The Concept of the human Soul is a religious concept, which has no basis in fact, and does not exist
-
ZurdoDev wrote:
Obviously. But you believe in plenty of scientific statements without having tested them yourself.
No, that is not a belief or faith. I know they are valid, because they are being verified and validated every day, by independent people. That means there's no requirement for me to "believe" or "assume". Seriously, would you have CP judge articles based on "faith" and "belief", or rather have the code verified by everyone who comes across it? Does your code require "faith"?
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
because they are being verified and validated every day, by independent people.
You assume. :laugh: :laugh: And you trust/have faith/believe/whatever you want to call it that they are doing it right.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
because they are being verified and validated every day, by independent people.
You assume. :laugh: :laugh: And you trust/have faith/believe/whatever you want to call it that they are doing it right.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
ZurdoDev wrote:
You assume. :laugh: :laugh: And you trust/have faith/believe/whatever you want to call it that they are doing it right.
No; we did quite some chemistry-tricks in school; you get a list of stuff you need, and then you can verify the results. Same goes for Newtons laws; go measure and verify. Everyone can verify it; if it needed belief, it would not be science, but yet another religion.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
ZurdoDev wrote:
You assume. :laugh: :laugh: And you trust/have faith/believe/whatever you want to call it that they are doing it right.
No; we did quite some chemistry-tricks in school; you get a list of stuff you need, and then you can verify the results. Same goes for Newtons laws; go measure and verify. Everyone can verify it; if it needed belief, it would not be science, but yet another religion.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Everyone can verify it
You keep repeating that as if I have disagreed. I have not disagreed. I have simply pointed out that YOU have not verified everything that YOU believe from science, which means you are "taking their word for it." Somehow my point is not getting across. :sigh:
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Everyone can verify it
You keep repeating that as if I have disagreed. I have not disagreed. I have simply pointed out that YOU have not verified everything that YOU believe from science, which means you are "taking their word for it." Somehow my point is not getting across. :sigh:
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
ZurdoDev wrote:
I have simply pointed out that YOU have not verified everything that YOU believe from science, which means you are "taking their word for it."
I have explained several times how that observation is nonsense. The scientific method is a self-correcting one, validated and verified independently. It has been so since Ibn Alhazen. It is NOT belief in science. It does not require belief. In fact, one is encouraged to doubt everything.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
ZurdoDev wrote:
I have simply pointed out that YOU have not verified everything that YOU believe from science, which means you are "taking their word for it."
I have explained several times how that observation is nonsense. The scientific method is a self-correcting one, validated and verified independently. It has been so since Ibn Alhazen. It is NOT belief in science. It does not require belief. In fact, one is encouraged to doubt everything.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Ya, you're still not getting it.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
It does not require belief.
I agree. Truth is truth regardless of belief. We'll try this from a different angle. Do you believe in the theory of evolution? Or in gravity?
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
-
Ya, you're still not getting it.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
It does not require belief.
I agree. Truth is truth regardless of belief. We'll try this from a different angle. Do you believe in the theory of evolution? Or in gravity?
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
ZurdoDev wrote:
Do you believe in the theory of evolution? Or in gravity?
I don't need to. The "theory" of evolution is also not a theoretical thing; it is considered a "theory and a fact". We are drowning in evidence of evolution. Gravity is something you can test for yourself. Go stand near a black hole :)
ZurdoDev wrote:
I agree. Truth is truth regardless of belief.
That's why scientist have to use tools to measure, and why their claims are tested by others using other unbiased tools. The machines dont lie.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
ZurdoDev wrote:
Do you believe in the theory of evolution? Or in gravity?
I don't need to. The "theory" of evolution is also not a theoretical thing; it is considered a "theory and a fact". We are drowning in evidence of evolution. Gravity is something you can test for yourself. Go stand near a black hole :)
ZurdoDev wrote:
I agree. Truth is truth regardless of belief.
That's why scientist have to use tools to measure, and why their claims are tested by others using other unbiased tools. The machines dont lie.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
I don't need to.
OK. :rolleyes: Dodge the question.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
I don't need to.
OK. :rolleyes: Dodge the question.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
I answered it, but you're too busy convinving yourself that you forgot to read the arguments. The theory of evolution is not a "belief". The fairy-tales without any evidence are. It's that simple :thumbsup:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
I answered it, but you're too busy convinving yourself that you forgot to read the arguments. The theory of evolution is not a "belief". The fairy-tales without any evidence are. It's that simple :thumbsup:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
I asked if you believe in the theory of evolution and your "answer" was "I don't need to." That is NOT an answer. There were only 2 possible answers and "I don't need to", is not one of them. :doh: When your wife asks, "do you believe we should do something to help out the kids?", your answer is "I don't need to." :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
-
I asked if you believe in the theory of evolution and your "answer" was "I don't need to." That is NOT an answer. There were only 2 possible answers and "I don't need to", is not one of them. :doh: When your wife asks, "do you believe we should do something to help out the kids?", your answer is "I don't need to." :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
ZurdoDev wrote:
I asked if you believe in the theory of evolution and your "answer" was "I don't need to." That is NOT an answer. There were only 2 possible answers and "I don't need to", is not one of them.
It is, even if you don't like it. I do not believe anyone, and have no need to.
ZurdoDev wrote:
When your wife asks, "do you believe we should do something to help out the kids?", your answer is "I don't need to." :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Precisely, 'cause I damned sure I don't have any kids. The idea that only y/n is valid is again nonsense, and you're abusing that notion to imply that one either believes in the theory or not. That's bullshit; evolution is fact, regardless of your belief :thumbsup:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
ZurdoDev wrote:
I asked if you believe in the theory of evolution and your "answer" was "I don't need to." That is NOT an answer. There were only 2 possible answers and "I don't need to", is not one of them.
It is, even if you don't like it. I do not believe anyone, and have no need to.
ZurdoDev wrote:
When your wife asks, "do you believe we should do something to help out the kids?", your answer is "I don't need to." :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Precisely, 'cause I damned sure I don't have any kids. The idea that only y/n is valid is again nonsense, and you're abusing that notion to imply that one either believes in the theory or not. That's bullshit; evolution is fact, regardless of your belief :thumbsup:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
I do not believe anyone,
I never asked if you believed a person. :doh: Geez, you can't seem to follow anything.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
I damned sure I don't have any kids.
Thank goodness. The fact that you can't pass on this crazy notion of "I don't believe anything" is good for the rest of society.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
evolution is fact
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
-
Falsify this: [Many-worlds interpretation - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds\_interpretation) (I have ten other fundamental theories after you finish with this one) :)
Not a quantum physicist, so I'll let them take point on that.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor
-
Not a quantum physicist, so I'll let them take point on that.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor
-
Nathan Minier wrote:
faith and science
Ironically, you have faith in science. :-D Faith is believing in something that can't be seen. You believe what science teaches you without actually verifying the results yourself, which means you are taking their word for it on faith. We ALL use faith every day in all that we do. It's not a bad thing nor just a religious thing.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
ZurdoDev wrote:
Faith is believing in something that can't be seen. You believe what science teaches you without actually verifying the results yourself, which means you are taking their word for it on faith.
So...science is a "their"? No, I am guilty of having faith in scientists, which is a fundamentally different thing. As a discipline, science is not predicated on faith.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor
-
I'm of course not religious. Just want to point out that science doesn't have all the answers at the moment. Our confidence in it is a bit exaggerated.
Claiming to have all the answers, "Knowing", is an article of faith. Didn't I already say that?
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor
-
I'm of course not religious. Just want to point out that science doesn't have all the answers at the moment. Our confidence in it is a bit exaggerated.
Urban Cricket wrote:
science doesn't have all the answers at the moment
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
-
I'm of course not religious. Just want to point out that science doesn't have all the answers at the moment. Our confidence in it is a bit exaggerated.
Urban Cricket wrote:
science doesn't have all the answers at the moment
The purpose of the scientific method is not to have all the answers but merely to prove or disprove a hypothesis. Because of this science can only be performed on a hypothesis which is able to be disproved which is why science does not explore the question of the 'soul', that question is really is more the realm of philosophy.
Urban Cricket wrote:
Out confidence in it is a bit exaggerated
I agree because many people and particularly many politicians really do not understand the scientific method. In particular, the area of probability which is not intuitive and vital to science is really difficult to grasp for many people.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
-
Claiming to have all the answers, "Knowing", is an article of faith. Didn't I already say that?
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor
-
No, but you claimed that science is falsifiable. Our most fundamental theories are not. String theory is another gem. That is why you will see Nobel prize winners to claim that they believe in one theory or another.
Anything that is scientifically approached is falsifiable provided new information. I don't care how fundamental it is, nor does science. Any "scientific theory" that is not falsifiable in the face of new information is simply not a scientific theory. In the case of quantum physics, they're often predicated on mathematical constructs that fit the circumstances. Again, not a quantum physicist so I can't say which ones that is the case with, but that's also why I don't wander around full of certainty about parallel realities where differences are measured in the spin and strangeness of quarks. Any scientist that "believes" a scientific theory is either using shorthand to say that it has not yet been falsified, or has the same basic disconnect between fact and belief that so many people in this community are demonstrating.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor
-
Anything that is scientifically approached is falsifiable provided new information. I don't care how fundamental it is, nor does science. Any "scientific theory" that is not falsifiable in the face of new information is simply not a scientific theory. In the case of quantum physics, they're often predicated on mathematical constructs that fit the circumstances. Again, not a quantum physicist so I can't say which ones that is the case with, but that's also why I don't wander around full of certainty about parallel realities where differences are measured in the spin and strangeness of quarks. Any scientist that "believes" a scientific theory is either using shorthand to say that it has not yet been falsified, or has the same basic disconnect between fact and belief that so many people in this community are demonstrating.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor
there is a brilliant summary of the current state of affairs in fundamental science: [Shut up and calculate](https://www.queensu.ca/connect/grad/files/2015/02/Dibujo20140531-david-mermin-shut-up-and-calculate.png) The problem is that we may never be able to obtain the necessary experimental information to prove one way or another the current theories. The infinite parallel realities are just a hint of the desperation for some interpretation that doesn't contradict itself.
