Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Duplication vs. Complexity

Duplication vs. Complexity

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questionjavascriptvisual-studiodesignalgorithms
37 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jacquers
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Rubber ducking here... ;) I'm working on a project that has a form which the user must fill in to submit a request. This form is used for various request types (+- 4) and shares common functionality (about 70%) between them. I have the choice of duplicating the form (UI and probably Logic) for the various request types or having one form with sections and columns that will be shown or hidden based on the request type. Either approach has pros and cons... Duplication: More maintenance if the common sections / logic change. Each request type's form will need to be updated. Complexity: Potentially many if else statements and more complex to understand and maintain e.g. changes in the common sections could break it for multiple request types. Which approach would you use? Maybe there is a hybrid approach? Edit: This is an Angular project, but I think the question applies to development in general.

    P J Kornfeld Eliyahu PeterK M M 20 Replies Last reply
    0
    • J Jacquers

      Rubber ducking here... ;) I'm working on a project that has a form which the user must fill in to submit a request. This form is used for various request types (+- 4) and shares common functionality (about 70%) between them. I have the choice of duplicating the form (UI and probably Logic) for the various request types or having one form with sections and columns that will be shown or hidden based on the request type. Either approach has pros and cons... Duplication: More maintenance if the common sections / logic change. Each request type's form will need to be updated. Complexity: Potentially many if else statements and more complex to understand and maintain e.g. changes in the common sections could break it for multiple request types. Which approach would you use? Maybe there is a hybrid approach? Edit: This is an Angular project, but I think the question applies to development in general.

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Peter_in_2780
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I don't know how it fits in your dev environment, but I've had success with a hybrid approach. Basically a couple of large include files that do all the scaffolding, UI layout etc. Each form includes them, calls the setup routines with appropriate page titles, etc. Then has its own logic to handle the fields specific to that form. So, basically, abstracting into (one or more) separate files, the stuff that is common to all the forms. hth Peter

      Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jacquers

        Rubber ducking here... ;) I'm working on a project that has a form which the user must fill in to submit a request. This form is used for various request types (+- 4) and shares common functionality (about 70%) between them. I have the choice of duplicating the form (UI and probably Logic) for the various request types or having one form with sections and columns that will be shown or hidden based on the request type. Either approach has pros and cons... Duplication: More maintenance if the common sections / logic change. Each request type's form will need to be updated. Complexity: Potentially many if else statements and more complex to understand and maintain e.g. changes in the common sections could break it for multiple request types. Which approach would you use? Maybe there is a hybrid approach? Edit: This is an Angular project, but I think the question applies to development in general.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jon McKee
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Depends on your stack, requirements, etc but in something like Angular, component composition would be a good solution to this problem. The idea being you have each of the specific components for the request types that deal with their specific stuff, and they include the common component in their template to handle common stuff, communicating with it through @Input and @Output bindings. Of course this assumes the common component is actually common. If it just so happens that it's common right now then it's not really common and I'd go with duplication instead. Otherwise that common component will end up accruing so much special-behavior-spaghetti over time it'll become unmanageable. Those are my initial thoughts at 5am at least. Reader beware :laugh:

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Jacquers

          Rubber ducking here... ;) I'm working on a project that has a form which the user must fill in to submit a request. This form is used for various request types (+- 4) and shares common functionality (about 70%) between them. I have the choice of duplicating the form (UI and probably Logic) for the various request types or having one form with sections and columns that will be shown or hidden based on the request type. Either approach has pros and cons... Duplication: More maintenance if the common sections / logic change. Each request type's form will need to be updated. Complexity: Potentially many if else statements and more complex to understand and maintain e.g. changes in the common sections could break it for multiple request types. Which approach would you use? Maybe there is a hybrid approach? Edit: This is an Angular project, but I think the question applies to development in general.

          Kornfeld Eliyahu PeterK Offline
          Kornfeld Eliyahu PeterK Offline
          Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I have a situation sounds almost the same. About 50 fill-in forms that has 80% common and 20% special... I have this also in ASP.NET and also Angular... I solved it using inheritance - a base form holds 80% of the code (part of which depends on settings overwritten by derivates(?))... And 50 derivates to add the case specifics...

          "The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012

          "It never ceases to amaze me that a spacecraft launched in 1977 can be fixed remotely from Earth." ― Brian Cox

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Jacquers

            Rubber ducking here... ;) I'm working on a project that has a form which the user must fill in to submit a request. This form is used for various request types (+- 4) and shares common functionality (about 70%) between them. I have the choice of duplicating the form (UI and probably Logic) for the various request types or having one form with sections and columns that will be shown or hidden based on the request type. Either approach has pros and cons... Duplication: More maintenance if the common sections / logic change. Each request type's form will need to be updated. Complexity: Potentially many if else statements and more complex to understand and maintain e.g. changes in the common sections could break it for multiple request types. Which approach would you use? Maybe there is a hybrid approach? Edit: This is an Angular project, but I think the question applies to development in general.

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Mircea Neacsu
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Without knowing all the details, it seems I have to point the obvious: do whatever is easier for the user. Don’t let him wade through a long, complicated form just because it makes your code nicer. In the end, users’ time is more valuable than yours (at least because there are so many of them) and making them happy should be the most important thing. Without them your company would not survive and you’d be looking for a job.

            Mircea

            J Kornfeld Eliyahu PeterK G 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • M Mircea Neacsu

              Without knowing all the details, it seems I have to point the obvious: do whatever is easier for the user. Don’t let him wade through a long, complicated form just because it makes your code nicer. In the end, users’ time is more valuable than yours (at least because there are so many of them) and making them happy should be the most important thing. Without them your company would not survive and you’d be looking for a job.

              Mircea

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jacquers
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I'm all for simplification, but I don't have a choice in how the form is structured and all the fields displayed are required. My question was aimed at the code layout / structure.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Mircea Neacsu

                Without knowing all the details, it seems I have to point the obvious: do whatever is easier for the user. Don’t let him wade through a long, complicated form just because it makes your code nicer. In the end, users’ time is more valuable than yours (at least because there are so many of them) and making them happy should be the most important thing. Without them your company would not survive and you’d be looking for a job.

                Mircea

                Kornfeld Eliyahu PeterK Offline
                Kornfeld Eliyahu PeterK Offline
                Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Mircea Neacsu wrote:

                making them happy should be the most important thing

                Except that sometime the most desired thing is to wipe them out totally :mad:

                "The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012

                "It never ceases to amaze me that a spacecraft launched in 1977 can be fixed remotely from Earth." ― Brian Cox

                M D 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • Kornfeld Eliyahu PeterK Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter

                  Mircea Neacsu wrote:

                  making them happy should be the most important thing

                  Except that sometime the most desired thing is to wipe them out totally :mad:

                  "The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mircea Neacsu
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  :laugh: Sure, but don’t we have the same love/hate relationship with many in our own families. Seriously speaking, I’m a passionate advocate for a user centric point of view. I’ve seen too many programmers and ‘architects’ in their ivory tower looking with disdain to lowly users and forgetting our whole profession come in existence just to help these users. Can you imagine the people at MIT programming the Apollo guidance computer and saying “screw these astronauts, they are just some trained monkeys”?

                  Mircea

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jacquers

                    Rubber ducking here... ;) I'm working on a project that has a form which the user must fill in to submit a request. This form is used for various request types (+- 4) and shares common functionality (about 70%) between them. I have the choice of duplicating the form (UI and probably Logic) for the various request types or having one form with sections and columns that will be shown or hidden based on the request type. Either approach has pros and cons... Duplication: More maintenance if the common sections / logic change. Each request type's form will need to be updated. Complexity: Potentially many if else statements and more complex to understand and maintain e.g. changes in the common sections could break it for multiple request types. Which approach would you use? Maybe there is a hybrid approach? Edit: This is an Angular project, but I think the question applies to development in general.

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Maximilien
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    see yourself in 1 year, what kind of psychopath will you be when you'll have to do changes in that code. Refactor your code.

                    CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Jacquers

                      Rubber ducking here... ;) I'm working on a project that has a form which the user must fill in to submit a request. This form is used for various request types (+- 4) and shares common functionality (about 70%) between them. I have the choice of duplicating the form (UI and probably Logic) for the various request types or having one form with sections and columns that will be shown or hidden based on the request type. Either approach has pros and cons... Duplication: More maintenance if the common sections / logic change. Each request type's form will need to be updated. Complexity: Potentially many if else statements and more complex to understand and maintain e.g. changes in the common sections could break it for multiple request types. Which approach would you use? Maybe there is a hybrid approach? Edit: This is an Angular project, but I think the question applies to development in general.

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Nagy Vilmos
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      I've successfully used a single dialog with all content and then injected the display and validation logic from a container. It should give you the best of both worlds.

                      veni bibi saltavi

                      N 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Maximilien

                        see yourself in 1 year, what kind of psychopath will you be when you'll have to do changes in that code. Refactor your code.

                        CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Jacquers
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        That's definitely part of my consideration on choosing the approach :) It's quite likely that another company will do the maintenance though due to an arrangement we have :laugh:

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Jacquers

                          Rubber ducking here... ;) I'm working on a project that has a form which the user must fill in to submit a request. This form is used for various request types (+- 4) and shares common functionality (about 70%) between them. I have the choice of duplicating the form (UI and probably Logic) for the various request types or having one form with sections and columns that will be shown or hidden based on the request type. Either approach has pros and cons... Duplication: More maintenance if the common sections / logic change. Each request type's form will need to be updated. Complexity: Potentially many if else statements and more complex to understand and maintain e.g. changes in the common sections could break it for multiple request types. Which approach would you use? Maybe there is a hybrid approach? Edit: This is an Angular project, but I think the question applies to development in general.

                          G Offline
                          G Offline
                          GuyThiebaut
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Complexity is perhaps going to make it easier to extend. Duplication will in all likelihood make it easier to debug. I know it's the wrong answer from a software engineering point of view - but from the point of view of someone who spends a lot of time fixing defects on a huge code base I would go for duplication. I have seen a lot of code that makes use of inheritance and quite frankly I have found it to at times be something of a nightmare. Complexity is clever and is elegant but it can make tracking and fixing bugs a lot more difficult.

                          “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

                          ― Christopher Hitchens

                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J Jacquers

                            Rubber ducking here... ;) I'm working on a project that has a form which the user must fill in to submit a request. This form is used for various request types (+- 4) and shares common functionality (about 70%) between them. I have the choice of duplicating the form (UI and probably Logic) for the various request types or having one form with sections and columns that will be shown or hidden based on the request type. Either approach has pros and cons... Duplication: More maintenance if the common sections / logic change. Each request type's form will need to be updated. Complexity: Potentially many if else statements and more complex to understand and maintain e.g. changes in the common sections could break it for multiple request types. Which approach would you use? Maybe there is a hybrid approach? Edit: This is an Angular project, but I think the question applies to development in general.

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            PIEBALDconsult
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Inheritance and specialization. Maybe make the common sections into UserControls, etc.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Kornfeld Eliyahu PeterK Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter

                              Mircea Neacsu wrote:

                              making them happy should be the most important thing

                              Except that sometime the most desired thing is to wipe them out totally :mad:

                              "The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012

                              D Offline
                              D Offline
                              Daniel Pfeffer
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Be careful what you wish for - we are all users, occasionally...

                              Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • G GuyThiebaut

                                Complexity is perhaps going to make it easier to extend. Duplication will in all likelihood make it easier to debug. I know it's the wrong answer from a software engineering point of view - but from the point of view of someone who spends a lot of time fixing defects on a huge code base I would go for duplication. I have seen a lot of code that makes use of inheritance and quite frankly I have found it to at times be something of a nightmare. Complexity is clever and is elegant but it can make tracking and fixing bugs a lot more difficult.

                                “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

                                ― Christopher Hitchens

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jacquers
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                GuyThiebaut wrote:

                                Complexity is clever and is elegant but it can make tracking and fixing bugs a lot more difficult.

                                Yeah, that's what I'm hoping to avoid.

                                J G 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • N Nagy Vilmos

                                  I've successfully used a single dialog with all content and then injected the display and validation logic from a container. It should give you the best of both worlds.

                                  veni bibi saltavi

                                  N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  Nelek
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Welcome Back Mr. Vilmos. ;) Long without seeing you. I hope everything is fine with you and your people.

                                  M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J Jacquers

                                    GuyThiebaut wrote:

                                    Complexity is clever and is elegant but it can make tracking and fixing bugs a lot more difficult.

                                    Yeah, that's what I'm hoping to avoid.

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    Jorgen Andersson
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    That's when you're overdoing it. Put everything common in a base file that you inherit. Duplicate the rest.

                                    Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J Jacquers

                                      Rubber ducking here... ;) I'm working on a project that has a form which the user must fill in to submit a request. This form is used for various request types (+- 4) and shares common functionality (about 70%) between them. I have the choice of duplicating the form (UI and probably Logic) for the various request types or having one form with sections and columns that will be shown or hidden based on the request type. Either approach has pros and cons... Duplication: More maintenance if the common sections / logic change. Each request type's form will need to be updated. Complexity: Potentially many if else statements and more complex to understand and maintain e.g. changes in the common sections could break it for multiple request types. Which approach would you use? Maybe there is a hybrid approach? Edit: This is an Angular project, but I think the question applies to development in general.

                                      F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      Fueled By Decaff
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      A bit of a different idea: could you implement the common code in UserControls and classes so they have a well defined internal API?

                                      F 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J Jacquers

                                        GuyThiebaut wrote:

                                        Complexity is clever and is elegant but it can make tracking and fixing bugs a lot more difficult.

                                        Yeah, that's what I'm hoping to avoid.

                                        G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        GuyThiebaut
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        I would also favour composition over inheritance where possible. So you could have a baseclass form that is very basic, then the implemented forms can perhaps use some form of builder to class to individually tailor those forms. Using composition may make it easier to see what each form is built from.

                                        “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

                                        ― Christopher Hitchens

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Fueled By Decaff

                                          A bit of a different idea: could you implement the common code in UserControls and classes so they have a well defined internal API?

                                          F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          Fueled By Decaff
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Hmm, metal note: refresh the page and read any new posts before posting. PIEBALDconsult beat me to this by about 2 hours and 30 minutes.

                                          E 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups