python - tail stuck under the rocks?

[OriginalGriff]

There is also the "Extra quote character": ''' which looks just like the ones around it, but will not compile in other peoples code - not that you would replace any, I'm sure ... :laugh:

Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

[Sander Rossel]

Richard MacCutchan wrote:

I agree, but you can still do quite a bit of damage with var.

In what language? JavaScript? Certainly, but JavaScript doesn't really get much better than that... In C# it's still a typed variable, so it's exactly the same thing as explicitly using the type name except instead of the type name you use var. So no damage there, except to readability.

Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Continuous Integration, Delivery, and Deployment arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

[Sander Rossel]

Dictionary<string, IEnumerable<IEnumerable<SomeValue>>> valuesPerLineFromACsvFileByKey = new Dictionary<string, IEnumerable<IEnumerable<SomeValue>>>();

or:

var valuesPerLineFromACsvFileByKey = new Dictionary<string, IEnumerable<IEnumerable<SomeValue>>>();

:D

Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Continuous Integration, Delivery, and Deployment arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

[Sander Rossel]

I know Haskell has it too. I know, because I had a school assignment that I've been looking at for two hours because I mixed up a few spaces with a tab... X|

if x is a:
do //...

Isn't the same as:

if x is a:
do //...

:rolleyes: It does produce some really clean and concise code though!

Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Continuous Integration, Delivery, and Deployment arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

[David ONeil]

OriginalGriff wrote:

- not that you would replace any, I'm sure

If I wasn't using a strongly-typed language, and had an asshole for a coworker that needed a lesson, I certainly would! Send him a copy in which a variable has unicode changes but looks the same: "It works for me, I can't understand why you are having problems!" :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

The forgotten roots of science | C++ Programming | DWinLib

[GuyThiebaut]

I started looking at Python in my home hobby time around 6 months ago and while it is a bit strange at first, I now find the indentation makes the code easier to read without brackets. I know IDEs allow you to indent bracketed languages but I find that Python easier to read. If you find the indentation strange, wait until you get on to the coding standards where lines should not exceed 79 characters in length.

“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

― Christopher Hitchens

[GuyThiebaut]

Which is why I see Python as a poor choice for teaching beginners to 'code'. Take this class definition containing a function:

class StringFormat(object):

@staticmethod
def FloatToStringFormat(num: float, decimalPlaces: int) -> str:
    return "{:.{}f}".format(num, decimalPlaces)

Calling it like this:

resultAsString = StringFormat.FloatToStringFormat(20.123, "2")

I would expect to get an error as I am passing in a string rather than an integer for decimalPlaces. But no, Python happily sets resultAsString to "20.12"

“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

― Christopher Hitchens

[Mike Winiberg]

It's interesting to see in this discussion that one of python's more attractive features is seen as a disadvantage 8) Once again, the debate here about whether the language is 'good' or not seems to have nothing to do with whether it actually is good or otherwise, but simply amounts to 'does it fit my idea of how a language should work'. If I've learnt anything from over 40 years of software development, it is that (with a few domain specific exceptions) the skill of writing good software - don't mistake me here, I'm not saying that I write good software! - has almost nothing to do with the language you write it in, and everything to do with domain knowledge and the skill of the programmer(s). Every language has rules; every language has flaws. Being aware of both and using/avoiding them so you produce good code is what it's all about. The behaviour cited above as being 'problematic' is exactly why I use Python for certain types of project. 8)

[GuyThiebaut]

Mike Winiberg wrote:

has almost nothing to do with the language you write it in, and everything to do with domain knowledge and the skill of the programmer(s).

I agree. I am glad you used the word "almost", because using Windows batch scripting for some devops work I have been doing has resulted in me having to work around the language and do things in a manner that I would not see as particularly elegant. Of course I could rewrite it with powershell scripting, which is on my list, but when you are working on systems that are business critical - doing a large code refactor is not always possible largely due to the cost to the business.

“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

― Christopher Hitchens

[Mike Winiberg]

Oh yes, I was careful to say "almost"! 8) It never ceases to amaze me how complex a process could be constructed with DOS batch scripts - often by relying on obscure side-effects of small .COM files etc. I've always liked Powershell (although I rarely use it!) because it seemed a genuine attempt to provide a full batch environment for windows with 'proper' controlled access to the entire system. I do find the verbosity of the naming convention somewhat off-putting though (as indeed is the case for some other languages) - ridiculously long and complex variable names can be as difficult to manage as i, ii, iii and iiii etc! (I once spent over a day hunting down a bug in some C++ code where a stupidly long descriptive variable name had been used in multiple places with two different internal spellings via a macro such that the compiler didn't 'notice' the variants!)

[Fueled By Decaff]

C#

var elapsedTime = stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
var processedCount = GetProcessedCount();
var processedPerSecond = processedCount / elapsedTime * 1000;

Spot the bug.

[Sander Rossel]

Fueled By Caffeine wrote:

var processedPerSecond = processedCount / elapsedTime * 1000;

Probably there, you get an int instead of a decimal? However, changing var to decimal will still result in a wrong output as an int is silently cast to a decimal, but that doesn't change outcome of the divide operation. The fix I think you're looking for is:

var processedPerSecond = (decimal)processedCount / elapsedTime * 1000;

Now here is a fun bug, which I've seen go wrong multiple times...

var query = databaseContext.SomeTable;
query = query.Where(x => x.SomeBoolLimitingTheResultFromThousandsToTens);
return query.ToList();

In this piece of code the query variable is of type IQueryable. That means the Where that is executed is actually Queryable.Where(IQueryable, Expression). The actual database call, with WHERE clause, is executed on the ToList method (or more precise, in the Enumerator). Now someone comes and changes the code, the first line becomes var query = databaseContext.SomeTable.ToList(); Suddenly, the type of query has changed to IEnumerable! The database query WITHOUT the WHERE clause is executed and Enumerable.Where(IEnumerable, Func) is executed to filter the collection in-memory. You now get thousands of records instead of tens, while the in-memory Where is probably more expensive than the database WHERE. All in all a nice performance hit... That is actually the only bug I've ever encountered while working with var, and it's pretty specific. And the only reason it goes wrong is because IQueryable and IEnumerable have pretty much the same extension methods, save for Expression and Func, but a Func can be implicitly cast to an Expression. Fun times :)

Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Continuous Integration, Delivery, and Deployment arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

[kalberts]

lopatir wrote:

but how do you misspell "i"

Right. That cost me a couple days of work, in the days when Fortran, as well as hardcopy code, were still around. (Yes I know there are languages called Fortran today, but they look completely different!). The loop went trhough once (as Fortran always does), but wouldn't repeat. I didn't discover the problem until I sat down with a printout of the disassebled binary code. Fortunately, the disassembler made use of the symbol defintions in the debug info, and fortunately, the printer (as opposed to the screen) used serif fonts. Then I could distinguish an "l" from an "I", so a conditional jump out of the loop used a diferent variable from the intended one. There are several such "false friends". I should have known, because in my student days, one of my friends who was a TA in the elementary Fortran programming class caused and "incident": The professor insisted on Norwegian variable names, so instead of "QUEUE" the variable should be named "KØ". "Ø" isn't recognized in Fortran, but ø is commonly transcribed to English as oe, which makes it "K0E". Because we have Ø as a letter, we do not slash zeroes here. Depending on the typeface, KOE and K0E may look almost perfectly identical. They did on our screens. When Jon discovered, he exclaimed loudly so that everybody around could hear hear it to the very good-looking, 18 year old female freshman: "Look, here you are not saying k-oh-e, you are saying k-null-e!" Zero is "null" in Norwegian and "knulle" means f**k... Jon didn't realize was he was "suggesting" until the word had been pronounced, and he got so ashamed that he wanted to flee away. But the girl did accept his excuses. Actually, it doesn't take national characters, like ø, to confuse 0 and O - even in English-speaking environments, non-slashed zeroes are common. Some typeface do not distinguish much between 1 and l either - I have seen troubles caused by that pair as well.

[kalberts]

I my days, when C squeezed out Pascal, one argument you could frequenty hear in favor of C was "There's so much typing in Pascal! In C, you can just use {}, and don't need those BEGINs and ENDs. You don't need to write FUNCTION or PROCEDURE, and so on". So we threw out a well designed, fairly safe language in favor of a "you asked for it, you got it" language, to save a few keystrokes. To some people that wasn't enough; even braces required keystrokes (even shifted ones, on most keyboards). Let's get rid of those! And we got Python. If you really want to save keystrokes, why don't you go for APL? Other crazy ways of saving keystrokes is to insist on using tabs rather than spaces, sometimes with semantic significance. (No, I am not talking about Whitespace, but seriously meant file formats.) Obligatory Geek & Poke[^]. You may argue that keywords do not reduce complexity - but it does help you to understand that this closes the while loop, that closes the method definition, and there is the end of the class definition. Besides, distinct keywords help the compiler back on the track after an error, and facilitates much more meaningful error messages.

[kalberts]

Cobol - and Fortran - didn't interpret indents semantically. The coding sheet (or individual line, for those who never saw a coding sheet) was divided into column (or fields of the line), with different functions: Label, line continuation marker, structure level markers, line sequence number etc. This was defined by the column (/field): Within the main field, you could indent or not without changing the semantics. The coding sheets had heavy lines separating the columns; you never misplaced any element accidentally. So even though positioning (in one column, or another column) was significant, it wasn't quite like Python but far more controlled and well defined, and it was very difficult to make mistakes that could pass by without being detected. Those languages had far worse defects ... :-)

[Member 7878116]

The indentation is part of Python, take it or leave it. Where it really gets annoying is when you try to cut'n'paste snippets. 8 space characters does not equal 1 tab. I use Vim with a tab equivalent to 2 spaces for real confusion.

[Asday]

Man, us "Pythonistas" are getting tired of this criticism. Do you indent your C? Of course you do, it's impossible to read poorly indented code. Does your C compiler whinge at you when you forget curly brackets? Of course it does, they define blocks. Except, you're already defining blocks for human eyes with indentation. Why do you also need to define them for machine eyes with curly brackets? Source code is for humans, not machines.

[Ri_Ho]

Yes, just one of the many "features" that relegates python to a 'fast food' language. What's not a 'fast food' language - Tcl\Tk Net: Take a look at Tcl and then you will asking yourself "Why does python even exist?"

[rk2153]

This single feature has held me back from investing time into this language. Doing some RCA my opinion is that technology like language generators has promoted the creation of marginally different quite a few languages—so called jvm languages — There was php and Perl. Anyone not intellectually lazy and a bit more egoless would have perfected php instead of whipping up a new language with brain dead features. Not sure python space or dos backslash takes the top spot for an epoch of productivity killer. Backslash inventor now admits that is his worst decision.

[Member 12247860]

More python indention confusion ???

# Python program to check if the input number is prime or not

num = 15

take input from the user

num = int(input("Enter a number: "))

prime numbers are greater than 1

if num > 1:
for i in range(2,num):
if (num % i) == 0:
print(num,"is not a prime number")
print(i,"times",num//i,"is",num)
break
else:
#print(num % i)
print(num,"is a prime number")

if input number is less than

or equal to 1, it is not prime

else:
print(num,"is not a prime number")

What the heck is that else: statement doing out there, who does it belong to? :)