Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Why doesn't the ISS look like this...

Why doesn't the ISS look like this...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
com
19 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jorgen Andersson

    An elevator. With a really strong wire

    Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

    OriginalGriffO Offline
    OriginalGriffO Offline
    OriginalGriff
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    It's a good idea: Space elevator - Wikipedia[^]

    "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

    "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
    "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Marc Clifton

      Jörgen Andersson wrote:

      An elevator.

      Space elevator - Wikipedia[^] Indeed!

      Latest Articles:
      Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jorgen Andersson
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      But Tsiolkovsky's original suggestion was a tower.

      Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

        It's a good idea: Space elevator - Wikipedia[^]

        "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jorgen Andersson
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        I know, the best part of that page is the calculations.

        Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

        K 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Marc Clifton

          Jörgen Andersson wrote:

          An elevator.

          Space elevator - Wikipedia[^] Indeed!

          Latest Articles:
          Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Daniel Pfeffer
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          There is a very good book by Arthur C. Clarke, The Fountains of Paradise, about the building of the first space elevator.

          Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Jorgen Andersson

            We need bigger rockets!

            Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

            W Offline
            W Offline
            W Balboos GHB
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Alternatively, very tiny astronauts.

            Ravings en masse^

            "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

            "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Marc Clifton

              https://www.productiondesignerscollective.org/single-post/2016/05/15/Connecting-The-Dots---2001-A-Space-Odyssey[^] on the inside, instead of this: https://mk0spaceflightnoa02a.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/dm2_iss.jpg[^] Well, the point being, it's so cluttered!

              Latest Articles:
              Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

              Mike HankeyM Offline
              Mike HankeyM Offline
              Mike Hankey
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              NASA Engineers don't make good interior decorators

              I'm not sure how many cookies it makes to be happy, but so far it's not 27. JaxCoder.com

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Marc Clifton

                https://www.productiondesignerscollective.org/single-post/2016/05/15/Connecting-The-Dots---2001-A-Space-Odyssey[^] on the inside, instead of this: https://mk0spaceflightnoa02a.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/dm2_iss.jpg[^] Well, the point being, it's so cluttered!

                Latest Articles:
                Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

                J Offline
                J Offline
                jeron1
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                That's good :thumbsup:, the next time someone comments on state of my desk, my new (less antagonistic) response will be "If it's good enough for the space station, it's good enough for me!"

                "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Daniel Pfeffer

                  The ISS also has much less than a millionth of the useful volume (going by the [2001: A Space Odyssey Docking Sequence](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48rh85d4yTI))

                  Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Slacker007
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  :thumbsup:

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jorgen Andersson

                    I know, the best part of that page is the calculations.

                    Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                    K Offline
                    K Offline
                    kalberts
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    My surprise is the number of reasonably qualified people who have pursued this idea for 125 years, when the calculations show that with current materials (over those 125 years), we many magnitudes away from being able to build such an elevator. There is only one reasonable explanation for that: These people never did the calculations. (And they didn't have Wikipedia to give it to them :-)) Even today, we are theorizing about nanomaterials that might be strong enough. I didn't see any estimate of the total amount of nanotubes required, but it occurs to me that those USD 6 billion for building the whole thing is slightly on the optimistic side. If those estimates hold true, we might even use a similar solution for an electricity generator: Put a little extra weight on the counterweight to pull the rope slowly outwards. In the earth end, the rope is pulled from a huge spool; the rotation of the spool drives the generator (through an almost unimaginable gearbox that probably will require another nano-development of strong enough materials). Maybe we end up with such a demand for carbon that we can't allow coal to be burned for heating... :-)

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Marc Clifton

                      https://www.productiondesignerscollective.org/single-post/2016/05/15/Connecting-The-Dots---2001-A-Space-Odyssey[^] on the inside, instead of this: https://mk0spaceflightnoa02a.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/dm2_iss.jpg[^] Well, the point being, it's so cluttered!

                      Latest Articles:
                      Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

                      W Offline
                      W Offline
                      wizardzz
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      I wonder if it started out looking less cluttered, and then, upgrades...

                      Streaming comedy shows: https://www.facebook.com/FunSimulation2000/ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjlYc8XLMNVsWhHwFstwtCg/videos https://www.twitch.tv/funsimulation

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Marc Clifton

                        https://www.productiondesignerscollective.org/single-post/2016/05/15/Connecting-The-Dots---2001-A-Space-Odyssey[^] on the inside, instead of this: https://mk0spaceflightnoa02a.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/dm2_iss.jpg[^] Well, the point being, it's so cluttered!

                        Latest Articles:
                        Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

                        Y Offline
                        Y Offline
                        yacCarsten
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Co-incidentally I found this yesterday "Street View" of IIS International Space Station — Google Arts & Culture[^]

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • K kalberts

                          My surprise is the number of reasonably qualified people who have pursued this idea for 125 years, when the calculations show that with current materials (over those 125 years), we many magnitudes away from being able to build such an elevator. There is only one reasonable explanation for that: These people never did the calculations. (And they didn't have Wikipedia to give it to them :-)) Even today, we are theorizing about nanomaterials that might be strong enough. I didn't see any estimate of the total amount of nanotubes required, but it occurs to me that those USD 6 billion for building the whole thing is slightly on the optimistic side. If those estimates hold true, we might even use a similar solution for an electricity generator: Put a little extra weight on the counterweight to pull the rope slowly outwards. In the earth end, the rope is pulled from a huge spool; the rotation of the spool drives the generator (through an almost unimaginable gearbox that probably will require another nano-development of strong enough materials). Maybe we end up with such a demand for carbon that we can't allow coal to be burned for heating... :-)

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Jorgen Andersson
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          Member 7989122 wrote:

                          My surprise is the number of reasonably qualified people who have pursued this idea for 125 years

                          People searching to solve the impossible are the one that makes science leap forward. The amount of things we can do or build today that was impossible 100 years ago is quite staggering. Then of course, the amount of things people thought would be easy to solve but still aren't is also really large. :)

                          Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Marc Clifton

                            https://www.productiondesignerscollective.org/single-post/2016/05/15/Connecting-The-Dots---2001-A-Space-Odyssey[^] on the inside, instead of this: https://mk0spaceflightnoa02a.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/dm2_iss.jpg[^] Well, the point being, it's so cluttered!

                            Latest Articles:
                            Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Super Lloyd
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            Close enough! :D

                            A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups