At last: A native 64 bit Visual Studio
-
OK, Visual C++ 6.0, you nitpick! :-D
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto
:laughs: Cadbury has somewhat recently changed their ads. It used to be said that there was a glass and a half in every one. Now, they say that there's a glass and a half in everyone. Not written mind you, but in the way it's said. I noticed and reckoned I knew what their angle was. Dad noticed too - but climbed up the mountain from a different angle and thought they'd made a mistake. :oops: :haha: When he called em to point it out, she explained that the saying was no longer referring to the blocks of chocolate, but were instead now talking about the consumers.. :laugh: (because they've shrunk the blocks so much that there is in fact, not that much milk in em) Your comment reminded me of this, with the placement of a comma. Native, 64 bit vs Native 64 bit Thanks for the fun. :)
-
Cp-Coder wrote:
first native 64 bit version of VS
Viewing response to your post it seems the Natives are restless.
The less you need, the more you have. JaxCoder.com
Could this be the Return of the Native?
T. Hardy
-
I just downloaded the 2022 preview of Visual Studio and noticed it installed in the Program Files folder, not the Program Files (x86) folder like all earlier versions. So this must be the first native 64 bit version of VS. Nice! What took you so long MS? :confused:
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
That doesn't necessarily guarantee that it's a 64-bit app. I've seen installers that forced their apps into
C:\Program Fileseven though they were 32-bit, largely because they had hard-coded folders in the application.Software Zen:
delete this; -
Quote:
first native 64 bit version
'native'? :laugh: Visual Studio 6 was native.
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto
Several years ago, I worked on a project where a few modules had to be built/maintained in Visual C++ 6.0. Always blew me away how fast it was.
-
That doesn't necessarily guarantee that it's a 64-bit app. I've seen installers that forced their apps into
C:\Program Fileseven though they were 32-bit, largely because they had hard-coded folders in the application.Software Zen:
delete this; -
I don't think Microsoft would do that? Would they? :confused:
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
I would find it a little irritating, but not surprising. They've been known to break their own rules and ignore their own guidelines often enough.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
Several years ago, I worked on a project where a few modules had to be built/maintained in Visual C++ 6.0. Always blew me away how fast it was.
-
That doesn't necessarily guarantee that it's a 64-bit app. I've seen installers that forced their apps into
C:\Program Fileseven though they were 32-bit, largely because they had hard-coded folders in the application.Software Zen:
delete this;I have installed it, and
devenv.exeprocess is indeed a 64-bit process. -
Until you realise the bit you are missing is the one bit you actually used to use all the time. :laugh:
-
Like playing solitaire with a deck of 51 cards.
-
Several years ago, I worked on a project where a few modules had to be built/maintained in Visual C++ 6.0. Always blew me away how fast it was.
The help was much better too.
