Laptop display size "survey"
-
So, my current laptop is 3.5 years old, and although I am confident in it, I received a "computer porn" email from my supplier. By that phrase I mean, "omg, the new version is gorgeous! Choice of processors (high end intel or amd), I'll certainly beef up the storage and RAM on my own, spec'd with an NVidia 3080... drool. Okay so this would be for a mainly development laptop. I normally stick with the 15.6" displays. They fit in my laptop backpack and seem to be in the sweet spot. But this new puppy comes with a 17.3" display at 2560x1440 with an nvidia 3080 GPU. :omg: So, for those of you who develop on laptops - insights and opinions into 15.6 vs. 17.3?
Charlie Gilley <italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
-
So, my current laptop is 3.5 years old, and although I am confident in it, I received a "computer porn" email from my supplier. By that phrase I mean, "omg, the new version is gorgeous! Choice of processors (high end intel or amd), I'll certainly beef up the storage and RAM on my own, spec'd with an NVidia 3080... drool. Okay so this would be for a mainly development laptop. I normally stick with the 15.6" displays. They fit in my laptop backpack and seem to be in the sweet spot. But this new puppy comes with a 17.3" display at 2560x1440 with an nvidia 3080 GPU. :omg: So, for those of you who develop on laptops - insights and opinions into 15.6 vs. 17.3?
Charlie Gilley <italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
17" is not a laptop, it's a foldable desktop. Better get a docking station and a pair of proper monitors instead. 14" is light enough to always bring around, and large enough to read.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
-
17" is not a laptop, it's a foldable desktop. Better get a docking station and a pair of proper monitors instead. 14" is light enough to always bring around, and large enough to read.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
truth, good perspective
Charlie Gilley <italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
-
My laptop is employer-provided and I have a 24" attached to it. (And three 24s at the office.)
1. https://2020news.de/en/home-english/
2. COVID19
3. #hanikesh #fuellmich #sosueme International Lawyer Network German Corona Investigative Committee
4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vECMv3QsMMo -
So, my current laptop is 3.5 years old, and although I am confident in it, I received a "computer porn" email from my supplier. By that phrase I mean, "omg, the new version is gorgeous! Choice of processors (high end intel or amd), I'll certainly beef up the storage and RAM on my own, spec'd with an NVidia 3080... drool. Okay so this would be for a mainly development laptop. I normally stick with the 15.6" displays. They fit in my laptop backpack and seem to be in the sweet spot. But this new puppy comes with a 17.3" display at 2560x1440 with an nvidia 3080 GPU. :omg: So, for those of you who develop on laptops - insights and opinions into 15.6 vs. 17.3?
Charlie Gilley <italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
charlieg wrote:
So, my current laptop is 3.5 years old
Mine it >8 years, and still "current". It runs VS, HOTS and WarCraft. On Wifi.
charlieg wrote:
So, for those of you who develop on laptops
One doesn't develop on a laptop. Get a desktop. Laptops are expensive for the power they pack in a limited space. Desktops are cheap. Get a cheap second hand-laptop to remote-desktop into your desktop. Not joking. A desktop gives you more bang for yer buck. Doesn't require a monitor either, just remote desktop. Get a decent system, not a glorified tab.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
17" is not a laptop, it's a foldable desktop. Better get a docking station and a pair of proper monitors instead. 14" is light enough to always bring around, and large enough to read.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
Jörgen Andersson wrote:
17" is not a laptop, it's a foldable desktop.
Depends on the purpose... I would not buy a 17'' for work or the taking with me everyday, but I do have a 17'' as multimedia center in the living room that comes with us, when we go on vacation. I get the laptop and my JBL3 and with that we can still have our films with us and enjoy them with a screen that is comfortable for the eyes even being a bit away.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Jörgen Andersson wrote:
17" is not a laptop, it's a foldable desktop.
Depends on the purpose... I would not buy a 17'' for work or the taking with me everyday, but I do have a 17'' as multimedia center in the living room that comes with us, when we go on vacation. I get the laptop and my JBL3 and with that we can still have our films with us and enjoy them with a screen that is comfortable for the eyes even being a bit away.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
Well, I assumed work. For vacation the kids have their own tablets, and I get, vacation. :-) I always bring an access point though.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
-
So, my current laptop is 3.5 years old, and although I am confident in it, I received a "computer porn" email from my supplier. By that phrase I mean, "omg, the new version is gorgeous! Choice of processors (high end intel or amd), I'll certainly beef up the storage and RAM on my own, spec'd with an NVidia 3080... drool. Okay so this would be for a mainly development laptop. I normally stick with the 15.6" displays. They fit in my laptop backpack and seem to be in the sweet spot. But this new puppy comes with a 17.3" display at 2560x1440 with an nvidia 3080 GPU. :omg: So, for those of you who develop on laptops - insights and opinions into 15.6 vs. 17.3?
Charlie Gilley <italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Size doesn't matter. ;) (I can't believe I missed that opportunity, and apparently so did everyone else!)
Latest Articles:
Client-Side Type-Based Publisher/Subscriber, Exploring Synchronous, "Event-ed", and Worker Thread Subscriptions -
Marc Clifton wrote:
Wish they didn't all have to conform with "watching movies" standards. :(
Then you will be happy to hear this: [16:9 Laptops Are Finally Dead and Gone. Good Riddance | Digital Trends](https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/16-9-laptops-are-finally-dead-and-gone-ces-2021/)
The Science of King David's Court | Object Oriented Programming with C++
David O'Neil wrote:
Then you will be happy to hear this:
Yes! :jig:
Latest Articles:
Client-Side Type-Based Publisher/Subscriber, Exploring Synchronous, "Event-ed", and Worker Thread Subscriptions -
Size doesn't matter. ;) (I can't believe I missed that opportunity, and apparently so did everyone else!)
Latest Articles:
Client-Side Type-Based Publisher/Subscriber, Exploring Synchronous, "Event-ed", and Worker Thread SubscriptionsMarc Clifton wrote:
(I can't believe I missed that opportunity, and apparently so did everyone else!)
Ehr.. You naive; it does.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
So, my current laptop is 3.5 years old, and although I am confident in it, I received a "computer porn" email from my supplier. By that phrase I mean, "omg, the new version is gorgeous! Choice of processors (high end intel or amd), I'll certainly beef up the storage and RAM on my own, spec'd with an NVidia 3080... drool. Okay so this would be for a mainly development laptop. I normally stick with the 15.6" displays. They fit in my laptop backpack and seem to be in the sweet spot. But this new puppy comes with a 17.3" display at 2560x1440 with an nvidia 3080 GPU. :omg: So, for those of you who develop on laptops - insights and opinions into 15.6 vs. 17.3?
Charlie Gilley <italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Depends how you use it. If it's your primary machine (or a machine you use a lot) and screen size is critical then the biggest screen that you're able to carry. For me, I've always used 13" but would grab a 14" if it was as small, or smaller, than the footprint of a current Macbook Pro . If I have to use the screen it's either being used as a secondary machine or I'm travelling between offices and 13" gets me through well enough. However, for working, I always connect to a 27" external. Everyone has their own answer. Whatever works best for you.
cheers Chris Maunder
-
Depends how you use it. If it's your primary machine (or a machine you use a lot) and screen size is critical then the biggest screen that you're able to carry. For me, I've always used 13" but would grab a 14" if it was as small, or smaller, than the footprint of a current Macbook Pro . If I have to use the screen it's either being used as a secondary machine or I'm travelling between offices and 13" gets me through well enough. However, for working, I always connect to a 27" external. Everyone has their own answer. Whatever works best for you.
cheers Chris Maunder
Chris Maunder wrote:
However, for working, I always connect to a 27" external.
27 inch? I'm afraid to translate that to metric. But almost 70 centimeter? I have a monthy python reference for that, and not going to repeat it. --edit Can't. Can't. Mustn't. No. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrcbCW4y9Dw[^] (not a rick roll, but worse, sorry)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
So, my current laptop is 3.5 years old, and although I am confident in it, I received a "computer porn" email from my supplier. By that phrase I mean, "omg, the new version is gorgeous! Choice of processors (high end intel or amd), I'll certainly beef up the storage and RAM on my own, spec'd with an NVidia 3080... drool. Okay so this would be for a mainly development laptop. I normally stick with the 15.6" displays. They fit in my laptop backpack and seem to be in the sweet spot. But this new puppy comes with a 17.3" display at 2560x1440 with an nvidia 3080 GPU. :omg: So, for those of you who develop on laptops - insights and opinions into 15.6 vs. 17.3?
Charlie Gilley <italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
I like 15 inch because 17 won't fit in a backpack very easily.
Real programmers use butterflies
-
Chris Maunder wrote:
However, for working, I always connect to a 27" external.
27 inch? I'm afraid to translate that to metric. But almost 70 centimeter? I have a monthy python reference for that, and not going to repeat it. --edit Can't. Can't. Mustn't. No. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrcbCW4y9Dw[^] (not a rick roll, but worse, sorry)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
My PC's screen is 55" :laugh:
Real programmers use butterflies
-
My PC's screen is 55" :laugh:
Real programmers use butterflies
...and how are you enjoying that screendoor effect? :-) Or is that 4K? I have a 40" 4K TV as my primary display, and at its native resolution, text is smaller on it than it is on my 27" 1080p monitor. For the equivalent text size (without rescaling), 4K would have to be spread across 54". So presumably you're right at the sweet spot.
-
So, my current laptop is 3.5 years old, and although I am confident in it, I received a "computer porn" email from my supplier. By that phrase I mean, "omg, the new version is gorgeous! Choice of processors (high end intel or amd), I'll certainly beef up the storage and RAM on my own, spec'd with an NVidia 3080... drool. Okay so this would be for a mainly development laptop. I normally stick with the 15.6" displays. They fit in my laptop backpack and seem to be in the sweet spot. But this new puppy comes with a 17.3" display at 2560x1440 with an nvidia 3080 GPU. :omg: So, for those of you who develop on laptops - insights and opinions into 15.6 vs. 17.3?
Charlie Gilley <italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
charlieg wrote:
omg, the new version is gorgeous!
"OMG that [hammer|power drill|chainsaw|laptop] is gorgeous!" Meh. A laptop is tool, not a fashion accessory. But then, I do realize there's apparently a market for those people, and [companies](https://www.apple.com) catering to them are doing rather well. Or were you drooling over the specs, like any good self-respecting geek should? :-)
-
...and how are you enjoying that screendoor effect? :-) Or is that 4K? I have a 40" 4K TV as my primary display, and at its native resolution, text is smaller on it than it is on my 27" 1080p monitor. For the equivalent text size (without rescaling), 4K would have to be spread across 54". So presumably you're right at the sweet spot.
I don't see well enough for it to impact me i guess. Either that or this TV is just good about it, or I've gotten so used to it I just don't notice. It's only 1080p
Real programmers use butterflies
-
My PC's screen is 55" :laugh:
Real programmers use butterflies
-
140 cm? Sounds nice for movies, but lines of code?
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Works great for me. YMMV
Real programmers use butterflies
-
So, my current laptop is 3.5 years old, and although I am confident in it, I received a "computer porn" email from my supplier. By that phrase I mean, "omg, the new version is gorgeous! Choice of processors (high end intel or amd), I'll certainly beef up the storage and RAM on my own, spec'd with an NVidia 3080... drool. Okay so this would be for a mainly development laptop. I normally stick with the 15.6" displays. They fit in my laptop backpack and seem to be in the sweet spot. But this new puppy comes with a 17.3" display at 2560x1440 with an nvidia 3080 GPU. :omg: So, for those of you who develop on laptops - insights and opinions into 15.6 vs. 17.3?
Charlie Gilley <italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape... "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
I prefer a lighter laptop for travel, so I have one with a 14" screen. At home and at work, I connect it to multiple screens, so the laptop size is irrelevant. If you travel a lot and work on the plane, you may wish to consider a 14" laptop; anything larger doesn't fit onto the @#$% tables they provide in economy.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
