Is it just me...
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
most gaming mouse have custom DPI settings. and also, windows has build-in "mouse acceleration" but not a fan of it, because it doesn't help the desktop experience much, but ruins gaming experience...
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
most gaming mouse have custom DPI settings. and also, windows has build-in "mouse acceleration" but not a fan of it, because it doesn't help the desktop experience much, but ruins gaming experience...
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
I am not much of a gamer. I still use Logitech, but my current M510 has speed and acceleration settings built in (although not DPI settings), and it isn't nearly as nice to use as my old rollerball ones used to be... :sigh: (and :cry: ) (And, if I recall correctly, they also only had acceleration and speed settings. The 'momentum' must have been the additional factor???)
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
Have you looked at changing the pointer speed? At least on Windows 10: 1. Start -> Mouse. 2. Additional mouse options. 3. Pointer options. 4. Motion. 5. Slide left/right as desired. There's also a checkbox that says Enhance Pointer precision but I can't quite see what difference it makes.
Cheers, Vikram.
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
I prefer the laser but the switches don't last long before they double click. I assume it is contact bounce but don't see a way to fix.
>64 Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.
-
I prefer the laser but the switches don't last long before they double click. I assume it is contact bounce but don't see a way to fix.
>64 Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.
theoldfool wrote:
I assume it is contact bounce but don't see a way to fix.
It's simply equipment made by the lowest bidder. The mouse button switches are rated (among other things) by the number of "clicks" they can perform. Reducing the number of clicks reduces the cost to the manufacturer. You might be able to replace the switches by buying them on fleabay, but it's probably a losing proposition - a new mouse is probably cheaper.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
no. they were bad.
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
Your memory is fine. I remember discussions about cleaning mouse balls, with different interpretations of what that meant!đŸ˜‚đŸ˜‚đŸ˜‚
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
Ah, the good old days. Sometimes they really were good.
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
I agree with you - the precision was a lot better. I also found it therapeutic to clean the mouse - if I was stuck thinking on a problem it was a great way to work on it in the background while cleaning.
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
My problem with modern mice isn't ball vs laser, but cordless vs wired. I keep getting told I had just a bad one and I should try again, but *every* cordless mouse I ever tried had this problem where, because they're so aggressively trying to conserve battery power, they're constantly trying to go to sleep, so if I'm in the middle of trying to do some precision selection, it'll go to sleep mode and I have to give it a jerk to wake it up...but in doing that, the pointer is now at the other end of the screen. Wired FTW. The same with network connections. I despise Wi-Fi.
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
I used an old rollerball mouse a few weeks ago when my optical gave out. While the optical had no issues panning across 3 monitors, the rollerball required effectively "multiple mouse pads". No matter what I tried (acceleration, etc.), it seemed to think my desktops were only 15 inches when they were at least 27.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
Your memory is bad. Or rather, you're mixing up two things here, namely the quality of the sensor (which, for ball mice, is shit) and the tooling around it. Optical mice are precise, ball mice aren't. Even without lint getting in the rollers (have fun pretending to prevent that), the mechanics ain't precise in the slightest. But that's what not what you're talking about. You're talking about settings kicking in after reading the sensor, before the results get translated to cursor movements. It seems, you're fond of mouse acceleration. I don't judge here, not everyone of us has to be a gamer. However, there's absolutely nothing preventing you from enabling mouse acceleration with a modern mouse. It's not the mouse that does this, it's the software! Windows got a mouse acceleration setting (albeit labeled somewhat awkwardly) right in the mouse control panel. So enable acceleration there and enjoy what you're used to with a modern mouse.
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
-
most gaming mouse have custom DPI settings. and also, windows has build-in "mouse acceleration" but not a fan of it, because it doesn't help the desktop experience much, but ruins gaming experience...
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
For graphic editing (Photoshop etc) I use a gaming mouse where I can, at the tap of a button, make it's movements very sluggish for those fiddly bits. Likewise when I need to drag mouse from screen 5 to screen 1, it is nice to have the mouse pointer travel at light speed.
Nothing succeeds like a budgie without teeth.
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
I somehow prefer the worst of both worlds, trackballs, they have a ball that gets dirty and are laser tracked :cool:
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
I don't know if perhaps you just haven't used a _really good_ modern mouse. There are plenty of cheap ones out there. You mention buying Logitech throughout the years, so I'd imagine good mice - tho even Logitech can make some cheaper ones. For example, even my M720 isn't "amazing" - it's just convenient because it can pair with 3 things and can do dongle or BT. But if I compare that with my SteelSeries Aerox - all the things you're talking about missing, with precision and so on - it's all there, but no cord to get in the way. Admittedly, because it's designed to be an uber-light mouse, the battery isn't huge, so I have to charge at least once a week (gaming at max dpi & max refresh (1000Hz) smashed the battery), but it is only 66g - if a bigger battery brought that up to even 120g, that would be lighter than a ball mouse and (imo) way better. I'd also traditionally been a Logitech guy - MX1000 (x2), MX1100, ergo trackball (wanted to try it out), M720 - but I haven't ever bought a gaming mouse from them, so perhaps their gaming line is equally good. I've definitely heard good things about them.
------------------------------------------------ If you say that getting the money is the most important thing You will spend your life completely wasting your time You will be doing things you don't like doing In order to go on living That is, to go on doing things you don't like doing Which is stupid. - Alan Watts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gXTZM\_uPMY
-
I am not much of a gamer. I still use Logitech, but my current M510 has speed and acceleration settings built in (although not DPI settings), and it isn't nearly as nice to use as my old rollerball ones used to be... :sigh: (and :cry: ) (And, if I recall correctly, they also only had acceleration and speed settings. The 'momentum' must have been the additional factor???)
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
It might just be that the build quality of Logitech mice has become worse. I used to own a G5, first generation laser mouse, and it was perfect. Then I broke it, and bought a second generation one, G500 rebrand. The build quality was noticeably worse, but still OK. Then it broke on me, and I bought a third generation one, G510 rebrand. This time. the wire was made from a very cheap material, it had swappable weights as a gimmick, and it practically disintegrated on it's own within 5 months. After that, I noticed that SteelSeries did a cheap nock-off version of the G5, so I moved on to the Rival 300 and I've been using that one ever since. I recently looked into buying a second Rival 300 for the office, but they discontinued the entire line, in favor of more gimmicks, overall lower build quality.. at double the price. And their latest drivers have ads, and break macro support entirely. To me, it seems like every peripheral company likes to release strong products initially, but will then cut costs aggressively for all subsequent generations. As a result, my next mouse will probably be a non-descript Chinese brand, that can present a compelling bill-of-materials and a friendly customer service by means of auto-translated responses. It might read bad on paper, but at least China is giving me quality at an agreeable price point. Logitech nowadays is like buying sub-par quality and gimmicks at a premium price point, or garbage quality at an economic price point. Neither option compels me.
-
It might just be that the build quality of Logitech mice has become worse. I used to own a G5, first generation laser mouse, and it was perfect. Then I broke it, and bought a second generation one, G500 rebrand. The build quality was noticeably worse, but still OK. Then it broke on me, and I bought a third generation one, G510 rebrand. This time. the wire was made from a very cheap material, it had swappable weights as a gimmick, and it practically disintegrated on it's own within 5 months. After that, I noticed that SteelSeries did a cheap nock-off version of the G5, so I moved on to the Rival 300 and I've been using that one ever since. I recently looked into buying a second Rival 300 for the office, but they discontinued the entire line, in favor of more gimmicks, overall lower build quality.. at double the price. And their latest drivers have ads, and break macro support entirely. To me, it seems like every peripheral company likes to release strong products initially, but will then cut costs aggressively for all subsequent generations. As a result, my next mouse will probably be a non-descript Chinese brand, that can present a compelling bill-of-materials and a friendly customer service by means of auto-translated responses. It might read bad on paper, but at least China is giving me quality at an agreeable price point. Logitech nowadays is like buying sub-par quality and gimmicks at a premium price point, or garbage quality at an economic price point. Neither option compels me.
-
My problem with modern mice isn't ball vs laser, but cordless vs wired. I keep getting told I had just a bad one and I should try again, but *every* cordless mouse I ever tried had this problem where, because they're so aggressively trying to conserve battery power, they're constantly trying to go to sleep, so if I'm in the middle of trying to do some precision selection, it'll go to sleep mode and I have to give it a jerk to wake it up...but in doing that, the pointer is now at the other end of the screen. Wired FTW. The same with network connections. I despise Wi-Fi.
-
Or were old rollerball mice (where the ball was under the mouse) far better, in a way, than modern laser mice? I remember long ago I could set mouse acceleration and speed so the mouse was far more responsive and intuitive than modern laser mice, or at least the mice I have had. Small, short movements, resulted in small, precise screen movements, whereas larger movements resulted in larger screen movements, but slowing down quickly brought back precision. I have been using Logitech almost exclusively throughout the years, and those old memories haunt me, reminding me of older, better times, when our world wasn't split along the divides it is now. On the other hand, I remember having to clean them regularly... Is my memory going bad? I would go back to those old mouse memories in spite of the cleaning problems, if it gave me back the precision I remember...
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
What we need is expo (exponential) like on RC airplane transmitters. You can set the rate, total throw, and a dead zone. Most importantly you can make the acceleration increase as the movement gets further from the center and adjust the rate of the expo to your liking. Gives you great fine control at first, then lots of throw when things start to go horribly wrong.