Is there a parser for .NET expression trees?

[Sander Rossel]

How about the following?

static void Main()
{
Expression> exp = x => 1 + x;
}

exp.Body is now of the type SimplyBinaryExpression, with a ConstantExpression for Left and PrimitiveParameterExpression for Right, etc. That's the only way I can think of turning code into Expressions. If you can parse an actual string in .NET, I don't know. Apparently there's a library that does it: Dynamic Expressions · zzzprojects/System.Linq.Dynamic Wiki · GitHub[^]

Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

[honey the codewitch]

Cool, maybe I'll write it then. I already have a C# subset parser.

Real programmers use butterflies

[Sander Rossel]

honey the codewitch wrote:

Cool, maybe I'll write it then.

Me: "There's a library that does that." You, a typical programmer (in this regard): *Sigh* "Fine, I'll do it myself!" :laugh:

Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

[honey the codewitch]

LOL I've been looking at one, I'm just not sure if I like it.

Real programmers use butterflies

[Sander Rossel]

Here's one simple trick and developers hate it!

string theCodez = "1 + x;";
var exp = (Expression)theCodez;

True story.

Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

[honey the codewitch]

wow. just... wow.

Real programmers use butterflies

[Member 14025503]

CS0030 Cannot convert type 'string' to 'System.Linq.Expressions.Expression'

[Sander Rossel]

I just thought of something. If you could ever find that eval-like function, you could do something like Eval($"Expression<Func<int, int>> exp = {myCode};"); and the exp variable would be available outside the Eval function in your current scope :D I remember the context in which I saw that function. The customer wanted to do stuff like enter "amount * 10", sort of a calculator utility inside the application. My coworker was like, "I could write a parser and spend a few days, or I can do it like this and be done with it" :laugh: I should mention it was VB.NET though and I think it was somewhere inside a VB specific namespace (although I'm not sure). I think I saw it work with C# once too. The fact that I can't find this function anywhere is really pissing me off (not that I'd want to use it) :sigh: I did find some smart guy who just compiled a string using reflection (using ICodeCompiler.CompileAssemblyFromSource) and then simply invokes it :laugh:

Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

[quantasm23]

Front End - jQuery QueryBuilder Backend - GitHub - castle-it/dynamic-linq-query-builder: A truly generic and dynamic linq query builder to compliment jQuery QueryBuilder and other dynamic linq query generation needs Other backend parsers - jQuery QueryBuilder

[honey the codewitch]

Sander Rossel wrote:

My coworker was like, "I could write a parser and spend a few days, or I can do it like this and be done with it

I can write an expression parser in about a day, but it would take forever to test

Sander Rossel wrote:

I did find some smart guy who just compiled a string using reflection (using ICodeCompiler.CompileAssemblyFromSource) and then simply invokes it

I actually considered that approach. Or using Roslyn. I think I'll avoid the Eval function, wherever it is. It probably compiles code anyway.

Real programmers use butterflies

[ZevSpitz]

If you already have code that parses C# expressions, why not use the factory methods at [`System.Linq.Expressions.Expression`](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.linq.expressions.expression)?

[honey the codewitch]

That was my plan, but before I did it I wanted to see if it was done. My parser spits out CodeDOM constructs, so it needs some retooling to work with expressions.

Real programmers use butterflies

[Oleg Shilo]

Are you looking for something like that?

var product = CSScript.CreateFunc(@"int Product(int a, int b)
{
return a * b;
}");
int result = product(3, 4);

The solution (cs-script) is based on Roslyn engine.

[buckrogerz 0]

So not sure if this is what your looking for but I used the System.Linq.Expressions namespace to build a dynamic link query to be executed against EF. here is an incomplete sample for syntax example:

propertyToUse = workingProperty.Substring(0, workingProperty.IndexOf('.'));
Type propertyToUseType = GetEntityType(propertyToUse, incomingParentType);

            ParameterExpression propertyToUseParameterExpression = Expression.Parameter(propertyToUseType, propertyToUse.Substring(0,1));
            Expression parentExpression = Expression.Property(workingExpression, propertyToUse);

            if (parentExpression.Type.IsGenericType &&
                typeof(IEnumerable<>)
                    .MakeGenericType(parentExpression.Type.GetGenericArguments())
                    .IsAssignableFrom(parentExpression.Type))
            {
                Expression childExpression = BuildPropertyExpression(propertyToUseParameterExpression,
                    workingProperty, comparisonOperation, compareValue);
                Type func = typeof(Func<,>);
                Type genericFunc = func.MakeGenericType(propertyToUseType, typeof(bool));
                LambdaExpression predicate =
                    Expression.Lambda(genericFunc, childExpression, propertyToUseParameterExpression);

                //we have call the AsQueryable on the collection since we don't have the compiler working for us and we need to use the any method
                MethodInfo asQueryableMethod = typeof(Queryable).GetMethods()
                    .Where(m => m.Name == "AsQueryable")
                    .Single(m => m.IsGenericMethod)
                    .MakeGenericMethod(propertyToUseType);
                Expression asQueryableExpression = Expression.Call(null, asQueryableMethod, parentExpression);

                //call the any method with the lambda expression we set up
                MethodInfo anyMethod = typeof(Queryable).GetMethods()
                    .Where(m => m.Name == "Any")
                    .Single(m => m.GetParameters().Length == 2)
                    .MakeGenericMethod(propertyToUseType);
                returnValue = Expression.Call(
                    null,
                    anyMethod,
                    asQueryableExpression, //the source
                    predicate); // the lambda expression
            }

There are other fa

[Sander Rossel]

Yes. That was a joke, there's no way a string can simply be cast to an Expression ;)

Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

[Sander Rossel]

honey the codewitch wrote:

but it would take forever to test

I wrote some TagHelpers for ASP.NET Core Razor and all your writing inspired me to write an article about it. So, clean up the code a bit (which took me hours, it was a mess, you'd be proud :laugh: ) and add unit tests... Turns out it's pretty much impossible to unit test those things! Here's the unit tests for the InputTagHelper: Mvc/InputTagHelperTest.cs at master · aspnet/Mvc · GitHub[^] That's almost 2000 lines and I inherited that thing :wtf: I'd need to test others too, like Mvc/SelectTagHelperTest.cs at master · aspnet/Mvc · GitHub[^] and Mvc/ValidationMessageTagHelperTest.cs at master · aspnet/Mvc · GitHub[^], another 1300 something LOC just for the basic tests :( But it doesn't stop there. It makes use of a "TestableHtmlGenerator", which I'm obviously going to need. Luckily, it's not a big class, but what the hell does it all do? :) Mvc/TestableHtmlGenerator.cs at master · aspnet/Mvc · GitHub[^] A single test would need about as much LOC as my entire library :sigh: So to hell with unit tests and back to some good old manual testing and praying for the best :laugh:

Best, Sander sanderrossel.com M

[honey the codewitch]

Sander Rossel wrote:

So to hell with unit tests and back to some good old manual testing and praying for the best

That's the spirit! Liberating isn't it? What's a good program without a few bugs anyway? :-D

Real programmers use butterflies

[Sander Rossel]

honey the codewitch wrote:

What's a good program without a few bugs anyway?

A very short program :laugh:

Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

[nassimi]

I did it this way (and I an NOT a JavaScript programmer): 1. JavaScript code:

class JsMath
{
static function Eval(expression: String): double
{
return eval(expression);
};
}

2. Compile:

C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\jsc.exe /t:library jsMath.js

3. Use in C#:

    private static double ExpressionValue(string expr)
    {
        return JsMath.Eval(expr);
    }

[honey the codewitch]

well I suppose that's one way to do it. :-D

Real programmers use butterflies