Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. This decision of the PGA is just mean

This decision of the PGA is just mean

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comadobegame-devagentic-aiquestion
18 Posts 10 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Cp Coder
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Last weekend at the PGA event in Bay Hill Bryson DeChambeau treated his fans to two unforgettable shots. On Saturday and again on Sunday he teed up on the par 5 6th hole. The hole has more than 300 yards of water between tee and green. The fairway runs around the pond and you're supposed to approach the green following the fairway's dogleg around the water. But DeChambeau had other ideas. He aimed for a spot just to the right of the green, facing a carry well over 300 yards over water. The ball left the clubface doing just under 200 mph. It was in the air for 347 yards, before it hit the fairway and bounced and rolled 30 yards more, to end up with a 376 yard drive. I have never seen a golf ball being struck that hard and well. It was amusing to see all other players who had a view of the tee, stop to watch his swing. His shot ended up 168 yards nearer the green than that of other players. Then DeChambeau announced that he would consider a similar strategy this coming weekend during the Player's Championship at Sawgrass. The 18th hole once again features a slight dogleg to the left around a pond. He mentioned that instead of going over the water he could go left of the water onto a patch next to the neighboring fairway, which would leave him a much shorter second shot to the green. This may be very unconventional but is perfectly within the rules. But the PGA did not like it, so they quickly declared the area where he would land his ball, an internal out-of-bounds! Nasty! Their reasoning: They are doing it for the safety of spectators and personnel. People are at risk at every hole at these events and that does not seem to bother them. In any case, they surely could keep spectators out of that area if it were so dangerous! Maybe the old fuddy duddies of the PGA doesn't like players to think out of the box and play the game differently! :mad: Players 2021: PGA Tour handcuffs Bryson DeChambeau with new rule that foils his bold 18th hole strategy[^]

    Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

    W P N Mike HankeyM M 8 Replies Last reply
    0
    • C Cp Coder

      Last weekend at the PGA event in Bay Hill Bryson DeChambeau treated his fans to two unforgettable shots. On Saturday and again on Sunday he teed up on the par 5 6th hole. The hole has more than 300 yards of water between tee and green. The fairway runs around the pond and you're supposed to approach the green following the fairway's dogleg around the water. But DeChambeau had other ideas. He aimed for a spot just to the right of the green, facing a carry well over 300 yards over water. The ball left the clubface doing just under 200 mph. It was in the air for 347 yards, before it hit the fairway and bounced and rolled 30 yards more, to end up with a 376 yard drive. I have never seen a golf ball being struck that hard and well. It was amusing to see all other players who had a view of the tee, stop to watch his swing. His shot ended up 168 yards nearer the green than that of other players. Then DeChambeau announced that he would consider a similar strategy this coming weekend during the Player's Championship at Sawgrass. The 18th hole once again features a slight dogleg to the left around a pond. He mentioned that instead of going over the water he could go left of the water onto a patch next to the neighboring fairway, which would leave him a much shorter second shot to the green. This may be very unconventional but is perfectly within the rules. But the PGA did not like it, so they quickly declared the area where he would land his ball, an internal out-of-bounds! Nasty! Their reasoning: They are doing it for the safety of spectators and personnel. People are at risk at every hole at these events and that does not seem to bother them. In any case, they surely could keep spectators out of that area if it were so dangerous! Maybe the old fuddy duddies of the PGA doesn't like players to think out of the box and play the game differently! :mad: Players 2021: PGA Tour handcuffs Bryson DeChambeau with new rule that foils his bold 18th hole strategy[^]

      Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

      W Offline
      W Offline
      W Balboos GHB
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Might I add that I find the PGA, watching golf, and the entire system less interesting than counting sheets of bathroom tissue prior to folding but possibly more interesting than watching paint dry. And that's considering the PGA at its best.

      Ravings en masse^

      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

      "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Cp Coder

        Last weekend at the PGA event in Bay Hill Bryson DeChambeau treated his fans to two unforgettable shots. On Saturday and again on Sunday he teed up on the par 5 6th hole. The hole has more than 300 yards of water between tee and green. The fairway runs around the pond and you're supposed to approach the green following the fairway's dogleg around the water. But DeChambeau had other ideas. He aimed for a spot just to the right of the green, facing a carry well over 300 yards over water. The ball left the clubface doing just under 200 mph. It was in the air for 347 yards, before it hit the fairway and bounced and rolled 30 yards more, to end up with a 376 yard drive. I have never seen a golf ball being struck that hard and well. It was amusing to see all other players who had a view of the tee, stop to watch his swing. His shot ended up 168 yards nearer the green than that of other players. Then DeChambeau announced that he would consider a similar strategy this coming weekend during the Player's Championship at Sawgrass. The 18th hole once again features a slight dogleg to the left around a pond. He mentioned that instead of going over the water he could go left of the water onto a patch next to the neighboring fairway, which would leave him a much shorter second shot to the green. This may be very unconventional but is perfectly within the rules. But the PGA did not like it, so they quickly declared the area where he would land his ball, an internal out-of-bounds! Nasty! Their reasoning: They are doing it for the safety of spectators and personnel. People are at risk at every hole at these events and that does not seem to bother them. In any case, they surely could keep spectators out of that area if it were so dangerous! Maybe the old fuddy duddies of the PGA doesn't like players to think out of the box and play the game differently! :mad: Players 2021: PGA Tour handcuffs Bryson DeChambeau with new rule that foils his bold 18th hole strategy[^]

        Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

        P Offline
        P Offline
        PIEBALDconsult
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I also heard (many years ago) about golfers doing something similar in which they hit onto a neighboring fairway to avoid a dogleg. However, (as a non-golfer) I do feel that a player should be allowed the opportunity to hit a hole-in-one on every hole. So, if he is honestly trying for a hole-in-one but winds up in the rough, I'm OK with that. But intentionally hitting into the rough should not be allowed. Yet it has nothing to do with spectator safety. But mainly, they cannot change the rules of the tournament after people have signed up -- they would need to allow people to back-out and refund their entry fees. I might need to watch "Tin Cup" again. :sigh:

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Cp Coder

          Last weekend at the PGA event in Bay Hill Bryson DeChambeau treated his fans to two unforgettable shots. On Saturday and again on Sunday he teed up on the par 5 6th hole. The hole has more than 300 yards of water between tee and green. The fairway runs around the pond and you're supposed to approach the green following the fairway's dogleg around the water. But DeChambeau had other ideas. He aimed for a spot just to the right of the green, facing a carry well over 300 yards over water. The ball left the clubface doing just under 200 mph. It was in the air for 347 yards, before it hit the fairway and bounced and rolled 30 yards more, to end up with a 376 yard drive. I have never seen a golf ball being struck that hard and well. It was amusing to see all other players who had a view of the tee, stop to watch his swing. His shot ended up 168 yards nearer the green than that of other players. Then DeChambeau announced that he would consider a similar strategy this coming weekend during the Player's Championship at Sawgrass. The 18th hole once again features a slight dogleg to the left around a pond. He mentioned that instead of going over the water he could go left of the water onto a patch next to the neighboring fairway, which would leave him a much shorter second shot to the green. This may be very unconventional but is perfectly within the rules. But the PGA did not like it, so they quickly declared the area where he would land his ball, an internal out-of-bounds! Nasty! Their reasoning: They are doing it for the safety of spectators and personnel. People are at risk at every hole at these events and that does not seem to bother them. In any case, they surely could keep spectators out of that area if it were so dangerous! Maybe the old fuddy duddies of the PGA doesn't like players to think out of the box and play the game differently! :mad: Players 2021: PGA Tour handcuffs Bryson DeChambeau with new rule that foils his bold 18th hole strategy[^]

          Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

          N Offline
          N Offline
          NotTodayYo
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          That is pretty frustrating. It's like telling Steph Curry he can't shoot the long shot anymore.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Cp Coder

            Last weekend at the PGA event in Bay Hill Bryson DeChambeau treated his fans to two unforgettable shots. On Saturday and again on Sunday he teed up on the par 5 6th hole. The hole has more than 300 yards of water between tee and green. The fairway runs around the pond and you're supposed to approach the green following the fairway's dogleg around the water. But DeChambeau had other ideas. He aimed for a spot just to the right of the green, facing a carry well over 300 yards over water. The ball left the clubface doing just under 200 mph. It was in the air for 347 yards, before it hit the fairway and bounced and rolled 30 yards more, to end up with a 376 yard drive. I have never seen a golf ball being struck that hard and well. It was amusing to see all other players who had a view of the tee, stop to watch his swing. His shot ended up 168 yards nearer the green than that of other players. Then DeChambeau announced that he would consider a similar strategy this coming weekend during the Player's Championship at Sawgrass. The 18th hole once again features a slight dogleg to the left around a pond. He mentioned that instead of going over the water he could go left of the water onto a patch next to the neighboring fairway, which would leave him a much shorter second shot to the green. This may be very unconventional but is perfectly within the rules. But the PGA did not like it, so they quickly declared the area where he would land his ball, an internal out-of-bounds! Nasty! Their reasoning: They are doing it for the safety of spectators and personnel. People are at risk at every hole at these events and that does not seem to bother them. In any case, they surely could keep spectators out of that area if it were so dangerous! Maybe the old fuddy duddies of the PGA doesn't like players to think out of the box and play the game differently! :mad: Players 2021: PGA Tour handcuffs Bryson DeChambeau with new rule that foils his bold 18th hole strategy[^]

            Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

            N Offline
            N Offline
            NotTodayYo
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Cp-Coder wrote:

            I have never seen a golf ball being struck that hard and well.

            I have. Happy Gilmore. :-D

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • W W Balboos GHB

              Might I add that I find the PGA, watching golf, and the entire system less interesting than counting sheets of bathroom tissue prior to folding but possibly more interesting than watching paint dry. And that's considering the PGA at its best.

              Ravings en masse^

              "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

              "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Cp Coder
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I share your sentiments, not for golf but when watching baseball (or cricket). :-D

              Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

              W 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P PIEBALDconsult

                I also heard (many years ago) about golfers doing something similar in which they hit onto a neighboring fairway to avoid a dogleg. However, (as a non-golfer) I do feel that a player should be allowed the opportunity to hit a hole-in-one on every hole. So, if he is honestly trying for a hole-in-one but winds up in the rough, I'm OK with that. But intentionally hitting into the rough should not be allowed. Yet it has nothing to do with spectator safety. But mainly, they cannot change the rules of the tournament after people have signed up -- they would need to allow people to back-out and refund their entry fees. I might need to watch "Tin Cup" again. :sigh:

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Cp Coder
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Quote:

                I might need to watch "Tin Cup" again

                One of my favorite movies. I like stories about characters who have the brass cahones to "go for it!"

                Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Cp Coder

                  I share your sentiments, not for golf but when watching baseball (or cricket). :-D

                  Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

                  W Offline
                  W Offline
                  W Balboos GHB
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Actually, I hate all professional sports. Playing can be fun but being a spectator? Possibly if one's kid is playing in the game, but beyond that? Classic Dr Who reruns are far more interesting.

                  Ravings en masse^

                  "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                  "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                  C F 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • W W Balboos GHB

                    Actually, I hate all professional sports. Playing can be fun but being a spectator? Possibly if one's kid is playing in the game, but beyond that? Classic Dr Who reruns are far more interesting.

                    Ravings en masse^

                    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                    "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Cp Coder
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Keep in mind that there are professional athletes who have little or no other talent to support themselves. Let them use the one good talent they have, to play some sport well, to get paid for it. They entertain the rest of us. They deserve to be paid. They make a lot of money for their sponsors. Let them get a portion of that back!

                    Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

                    W 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Cp Coder

                      Keep in mind that there are professional athletes who have little or no other talent to support themselves. Let them use the one good talent they have, to play some sport well, to get paid for it. They entertain the rest of us. They deserve to be paid. They make a lot of money for their sponsors. Let them get a portion of that back!

                      Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

                      W Offline
                      W Offline
                      W Balboos GHB
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      No - unacceptable. There are people who do really good things for the world and don't earn in a lifetime what these slobs earn in a few months. They really produce nothing - entertainment by staring at others doing does not merit much above a minimum wage. Everything related to it is overpriced. So that some can live vicariously by wearing their logo? Better they should go out and actually do something to be proud of instead of taking pride in a bunch of overpaid strangers. Ditto, by the way, for Movie/TV actors/actresses. The lions share of the money should go to the writer. It doesn't. It's all part of an absurd scam where a person feels (and is?) left out if they can't recite scores and statistics that have zero worth.

                      Ravings en masse^

                      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                      "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • W W Balboos GHB

                        Actually, I hate all professional sports. Playing can be fun but being a spectator? Possibly if one's kid is playing in the game, but beyond that? Classic Dr Who reruns are far more interesting.

                        Ravings en masse^

                        "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                        "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                        F Offline
                        F Offline
                        Forogar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        I concur. Sports, especially professional sports, are incredibly boring to watch - I don't understand the extreme interest some people have in them.

                        - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

                        W 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Forogar

                          I concur. Sports, especially professional sports, are incredibly boring to watch - I don't understand the extreme interest some people have in them.

                          - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

                          W Offline
                          W Offline
                          W Balboos GHB
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          It's a way to feel part of something without really being part of anything. Knowing lots of stats and data are then discussed with others in the same state. Team paraphernalia are another way to signal they're (self-perceived) insiders or members (and a way to relive them of money). You can hear it in hallway - or being discussed between stalls in a bathroom. Rivalries and, in order to feel truly bonded with a bunch of people who don't care if they live or die, they may bet on the outcomes to show true commitment. Honestly, I find it more exciting when seeds I planted emerge from the soil. Later on, in the summer, and without fanfare, we get to eat stuff we grew ourselves. Amazingly, I don't wear a hat or coat with a picture of what I'm growing so I can bond with other gardeners. Go figure?

                          Ravings en masse^

                          "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                          "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Cp Coder

                            Last weekend at the PGA event in Bay Hill Bryson DeChambeau treated his fans to two unforgettable shots. On Saturday and again on Sunday he teed up on the par 5 6th hole. The hole has more than 300 yards of water between tee and green. The fairway runs around the pond and you're supposed to approach the green following the fairway's dogleg around the water. But DeChambeau had other ideas. He aimed for a spot just to the right of the green, facing a carry well over 300 yards over water. The ball left the clubface doing just under 200 mph. It was in the air for 347 yards, before it hit the fairway and bounced and rolled 30 yards more, to end up with a 376 yard drive. I have never seen a golf ball being struck that hard and well. It was amusing to see all other players who had a view of the tee, stop to watch his swing. His shot ended up 168 yards nearer the green than that of other players. Then DeChambeau announced that he would consider a similar strategy this coming weekend during the Player's Championship at Sawgrass. The 18th hole once again features a slight dogleg to the left around a pond. He mentioned that instead of going over the water he could go left of the water onto a patch next to the neighboring fairway, which would leave him a much shorter second shot to the green. This may be very unconventional but is perfectly within the rules. But the PGA did not like it, so they quickly declared the area where he would land his ball, an internal out-of-bounds! Nasty! Their reasoning: They are doing it for the safety of spectators and personnel. People are at risk at every hole at these events and that does not seem to bother them. In any case, they surely could keep spectators out of that area if it were so dangerous! Maybe the old fuddy duddies of the PGA doesn't like players to think out of the box and play the game differently! :mad: Players 2021: PGA Tour handcuffs Bryson DeChambeau with new rule that foils his bold 18th hole strategy[^]

                            Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

                            Mike HankeyM Offline
                            Mike HankeyM Offline
                            Mike Hankey
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            His decision must have offended the other players?, and we can't have that!

                            The less you need, the more you have. JaxCoder.com

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • W W Balboos GHB

                              No - unacceptable. There are people who do really good things for the world and don't earn in a lifetime what these slobs earn in a few months. They really produce nothing - entertainment by staring at others doing does not merit much above a minimum wage. Everything related to it is overpriced. So that some can live vicariously by wearing their logo? Better they should go out and actually do something to be proud of instead of taking pride in a bunch of overpaid strangers. Ditto, by the way, for Movie/TV actors/actresses. The lions share of the money should go to the writer. It doesn't. It's all part of an absurd scam where a person feels (and is?) left out if they can't recite scores and statistics that have zero worth.

                              Ravings en masse^

                              "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                              "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Cp Coder
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              We'll have to agree to disagree.

                              Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Cp Coder

                                Last weekend at the PGA event in Bay Hill Bryson DeChambeau treated his fans to two unforgettable shots. On Saturday and again on Sunday he teed up on the par 5 6th hole. The hole has more than 300 yards of water between tee and green. The fairway runs around the pond and you're supposed to approach the green following the fairway's dogleg around the water. But DeChambeau had other ideas. He aimed for a spot just to the right of the green, facing a carry well over 300 yards over water. The ball left the clubface doing just under 200 mph. It was in the air for 347 yards, before it hit the fairway and bounced and rolled 30 yards more, to end up with a 376 yard drive. I have never seen a golf ball being struck that hard and well. It was amusing to see all other players who had a view of the tee, stop to watch his swing. His shot ended up 168 yards nearer the green than that of other players. Then DeChambeau announced that he would consider a similar strategy this coming weekend during the Player's Championship at Sawgrass. The 18th hole once again features a slight dogleg to the left around a pond. He mentioned that instead of going over the water he could go left of the water onto a patch next to the neighboring fairway, which would leave him a much shorter second shot to the green. This may be very unconventional but is perfectly within the rules. But the PGA did not like it, so they quickly declared the area where he would land his ball, an internal out-of-bounds! Nasty! Their reasoning: They are doing it for the safety of spectators and personnel. People are at risk at every hole at these events and that does not seem to bother them. In any case, they surely could keep spectators out of that area if it were so dangerous! Maybe the old fuddy duddies of the PGA doesn't like players to think out of the box and play the game differently! :mad: Players 2021: PGA Tour handcuffs Bryson DeChambeau with new rule that foils his bold 18th hole strategy[^]

                                Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                markrlondon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Cp-Coder wrote:

                                Their reasoning: They are doing it for the safety of spectators and personnel. People are at risk at every hole at these events and that does not seem to bother them. In any case, they surely could keep spectators out of that area if it were so dangerous!

                                The safety of personnel/public/anyone has become an over-used pretext for meddling and micro-management. It is exhibited by all organisations with power over others. It's not healthy and it's not beneficial in net terms.

                                Greg UtasG 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C Cp Coder

                                  Last weekend at the PGA event in Bay Hill Bryson DeChambeau treated his fans to two unforgettable shots. On Saturday and again on Sunday he teed up on the par 5 6th hole. The hole has more than 300 yards of water between tee and green. The fairway runs around the pond and you're supposed to approach the green following the fairway's dogleg around the water. But DeChambeau had other ideas. He aimed for a spot just to the right of the green, facing a carry well over 300 yards over water. The ball left the clubface doing just under 200 mph. It was in the air for 347 yards, before it hit the fairway and bounced and rolled 30 yards more, to end up with a 376 yard drive. I have never seen a golf ball being struck that hard and well. It was amusing to see all other players who had a view of the tee, stop to watch his swing. His shot ended up 168 yards nearer the green than that of other players. Then DeChambeau announced that he would consider a similar strategy this coming weekend during the Player's Championship at Sawgrass. The 18th hole once again features a slight dogleg to the left around a pond. He mentioned that instead of going over the water he could go left of the water onto a patch next to the neighboring fairway, which would leave him a much shorter second shot to the green. This may be very unconventional but is perfectly within the rules. But the PGA did not like it, so they quickly declared the area where he would land his ball, an internal out-of-bounds! Nasty! Their reasoning: They are doing it for the safety of spectators and personnel. People are at risk at every hole at these events and that does not seem to bother them. In any case, they surely could keep spectators out of that area if it were so dangerous! Maybe the old fuddy duddies of the PGA doesn't like players to think out of the box and play the game differently! :mad: Players 2021: PGA Tour handcuffs Bryson DeChambeau with new rule that foils his bold 18th hole strategy[^]

                                  Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

                                  O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  obermd
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  The PGA has a history of banning anything that improves golfer's game.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M markrlondon

                                    Cp-Coder wrote:

                                    Their reasoning: They are doing it for the safety of spectators and personnel. People are at risk at every hole at these events and that does not seem to bother them. In any case, they surely could keep spectators out of that area if it were so dangerous!

                                    The safety of personnel/public/anyone has become an over-used pretext for meddling and micro-management. It is exhibited by all organisations with power over others. It's not healthy and it's not beneficial in net terms.

                                    Greg UtasG Offline
                                    Greg UtasG Offline
                                    Greg Utas
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    They're doing it for the children!

                                    Robust Services Core | Software Techniques for Lemmings | Articles
                                    The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.

                                    <p><a href="https://github.com/GregUtas/robust-services-core/blob/master/README.md">Robust Services Core</a>
                                    <em>The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.</em></p>

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Cp Coder

                                      Last weekend at the PGA event in Bay Hill Bryson DeChambeau treated his fans to two unforgettable shots. On Saturday and again on Sunday he teed up on the par 5 6th hole. The hole has more than 300 yards of water between tee and green. The fairway runs around the pond and you're supposed to approach the green following the fairway's dogleg around the water. But DeChambeau had other ideas. He aimed for a spot just to the right of the green, facing a carry well over 300 yards over water. The ball left the clubface doing just under 200 mph. It was in the air for 347 yards, before it hit the fairway and bounced and rolled 30 yards more, to end up with a 376 yard drive. I have never seen a golf ball being struck that hard and well. It was amusing to see all other players who had a view of the tee, stop to watch his swing. His shot ended up 168 yards nearer the green than that of other players. Then DeChambeau announced that he would consider a similar strategy this coming weekend during the Player's Championship at Sawgrass. The 18th hole once again features a slight dogleg to the left around a pond. He mentioned that instead of going over the water he could go left of the water onto a patch next to the neighboring fairway, which would leave him a much shorter second shot to the green. This may be very unconventional but is perfectly within the rules. But the PGA did not like it, so they quickly declared the area where he would land his ball, an internal out-of-bounds! Nasty! Their reasoning: They are doing it for the safety of spectators and personnel. People are at risk at every hole at these events and that does not seem to bother them. In any case, they surely could keep spectators out of that area if it were so dangerous! Maybe the old fuddy duddies of the PGA doesn't like players to think out of the box and play the game differently! :mad: Players 2021: PGA Tour handcuffs Bryson DeChambeau with new rule that foils his bold 18th hole strategy[^]

                                      Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      Chris Maunder
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Don't get me started about the UCI rule to [ban riders from leaning on their handlebars](https://www.velonews.com/news/road/uci-to-ban-forearms-time-trial-position-on-road-bikes/).

                                      cheers Chris Maunder

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups