Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Does anyone miss programming in old languages?

Does anyone miss programming in old languages?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpquestiondiscussion
61 Posts 46 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R realJSOP

    I kinda miss Turbo Pascal... Most fond memory of it was that it was only $30.

    ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
    -----
    You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
    -----
    When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

    H Offline
    H Offline
    Harrison Pratt
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Me too ... and I miss Turbo Prolog even more. Of course, everything was simpler those days. "The only easy day was yesterday" as the Navy Seals say.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Forogar

      I recently got pulled in to help out on a 30+ years old mainframe project written in COBOL. It was a bit of shock to realise how much I remembered, since it had been 30+ years since I last worked with COBOL! I occasionally miss my old FORTRAN days (most recently Fortran 77 rather than FORTRAN IV) but I never have yearned to do COBOL (or even PL/1) again. Nostalgic thoughts?

      - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      rtischer8277
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      I have always programmed in C++. Except for a stint before it came out when I purchased UCSD Pascal for $100. You got the source code too. Its 16-bit byte codes ran on an interpreter whose idea was later later adopted by Java and Microsoft's reaction to Java, C#. You could debug UCSD Pascal both forwards and backwards, something Visual Studio is still dreaming about doing.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R realJSOP

        I kinda miss Turbo Pascal... Most fond memory of it was that it was only $30.

        ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
        -----
        You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
        -----
        When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Steve Naidamast
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        Those were the days... :)

        Steve Naidamast Sr. Software Engineer Black Falcon Software, Inc. blackfalconsoftware@outlook.com

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

          I spent a lot of my life coding in Z80 assembler, and sometimes - but not often - I do miss it. Being that "close" to the hardware feels ... natural, if you know what I mean.

          Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

          A Offline
          A Offline
          agolddog
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          Yeah, my first job was on an old IBM Series/1, which ran in this somewhat low-level language called EDL (Event Driven Language). It was kind of assembler-like. Debugging consisted of getting a printout, on the left of which would be the actual compiled code (80A2 as an if-equals, I think). So, you learned a lot of how memory is actually managed by getting that close to the OS. I think that helps understand (or at least be able to theorize) better about what's under the hood when using higher-level languages. I wouldn't say I miss it, Bob. But, it was interesting to peer into the sausage factory, and I think it made me better at thinking about doing things (relatively) efficiently in more modern systems.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Forogar

            I recently got pulled in to help out on a 30+ years old mainframe project written in COBOL. It was a bit of shock to realise how much I remembered, since it had been 30+ years since I last worked with COBOL! I occasionally miss my old FORTRAN days (most recently Fortran 77 rather than FORTRAN IV) but I never have yearned to do COBOL (or even PL/1) again. Nostalgic thoughts?

            - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Richard Winks
            wrote on last edited by
            #45

            I used many different languages to some extent (some pretty obscure) in my 50+ year programming career. Of them all I think I liked C most of all. It was a short step up from the assembler to learn and was easy for me to use. Being a control freak I felt it gave me the best product from my time. I found the C lib functions straight forward and manageable. This is just an old fart's opinion. I can get by in just about anything. There is truly nothing under the sun. The language syntax and organization changes but it is all pretty much the same.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R realJSOP

              I kinda miss Turbo Pascal... Most fond memory of it was that it was only $30.

              ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
              -----
              You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
              -----
              When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Robert Gale
              wrote on last edited by
              #46

              Still keeping an old TP app alive that I offered to help out with 25 years ago! DosBox and no "Opening the file" messages - joy!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Forogar

                I recently got pulled in to help out on a 30+ years old mainframe project written in COBOL. It was a bit of shock to realise how much I remembered, since it had been 30+ years since I last worked with COBOL! I occasionally miss my old FORTRAN days (most recently Fortran 77 rather than FORTRAN IV) but I never have yearned to do COBOL (or even PL/1) again. Nostalgic thoughts?

                - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

                A Offline
                A Offline
                AnotherKen
                wrote on last edited by
                #47

                I remember them, but I don't exactly miss them enough to download a compiler and start writing Cobol or Fortran code. Almost, but not quite, now we have Mathf and C# so who needs the older languages? Well, unless you are called on to do a code conversion or repair old code. I learned with Basic and Pascal. But I will never refer a beginner to those languages these days.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B BryanFazekas

                  Turbo Pascal was my first thought as well!

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Leonardo Pessoa
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #48

                  Same here

                  - Leonardo

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Gary Wheeler

                    There are the languages I really liked working in at the time: Ada, VAX FORTRAN, VAX/VMS DCL (scripting), LISP, and Intel assembly language using a flat memory model. At the time I developed sufficient fluency in each of these that I could solve any programming problem you like in them, given enough time. Interestingly, I don't feel any nostalgia to go back to programming in any of them. The amenities available now in most languages are so superior it's incredible. I know that Ada, FORTRAN, and LISP all have contemporary versions with modern facilities, but those all seem to have a "me too!" flavor to them. Today my language of choice is C# unless there's substantial bit/byte-fiddling to be done, and then it's C++.

                    Software Zen: delete this;

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Steven1218
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #49

                    I loved the VAX/VMS system. I used Pascal, some C, DCL, FMS, and others. I had a 2 shelf set of manuals from DEC, which if you followed the rules everything would just work. I even developed a primitive pre-object system where I would pass a structure for specific data entry forms to several routines; saved a lot of coding.

                    Y 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      FoxPro for DOS (pre-MS). I wrote a sales lead tracking application (think early CRM) that ran unchanged for well over a decade. It even survived Y2K. ;P

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      DrTechnical
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #50

                      I used FoxPro for DOS at my workplace to create some pretty complicated applications. Once, during an upgrade to our payroll system used for almost 20,000 employees, I wrote an application to compare the master file output from the old version with the new version, looking for differences which would signal compatibility issues. This app helped to eliminate a lot of confusion and busy work by our HR and payroll folks to ferret out those problems. My star shone a little brighter for a while...sigh.

                      FoxPro fan

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Forogar

                        I recently got pulled in to help out on a 30+ years old mainframe project written in COBOL. It was a bit of shock to realise how much I remembered, since it had been 30+ years since I last worked with COBOL! I occasionally miss my old FORTRAN days (most recently Fortran 77 rather than FORTRAN IV) but I never have yearned to do COBOL (or even PL/1) again. Nostalgic thoughts?

                        - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Daniel R Przybylski
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #51

                        I programmed in a new language called C# almost twenty years ago when it first came out. I don't miss it though. I still use it nearly every day.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          I Sometimes miss the Univac 1100 Assembler that I spent so many years working on. But most modern languages are so much better in many ways.

                          Y Offline
                          Y Offline
                          YaakovF
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #52

                          I learned programming in college by writing programs in Algol-60 on a Univac 1108. My, how time flies!

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J jeron1

                            Fortran 77, I took a Basic class (my first programming class) before this and darn near swore off programming, as the spaghettification factor was overwhelming. A math instructor talking me into taking Fortran class and I loved it. Motorola HC11 assembler is another one, my first assembler language. At the time Motorola had what I thought was really good documentation regarding the chips' operation and the instruction set, coded a lot of assembler back then.

                            "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

                            Y Offline
                            Y Offline
                            YaakovF
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #53

                            I had a job once programming in Fortran 77 on a VAX 11/780. That was a nice machine!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Steven1218

                              I loved the VAX/VMS system. I used Pascal, some C, DCL, FMS, and others. I had a 2 shelf set of manuals from DEC, which if you followed the rules everything would just work. I even developed a primitive pre-object system where I would pass a structure for specific data entry forms to several routines; saved a lot of coding.

                              Y Offline
                              Y Offline
                              YaakovF
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #54

                              Yeah, that was some system. I don't miss the languages as much as the system itself. You read the directions and wrote the program, and it worked.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Y YaakovF

                                I learned programming in college by writing programs in Algol-60 on a Univac 1108. My, how time flies!

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #55

                                I learned Assembler, Fortran and PLUS on the 1108. Never got into Algol-60, but I know one of the Burroughs systems used it for all their Operating System code.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Forogar

                                  I recently got pulled in to help out on a 30+ years old mainframe project written in COBOL. It was a bit of shock to realise how much I remembered, since it had been 30+ years since I last worked with COBOL! I occasionally miss my old FORTRAN days (most recently Fortran 77 rather than FORTRAN IV) but I never have yearned to do COBOL (or even PL/1) again. Nostalgic thoughts?

                                  - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Davie21240
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #56

                                  I have a warm spot in my heart for Ada. Think more teams should consider Ada2012 for their next project at least if it's realtime embedded development.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Forogar

                                    I recently got pulled in to help out on a 30+ years old mainframe project written in COBOL. It was a bit of shock to realise how much I remembered, since it had been 30+ years since I last worked with COBOL! I occasionally miss my old FORTRAN days (most recently Fortran 77 rather than FORTRAN IV) but I never have yearned to do COBOL (or even PL/1) again. Nostalgic thoughts?

                                    - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

                                    O Offline
                                    O Offline
                                    ormonds
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #57

                                    Sigh. Yes, I miss FORTRAN77. My first love, I guess.

                                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Forogar

                                      I recently got pulled in to help out on a 30+ years old mainframe project written in COBOL. It was a bit of shock to realise how much I remembered, since it had been 30+ years since I last worked with COBOL! I occasionally miss my old FORTRAN days (most recently Fortran 77 rather than FORTRAN IV) but I never have yearned to do COBOL (or even PL/1) again. Nostalgic thoughts?

                                      - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      Davie21240
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #58

                                      I have a warm spot in my heart for Ada. Think more teams should consider Ada2012 for their next project at least if it's realtime embedded development.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • O ormonds

                                        Sigh. Yes, I miss FORTRAN77. My first love, I guess.

                                        F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        Forogar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #59

                                        Yeah, me too. :sigh:

                                        - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          Yes, but remember how long it took to write out the coding sheets, get the cards punched, submit them for compilation, only to find you made a simple spelling mistake, or the punch girl mis-read your hieroglyphics.

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          jsc42
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #60

                                          Ah yes - happy days (not). Two weeks turnround. It ensured we did desk debugging properly. Still got some of my old programs. Has anyone got a card reader?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups