?

                              jschell wrote:

                              Second it is a mental health study, it is subject to the same problems with others of that type

                              What are you, an expert on mental health studies too?

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              jschell
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #71

                              Sablerz wrote:

                              Can you even be bothered to stick to one message in a thread?

                              I respond to posts.

                              Sablerz wrote:

                              What are you, an expert on mental health studies too?

                              Not sure what you are referring to. You cited a specific study in an attempt to support your claim. It was at best poor support. Which I pointed out. Feel free to find another study that has better support for your claim. Other than that I read through the study and I am in fact aware of some of the limitations of science in the soft sciences. There is after all a reason they are called "soft sciences."

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Oh, hi, would you like to make any more identical replies to messages in this thread?

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                jschell
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #72

                                Yes I would. I respond to posts. So not people and I do not bother organizing vast chains to insure that nothing is repeated, especially when other posts are also repetitive and thus each needs to be challenged. Clear now?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups