Facebook AI Bubble
-
You might have heard that most social network reinforce the media and point of view bubble that we have by prominently putting forward whatever view we already supports? Well I dunno if they changed their algorithm, or if I fell through the cracks, or something... Now on my Facebook page I got link I never got before, like a video on how to defend Christian Faith against Unbelievers.. This is like unreal... Now I wonder should I watch the video out of curiosity? While it might enrich my knowledge of the world, simply watching such stupidity feels physically painful (quite literally! :O )... Hard conundrum, should I chose pain and (not very useful) knowledge of other social group or blissful ignorance? Mmm... Come to think of it, this is a general problem. Simply engaging with some.. different people, feels painful sometimes. Not because they punch us or something. But the simple thought gap between us and them is simply too wide and hurting. Yet engaging them can be necessary. One could wonder how could one do it without needless suffering?! :-O
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
Super Lloyd wrote:
should I chose pain and (not very useful) knowledge of other social group or blissful ignorance?
It depends... If it is really crystal clear for you that the video is just extrinsic stupidity... then you can have a look, maybe you might laugh your a... off But the risk is there too, that you :doh: :doh: that stark, that your head aches after a huge facepalm
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
You might have heard that most social network reinforce the media and point of view bubble that we have by prominently putting forward whatever view we already supports? Well I dunno if they changed their algorithm, or if I fell through the cracks, or something... Now on my Facebook page I got link I never got before, like a video on how to defend Christian Faith against Unbelievers.. This is like unreal... Now I wonder should I watch the video out of curiosity? While it might enrich my knowledge of the world, simply watching such stupidity feels physically painful (quite literally! :O )... Hard conundrum, should I chose pain and (not very useful) knowledge of other social group or blissful ignorance? Mmm... Come to think of it, this is a general problem. Simply engaging with some.. different people, feels painful sometimes. Not because they punch us or something. But the simple thought gap between us and them is simply too wide and hurting. Yet engaging them can be necessary. One could wonder how could one do it without needless suffering?! :-O
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
Once you watch one, the algorithm will recommend more. And they'll get steadily more batshit with each view. Before you know it, you'll be watching a video explaining how the lizard people from the hollow Earth, in cahoots with the last survivors from Atlantis, are using 5G to infect us with programmable chips so they can use us to mine for cryptocurrency, and only this expensive bit of tat that the video host happens to be selling will protect you. :rolleyes:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
Once you watch one, the algorithm will recommend more. And they'll get steadily more batshit with each view. Before you know it, you'll be watching a video explaining how the lizard people from the hollow Earth, in cahoots with the last survivors from Atlantis, are using 5G to infect us with programmable chips so they can use us to mine for cryptocurrency, and only this expensive bit of tat that the video host happens to be selling will protect you. :rolleyes:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
So.. not watch! :doh: However, about what you said about Lizard People, isn't that true?! ;P :laugh:
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
Once you watch one, the algorithm will recommend more. And they'll get steadily more batshit with each view. Before you know it, you'll be watching a video explaining how the lizard people from the hollow Earth, in cahoots with the last survivors from Atlantis, are using 5G to infect us with programmable chips so they can use us to mine for cryptocurrency, and only this expensive bit of tat that the video host happens to be selling will protect you. :rolleyes:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
Richard Deeming wrote:
explaining how the lizard people from the hollow Earth, in cahoots with the last survivors from Atlantis, are using 5G to infect us with programmable chips so they can use us to mine for cryptocurrency,
Lies, lies I tell you. They don't mine cryptocurrency, they will use it to control us so they can take over the surface again ;P
Tom
-
You might have heard that most social network reinforce the media and point of view bubble that we have by prominently putting forward whatever view we already supports? Well I dunno if they changed their algorithm, or if I fell through the cracks, or something... Now on my Facebook page I got link I never got before, like a video on how to defend Christian Faith against Unbelievers.. This is like unreal... Now I wonder should I watch the video out of curiosity? While it might enrich my knowledge of the world, simply watching such stupidity feels physically painful (quite literally! :O )... Hard conundrum, should I chose pain and (not very useful) knowledge of other social group or blissful ignorance? Mmm... Come to think of it, this is a general problem. Simply engaging with some.. different people, feels painful sometimes. Not because they punch us or something. But the simple thought gap between us and them is simply too wide and hurting. Yet engaging them can be necessary. One could wonder how could one do it without needless suffering?! :-O
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
I recently had some Jehovah witnesses at my door. While I don't agree with what they're doing, they're still people so I'm nice to them. So I asked "If there's a god, why would he allow so much suffering?" The answer amazed me. Apparently, God has a bet with the Devil that humanity can make it on its own. Once we have proven ourselves and the Devil lost the best, God will return and make paradise on earth. I literally told them "No offence, but your God is an asshole if ever there was one! So much suffering for a bet with the Devil? How big is this guy's ego, how small is his dick?" They understood my point, but still insisted he's merciful X| Unfortunately, I haven't asked what happens if God loses the bet, because things seem to be headed that way :sigh:
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
Richard Deeming wrote:
explaining how the lizard people from the hollow Earth, in cahoots with the last survivors from Atlantis, are using 5G to infect us with programmable chips so they can use us to mine for cryptocurrency,
Lies, lies I tell you. They don't mine cryptocurrency, they will use it to control us so they can take over the surface again ;P
Tom
I knew it! :omg:
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
I recently had some Jehovah witnesses at my door. While I don't agree with what they're doing, they're still people so I'm nice to them. So I asked "If there's a god, why would he allow so much suffering?" The answer amazed me. Apparently, God has a bet with the Devil that humanity can make it on its own. Once we have proven ourselves and the Devil lost the best, God will return and make paradise on earth. I literally told them "No offence, but your God is an asshole if ever there was one! So much suffering for a bet with the Devil? How big is this guy's ego, how small is his dick?" They understood my point, but still insisted he's merciful X| Unfortunately, I haven't asked what happens if God loses the bet, because things seem to be headed that way :sigh:
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
Sander Rossel wrote:
I literally told them "No offence, but your God is an a**hole if ever there was one! So much suffering for a bet with the Devil? How big is this guy's ego, how small is his dick?"
Job and his friends dealt with the same question over 2,000 years ago. Their answers were much more eloquent... :-\
Sander Rossel wrote:
I haven't asked what happens if God loses the bet
I would have been interested in their answer...
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
Sander Rossel wrote:
I literally told them "No offence, but your God is an a**hole if ever there was one! So much suffering for a bet with the Devil? How big is this guy's ego, how small is his dick?"
Job and his friends dealt with the same question over 2,000 years ago. Their answers were much more eloquent... :-\
Sander Rossel wrote:
I haven't asked what happens if God loses the bet
I would have been interested in their answer...
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
Daniel Pfeffer wrote:
Their answers were much more eloquent...
I didn't want to be eloquent, I wanted to be clear :laugh: Stephen Fry puts it nicely[^]. The face of the interviewer at 1:42 is priceless :laugh: One of my favorite questions is also "There have been thousands of Gods, yet you claim yours is the only one. That sounds kind of arrogant so why do you believe your God is the one and only?" The answer is often something like "Because you see it all around you." or "Because it's written in the Bible." It's so illogical it's not even funny anymore :sigh: For the record, I don't usually pester Christians like that, but when they come to my door they better be ready :laugh:
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
I recently had some Jehovah witnesses at my door. While I don't agree with what they're doing, they're still people so I'm nice to them. So I asked "If there's a god, why would he allow so much suffering?" The answer amazed me. Apparently, God has a bet with the Devil that humanity can make it on its own. Once we have proven ourselves and the Devil lost the best, God will return and make paradise on earth. I literally told them "No offence, but your God is an asshole if ever there was one! So much suffering for a bet with the Devil? How big is this guy's ego, how small is his dick?" They understood my point, but still insisted he's merciful X| Unfortunately, I haven't asked what happens if God loses the bet, because things seem to be headed that way :sigh:
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
I can give you a reasonably intellectual reason why there's so much suffering. (If) One axiomatically accepts the existence of a creator/deity. Even with the biblical stores being take at face value about "creation", one must accept that the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil" was put their with the intention that Adam/Eve would eat from it. It didn't matter whether it was a day - a year - a thousand years - sooner or later they were intended to eat from it. Why? Let's suppose they didn't. Then what would have happened in the world? Well . . . nothing! Adam and Eve and the animals and everything else would have just gone on effortlessly eating and multiplying. Overall, very pointless. Now, forget about the existence of a so-called devil. If one's accepted deity is THE Supreme Being then there can be no opposition. Period. No absurd bets or anything. So what's it all about then? Recall that I said that the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was put their deliberately to be eaten? Now, with a knowledge of good and evil, doing either becomes a choice. So, what will mankind do? Languish as before eating "the apple" ? Well, now we have options! SO - if you were the creator of a sentient, mainly, you'd stay out of things and see how it develops. Will man become ever more despicable a creation? Some do. Perhaps, instead, he will rise above just bare existence and give of himself to help others "above and beyond the call" as they say. Now, as a deity, you have a creation with a purpose - to rise or fall, rather than just rot in paradise. How will it turn out? That could be interesting when free will is thrown in. So - shit happens. Not only natural phenomena but of our own doing. How do we respond? Which side of The Force will you embrace, so-to-speak? Already too long, but I'll throw in one more tidbit to consider: if Adam and Eve did not know the difference between good and evil until eating that apple, then eating that apple could not have been a sin. They were, for all practical purposes, infants in that regard. Also, "creations" could have been "no more" than creating the laws of physics, using entropy as a driving force, and give the universe a push-start. That, to me, is more fantastic and glorious a creator's design then the old-school versions.
"The difference bet
-
I can give you a reasonably intellectual reason why there's so much suffering. (If) One axiomatically accepts the existence of a creator/deity. Even with the biblical stores being take at face value about "creation", one must accept that the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil" was put their with the intention that Adam/Eve would eat from it. It didn't matter whether it was a day - a year - a thousand years - sooner or later they were intended to eat from it. Why? Let's suppose they didn't. Then what would have happened in the world? Well . . . nothing! Adam and Eve and the animals and everything else would have just gone on effortlessly eating and multiplying. Overall, very pointless. Now, forget about the existence of a so-called devil. If one's accepted deity is THE Supreme Being then there can be no opposition. Period. No absurd bets or anything. So what's it all about then? Recall that I said that the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was put their deliberately to be eaten? Now, with a knowledge of good and evil, doing either becomes a choice. So, what will mankind do? Languish as before eating "the apple" ? Well, now we have options! SO - if you were the creator of a sentient, mainly, you'd stay out of things and see how it develops. Will man become ever more despicable a creation? Some do. Perhaps, instead, he will rise above just bare existence and give of himself to help others "above and beyond the call" as they say. Now, as a deity, you have a creation with a purpose - to rise or fall, rather than just rot in paradise. How will it turn out? That could be interesting when free will is thrown in. So - shit happens. Not only natural phenomena but of our own doing. How do we respond? Which side of The Force will you embrace, so-to-speak? Already too long, but I'll throw in one more tidbit to consider: if Adam and Eve did not know the difference between good and evil until eating that apple, then eating that apple could not have been a sin. They were, for all practical purposes, infants in that regard. Also, "creations" could have been "no more" than creating the laws of physics, using entropy as a driving force, and give the universe a push-start. That, to me, is more fantastic and glorious a creator's design then the old-school versions.
"The difference bet
That sounds like fun for a creator, and I might do it too were I it, but you can hardly argue it's benevolent and loving. Or perhaps, in its eyes, give or take 100 years of occasional suffering for the 'experiment' is nothing compared to an eternal afterlife in heaven.
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
I can give you a reasonably intellectual reason why there's so much suffering. (If) One axiomatically accepts the existence of a creator/deity. Even with the biblical stores being take at face value about "creation", one must accept that the "Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil" was put their with the intention that Adam/Eve would eat from it. It didn't matter whether it was a day - a year - a thousand years - sooner or later they were intended to eat from it. Why? Let's suppose they didn't. Then what would have happened in the world? Well . . . nothing! Adam and Eve and the animals and everything else would have just gone on effortlessly eating and multiplying. Overall, very pointless. Now, forget about the existence of a so-called devil. If one's accepted deity is THE Supreme Being then there can be no opposition. Period. No absurd bets or anything. So what's it all about then? Recall that I said that the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil was put their deliberately to be eaten? Now, with a knowledge of good and evil, doing either becomes a choice. So, what will mankind do? Languish as before eating "the apple" ? Well, now we have options! SO - if you were the creator of a sentient, mainly, you'd stay out of things and see how it develops. Will man become ever more despicable a creation? Some do. Perhaps, instead, he will rise above just bare existence and give of himself to help others "above and beyond the call" as they say. Now, as a deity, you have a creation with a purpose - to rise or fall, rather than just rot in paradise. How will it turn out? That could be interesting when free will is thrown in. So - shit happens. Not only natural phenomena but of our own doing. How do we respond? Which side of The Force will you embrace, so-to-speak? Already too long, but I'll throw in one more tidbit to consider: if Adam and Eve did not know the difference between good and evil until eating that apple, then eating that apple could not have been a sin. They were, for all practical purposes, infants in that regard. Also, "creations" could have been "no more" than creating the laws of physics, using entropy as a driving force, and give the universe a push-start. That, to me, is more fantastic and glorious a creator's design then the old-school versions.
"The difference bet
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
if Adam and Eve did not know the difference between good and evil until eating that apple, then eating that apple could not have been a sin. They were, for all practical purposes, infants in that regard
It wasn't a sin, but it did deserve punishment. Dogs don't know the difference between good and evil, but we still punish them when they poop on the carpet.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote:
if Adam and Eve did not know the difference between good and evil until eating that apple, then eating that apple could not have been a sin. They were, for all practical purposes, infants in that regard
It wasn't a sin, but it did deserve punishment. Dogs don't know the difference between good and evil, but we still punish them when they poop on the carpet.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
No need to punish the innocent. You don't whack the puppy after its first mistake! Instead, consider punishment for each of their first sins. Adam: passed the buck to Eve ('that woman you gave me') Eve: enticing atom when she, at least, should have known better*, and also, for scapegoating the snake. The Snake - that's an interesting one to consider. Was the snake created wiser than Adam and Ever? From the narrative, it would seem so ! * Did Eve take two bites . . . just to stay one step ahead? (for women).
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
That sounds like fun for a creator, and I might do it too were I it, but you can hardly argue it's benevolent and loving. Or perhaps, in its eyes, give or take 100 years of occasional suffering for the 'experiment' is nothing compared to an eternal afterlife in heaven.
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
Sander Rossel wrote:
eternal afterlife in heaven.
Did you ever consider that in the Bible, neither an afterlife, let alone a heaven and hell, are ever mentioned? Prophets may have dreams, stories and folk-law take one a life and certainty of their own. But it is not so written. I hope it's so - but it's just mankind's hope that there's more to ones consciousness when the body returns to dust.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
Once you watch one, the algorithm will recommend more. And they'll get steadily more batshit with each view. Before you know it, you'll be watching a video explaining how the lizard people from the hollow Earth, in cahoots with the last survivors from Atlantis, are using 5G to infect us with programmable chips so they can use us to mine for cryptocurrency, and only this expensive bit of tat that the video host happens to be selling will protect you. :rolleyes:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
That has to be the best conspiracy theory I've ever heard! You could make millions off of that! :laugh:
"When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others; same thing when you are stupid." Ignorant - An individual without knowledge, but is willing to learn. Stupid - An individual without knowledge and is incapable of learning. Idiot - An individual without knowledge and allows social media to do the thinking for them.
