Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Windows GUI in 2005

Windows GUI in 2005

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comquestion
6 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Allen Sun
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I was reading an article by Paul DiLascia on MSDN ( http://www.microsoft.com/msj/defaultframe.asp?page=/msj/0198/coolmenu.htm ) And here is what he has to say about the GUI in 2005: "Soon, the world will catch up to my advanced taste—I predict that before the year 2005, Windows will revert to its 3.1 look." Cheers!

    A P 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • A Allen Sun

      I was reading an article by Paul DiLascia on MSDN ( http://www.microsoft.com/msj/defaultframe.asp?page=/msj/0198/coolmenu.htm ) And here is what he has to say about the GUI in 2005: "Soon, the world will catch up to my advanced taste—I predict that before the year 2005, Windows will revert to its 3.1 look." Cheers!

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Alvaro Mendez
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I actually liked the Windows 3.1 look. Sure, windows didn't have the now-familiar Close button but that to me was a good thing -- it wasn't easy to close things accidentally. Toolbar buttons actually looked like buttons and menus were always the topmost thing on a window, just below the title bar. One thing I do like about the Windows 95 interface is the variable-sized scrollbars which Windows 3.1 lacked for some reason. Also, the left-justified title bars I kinda like although I didn't mind it centered either. Regards, Alvaro

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Allen Sun

        I was reading an article by Paul DiLascia on MSDN ( http://www.microsoft.com/msj/defaultframe.asp?page=/msj/0198/coolmenu.htm ) And here is what he has to say about the GUI in 2005: "Soon, the world will catch up to my advanced taste—I predict that before the year 2005, Windows will revert to its 3.1 look." Cheers!

        P Offline
        P Offline
        Paul Watson
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        While, horror of all horrors, I like the new Windows XP interface (hey, I played with lego when I was young (alright, alright so I still do ;) ), so I have a certain feeling of deja-vu with XP) the one thing I wish it had was an easily accesible.. wait for it.. DOS prompt. I remember there was something called Windows Commander ages ago and at the bottom of the screen there was a text box which gave you quick and direct access to the command prompt. Does anybody know of a similar utility? Naturally it would be best if the command prompt just sat in the Start bar and could be expanded or collapsed easily. hmm might be a good coding project, no? regards, Paul Watson Cape Town, South Africa e: paulmwatson@email.com w: vergen.org

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Paul Watson

          While, horror of all horrors, I like the new Windows XP interface (hey, I played with lego when I was young (alright, alright so I still do ;) ), so I have a certain feeling of deja-vu with XP) the one thing I wish it had was an easily accesible.. wait for it.. DOS prompt. I remember there was something called Windows Commander ages ago and at the bottom of the screen there was a text box which gave you quick and direct access to the command prompt. Does anybody know of a similar utility? Naturally it would be best if the command prompt just sat in the Start bar and could be expanded or collapsed easily. hmm might be a good coding project, no? regards, Paul Watson Cape Town, South Africa e: paulmwatson@email.com w: vergen.org

          J Offline
          J Offline
          James Pullicino
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          The closest feature I found is the address bar on the task bar. To enable it (this is on windows 2000), rightclick on the taskbar, select Toolbars and select Address. Enjoy! (2b || !2b)

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Alvaro Mendez

            I actually liked the Windows 3.1 look. Sure, windows didn't have the now-familiar Close button but that to me was a good thing -- it wasn't easy to close things accidentally. Toolbar buttons actually looked like buttons and menus were always the topmost thing on a window, just below the title bar. One thing I do like about the Windows 95 interface is the variable-sized scrollbars which Windows 3.1 lacked for some reason. Also, the left-justified title bars I kinda like although I didn't mind it centered either. Regards, Alvaro

            T Offline
            T Offline
            Tomasz Sowinski
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Also, the left-justified title bars I kinda like although I didn't mind it centered either. Centered titles were my favorite GUI feature in Win 3.x. Is there any advanced option in XP that gives them back? Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J James Pullicino

              The closest feature I found is the address bar on the task bar. To enable it (this is on windows 2000), rightclick on the taskbar, select Toolbars and select Address. Enjoy! (2b || !2b)

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Paul Watson
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Yup that is almost exactly what I am looking for, just need one that works on the command prompt now :) Thanks for reminding me about that address bar btw, it is quite helpful. regards, Paul Watson Cape Town, South Africa e: paulmwatson@email.com w: vergen.org

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups