What can over 400K programmers do?
-
Wonder how long it would take for over 400,000 programmers (assuming that all memebers are programmers) to build an FREE OS from the ground up and a new programming language to go with it.... Supporting only a given set of hardware (nothing older than three years)... Rocky Moore <><
We will never know if we don't try. I think it will be like a travel. The most funny part is to plan it. And if "the more merrier" is true, then with 400.000 it will be hilarious. Count me in! jhaga CodeProject House, Paul Watson wrote: ...and the roar of John Simmons own personal Nascar in the garage. Meg flitting about taking photos.Chris having an heated arguement with Colin Davies and .S.Rod. over egian values. Nish manically typing *censur*. Duncan racing around after his pet *c.* Michael Martin and Bryce loudly yelling *c.* C.G. having a fit as Roger Wright loads up *c.* . Anna waving her *c.* and Deb scoffing chocolates in the corner. ...Good heavens!
-
Rocky Moore wrote: 400K programmers Probably 50k programmers, the rest well who knows? To iterate is human, to recurse is devine.
VB :suss:
"I have a strange ginger man living on my roof!"
"One of the most important things you learn from the internet is that there is no ‘them’ out there. It’s just an awful lot of ‘us’." -Douglas Adams
Jonathan 'nonny' Newman Homepage [www.nonny.com] [^] -
Sounds a bit like re-inventing the wheel. Regardz Colin J Davies
*** WARNING *
This could be addictive
**The minion's version of "Catch :bob: "It's a real shame that people as stupid as you can work out how to use a computer. said by Christian Graus in the Soapbox
Colin Davies wrote: The minion's version of "Catch :omg: And I thought I had too much spare time...
"I have a strange ginger man living on my roof!"
"One of the most important things you learn from the internet is that there is no ‘them’ out there. It’s just an awful lot of ‘us’." -Douglas Adams
Jonathan 'nonny' Newman Homepage [www.nonny.com] [^] -
Wonder how long it would take for over 400,000 programmers (assuming that all memebers are programmers) to build an FREE OS from the ground up and a new programming language to go with it.... Supporting only a given set of hardware (nothing older than three years)... Rocky Moore <><
can't make a baby in one month. Kant wrote: Actually she replied back to me "You shouldn't fix the bug. You should kill it"
-
Wonder how long it would take for over 400,000 programmers (assuming that all memebers are programmers) to build an FREE OS from the ground up and a new programming language to go with it.... Supporting only a given set of hardware (nothing older than three years)... Rocky Moore <><
Every person who wants to download a file from CP ( and possibly post, I'm not sure ) needs to register. That is why the numbers have exploded. Out of that, you'd have maybe 100,000 competent programmers, of which 20,000 would read the site regularly, and maybe 400 would have the time, the energy, and the inclination to involve themselves in such a project. I'm in. :-) Christian NO MATTER HOW MUCH BIG IS THE WORD SIZE ,THE DATA MUCT BE TRANSPORTED INTO THE CPU. - Vinod Sharma Anonymous wrote: OK. I read a c++ book. Or...a bit of it anyway. I'm sick of that evil looking console window. I think you are a good candidate for Visual Basic. - Nemanja Trifunovic
-
can't make a baby in one month. Kant wrote: Actually she replied back to me "You shouldn't fix the bug. You should kill it"
Are you in or out? jhaga CodeProject House, Paul Watson wrote: ...and the roar of John Simmons own personal Nascar in the garage. Meg flitting about taking photos.Chris having an heated arguement with Colin Davies and .S.Rod. over egian values. Nish manically typing *censur*. Duncan racing around after his pet *c.* Michael Martin and Bryce loudly yelling *c.* C.G. having a fit as Roger Wright loads up *c.* . Anna waving her *c.* and Deb scoffing chocolates in the corner. ...Good heavens!
-
It would take forever. Especially with all the different mindsets we have here. It's hard enough managing a team of 5 programmers who sit in the same office, speak the same language and have similiar mindsets when it comes to code. Michael 'War is at best barbarism...Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is hell.' - General William Sherman, 1879
Michael P Butler wrote: ... sit in the same office, speak the same language and have similiar mindsets ... But still, the most important item, and the one that will doom the 400k programmers to failure is "Where do we put the curly braces?" Dave "You can say that again." -- Dept. of Redundancy Dept.
-
Wonder how long it would take for over 400,000 programmers (assuming that all memebers are programmers) to build an FREE OS from the ground up and a new programming language to go with it.... Supporting only a given set of hardware (nothing older than three years)... Rocky Moore <><
Well we probably keep Mr Maunder's etc SQL Server box, and web servers fairly busy. :-D
"Je pense, donc je mange." - Rene Descartes 1689 - Just before his mother put his tea on the table. Shameless Plug - Distributed Database Transactions in .NET using COM+
-
Wonder how long it would take for over 400,000 programmers (assuming that all memebers are programmers) to build an FREE OS from the ground up and a new programming language to go with it.... Supporting only a given set of hardware (nothing older than three years)... Rocky Moore <><
If you believe the 40 ships theory of management it should only take about 20 minutes.
"Ask not for whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee..." -
B :-D Paul ;) Now if only they'd let us have duct tape and lighter fluid - that'd shut the little turds up. - David Wulff on Spammers
Funny, that! :laugh: Anna :rose: Homepage | My life in tears "Be yourself - not what others think you should be" - Marcia Graesch "Anna's just a sexy-looking lesbian tart" - A friend, trying to wind me up. It didn't work. Trouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Visual C++ Add-In
-
Michael P Butler wrote: ... sit in the same office, speak the same language and have similiar mindsets ... But still, the most important item, and the one that will doom the 400k programmers to failure is "Where do we put the curly braces?" Dave "You can say that again." -- Dept. of Redundancy Dept.
At the end of the bar, of course... ;) Anna :rose: Homepage | My life in tears "Be yourself - not what others think you should be" - Marcia Graesch "Anna's just a sexy-looking lesbian tart" - A friend, trying to wind me up. It didn't work. Trouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Visual C++ Add-In
-
Wonder how long it would take for over 400,000 programmers (assuming that all memebers are programmers) to build an FREE OS from the ground up and a new programming language to go with it.... Supporting only a given set of hardware (nothing older than three years)... Rocky Moore <><
Hmmm - 400,000 developers all complaining about how to format the whitespace and comments :rolleyes: cheers, Chris Maunder
-
Well we probably keep Mr Maunder's etc SQL Server box, and web servers fairly busy. :-D
"Je pense, donc je mange." - Rene Descartes 1689 - Just before his mother put his tea on the table. Shameless Plug - Distributed Database Transactions in .NET using COM+
Not to mention keeping Mr Maunder himself reasonably occupied as well ;) cheers, Chris Maunder
-
Hmmm - 400,000 developers all complaining about how to format the whitespace and comments :rolleyes: cheers, Chris Maunder
Exactly. I want front row seats. :) J
"You can get anything you want at Alice's Restaurant."
-
Wonder how long it would take for over 400,000 programmers (assuming that all memebers are programmers) to build an FREE OS from the ground up and a new programming language to go with it.... Supporting only a given set of hardware (nothing older than three years)... Rocky Moore <><
I think the best bet for this is to do work on Linix and the Wine project. The biggest problem I see with a shinny new operating system is it will have to be 100% windows compatible or no one will use it. Also you will have to convince software companies to program for your new operating system. In its day OS/2 was better than windows but windows was more popular, installed on all new machines by default, everyone wrote their applications for windows so OS/2 lost. I think the situation will be much harder now because there are soo many applications for windows. It would be very hard to convince someone to write applications for your operating system. This is the biggest problem for Linux. John
-
Sounds a bit like re-inventing the wheel. Regardz Colin J Davies
*** WARNING *
This could be addictive
**The minion's version of "Catch :bob: "It's a real shame that people as stupid as you can work out how to use a computer. said by Christian Graus in the Soapbox
Colin Davies wrote: Sounds a bit like re-inventing the wheel. And what's wrong with that? Who ever decided that they should be round, anyway? I certainly never was asked to vote on it, and I know some polygons with very strong opinions about the issue. And why is there a hole in the middle? It just complicates matters to have to invent a whole new coordinate system to accomodate them in mathematics. And given their tendendcy to go flat at the most inconvenient times it would seem to make sense to manufacture them that way and just deal with it. Surely we're clever enough to design machines that make use of wheel-like structures with one flat side. Besides, who really needs them? It was proved a long time ago that, given a proper fulcrum, we can move the Earth. What more do we need that this wheel thingy has to offer?
"Ask not for whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee..." -
Colin Davies wrote: Sounds a bit like re-inventing the wheel. And what's wrong with that? Who ever decided that they should be round, anyway? I certainly never was asked to vote on it, and I know some polygons with very strong opinions about the issue. And why is there a hole in the middle? It just complicates matters to have to invent a whole new coordinate system to accomodate them in mathematics. And given their tendendcy to go flat at the most inconvenient times it would seem to make sense to manufacture them that way and just deal with it. Surely we're clever enough to design machines that make use of wheel-like structures with one flat side. Besides, who really needs them? It was proved a long time ago that, given a proper fulcrum, we can move the Earth. What more do we need that this wheel thingy has to offer?
"Ask not for whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee..."I agree. I see that there is value in re-inventing the wheel :). Why did Microsoft make an OS? It was not because no OS existed before. And, if I remember right, the early Microsoft OSs sucked compared to the ones already available. On the same note, is not .NET re-inventing the concept introduced by Java, and Java reinventing the concept of VMs. The same could be applied to anything that man has ever built. It is all about control, and power. If someone creates another OS, which is better than all available (or convince enough people about it- does not have to be true) then there is a market value to it - and that is the basis of our economy. My article on a reference-counted smart pointer that supports polymorphic objects and raw pointers
-
Every person who wants to download a file from CP ( and possibly post, I'm not sure ) needs to register. That is why the numbers have exploded. Out of that, you'd have maybe 100,000 competent programmers, of which 20,000 would read the site regularly, and maybe 400 would have the time, the energy, and the inclination to involve themselves in such a project. I'm in. :-) Christian NO MATTER HOW MUCH BIG IS THE WORD SIZE ,THE DATA MUCT BE TRANSPORTED INTO THE CPU. - Vinod Sharma Anonymous wrote: OK. I read a c++ book. Or...a bit of it anyway. I'm sick of that evil looking console window. I think you are a good candidate for Visual Basic. - Nemanja Trifunovic
I am also in, but I don't know the extent of participation that I will be able to put in. :) My article on a reference-counted smart pointer that supports polymorphic objects and raw pointers
-
If you believe the 40 ships theory of management it should only take about 20 minutes.
"Ask not for whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee..." -
I agree. I see that there is value in re-inventing the wheel :). Why did Microsoft make an OS? It was not because no OS existed before. And, if I remember right, the early Microsoft OSs sucked compared to the ones already available. On the same note, is not .NET re-inventing the concept introduced by Java, and Java reinventing the concept of VMs. The same could be applied to anything that man has ever built. It is all about control, and power. If someone creates another OS, which is better than all available (or convince enough people about it- does not have to be true) then there is a market value to it - and that is the basis of our economy. My article on a reference-counted smart pointer that supports polymorphic objects and raw pointers
Thomas George wrote: is not .NET re-inventing the concept introduced by Java, and Java reinventing the concept of VMs. Yup! Remember p-code (Pascal)? Thomas George wrote: the early Microsoft OSs sucked compared to the ones already available. They still do, but they managed to convince the technically challenged that computers have uses. We have Microsoft to thank for a few million jobs (those of us that have jobs), and endless opportunity for unemployed tech wizards to pick up beer money treating psychotic Windows machines owned by their friends and families. The next OS should be robust and friendly enough to suck in the remaining Luddites in the world, finally acheiving the goal of ubiquitous computing. All we need is an AI front end that can correctly anticipate which wrong key the user will try next, and disable it before the thing gets pressed.:)
"Ask not for whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee..."