Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Wicked code

Wicked code

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comai-coding
8 Posts 5 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • honey the codewitchH Offline
    honey the codewitchH Offline
    honey the codewitch
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I love the feeling of creating amazing code. I think the appeal of it is what keeps me coding - just on the off chance that I make something really cool. I did recently. Reggie[^] is *really cool*. I have a better way of doing complicated code generation now too, which Reggie inspired by being difficult to maintain until I added that. Since the 23rd I've just been busting it out, one bit of sorcery after another. It feels good. ;)

    Real programmers use butterflies

    P L 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • honey the codewitchH honey the codewitch

      I love the feeling of creating amazing code. I think the appeal of it is what keeps me coding - just on the off chance that I make something really cool. I did recently. Reggie[^] is *really cool*. I have a better way of doing complicated code generation now too, which Reggie inspired by being difficult to maintain until I added that. Since the 23rd I've just been busting it out, one bit of sorcery after another. It feels good. ;)

      Real programmers use butterflies

      P Offline
      P Offline
      PIEBALDconsult
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      YAGNI :suss: "Cool" is not a desirable attribute in software.

      honey the codewitchH 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • honey the codewitchH honey the codewitch

        I love the feeling of creating amazing code. I think the appeal of it is what keeps me coding - just on the off chance that I make something really cool. I did recently. Reggie[^] is *really cool*. I have a better way of doing complicated code generation now too, which Reggie inspired by being difficult to maintain until I added that. Since the 23rd I've just been busting it out, one bit of sorcery after another. It feels good. ;)

        Real programmers use butterflies

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I also have the feeling you are creating amazing code! Nevertheless I don't see you have the right to advertise it in the Lounge... Every nobody else doing same will be canceled

        honey the codewitchH 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P PIEBALDconsult

          YAGNI :suss: "Cool" is not a desirable attribute in software.

          honey the codewitchH Offline
          honey the codewitchH Offline
          honey the codewitch
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Yeah, that would be a big wrong. I'm not writing unicode pattern matching code by hand, for example. I really don't want to type the following if statement:

          if((ch >= 92736 && ch <= 92766) || (ch >= 92880 && ch <= 92909) || (ch >= 92928 && ch <= 92975) || (ch >= 92992 && ch <= 92995) || (ch >= 93027 && ch <= 93047) || (ch >= 93053 && ch <= 93071) || (ch >= 93952 && ch <= 94020) || ch == 94032 || (ch >= 94099 && ch <= 94111) || ch == 110592 || ch == 110593 ||
          (ch >= 113664 && ch <= 113770) || (ch >= 113776 && ch <= 113788) || (ch >= 113792 && ch <= 113800) || (ch >= 113808 && ch <= 113817) || (ch >= 119808 && ch <= 119892) || (ch >= 119894 && ch <= 119964) || ch == 119966 || ch == 119967 || ch == 119970 || ch == 119973 || ch == 119974 || (ch >= 119977 && ch <= 119980) ||
          (ch >= 119982 && ch <= 119993) || ch == 119995 || (ch >= 119997 && ch <= 120003) || (ch >= 120005 && ch <= 120069) || (ch >= 120071 && ch <= 120074) || (ch >= 120077 && ch <= 120084) || (ch >= 120086 && ch <= 120092) || (ch >= 120094 && ch <= 120121) || (ch >= 120123 && ch <= 120126) || (ch >= 120128 && ch <= 120132) ||
          ch == 120134 || (ch >= 120138 && ch <= 120144) || (ch >= 120146 && ch <= 120485) || (ch >= 120488 && ch <= 120512) || (ch >= 120514 && ch <= 120538) || (ch >= 120540 && ch <= 120570) || (ch >= 120572 && ch <= 120596) || (ch >= 120598 && ch <= 120628) || (ch >= 120630 && ch <= 120654) || (ch >= 120656 && ch <= 120686) ||
          (ch >= 120688 && ch <= 120712) || (ch >= 120714 && ch <= 120744) || (ch >= 120746 && ch <= 120770) || (ch >= 120772 && ch <= 120779) || (ch >= 124928 && ch <= 125124) || (ch >= 126464 && ch <= 126467) || (ch >= 126469 && ch <= 126495) || ch == 126497 || ch == 126498 || ch == 126500 || ch == 126503 ||
          (ch >= 126505 && ch <= 126514) || (ch >= 126516 && ch <= 126519) || ch == 126521 || ch == 126523

          O 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            I also have the feeling you are creating amazing code! Nevertheless I don't see you have the right to advertise it in the Lounge... Every nobody else doing same will be canceled

            honey the codewitchH Offline
            honey the codewitchH Offline
            honey the codewitch
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I'll let Chris decide that. I think I was in bounds.

            Real programmers use butterflies

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • honey the codewitchH honey the codewitch

              I'll let Chris decide that. I think I was in bounds.

              Real programmers use butterflies

              G Offline
              G Offline
              g_p_l
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              That aint code Its sourcery

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • honey the codewitchH honey the codewitch

                Yeah, that would be a big wrong. I'm not writing unicode pattern matching code by hand, for example. I really don't want to type the following if statement:

                if((ch >= 92736 && ch <= 92766) || (ch >= 92880 && ch <= 92909) || (ch >= 92928 && ch <= 92975) || (ch >= 92992 && ch <= 92995) || (ch >= 93027 && ch <= 93047) || (ch >= 93053 && ch <= 93071) || (ch >= 93952 && ch <= 94020) || ch == 94032 || (ch >= 94099 && ch <= 94111) || ch == 110592 || ch == 110593 ||
                (ch >= 113664 && ch <= 113770) || (ch >= 113776 && ch <= 113788) || (ch >= 113792 && ch <= 113800) || (ch >= 113808 && ch <= 113817) || (ch >= 119808 && ch <= 119892) || (ch >= 119894 && ch <= 119964) || ch == 119966 || ch == 119967 || ch == 119970 || ch == 119973 || ch == 119974 || (ch >= 119977 && ch <= 119980) ||
                (ch >= 119982 && ch <= 119993) || ch == 119995 || (ch >= 119997 && ch <= 120003) || (ch >= 120005 && ch <= 120069) || (ch >= 120071 && ch <= 120074) || (ch >= 120077 && ch <= 120084) || (ch >= 120086 && ch <= 120092) || (ch >= 120094 && ch <= 120121) || (ch >= 120123 && ch <= 120126) || (ch >= 120128 && ch <= 120132) ||
                ch == 120134 || (ch >= 120138 && ch <= 120144) || (ch >= 120146 && ch <= 120485) || (ch >= 120488 && ch <= 120512) || (ch >= 120514 && ch <= 120538) || (ch >= 120540 && ch <= 120570) || (ch >= 120572 && ch <= 120596) || (ch >= 120598 && ch <= 120628) || (ch >= 120630 && ch <= 120654) || (ch >= 120656 && ch <= 120686) ||
                (ch >= 120688 && ch <= 120712) || (ch >= 120714 && ch <= 120744) || (ch >= 120746 && ch <= 120770) || (ch >= 120772 && ch <= 120779) || (ch >= 124928 && ch <= 125124) || (ch >= 126464 && ch <= 126467) || (ch >= 126469 && ch <= 126495) || ch == 126497 || ch == 126498 || ch == 126500 || ch == 126503 ||
                (ch >= 126505 && ch <= 126514) || (ch >= 126516 && ch <= 126519) || ch == 126521 || ch == 126523

                O Offline
                O Offline
                obermd
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                That code should be banned. ;P

                honey the codewitchH 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O obermd

                  That code should be banned. ;P

                  honey the codewitchH Offline
                  honey the codewitchH Offline
                  honey the codewitch
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  The thing is, it's generated from regular expressions, and it's fast.

                  Real programmers use butterflies

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups