Aliens could be living among us on Earth
-
Aliens definitely exist and they could be living among us on Earth, says astronaut Helen Sharman[^] [CNN] /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
Ingo Swann, the renown remote viewer, cited several instances of encountering aliens.
-
Aliens definitely exist and they could be living among us on Earth, says astronaut Helen Sharman[^] [CNN] /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
That explains SO much about my wife and her family! :-O
I swear it's True
-
I've got relatives who claim that they have proof in a book. It is supposed to be sufficient proof that a non-human fellow coming from above is living among us, so strong that they devote their life to it. The problem is that I never get to meet this fellow, yet they claim he is present.
Is it just one book or is it a set of books written by multiple authors with different perspectives that corroborate each other? Is it just your relatives making this claim or has the claim been made by millions of people for thousands of years? Do other writings exist besides the book you mentioned that support the existence of this "fellow"? If the answer to these questions is "Yes" then maybe it shouldn't be dismissed so casually.
-
Aliens definitely exist and they could be living among us on Earth, says astronaut Helen Sharman[^] [CNN] /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
Ingo Swann, the renown remote viewer, cited several instances of encountering aliens.
-
Aliens definitely exist and they could be living among us on Earth, says astronaut Helen Sharman[^] [CNN] /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
I wonder why it is that some people would see the statement in this story "Aliens could be living among us, undetected" and define it as patently false, but have no trouble believing in a magical, undetectable person who lives in the sky and watches our every move.
-
Relativism and denying the evidence of your own senses is being a lefty? If so, it explains a lot. I find it amusing that people who have to deal with hard reality when it comes to software can spout such drivel.
-
It's my mother tongue :laugh: Also, this Glitch Text Generator (copy and paste) ― LingoJam[^] ;)
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
Aliens definitely exist and they could be living among us on Earth, says astronaut Helen Sharman[^] [CNN] /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
Hold on everyone... The British astronaut is very clear that what she is saying is only her opinion. However, considering that I have "seen the lights in the sky" three times already, I also believe that we are not and never have been alone...
Steve Naidamast Sr. Software Engineer Black Falcon Software, Inc. blackfalconsoftware@outlook.com
-
I'm willing to believe, but have seen no tangible proof.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
Aliens definitely exist and they could be living among us on Earth, says astronaut Helen Sharman[^] [CNN] /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
I'm Asian working in the US, and yes I am Alien. :suss:
-
A claim of aliens living among us is simply conjecture and speculation based on hearsay and opinion. To the person making the statement, I say prove it with tangible and irrefutable evidence, or STFU. Simple as that. I'm willing to believe, but I need to see proof.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013#realJSOP wrote:
but I need to see proof
Politicians. Does that count? ;P
-
I'm Asian working in the US, and yes I am Alien. :suss:
I was once a resident alien. :) /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
-
I'm willing to believe, but have seen no tangible proof.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013According to the Cosmological Argument from Contingency, the universe itself is tangible proof. If you're willing, please take a look at this - Five Arguments for God
-
I was once a resident alien. :) /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
Cheers for the experience being an Alien! ;P
-
Aliens definitely exist and they could be living among us on Earth, says astronaut Helen Sharman[^] [CNN] /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
-
Is it just one book or is it a set of books written by multiple authors with different perspectives that corroborate each other? Is it just your relatives making this claim or has the claim been made by millions of people for thousands of years? Do other writings exist besides the book you mentioned that support the existence of this "fellow"? If the answer to these questions is "Yes" then maybe it shouldn't be dismissed so casually.
I guess there are multiple authors, and they certainly do not agree on the details. Like, one claims he was born under one king, another guy claims it was under another ruler who didn't come into power until twelve years after the first king died. One claims that his parents were living in his town of birth, but had to flee and lived as refugees abroad for quite some time, the other one claims they were living in a different town and just were passing that town on their way, and returned back to their home after the birth. And, these two authors give quite conflicting information about the fellow's forefathers. Yet it all is undisputable Truth. So I have come to the conclusion that my relatives must be more knowledgeable than me about this "duality" that you probably are familiar with. Like light may appear both as particles and as waves (and my relatives refer to light all the time). Or quantum logic, where you have a multitude of alternate answers, with varying probability of being the correct one. Maybe they know enough to extend the same principle to this fellow, that the two dates of birth are both true answers, with different probability. I don't knwow which one they claim to be more probable; a couple weeks ago they proclaimed that was the one were the fellow was born while his parents were travelling through this town, but then again they also referred to the other author's referral to visitors giving gifts to the kid. But that is how it is with probabilities and quantum logic; each element of the story has its own probability, and does not rule out the others. I sort of like those people who base their ideas on modern, logical thought (well... let us assume for now that quantum theory is logical). I am not much into that stuff, but my gut feeling is that they take this duality priciple and quantum probability stuff a little too far. But that is just my thoughts. As far as I know, there are not many other documents about this fellow. When the book was collected, the editors rejected a handful of other authors, because their stories did not fit in with the image of the fellow that the editors wanted to promote. There are a number of other books in the market, who tells similar stories about other tykes (and in fact, several of the stories about this fellow my relatives refer to have been accused of being plagiarism, as exactly the same story had been told about others long before the birth of this fellow). That may of course some question of probabilty as well, the probabilty of the stories being
-
#realJSOP wrote:
I say prove it with tangible and irrefutable evidence
That is a common yet very weak and short-sighted argument. For example, prove to me that love exists. You can't. Yet you and I know that it does exist. In other words there are all kinds of things we all know exist but that can't be proven using the scientific method. It's not a complete method and should not be used as gospel.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
The great philosopher, Rama Kandra; on the human emotion of love
No, it is a word. What matters is the connection the word implies.
It is very easy to prove that love exists; all you need to do is to look it up in the dictionary.
Director of Transmogrification Services Shinobi of Query Language Master of Yoda Conditional
-
The great philosopher, Rama Kandra; on the human emotion of love
No, it is a word. What matters is the connection the word implies.
It is very easy to prove that love exists; all you need to do is to look it up in the dictionary.
Director of Transmogrification Services Shinobi of Query Language Master of Yoda Conditional
-
I guess there are multiple authors, and they certainly do not agree on the details. Like, one claims he was born under one king, another guy claims it was under another ruler who didn't come into power until twelve years after the first king died. One claims that his parents were living in his town of birth, but had to flee and lived as refugees abroad for quite some time, the other one claims they were living in a different town and just were passing that town on their way, and returned back to their home after the birth. And, these two authors give quite conflicting information about the fellow's forefathers. Yet it all is undisputable Truth. So I have come to the conclusion that my relatives must be more knowledgeable than me about this "duality" that you probably are familiar with. Like light may appear both as particles and as waves (and my relatives refer to light all the time). Or quantum logic, where you have a multitude of alternate answers, with varying probability of being the correct one. Maybe they know enough to extend the same principle to this fellow, that the two dates of birth are both true answers, with different probability. I don't knwow which one they claim to be more probable; a couple weeks ago they proclaimed that was the one were the fellow was born while his parents were travelling through this town, but then again they also referred to the other author's referral to visitors giving gifts to the kid. But that is how it is with probabilities and quantum logic; each element of the story has its own probability, and does not rule out the others. I sort of like those people who base their ideas on modern, logical thought (well... let us assume for now that quantum theory is logical). I am not much into that stuff, but my gut feeling is that they take this duality priciple and quantum probability stuff a little too far. But that is just my thoughts. As far as I know, there are not many other documents about this fellow. When the book was collected, the editors rejected a handful of other authors, because their stories did not fit in with the image of the fellow that the editors wanted to promote. There are a number of other books in the market, who tells similar stories about other tykes (and in fact, several of the stories about this fellow my relatives refer to have been accused of being plagiarism, as exactly the same story had been told about others long before the birth of this fellow). That may of course some question of probabilty as well, the probabilty of the stories being
From your original post, I couldn't tell that you had given it that much thought. The accounts of Jesus' early life are different but they can be reconciled and are not mutually exclusive - https://www.ncregister.com/blog/jimmy-akin/how-the-accounts-of-jesus-childhood-fit-together-6-things-to-know-and-share
