I was very very wrong...
-
I will up the ante with a single (curse) word: DCOM.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
-
I used to think WCF XML configurations were hell until i started working with SSAS MDX queries. How on earth am i going to understand this weird syntax :zzz: :zzz: Is this even a syntax??
"Coming soon"
-
If only it were that innocent... :sigh:
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
I will up the ante with a single (curse) word: DCOM.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I see you a DCOM, and raise you a JCL.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
I see you a DCOM, and raise you a JCL.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
If only it were that innocent... :sigh:
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
They do have a Princess Protection Program[^]. You can try to enroll.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[^]
lw@zi wrote:
You can try to enroll
Why? I am neither a princess, nor do I require protection. :)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
My ignorance protects me from what I suppose would be a lethal mind attack.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
Google "IBM JCL". Any further description (or link to such) would be more appropriate to the Soapbox. X|
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
Google "IBM JCL". Any further description (or link to such) would be more appropriate to the Soapbox. X|
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
I already did, my ignorance lies in the lack of direct experience with that... I can understand it's hellish but I don't have the pain receptors reflexively triggered :D
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
-
I see you a DCOM, and raise you a JCL.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
I'll just leave this here:
PXSelectBase<Account> query = new PXSelectJoinGroupBy<Account,
LeftJoin<SalesOrder, On<SalesOrder.customerAccountID, Equal<Account.accountID>>,
LeftJoin<OrderDetail, On<SalesOrder.orderNbr, Equal<OrderDetail.orderNbr>>,
LeftJoin<Product, On<Product.productID, Equal<OrderDetail.productID>>>>>,
Where<Account.companyType, Equal<CompanyTypes.customer>>,
Aggregate<GroupBy<Account.accountID, GroupBy<Product.categoryCD, Sum<OrderDetail.extPrice>>>>>(this);A query using a custom ORM from a CRM product we were evaluating last year. It makes LINQ look positively beautiful by comparison. X|
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
-
I'll just leave this here:
PXSelectBase<Account> query = new PXSelectJoinGroupBy<Account,
LeftJoin<SalesOrder, On<SalesOrder.customerAccountID, Equal<Account.accountID>>,
LeftJoin<OrderDetail, On<SalesOrder.orderNbr, Equal<OrderDetail.orderNbr>>,
LeftJoin<Product, On<Product.productID, Equal<OrderDetail.productID>>>>>,
Where<Account.companyType, Equal<CompanyTypes.customer>>,
Aggregate<GroupBy<Account.accountID, GroupBy<Product.categoryCD, Sum<OrderDetail.extPrice>>>>>(this);A query using a custom ORM from a CRM product we were evaluating last year. It makes LINQ look positively beautiful by comparison. X|
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
Where's my mind bleach?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
I used to think WCF XML configurations were hell until i started working with SSAS MDX queries. How on earth am i going to understand this weird syntax :zzz: :zzz: Is this even a syntax??
"Coming soon"
Some beautiful AutoLisp, enjoy :-\
(defun traverse1 (tree queue depth)
(cond ((= depth (length queue)) ;only dive into depth
(list (car tree)))
(T (append (traverse1 (caadr tree) ;simplified for binary trees
(append queue (list (car tree)))
depth)
(traverse1 (cadadr tree)
(append queue (list (car tree)))
depth))))) -
I used to think WCF XML configurations were hell until i started working with SSAS MDX queries. How on earth am i going to understand this weird syntax :zzz: :zzz: Is this even a syntax??
"Coming soon"
devenv.exe wrote:
Is this even a syntax??
Everything is a syntax for anyone.
-
devenv.exe wrote:
Is this even a syntax??
Everything is a syntax for anyone.
Translated that to English for ya! :) Everything is a syntax to someone.
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
I see you a DCOM, and raise you a JCL.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
I see you a DCOM, and raise you a JCL.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
Bloatus macro script - the original which was the same as the spreadsheet.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
I'll just leave this here:
PXSelectBase<Account> query = new PXSelectJoinGroupBy<Account,
LeftJoin<SalesOrder, On<SalesOrder.customerAccountID, Equal<Account.accountID>>,
LeftJoin<OrderDetail, On<SalesOrder.orderNbr, Equal<OrderDetail.orderNbr>>,
LeftJoin<Product, On<Product.productID, Equal<OrderDetail.productID>>>>>,
Where<Account.companyType, Equal<CompanyTypes.customer>>,
Aggregate<GroupBy<Account.accountID, GroupBy<Product.categoryCD, Sum<OrderDetail.extPrice>>>>>(this);A query using a custom ORM from a CRM product we were evaluating last year. It makes LINQ look positively beautiful by comparison. X|
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
I have a new appreciation for Expression Trees.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli
-
I used to think WCF XML configurations were hell until i started working with SSAS MDX queries. How on earth am i going to understand this weird syntax :zzz: :zzz: Is this even a syntax??
"Coming soon"
There happens to be an article about that here on CodeProject [^] - I used that some years ago when I had the pleasure to use MDX queries :)
-
I'll just leave this here:
PXSelectBase<Account> query = new PXSelectJoinGroupBy<Account,
LeftJoin<SalesOrder, On<SalesOrder.customerAccountID, Equal<Account.accountID>>,
LeftJoin<OrderDetail, On<SalesOrder.orderNbr, Equal<OrderDetail.orderNbr>>,
LeftJoin<Product, On<Product.productID, Equal<OrderDetail.productID>>>>>,
Where<Account.companyType, Equal<CompanyTypes.customer>>,
Aggregate<GroupBy<Account.accountID, GroupBy<Product.categoryCD, Sum<OrderDetail.extPrice>>>>>(this);A query using a custom ORM from a CRM product we were evaluating last year. It makes LINQ look positively beautiful by comparison. X|
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
New Rule... If your cool new "one liner" is more reminiscent of a perl trick... STOP!
