Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Site Bugs / Suggestions
  4. These spammers are a PITA

These spammers are a PITA

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Site Bugs / Suggestions
combeta-testingquestion
20 Posts 12 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • realJSOPR realJSOP

    One question per day, and/or recaptcha for users less than a year old, or for users under a certain rep points threshold, say 10k points. It would be ludicrous to ask high-rep or long-time members to complete a recaptcha.

    ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
    -----
    You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
    -----
    When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jorgen Andersson
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    There is a rep point threshold, but it's at 500 points. See my post above.

    Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

      John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

      It would be ludicrous to ask high-rep or long-time members to complete a recaptcha.

      Indeed. Most of us would fail ... :laugh:

      Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

      realJSOPR Offline
      realJSOPR Offline
      realJSOP
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      That's funny - I don't care who y'are...

      ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
      -----
      You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
      -----
      When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

        You can't see anything in QA except "black magic" crap at the moment, and they are posting faster than we can remove the dross. The spam filter seems to be ignoring them as well, and it's had plenty of examples! How about a "Protector" only report option: two protectors hit it and the account is closed or suspended and all posts, comments, messages, questions, and answers go to a "quarantine" for staff inspection? It would "clean up" the site quickly (and manually reporting 90+ QA questions for one user takes time) and that should discourage the idiots from posting at all. Yesterday was a tester: "Can we get past the detector?". Today would seem to be "payload day" - and the site looks like a New Age Drivel site because you can't see anything but astrology in QA ...

        Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

        Richard DeemingR Offline
        Richard DeemingR Offline
        Richard Deeming
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        QA does stand for "Quick Astrologers", doesn't it? :doh:


        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

        "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

          John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

          It would be ludicrous to ask high-rep or long-time members to complete a recaptcha.

          Indeed. Most of us would fail ... :laugh:

          Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

          B Offline
          B Offline
          Bryian Tan
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          we can make the captcha ask simple question, like what is 1 + 5, 2 x 3 :) have a calculator ready

          Bryian Tan

          OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Bryian Tan

            we can make the captcha ask simple question, like what is 1 + 5, 2 x 3 :) have a calculator ready

            Bryian Tan

            OriginalGriffO Offline
            OriginalGriffO Offline
            OriginalGriff
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Most QA questioners would have to ask a question in QA to solve the problem! :laugh: Hang on ... you may be on to something here ... Hmmm ...

            Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

            "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
            "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

              You can't see anything in QA except "black magic" crap at the moment, and they are posting faster than we can remove the dross. The spam filter seems to be ignoring them as well, and it's had plenty of examples! How about a "Protector" only report option: two protectors hit it and the account is closed or suspended and all posts, comments, messages, questions, and answers go to a "quarantine" for staff inspection? It would "clean up" the site quickly (and manually reporting 90+ QA questions for one user takes time) and that should discourage the idiots from posting at all. Yesterday was a tester: "Can we get past the detector?". Today would seem to be "payload day" - and the site looks like a New Age Drivel site because you can't see anything but astrology in QA ...

              Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

              R Offline
              R Offline
              RmcbainTheThird
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              So who is responsible for cleaning up these posts?

              OriginalGriffO P 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • R RmcbainTheThird

                So who is responsible for cleaning up these posts?

                OriginalGriffO Offline
                OriginalGriffO Offline
                OriginalGriff
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                The hamsters will get 'em - they have direct access to the DB and can wield The Obsidian Axe of Sql against them. :-D

                Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
                "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R RmcbainTheThird

                  So who is responsible for cleaning up these posts?

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Pete OHanlon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  You are. We will give you a chisel.

                  This space for rent

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                    John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                    It would be ludicrous to ask high-rep or long-time members to complete a recaptcha.

                    Indeed. Most of us would fail ... :laugh:

                    Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mohibur Rashid
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    I found it amusing :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

                    I do not fear of failure. I fear of giving up out of frustration.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                      QA does stand for "Quick Astrologers", doesn't it? :doh:


                      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mohibur Rashid
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      uranus is related to astrology:java:

                      I do not fear of failure. I fear of giving up out of frustration.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                        You can't see anything in QA except "black magic" crap at the moment, and they are posting faster than we can remove the dross. The spam filter seems to be ignoring them as well, and it's had plenty of examples! How about a "Protector" only report option: two protectors hit it and the account is closed or suspended and all posts, comments, messages, questions, and answers go to a "quarantine" for staff inspection? It would "clean up" the site quickly (and manually reporting 90+ QA questions for one user takes time) and that should discourage the idiots from posting at all. Yesterday was a tester: "Can we get past the detector?". Today would seem to be "payload day" - and the site looks like a New Age Drivel site because you can't see anything but astrology in QA ...

                        Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Chris Maunder
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        The issue here is that we set the level for people to avoid the spam tester too low - 600 points in some cases. This has been updated (you need Gold status now) so let's see how this goes instead of pushing the issue back onto manual user intervention as the primary guard.

                        cheers Chris Maunder

                        OriginalGriffO G 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • C Chris Maunder

                          The issue here is that we set the level for people to avoid the spam tester too low - 600 points in some cases. This has been updated (you need Gold status now) so let's see how this goes instead of pushing the issue back onto manual user intervention as the primary guard.

                          cheers Chris Maunder

                          OriginalGriffO Offline
                          OriginalGriffO Offline
                          OriginalGriff
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          I'd agree that it shouldn't be the first line of defence - the spam detector does a good job nearly all the time. But for days like yesterday when you can't feed the damn things to the detector fast enough, we do need a backup option to discourage them from further posting. If we turn their efforts into a waste of time quickly enough, they will bugger off elsewhere (as we've seen today). And (no offence intended) they tend to be in a time zone when you are all having a well-deserved sleep. You've got a network of protectors in every time zone, so I'm just suggesting you give them a backup tool in the box to prevent floods.

                          Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                          "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
                          "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

                          N 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Chris Maunder

                            The issue here is that we set the level for people to avoid the spam tester too low - 600 points in some cases. This has been updated (you need Gold status now) so let's see how this goes instead of pushing the issue back onto manual user intervention as the primary guard.

                            cheers Chris Maunder

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            GKP1992
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            Whew, I wouldn't have noticed, I received the gold just yesterday.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                              I'd agree that it shouldn't be the first line of defence - the spam detector does a good job nearly all the time. But for days like yesterday when you can't feed the damn things to the detector fast enough, we do need a backup option to discourage them from further posting. If we turn their efforts into a waste of time quickly enough, they will bugger off elsewhere (as we've seen today). And (no offence intended) they tend to be in a time zone when you are all having a well-deserved sleep. You've got a network of protectors in every time zone, so I'm just suggesting you give them a backup tool in the box to prevent floods.

                              Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                              N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Nelek
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              I would add something to your feature... It could be a "only protectors or higher" check box near the red flag to report an account... something like: This user is a massive spammer, if closed, delete {all messages // messages younger than X days} related to this account So we check the box first and then hit the report button. Combining the power of several small hits to make a big spam hammer as CP Staff's

                              M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups