Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Why (western) humans use the decimal system?

Why (western) humans use the decimal system?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questionhelp
57 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Is it really because we have ten fingers? Would it then not be more logical to use then a system based on 11?:confused: :laugh: Btw: I'm Aware, it took a longer time to recognize that "Zero" also exists. From what I remember it was somebody from India who recognized this fact first. [Edit] Try to imagine we would have only one finger...

    It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

    K Offline
    K Offline
    kmoorevs
    wrote on last edited by
    #35

    I have nothing to add, just wanted to say that this is a great example of why I like this place. i. Interesting questions ii. Lot's of really smart people here with intelligent or humorous (both entertaining) answers ..even on a weekend! :)

    "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse

    L M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • K kmoorevs

      I have nothing to add, just wanted to say that this is a great example of why I like this place. i. Interesting questions ii. Lot's of really smart people here with intelligent or humorous (both entertaining) answers ..even on a weekend! :)

      "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #36

      So have a nice Weekend :)

      It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mladen Jankovic

        [Because every base is base 10](https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-c9468c7f3d7bcef7b0f2d0fdf83328d4)

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #37

        :thumbsup:

        It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B BillWoodruff

          There is some very interesting speculation about west-to-east (from Egypt) cultural transmission of iconography and the mathematical basis for weights and measures in this book on the weights of Burma (now Myanmar): Note: CP editor is not displaying pasted in links as expected ... https://www.amazon.com/Earth-Heaven-Animal-Shaped-Weights-Burmese/dp/9747551209 It's an out-of print book for a specialist, and ridiculously expensive, now. And, frustrating to read because some very grandiose theories are proposed, but sources are not annotated satisfactorily.

          «... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #38

          Earth to Heaven: The Royal Animal-Shaped Weights of the Burmese Empire: Joan Gear, Donald Gear: 9789747551204: Amazon.com: Books[^] To Format a link I'm usually go to Q/A, paste the link into an answer, copy the formated preview and cancel answering. This works reliable most (all the) times.

          It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B BillWoodruff

            There is some very interesting speculation about west-to-east (from Egypt) cultural transmission of iconography and the mathematical basis for weights and measures in this book on the weights of Burma (now Myanmar): Note: CP editor is not displaying pasted in links as expected ... https://www.amazon.com/Earth-Heaven-Animal-Shaped-Weights-Burmese/dp/9747551209 It's an out-of print book for a specialist, and ridiculously expensive, now. And, frustrating to read because some very grandiose theories are proposed, but sources are not annotated satisfactorily.

            «... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #39

            Hi, Found a peer-review of the book[^]. It looks interesting. Best Wishes, -David Delaune

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B BillWoodruff

              0x01AA wrote:

              explain what you are discussing

              Re-read the title of your post, then re-read the links in my post. If you're still confused, don't feel you need to tell me :)

              «... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #40

              I am often surprised by my contributions :laugh:

              It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Patrice T

                Jörgen Andersson wrote:

                The danes and the french does.

                En est tu certain ?

                Patrice “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jorgen Andersson
                wrote on last edited by
                #41

                70 = soixante-dix 80 = quatre-vingts 90 = quatre-vingt-dix And danish: 50 = halvtreds 60 = tres 70 = halvfjerds 80 = firs 90 = halvfems In Paris you have (Or had) l’Hôpital des Quinze-Vingts, which used to have 300 beds. Mostly remnants today, the Swizz (and if I recall correctly the Belgians) have gone full decimal. Switzerland uses septante for 70, octante or huitante for 80 and nonante for 90 In english there are small rests of it too: "Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." (The Gettysberg Address, 1863)

                Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                P P 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • J Jorgen Andersson

                  70 = soixante-dix 80 = quatre-vingts 90 = quatre-vingt-dix And danish: 50 = halvtreds 60 = tres 70 = halvfjerds 80 = firs 90 = halvfems In Paris you have (Or had) l’Hôpital des Quinze-Vingts, which used to have 300 beds. Mostly remnants today, the Swizz (and if I recall correctly the Belgians) have gone full decimal. Switzerland uses septante for 70, octante or huitante for 80 and nonante for 90 In english there are small rests of it too: "Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." (The Gettysberg Address, 1863)

                  Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  pth14
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #42

                  It is almost correct. Belgians still use 80 (quatre-vingts). But you are perfectly right about 70 and 90.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    I am often surprised by my contributions :laugh:

                    It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    BillWoodruff
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #43

                    0x01AA wrote:

                    am often surprised by my contributions

                    I think that is one of the most wonderful "features" of this great site, and the remarkable people on it ! What could be better than to learn things we did not know we did not know ? :) cheers, Bill

                    «... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Jorgen Andersson

                      70 = soixante-dix 80 = quatre-vingts 90 = quatre-vingt-dix And danish: 50 = halvtreds 60 = tres 70 = halvfjerds 80 = firs 90 = halvfems In Paris you have (Or had) l’Hôpital des Quinze-Vingts, which used to have 300 beds. Mostly remnants today, the Swizz (and if I recall correctly the Belgians) have gone full decimal. Switzerland uses septante for 70, octante or huitante for 80 and nonante for 90 In english there are small rests of it too: "Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." (The Gettysberg Address, 1863)

                      Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Patrice T
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #44

                      We count in base 10, but some names remain from the past. :-D The dozen is still in little usage: 2 dozen eggs

                      Patrice “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

                      J P 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Hi, Found a peer-review of the book[^]. It looks interesting. Best Wishes, -David Delaune

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        BillWoodruff
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #45

                        Hi, If you really want this book, let me know ... while I don't think it has ever been digitized, once in a while I find a copy in a Chiang Mai used book store for cheap. I disagree with both the reviews currently on Amazon :) cheers, Bill

                        «... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P Patrice T

                          We count in base 10, but some names remain from the past. :-D The dozen is still in little usage: 2 dozen eggs

                          Patrice “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Jorgen Andersson
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #46

                          I understand it's a leftover from the Celts.

                          Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Is it really because we have ten fingers? Would it then not be more logical to use then a system based on 11?:confused: :laugh: Btw: I'm Aware, it took a longer time to recognize that "Zero" also exists. From what I remember it was somebody from India who recognized this fact first. [Edit] Try to imagine we would have only one finger...

                            It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            maze3
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #47

                            I can think that Zero does not offer much trade use? You either trade or not. If i give you 10 for somthing of 5 value, you give me 5 back. but if i give you 10 for something of 10 value, you don't give me anything back. Nothing/Zero is similar. - yes its zero, but for the purpose of the trade, nothing. contrast with mathematics, 2x0 - not sure what trade situation except the trader turns up with nothing to trade. I'm not going to work out some maths to know he aint got anything to trade.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P Patrice T

                              We count in base 10, but some names remain from the past. :-D The dozen is still in little usage: 2 dozen eggs

                              Patrice “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              PeejayAdams
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #48

                              The dozen, I suspect, is also based on fingers. It's a system that emanates from East Anglia.

                              98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Earth to Heaven: The Royal Animal-Shaped Weights of the Burmese Empire: Joan Gear, Donald Gear: 9789747551204: Amazon.com: Books[^] To Format a link I'm usually go to Q/A, paste the link into an answer, copy the formated preview and cancel answering. This works reliable most (all the) times.

                                It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

                                B Offline
                                B Offline
                                BillWoodruff
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #49

                                There is a known bug with link paste currently being reported on the Buggs%Suggs forum.

                                «... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Is it really because we have ten fingers? Would it then not be more logical to use then a system based on 11?:confused: :laugh: Btw: I'm Aware, it took a longer time to recognize that "Zero" also exists. From what I remember it was somebody from India who recognized this fact first. [Edit] Try to imagine we would have only one finger...

                                  It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

                                  K Offline
                                  K Offline
                                  Kirill Illenseer
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #50

                                  11 is far from logical. Afterall, using an 11-based system would exclude roughly half of the population from counting.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P PeejayAdams

                                    The dozen, I suspect, is also based on fingers. It's a system that emanates from East Anglia.

                                    98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    milo xml
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #51

                                    I read something on this once. From what I recall, 12 is used for dozen and timekeeping because it was easier to break down into fractions with no remainder. 10 is divisible by 2 and 5 whereas 12 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • K kmoorevs

                                      I have nothing to add, just wanted to say that this is a great example of why I like this place. i. Interesting questions ii. Lot's of really smart people here with intelligent or humorous (both entertaining) answers ..even on a weekend! :)

                                      "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      milo xml
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #52

                                      I second this. I learn a lot in these discussions. :D

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        Is it really because we have ten fingers? Would it then not be more logical to use then a system based on 11?:confused: :laugh: Btw: I'm Aware, it took a longer time to recognize that "Zero" also exists. From what I remember it was somebody from India who recognized this fact first. [Edit] Try to imagine we would have only one finger...

                                        It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

                                        K Offline
                                        K Offline
                                        Kirk 10389821
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #53

                                        It's hard to see the past with future knowledge. There were 2 concepts. COUNTING, which everyone had to learn how to do. And NOBODY bothered COUNTING ZERO of something. Does a cow farmer record ZERO Sheep, ZERO Goats, etc... Nope, he counts cows... And if the count is ZERO... I am certain he is in PANIC mode. LOL The other concept was MATH. And that is where ZERO is a strict requirement. And we learn numbers first, then math to this day, but we learn more math sooner. Also, I have a daughter, I remember teaching her to count. I can't remember teaching her to start at ZERO. == Here is something interesting about the NAMES for our numbers. Which are NOT good names in English. Because we USED to use BASE 12. The repetition parallel naming starts at 21 (21, 31, 41). But not 11 (which should be tenny-one, or ten-1 or One-teen [best]... Indicating 10 Plus one) But because we used to be base 12 (12 inches in a foot, 12 in dozen, etc)... the TEENS start at 13. Also, implied... Many people were counting much passed this. And mathematically speaking... Base 12 was superior. It divides by 2,3 and 4. Something 10 cannot do without decimals. And don't get me started with decimals. try that in ROMAN Numerals. In fact, division of Roman Numerals (without converting to decimal in your head), takes YEARS to master. So, now we realize we have COUNTING, MATH, and REPRESENTATION... The last one becomes important. How many times have you seen someone open and close their hands to tell you a bigger number like 20, or 30... Do that using Hexadecimal Representation. LOL...

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • K Kirk 10389821

                                          It's hard to see the past with future knowledge. There were 2 concepts. COUNTING, which everyone had to learn how to do. And NOBODY bothered COUNTING ZERO of something. Does a cow farmer record ZERO Sheep, ZERO Goats, etc... Nope, he counts cows... And if the count is ZERO... I am certain he is in PANIC mode. LOL The other concept was MATH. And that is where ZERO is a strict requirement. And we learn numbers first, then math to this day, but we learn more math sooner. Also, I have a daughter, I remember teaching her to count. I can't remember teaching her to start at ZERO. == Here is something interesting about the NAMES for our numbers. Which are NOT good names in English. Because we USED to use BASE 12. The repetition parallel naming starts at 21 (21, 31, 41). But not 11 (which should be tenny-one, or ten-1 or One-teen [best]... Indicating 10 Plus one) But because we used to be base 12 (12 inches in a foot, 12 in dozen, etc)... the TEENS start at 13. Also, implied... Many people were counting much passed this. And mathematically speaking... Base 12 was superior. It divides by 2,3 and 4. Something 10 cannot do without decimals. And don't get me started with decimals. try that in ROMAN Numerals. In fact, division of Roman Numerals (without converting to decimal in your head), takes YEARS to master. So, now we realize we have COUNTING, MATH, and REPRESENTATION... The last one becomes important. How many times have you seen someone open and close their hands to tell you a bigger number like 20, or 30... Do that using Hexadecimal Representation. LOL...

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #54

                                          Impressive, thanks for this :thumbsup:

                                          It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups