Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Why (western) humans use the decimal system?

Why (western) humans use the decimal system?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questionhelp
57 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B BillWoodruff

    There is some very interesting speculation about west-to-east (from Egypt) cultural transmission of iconography and the mathematical basis for weights and measures in this book on the weights of Burma (now Myanmar): Note: CP editor is not displaying pasted in links as expected ... https://www.amazon.com/Earth-Heaven-Animal-Shaped-Weights-Burmese/dp/9747551209 It's an out-of print book for a specialist, and ridiculously expensive, now. And, frustrating to read because some very grandiose theories are proposed, but sources are not annotated satisfactorily.

    «... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Hi, Found a peer-review of the book[^]. It looks interesting. Best Wishes, -David Delaune

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B BillWoodruff

      0x01AA wrote:

      explain what you are discussing

      Re-read the title of your post, then re-read the links in my post. If you're still confused, don't feel you need to tell me :)

      «... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #40

      I am often surprised by my contributions :laugh:

      It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Patrice T

        Jörgen Andersson wrote:

        The danes and the french does.

        En est tu certain ?

        Patrice “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jorgen Andersson
        wrote on last edited by
        #41

        70 = soixante-dix 80 = quatre-vingts 90 = quatre-vingt-dix And danish: 50 = halvtreds 60 = tres 70 = halvfjerds 80 = firs 90 = halvfems In Paris you have (Or had) l’Hôpital des Quinze-Vingts, which used to have 300 beds. Mostly remnants today, the Swizz (and if I recall correctly the Belgians) have gone full decimal. Switzerland uses septante for 70, octante or huitante for 80 and nonante for 90 In english there are small rests of it too: "Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." (The Gettysberg Address, 1863)

        Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

        P P 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • J Jorgen Andersson

          70 = soixante-dix 80 = quatre-vingts 90 = quatre-vingt-dix And danish: 50 = halvtreds 60 = tres 70 = halvfjerds 80 = firs 90 = halvfems In Paris you have (Or had) l’Hôpital des Quinze-Vingts, which used to have 300 beds. Mostly remnants today, the Swizz (and if I recall correctly the Belgians) have gone full decimal. Switzerland uses septante for 70, octante or huitante for 80 and nonante for 90 In english there are small rests of it too: "Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." (The Gettysberg Address, 1863)

          Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

          P Offline
          P Offline
          pth14
          wrote on last edited by
          #42

          It is almost correct. Belgians still use 80 (quatre-vingts). But you are perfectly right about 70 and 90.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            I am often surprised by my contributions :laugh:

            It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

            B Offline
            B Offline
            BillWoodruff
            wrote on last edited by
            #43

            0x01AA wrote:

            am often surprised by my contributions

            I think that is one of the most wonderful "features" of this great site, and the remarkable people on it ! What could be better than to learn things we did not know we did not know ? :) cheers, Bill

            «... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jorgen Andersson

              70 = soixante-dix 80 = quatre-vingts 90 = quatre-vingt-dix And danish: 50 = halvtreds 60 = tres 70 = halvfjerds 80 = firs 90 = halvfems In Paris you have (Or had) l’Hôpital des Quinze-Vingts, which used to have 300 beds. Mostly remnants today, the Swizz (and if I recall correctly the Belgians) have gone full decimal. Switzerland uses septante for 70, octante or huitante for 80 and nonante for 90 In english there are small rests of it too: "Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." (The Gettysberg Address, 1863)

              Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Patrice T
              wrote on last edited by
              #44

              We count in base 10, but some names remain from the past. :-D The dozen is still in little usage: 2 dozen eggs

              Patrice “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

              J P 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Hi, Found a peer-review of the book[^]. It looks interesting. Best Wishes, -David Delaune

                B Offline
                B Offline
                BillWoodruff
                wrote on last edited by
                #45

                Hi, If you really want this book, let me know ... while I don't think it has ever been digitized, once in a while I find a copy in a Chiang Mai used book store for cheap. I disagree with both the reviews currently on Amazon :) cheers, Bill

                «... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Patrice T

                  We count in base 10, but some names remain from the past. :-D The dozen is still in little usage: 2 dozen eggs

                  Patrice “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jorgen Andersson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #46

                  I understand it's a leftover from the Celts.

                  Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Is it really because we have ten fingers? Would it then not be more logical to use then a system based on 11?:confused: :laugh: Btw: I'm Aware, it took a longer time to recognize that "Zero" also exists. From what I remember it was somebody from India who recognized this fact first. [Edit] Try to imagine we would have only one finger...

                    It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    maze3
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #47

                    I can think that Zero does not offer much trade use? You either trade or not. If i give you 10 for somthing of 5 value, you give me 5 back. but if i give you 10 for something of 10 value, you don't give me anything back. Nothing/Zero is similar. - yes its zero, but for the purpose of the trade, nothing. contrast with mathematics, 2x0 - not sure what trade situation except the trader turns up with nothing to trade. I'm not going to work out some maths to know he aint got anything to trade.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Patrice T

                      We count in base 10, but some names remain from the past. :-D The dozen is still in little usage: 2 dozen eggs

                      Patrice “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      PeejayAdams
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #48

                      The dozen, I suspect, is also based on fingers. It's a system that emanates from East Anglia.

                      98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Earth to Heaven: The Royal Animal-Shaped Weights of the Burmese Empire: Joan Gear, Donald Gear: 9789747551204: Amazon.com: Books[^] To Format a link I'm usually go to Q/A, paste the link into an answer, copy the formated preview and cancel answering. This works reliable most (all the) times.

                        It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        BillWoodruff
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #49

                        There is a known bug with link paste currently being reported on the Buggs%Suggs forum.

                        «... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Is it really because we have ten fingers? Would it then not be more logical to use then a system based on 11?:confused: :laugh: Btw: I'm Aware, it took a longer time to recognize that "Zero" also exists. From what I remember it was somebody from India who recognized this fact first. [Edit] Try to imagine we would have only one finger...

                          It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          Kirill Illenseer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #50

                          11 is far from logical. Afterall, using an 11-based system would exclude roughly half of the population from counting.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P PeejayAdams

                            The dozen, I suspect, is also based on fingers. It's a system that emanates from East Anglia.

                            98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            milo xml
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #51

                            I read something on this once. From what I recall, 12 is used for dozen and timekeeping because it was easier to break down into fractions with no remainder. 10 is divisible by 2 and 5 whereas 12 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • K kmoorevs

                              I have nothing to add, just wanted to say that this is a great example of why I like this place. i. Interesting questions ii. Lot's of really smart people here with intelligent or humorous (both entertaining) answers ..even on a weekend! :)

                              "Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              milo xml
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #52

                              I second this. I learn a lot in these discussions. :D

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Is it really because we have ten fingers? Would it then not be more logical to use then a system based on 11?:confused: :laugh: Btw: I'm Aware, it took a longer time to recognize that "Zero" also exists. From what I remember it was somebody from India who recognized this fact first. [Edit] Try to imagine we would have only one finger...

                                It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

                                K Offline
                                K Offline
                                Kirk 10389821
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #53

                                It's hard to see the past with future knowledge. There were 2 concepts. COUNTING, which everyone had to learn how to do. And NOBODY bothered COUNTING ZERO of something. Does a cow farmer record ZERO Sheep, ZERO Goats, etc... Nope, he counts cows... And if the count is ZERO... I am certain he is in PANIC mode. LOL The other concept was MATH. And that is where ZERO is a strict requirement. And we learn numbers first, then math to this day, but we learn more math sooner. Also, I have a daughter, I remember teaching her to count. I can't remember teaching her to start at ZERO. == Here is something interesting about the NAMES for our numbers. Which are NOT good names in English. Because we USED to use BASE 12. The repetition parallel naming starts at 21 (21, 31, 41). But not 11 (which should be tenny-one, or ten-1 or One-teen [best]... Indicating 10 Plus one) But because we used to be base 12 (12 inches in a foot, 12 in dozen, etc)... the TEENS start at 13. Also, implied... Many people were counting much passed this. And mathematically speaking... Base 12 was superior. It divides by 2,3 and 4. Something 10 cannot do without decimals. And don't get me started with decimals. try that in ROMAN Numerals. In fact, division of Roman Numerals (without converting to decimal in your head), takes YEARS to master. So, now we realize we have COUNTING, MATH, and REPRESENTATION... The last one becomes important. How many times have you seen someone open and close their hands to tell you a bigger number like 20, or 30... Do that using Hexadecimal Representation. LOL...

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • K Kirk 10389821

                                  It's hard to see the past with future knowledge. There were 2 concepts. COUNTING, which everyone had to learn how to do. And NOBODY bothered COUNTING ZERO of something. Does a cow farmer record ZERO Sheep, ZERO Goats, etc... Nope, he counts cows... And if the count is ZERO... I am certain he is in PANIC mode. LOL The other concept was MATH. And that is where ZERO is a strict requirement. And we learn numbers first, then math to this day, but we learn more math sooner. Also, I have a daughter, I remember teaching her to count. I can't remember teaching her to start at ZERO. == Here is something interesting about the NAMES for our numbers. Which are NOT good names in English. Because we USED to use BASE 12. The repetition parallel naming starts at 21 (21, 31, 41). But not 11 (which should be tenny-one, or ten-1 or One-teen [best]... Indicating 10 Plus one) But because we used to be base 12 (12 inches in a foot, 12 in dozen, etc)... the TEENS start at 13. Also, implied... Many people were counting much passed this. And mathematically speaking... Base 12 was superior. It divides by 2,3 and 4. Something 10 cannot do without decimals. And don't get me started with decimals. try that in ROMAN Numerals. In fact, division of Roman Numerals (without converting to decimal in your head), takes YEARS to master. So, now we realize we have COUNTING, MATH, and REPRESENTATION... The last one becomes important. How many times have you seen someone open and close their hands to tell you a bigger number like 20, or 30... Do that using Hexadecimal Representation. LOL...

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #54

                                  Impressive, thanks for this :thumbsup:

                                  It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Mladen Jankovic

                                    [Because every base is base 10](https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-c9468c7f3d7bcef7b0f2d0fdf83328d4)

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Andre Pereira
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #55

                                    Please explain.

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Andre Pereira

                                      Please explain.

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mladen Jankovic
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #56

                                      How would you represent number 16dec in hexadecimal system? 8dec in octal? 2dec in binary? Base of any numerical system is represented as 10 in it's own base.

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Mladen Jankovic

                                        How would you represent number 16dec in hexadecimal system? 8dec in octal? 2dec in binary? Base of any numerical system is represented as 10 in it's own base.

                                        A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        Andre Pereira
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #57

                                        You just ran over a math's train over my head. It truly is mathematically indistinguishable :p

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups