Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Wicked code

Wicked code

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comai-coding
8 Posts 5 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    honey the codewitch
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I love the feeling of creating amazing code. I think the appeal of it is what keeps me coding - just on the off chance that I make something really cool. I did recently. Reggie[^] is *really cool*. I have a better way of doing complicated code generation now too, which Reggie inspired by being difficult to maintain until I added that. Since the 23rd I've just been busting it out, one bit of sorcery after another. It feels good. ;)

    Real programmers use butterflies

    P L 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • H honey the codewitch

      I love the feeling of creating amazing code. I think the appeal of it is what keeps me coding - just on the off chance that I make something really cool. I did recently. Reggie[^] is *really cool*. I have a better way of doing complicated code generation now too, which Reggie inspired by being difficult to maintain until I added that. Since the 23rd I've just been busting it out, one bit of sorcery after another. It feels good. ;)

      Real programmers use butterflies

      P Offline
      P Offline
      PIEBALDconsult
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      YAGNI :suss: "Cool" is not a desirable attribute in software.

      H 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H honey the codewitch

        I love the feeling of creating amazing code. I think the appeal of it is what keeps me coding - just on the off chance that I make something really cool. I did recently. Reggie[^] is *really cool*. I have a better way of doing complicated code generation now too, which Reggie inspired by being difficult to maintain until I added that. Since the 23rd I've just been busting it out, one bit of sorcery after another. It feels good. ;)

        Real programmers use butterflies

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I also have the feeling you are creating amazing code! Nevertheless I don't see you have the right to advertise it in the Lounge... Every nobody else doing same will be canceled

        H 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P PIEBALDconsult

          YAGNI :suss: "Cool" is not a desirable attribute in software.

          H Offline
          H Offline
          honey the codewitch
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Yeah, that would be a big wrong. I'm not writing unicode pattern matching code by hand, for example. I really don't want to type the following if statement:

          if((ch >= 92736 && ch <= 92766) || (ch >= 92880 && ch <= 92909) || (ch >= 92928 && ch <= 92975) || (ch >= 92992 && ch <= 92995) || (ch >= 93027 && ch <= 93047) || (ch >= 93053 && ch <= 93071) || (ch >= 93952 && ch <= 94020) || ch == 94032 || (ch >= 94099 && ch <= 94111) || ch == 110592 || ch == 110593 ||
          (ch >= 113664 && ch <= 113770) || (ch >= 113776 && ch <= 113788) || (ch >= 113792 && ch <= 113800) || (ch >= 113808 && ch <= 113817) || (ch >= 119808 && ch <= 119892) || (ch >= 119894 && ch <= 119964) || ch == 119966 || ch == 119967 || ch == 119970 || ch == 119973 || ch == 119974 || (ch >= 119977 && ch <= 119980) ||
          (ch >= 119982 && ch <= 119993) || ch == 119995 || (ch >= 119997 && ch <= 120003) || (ch >= 120005 && ch <= 120069) || (ch >= 120071 && ch <= 120074) || (ch >= 120077 && ch <= 120084) || (ch >= 120086 && ch <= 120092) || (ch >= 120094 && ch <= 120121) || (ch >= 120123 && ch <= 120126) || (ch >= 120128 && ch <= 120132) ||
          ch == 120134 || (ch >= 120138 && ch <= 120144) || (ch >= 120146 && ch <= 120485) || (ch >= 120488 && ch <= 120512) || (ch >= 120514 && ch <= 120538) || (ch >= 120540 && ch <= 120570) || (ch >= 120572 && ch <= 120596) || (ch >= 120598 && ch <= 120628) || (ch >= 120630 && ch <= 120654) || (ch >= 120656 && ch <= 120686) ||
          (ch >= 120688 && ch <= 120712) || (ch >= 120714 && ch <= 120744) || (ch >= 120746 && ch <= 120770) || (ch >= 120772 && ch <= 120779) || (ch >= 124928 && ch <= 125124) || (ch >= 126464 && ch <= 126467) || (ch >= 126469 && ch <= 126495) || ch == 126497 || ch == 126498 || ch == 126500 || ch == 126503 ||
          (ch >= 126505 && ch <= 126514) || (ch >= 126516 && ch <= 126519) || ch == 126521 || ch == 126523

          O 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            I also have the feeling you are creating amazing code! Nevertheless I don't see you have the right to advertise it in the Lounge... Every nobody else doing same will be canceled

            H Offline
            H Offline
            honey the codewitch
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I'll let Chris decide that. I think I was in bounds.

            Real programmers use butterflies

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H honey the codewitch

              I'll let Chris decide that. I think I was in bounds.

              Real programmers use butterflies

              G Offline
              G Offline
              g_p_l
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              That aint code Its sourcery

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H honey the codewitch

                Yeah, that would be a big wrong. I'm not writing unicode pattern matching code by hand, for example. I really don't want to type the following if statement:

                if((ch >= 92736 && ch <= 92766) || (ch >= 92880 && ch <= 92909) || (ch >= 92928 && ch <= 92975) || (ch >= 92992 && ch <= 92995) || (ch >= 93027 && ch <= 93047) || (ch >= 93053 && ch <= 93071) || (ch >= 93952 && ch <= 94020) || ch == 94032 || (ch >= 94099 && ch <= 94111) || ch == 110592 || ch == 110593 ||
                (ch >= 113664 && ch <= 113770) || (ch >= 113776 && ch <= 113788) || (ch >= 113792 && ch <= 113800) || (ch >= 113808 && ch <= 113817) || (ch >= 119808 && ch <= 119892) || (ch >= 119894 && ch <= 119964) || ch == 119966 || ch == 119967 || ch == 119970 || ch == 119973 || ch == 119974 || (ch >= 119977 && ch <= 119980) ||
                (ch >= 119982 && ch <= 119993) || ch == 119995 || (ch >= 119997 && ch <= 120003) || (ch >= 120005 && ch <= 120069) || (ch >= 120071 && ch <= 120074) || (ch >= 120077 && ch <= 120084) || (ch >= 120086 && ch <= 120092) || (ch >= 120094 && ch <= 120121) || (ch >= 120123 && ch <= 120126) || (ch >= 120128 && ch <= 120132) ||
                ch == 120134 || (ch >= 120138 && ch <= 120144) || (ch >= 120146 && ch <= 120485) || (ch >= 120488 && ch <= 120512) || (ch >= 120514 && ch <= 120538) || (ch >= 120540 && ch <= 120570) || (ch >= 120572 && ch <= 120596) || (ch >= 120598 && ch <= 120628) || (ch >= 120630 && ch <= 120654) || (ch >= 120656 && ch <= 120686) ||
                (ch >= 120688 && ch <= 120712) || (ch >= 120714 && ch <= 120744) || (ch >= 120746 && ch <= 120770) || (ch >= 120772 && ch <= 120779) || (ch >= 124928 && ch <= 125124) || (ch >= 126464 && ch <= 126467) || (ch >= 126469 && ch <= 126495) || ch == 126497 || ch == 126498 || ch == 126500 || ch == 126503 ||
                (ch >= 126505 && ch <= 126514) || (ch >= 126516 && ch <= 126519) || ch == 126521 || ch == 126523

                O Offline
                O Offline
                obermd
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                That code should be banned. ;P

                H 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O obermd

                  That code should be banned. ;P

                  H Offline
                  H Offline
                  honey the codewitch
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  The thing is, it's generated from regular expressions, and it's fast.

                  Real programmers use butterflies

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups