Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. about $2k to $2.5k to spend on a dev machine this year, need CPU recommends

about $2k to $2.5k to spend on a dev machine this year, need CPU recommends

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
game-devquestionlearning
41 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H honey the codewitch

    Yeah but it's still a pain setting up a new machine when that happens. Especially after a year or two of getting it how i like

    Real programmers use butterflies

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Joan M
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    They come and repair it for you at your home/office/where you are. Replacing even cracked screens. I don't know if they replace the whole computer... and how you cope with that... Never needed it.

    www.robotecnik.com[^] - robots, CNC and PLC programming

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Scott Serl

      The only problem I've had with barebones systems is the quality of the motherboard. Barebones systems usually have cheap MB, so I prefer to choose my MB with features and quality in mind.

      H Offline
      H Offline
      honey the codewitch
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      Generally I agree, although it depends on the barebones system - most are bargain basement but some are just builder systems that are intended for people like me. Again, I like to shop around after having a good idea of what i want. I've seen an FSB get melted on a cheap motherboard so i hear you.

      Real programmers use butterflies

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H honey the codewitch

        I don't necessarily need all around performance. Just several cores and VM support. So yeah, my box will probably be cpu heavy. I found a computer with an i9 beast like that for about $3k on amazon without really trying.

        Real programmers use butterflies

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Scott Serl
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        I have found i7-9750H to be fine for development with 6 cores (12 hyper-threaded). I have 32GB RAM and 512GB nvme m.2 ssd and can choose between intel integrated gfx or NVidia. This is in a laptop running linux that cost about $1800. Something similar in a desktop could probably be built for <$1000 excluding NVidia gfx, not including monitors, just the cpu box and internals. I no longer run VMs, but I used to some time ago, and this config should do fine...currently use Docker for multi-machine systems development.

        H 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H honey the codewitch

          I'll be running a machine with multiple VMs so I want cores to spare. 8 cores is more than enough. 4 is about minimum. I'll need the various VM bells and whistles like HyperV support and VTx whatever of course. I don't really game per se, though for this kind of money I wouldn't mind being able to game with the machine if i wanted to. i play the fallout franchise at least. I'm considering either an i7-9700(k?) or an i9-9900 or whatever. I think the i9 will come down this year and be in budget. *knock on wood* anyone use either of these CPUs heavily and can tell me, particularly when using VMs if they're happy with it, or if they would have gone better in retrospect? Or any alternatives to suggest? (I strongly prefer Intel to AMD cpus) I'm curious mostly, leaning toward the i9 for future proofing, assuming it's not still bleeding edge by the time i buy and i can afford it.

          Real programmers use butterflies

          K Offline
          K Offline
          Kris Lantz
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          I've been an Intel fan-boy for years, but with what AMD is doing with the Ryzen stuff, now's a good time to swap-over. Had it not been for some Ryzen issues with the Vive VR setup, I'd probably have AMD'd earlier. With today's CPU selection, you really can't go wrong with either, but AMD is quickly feeling like the more cost-efficient option. As for GPU, of course it should be a NVidia. I personally use the gtx1060, and it's been plenty for my needs.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H honey the codewitch

            I think i'll be okay with 32GB as right now I'm running one VM with VS and win installed on an 8GB machine :laugh: . my OS setup is similar to yours - linux hosts win VMs. But I won't need more than say, three. and none will be doing constant work except the one i'm working in. What i mean is i'm not running databases or webservers or anything in them, or at least not ones where perf matters. I'll definitely be looking for a board that can support more than 32GB though. And if i did game with it, i wouldn't mind dual booting for that, though i doubt i will game with it. I have a console for fallout :)

            Real programmers use butterflies

            R Offline
            R Offline
            realJSOP
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            Actually, I said a machine *capable* of being upgraded to 64gb...

            ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
            -----
            You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
            -----
            When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H honey the codewitch

              I think my main reason for the Intel preference comes from the bad old days of AMD being behind in lithographic tech, and their chips running hotter and sucking more juice as a result. Or before that when their FP processing sucked. Of course, that's all in the past (I think?) But I've followed Intel CPUs over AMD because of it, and I just have a good feel for what a good Intel is vs a bad one, and I don't have the same feel for AMD - at least not yet. So I don't really know what I'm buying. How much cache is enough for an AMD 12core? for example. I can figure out baselines for intel's chips based on past experience and review knowledge i've accrued at say overclock.net. I haven't done that same legwork on AMD over the years so their lineup is largely opaque to me. And maybe it's time i changed that. I'll give the ryzens a look.

              Real programmers use butterflies

              R Offline
              R Offline
              realJSOP
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              I've been using AMD CPUs since forever.

              ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
              -----
              You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
              -----
              When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H honey the codewitch

                I'll be running a machine with multiple VMs so I want cores to spare. 8 cores is more than enough. 4 is about minimum. I'll need the various VM bells and whistles like HyperV support and VTx whatever of course. I don't really game per se, though for this kind of money I wouldn't mind being able to game with the machine if i wanted to. i play the fallout franchise at least. I'm considering either an i7-9700(k?) or an i9-9900 or whatever. I think the i9 will come down this year and be in budget. *knock on wood* anyone use either of these CPUs heavily and can tell me, particularly when using VMs if they're happy with it, or if they would have gone better in retrospect? Or any alternatives to suggest? (I strongly prefer Intel to AMD cpus) I'm curious mostly, leaning toward the i9 for future proofing, assuming it's not still bleeding edge by the time i buy and i can afford it.

                Real programmers use butterflies

                D Offline
                D Offline
                dandy72
                wrote on last edited by
                #24

                You'll be doing plenty good with any i7 that's being sold in stores today as brand new. An i9 will get you future-proofed for a while longer still. I can't even remember how old my i7-4820K is, since it's been a few years--it's only 4 cores (+ hyperthreading), but it's plenty fast for my use - with 64GB of RAM, right now I have 8 VMs running simultaneously 24/7 (sometimes more), with memory allocated to each varying anywhere between 1.5 and 8GB. Get big, fat SSDs to host your VMs. I started off with a pair of 512GB, and have since added a single 2TB (not including the boot drive). Before that, I was using an i7-2600K, and the main reason I moved away from it is that I wanted to repurpose it as my gaming box (still in use today) and 32GB wasn't enough for the number of VMs I wanted to run side-by-side. That was otherwise also plenty fast. And of course now that my main VM host has 64GB, I'd really rather have it run with 128...but those boards were few and far in-between back when I purchased it. But I wouldn't settle for anything less than an i7 to host VMs. I have an i5-based NUC with 32GB of RAM, and when it's running more than 4 VMs at once, they all start to feel sluggish. This is where an i7 (or better) really makes a difference, IMO.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Scott Serl

                  I have found i7-9750H to be fine for development with 6 cores (12 hyper-threaded). I have 32GB RAM and 512GB nvme m.2 ssd and can choose between intel integrated gfx or NVidia. This is in a laptop running linux that cost about $1800. Something similar in a desktop could probably be built for <$1000 excluding NVidia gfx, not including monitors, just the cpu box and internals. I no longer run VMs, but I used to some time ago, and this config should do fine...currently use Docker for multi-machine systems development.

                  H Offline
                  H Offline
                  honey the codewitch
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  thank you, that's good to know

                  Real programmers use butterflies

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H honey the codewitch

                    I'll be running a machine with multiple VMs so I want cores to spare. 8 cores is more than enough. 4 is about minimum. I'll need the various VM bells and whistles like HyperV support and VTx whatever of course. I don't really game per se, though for this kind of money I wouldn't mind being able to game with the machine if i wanted to. i play the fallout franchise at least. I'm considering either an i7-9700(k?) or an i9-9900 or whatever. I think the i9 will come down this year and be in budget. *knock on wood* anyone use either of these CPUs heavily and can tell me, particularly when using VMs if they're happy with it, or if they would have gone better in retrospect? Or any alternatives to suggest? (I strongly prefer Intel to AMD cpus) I'm curious mostly, leaning toward the i9 for future proofing, assuming it's not still bleeding edge by the time i buy and i can afford it.

                    Real programmers use butterflies

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Rick York
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    I am a total AMD fan so, naturally, I would advocate their CPUs. I have a bit of a bias against their video cards though because of previous bad experiences with them. Anyway, I went to newegg and configured a system and saved it as a wish list. It has a 2060 video card just in case you might want to experiment with ray tracing. If that holds no interest to you then you can save a bit of money with a less expensive card. As it is, it comes in at $1820. Here's a link : wishlist system[^]. If nothing else, it's something to consider. Have Fun. -edit- That has a 2TB M.2 drive, 32GB RAM, and a 750W PSU. Those can likely be scaled back if you prefer and/or want to save some money for a really nice monitor(s).

                    "They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"

                    H C 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • R Rick York

                      I am a total AMD fan so, naturally, I would advocate their CPUs. I have a bit of a bias against their video cards though because of previous bad experiences with them. Anyway, I went to newegg and configured a system and saved it as a wish list. It has a 2060 video card just in case you might want to experiment with ray tracing. If that holds no interest to you then you can save a bit of money with a less expensive card. As it is, it comes in at $1820. Here's a link : wishlist system[^]. If nothing else, it's something to consider. Have Fun. -edit- That has a 2TB M.2 drive, 32GB RAM, and a 750W PSU. Those can likely be scaled back if you prefer and/or want to save some money for a really nice monitor(s).

                      "They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"

                      H Offline
                      H Offline
                      honey the codewitch
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      I use a 55" TV as a monitor already. The rest of the specs actually seem like what I'm after although i'll see if the drive is NVMe? i think M.2 implies it is? i'll look. Keep in mind i'm not buying right away so any of these systems are going to be cheaper by the time i buy. I figure in my budget i can get just below bleeding edge for the stuff i *want* and the rest to be acceptable. I need room for lots of ram and i need lots of cores. I'll start with 32GB of RAM. Video card is meh as I am at best a casual gamer and I have a console but it would be nice if i could play with gaming on it, just for kicks. For that kind of money it should, so long as i had a mid range video card it would do me fine - i've had good luck getting gaming cards on the cheap on ebay from people who have to have the latest all the time and sell off their newish cards as soon as the next nvidia is out Eventually, - not for this system - but for my fancy system, it won't be a speed demon, but it will have zero moving parts. Copper cauliflower heatsink and convection power supply, probably in a bespoke case i get milled. yeah, wood. or maybe a custom glass metal job.

                      Real programmers use butterflies

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • H honey the codewitch

                        I use a 55" TV as a monitor already. The rest of the specs actually seem like what I'm after although i'll see if the drive is NVMe? i think M.2 implies it is? i'll look. Keep in mind i'm not buying right away so any of these systems are going to be cheaper by the time i buy. I figure in my budget i can get just below bleeding edge for the stuff i *want* and the rest to be acceptable. I need room for lots of ram and i need lots of cores. I'll start with 32GB of RAM. Video card is meh as I am at best a casual gamer and I have a console but it would be nice if i could play with gaming on it, just for kicks. For that kind of money it should, so long as i had a mid range video card it would do me fine - i've had good luck getting gaming cards on the cheap on ebay from people who have to have the latest all the time and sell off their newish cards as soon as the next nvidia is out Eventually, - not for this system - but for my fancy system, it won't be a speed demon, but it will have zero moving parts. Copper cauliflower heatsink and convection power supply, probably in a bespoke case i get milled. yeah, wood. or maybe a custom glass metal job.

                        Real programmers use butterflies

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Rick York
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #28

                        If you are into custom cases, check www.guru3d.com and their monthly contest. I have seen a few wooden ones and all kinds of wild stuff. Linkage : The Guru3D Rig of the Month[^]

                        "They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"

                        H 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Rick York

                          If you are into custom cases, check www.guru3d.com and their monthly contest. I have seen a few wooden ones and all kinds of wild stuff. Linkage : The Guru3D Rig of the Month[^]

                          "They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"

                          H Offline
                          H Offline
                          honey the codewitch
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #29

                          That's cool.

                          Real programmers use butterflies

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R raddevus

                            #realJSOP wrote:

                            My personal pref for cpu's is AMD.

                            #realJSOP wrote:

                            I personally prefer nVidia video cards.

                            I agree 100%. Also, I recently did a build that included AMD AMD RYZEN 5 2600X (12Core) and an NVidia card and 16GB ram, with Gigabyte M/B for about $500 and I'm running Ubuntu (dual boot with Windows, but never boot windows really) and the machine is blazing fast even doing Android dev with emulators running and Android Studio etc.

                            K Offline
                            K Offline
                            kubiiik
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #30

                            Which motherboard do you use?

                            H R 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • K kubiiik

                              Which motherboard do you use?

                              H Offline
                              H Offline
                              honey the codewitch
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #31

                              it doesn't matter. i'm not putting the CPU in an existing system. I'm building a new one. The motherboard is whatever motherboard will work with it. Whoops, i thought you were replying to me. I thought the question was weird, :laugh:

                              Real programmers use butterflies

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • H honey the codewitch

                                I'll be running a machine with multiple VMs so I want cores to spare. 8 cores is more than enough. 4 is about minimum. I'll need the various VM bells and whistles like HyperV support and VTx whatever of course. I don't really game per se, though for this kind of money I wouldn't mind being able to game with the machine if i wanted to. i play the fallout franchise at least. I'm considering either an i7-9700(k?) or an i9-9900 or whatever. I think the i9 will come down this year and be in budget. *knock on wood* anyone use either of these CPUs heavily and can tell me, particularly when using VMs if they're happy with it, or if they would have gone better in retrospect? Or any alternatives to suggest? (I strongly prefer Intel to AMD cpus) I'm curious mostly, leaning toward the i9 for future proofing, assuming it's not still bleeding edge by the time i buy and i can afford it.

                                Real programmers use butterflies

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stuart Dootson
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #32

                                I got a Lenovo P1 (that's a laptop, not desktop) about a year ago. It's got an i7-8750H and that's handled anything I've thrown at it. 6 cores, turbo boost up to 4.1GHz, it's fine. Having said that, my work desktop workstation was acquired in 2013. It's got a Xeon E5-1650, 6 cores, 3.2GHz. It's slower than my P1 (I can tell from compilation jobs, although that could equally be because it has SATA SSDs, not NVMe), but can run multiple VMs fine. And then there's our dev server at work - we got that around 2015, IIRC. It's got a Xeon E5-2440 v2, 8 cores, 1.9GHz. And that runs 6 VMs, 24/7 (we've separated out our Git, Redmine etc applications, but did it before Docker became a thing, so they went in separate VMs. One of my 'to-do' items is dockerising them, but it's never a high enough priority!). 5 are Windows Server, 1 is Linux. RAM is more of a resource than CPU, I've found. I guess what I'm saying is - I reckon any modern i7 will be plenty good enough for running multiple VMs, given that ancient Xeons can manage it without a problem. Make sure you get at least 32GB of RAM, you'll be fine.

                                Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

                                H 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Stuart Dootson

                                  I got a Lenovo P1 (that's a laptop, not desktop) about a year ago. It's got an i7-8750H and that's handled anything I've thrown at it. 6 cores, turbo boost up to 4.1GHz, it's fine. Having said that, my work desktop workstation was acquired in 2013. It's got a Xeon E5-1650, 6 cores, 3.2GHz. It's slower than my P1 (I can tell from compilation jobs, although that could equally be because it has SATA SSDs, not NVMe), but can run multiple VMs fine. And then there's our dev server at work - we got that around 2015, IIRC. It's got a Xeon E5-2440 v2, 8 cores, 1.9GHz. And that runs 6 VMs, 24/7 (we've separated out our Git, Redmine etc applications, but did it before Docker became a thing, so they went in separate VMs. One of my 'to-do' items is dockerising them, but it's never a high enough priority!). 5 are Windows Server, 1 is Linux. RAM is more of a resource than CPU, I've found. I guess what I'm saying is - I reckon any modern i7 will be plenty good enough for running multiple VMs, given that ancient Xeons can manage it without a problem. Make sure you get at least 32GB of RAM, you'll be fine.

                                  Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

                                  H Offline
                                  H Offline
                                  honey the codewitch
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #33

                                  That was kind of my thoughts too. Practically speaking I figured I could do with an i7. I still kinda want the i9 though, for reasons :-D

                                  Real programmers use butterflies

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • K kubiiik

                                    Which motherboard do you use?

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    raddevus
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #34

                                    kubiiik wrote:

                                    Which motherboard do you use?

                                    This one: B450M DS3H WIFI (rev. 1.0) | Motherboard - GIGABYTE U.S.A.[^]

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • H honey the codewitch

                                      That was kind of my thoughts too. Practically speaking I figured I could do with an i7. I still kinda want the i9 though, for reasons :-D

                                      Real programmers use butterflies

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Stuart Dootson
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #35

                                      honey the codewitch wrote:

                                      I still kinda want the i9 though, for reasons :-D

                                      Yes, I know those sorts of reasons - the ones that would never fly in a properly costed business case, but are very important nonetheless ;-) My Lenovo laptop may have had some of those reasons behind its purchase as well...

                                      Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • H honey the codewitch

                                        I'll be running a machine with multiple VMs so I want cores to spare. 8 cores is more than enough. 4 is about minimum. I'll need the various VM bells and whistles like HyperV support and VTx whatever of course. I don't really game per se, though for this kind of money I wouldn't mind being able to game with the machine if i wanted to. i play the fallout franchise at least. I'm considering either an i7-9700(k?) or an i9-9900 or whatever. I think the i9 will come down this year and be in budget. *knock on wood* anyone use either of these CPUs heavily and can tell me, particularly when using VMs if they're happy with it, or if they would have gone better in retrospect? Or any alternatives to suggest? (I strongly prefer Intel to AMD cpus) I'm curious mostly, leaning toward the i9 for future proofing, assuming it's not still bleeding edge by the time i buy and i can afford it.

                                        Real programmers use butterflies

                                        U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        User 11783308
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #36

                                        It is not as critical as you might think. I am still using a 3770k with 32G. It has 4 cores (8 threads) and I can (and have) run a half dozen different VMs at the same time, and never use more than 25% of the CPU. While I certainly won't recommend a CPU that old, pretty much any more modern CPU should do the trick. I would recommend water cooling -- not necessarily a custom setup, but a "complete" system. They are nearly the same cost as a fan. Just put one in my daughter's new computer. Otherwise when your CPU does pull out all of the stops, the fans can get pretty noisy. I do not game either -- however, I use a 1080 graphics card. Not for framerate, but to get good high resolution and for use in parallel applications. And a SSD for drive C is essential. The system is old, but other than a couple of GPU upgrades, it has been more than adequate development. Now, if you need very large data storage, your cost can rise substantially by the time you implement a good RAID (preferably RAID 6).

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • H honey the codewitch

                                          Yeah but it's still a pain setting up a new machine when that happens. Especially after a year or two of getting it how i like

                                          Real programmers use butterflies

                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          charlieg
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #37

                                          This is true, but with the performance available today, I'd take a hard look at just running inside a VM (unless you are gaming). For development, you just can't tell the difference. When you replace the base hardware, you copy the VM(s) and boom, back in business. Just a thought.

                                          Charlie Gilley <italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759

                                          H 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups