Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. "Will Open Source Lose the Battle for the Web?"

"Will Open Source Lose the Battle for the Web?"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmlwcfcomarchitecturequestion
22 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    Paul Watson
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Just thought this was a good article on how the Open Source community needs to wake up and get real. Summary: This article argues that the shift towards Web services has reduced the attractiveness of the current generation of Open Source Web products. The only solution is for Open Source to adopt a Web services architecture, and fast. Fortunately, there is one at hand, and it's not dotGNU! Can the Open Sourcers wake up and save the world before it is too late? Read on to find out. Bottom line IMHO? : Open Source needs to realise that they cannot ride on Good Intentions much longer and that the real, rather insidious, world is actually important. regards, Paul Watson Cape Town, South Africa e: paulmwatson@email.com w: vergen.org

    T realJSOPR T S 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • P Paul Watson

      Just thought this was a good article on how the Open Source community needs to wake up and get real. Summary: This article argues that the shift towards Web services has reduced the attractiveness of the current generation of Open Source Web products. The only solution is for Open Source to adopt a Web services architecture, and fast. Fortunately, there is one at hand, and it's not dotGNU! Can the Open Sourcers wake up and save the world before it is too late? Read on to find out. Bottom line IMHO? : Open Source needs to realise that they cannot ride on Good Intentions much longer and that the real, rather insidious, world is actually important. regards, Paul Watson Cape Town, South Africa e: paulmwatson@email.com w: vergen.org

      T Offline
      T Offline
      Tim Smith
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      To a degree, we are all open source supporters here. I have been reading a set of very interesting papers from OpenSource people talking about taking a real look at OpenSource without 'rose colored glasses'. The papers have impressed me in that they do point out all the problems while still supporting the movement. When I get home, I will post the URL. It was refreshing to read this stuff. Gave me new faith in the realistic capabilities of OpenSource. Tim Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Paul Watson

        Just thought this was a good article on how the Open Source community needs to wake up and get real. Summary: This article argues that the shift towards Web services has reduced the attractiveness of the current generation of Open Source Web products. The only solution is for Open Source to adopt a Web services architecture, and fast. Fortunately, there is one at hand, and it's not dotGNU! Can the Open Sourcers wake up and save the world before it is too late? Read on to find out. Bottom line IMHO? : Open Source needs to realise that they cannot ride on Good Intentions much longer and that the real, rather insidious, world is actually important. regards, Paul Watson Cape Town, South Africa e: paulmwatson@email.com w: vergen.org

        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOP
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        The fact that MS wants to control the internet (and access to it) is obvious. We're all getting dangerously close to not being able to effectively use the net unless we have the latest version of Windows on our machines. That makes me quite uncomfortable.

        T A 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • realJSOPR realJSOP

          The fact that MS wants to control the internet (and access to it) is obvious. We're all getting dangerously close to not being able to effectively use the net unless we have the latest version of Windows on our machines. That makes me quite uncomfortable.

          T Offline
          T Offline
          Tim Smith
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          FUD Anytime one group (Apache) has dominance, we are at their mercy. Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Tim Smith

            To a degree, we are all open source supporters here. I have been reading a set of very interesting papers from OpenSource people talking about taking a real look at OpenSource without 'rose colored glasses'. The papers have impressed me in that they do point out all the problems while still supporting the movement. When I get home, I will post the URL. It was refreshing to read this stuff. Gave me new faith in the realistic capabilities of OpenSource. Tim Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Paul Watson
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            ..."rose colored glasses"... is exactly right. "To a degree, we are all open source supporters here."... I think deep down we all really want it this way, some of us just want others to realise that we have to be virtuos AND practical. Charity and goodwill only go so far. ..."they do point out all the problems while still supporting the movement"... the movement is still relatively young (though age does not guarantee peace ;) ) and I hope that it goes from strength to strength. Can't wait for that URL, interesting stuff :) regards, Paul Watson Cape Town, South Africa e: paulmwatson@email.com w: vergen.org

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • realJSOPR realJSOP

              The fact that MS wants to control the internet (and access to it) is obvious. We're all getting dangerously close to not being able to effectively use the net unless we have the latest version of Windows on our machines. That makes me quite uncomfortable.

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Andrew Peace
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              We're all getting dangerously close to not being able to effectively use the net unless we have the latest version of Windows on our machines. Yes, but that's not Microsoft's fault. The reason for this is because their Internet browsing software is far superior, and nobody else is challenging it (I mean, Netscape 6 is a joke). It's like saying "Oh, I don't like Keloggs because they have too much control over the cereal market", but the truth is, the reason they have this control is because they make cereals better than anyone else. Bad analagy I know but I couldn't think of anything else at the time. > Andrew     "Do you like my mask, it raises the dead...!"     -- Buffy (season 3, Giles)

              D realJSOPR 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • P Paul Watson

                Just thought this was a good article on how the Open Source community needs to wake up and get real. Summary: This article argues that the shift towards Web services has reduced the attractiveness of the current generation of Open Source Web products. The only solution is for Open Source to adopt a Web services architecture, and fast. Fortunately, there is one at hand, and it's not dotGNU! Can the Open Sourcers wake up and save the world before it is too late? Read on to find out. Bottom line IMHO? : Open Source needs to realise that they cannot ride on Good Intentions much longer and that the real, rather insidious, world is actually important. regards, Paul Watson Cape Town, South Africa e: paulmwatson@email.com w: vergen.org

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Tomasz Sowinski
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Author describes himself as "a devout follower of the pro-humanity Java-Linux religion". Sometimes I think they're taking it too seriously ;) Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Andrew Peace

                  We're all getting dangerously close to not being able to effectively use the net unless we have the latest version of Windows on our machines. Yes, but that's not Microsoft's fault. The reason for this is because their Internet browsing software is far superior, and nobody else is challenging it (I mean, Netscape 6 is a joke). It's like saying "Oh, I don't like Keloggs because they have too much control over the cereal market", but the truth is, the reason they have this control is because they make cereals better than anyone else. Bad analagy I know but I couldn't think of anything else at the time. > Andrew     "Do you like my mask, it raises the dead...!"     -- Buffy (season 3, Giles)

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  David Wulff
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I think your analogy was quite a good one, actually. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Paul Watson

                    Just thought this was a good article on how the Open Source community needs to wake up and get real. Summary: This article argues that the shift towards Web services has reduced the attractiveness of the current generation of Open Source Web products. The only solution is for Open Source to adopt a Web services architecture, and fast. Fortunately, there is one at hand, and it's not dotGNU! Can the Open Sourcers wake up and save the world before it is too late? Read on to find out. Bottom line IMHO? : Open Source needs to realise that they cannot ride on Good Intentions much longer and that the real, rather insidious, world is actually important. regards, Paul Watson Cape Town, South Africa e: paulmwatson@email.com w: vergen.org

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Serge Weinstock
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    The author of this article criticize Apache without knowing what he's talking about. Apache has a lot evolved since two years. It has already support for SOAP => SOAP == Web Services. Have a look at xml.apache.org Have also a look at XMethods (that's the only web service directory which show the kind of HTTP server), you wil that there is already a lot of web services loacted on Appach servers... Serge

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Andrew Peace

                      We're all getting dangerously close to not being able to effectively use the net unless we have the latest version of Windows on our machines. Yes, but that's not Microsoft's fault. The reason for this is because their Internet browsing software is far superior, and nobody else is challenging it (I mean, Netscape 6 is a joke). It's like saying "Oh, I don't like Keloggs because they have too much control over the cereal market", but the truth is, the reason they have this control is because they make cereals better than anyone else. Bad analagy I know but I couldn't think of anything else at the time. > Andrew     "Do you like my mask, it raises the dead...!"     -- Buffy (season 3, Giles)

                      realJSOPR Offline
                      realJSOPR Offline
                      realJSOP
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      I'm not talking about browsers or email clients or any of the top-level stuff. I'm talking about the underlying protocols and proprietary technologies. If you think they're going to willingly help Linux/Unix into the .NET arena, you're crazy. They already don't readily support Java, and the latest version of MSIE doesn't support netscape style plug-ins. Where do you think all of this is going?

                      T T A D 4 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • realJSOPR realJSOP

                        I'm not talking about browsers or email clients or any of the top-level stuff. I'm talking about the underlying protocols and proprietary technologies. If you think they're going to willingly help Linux/Unix into the .NET arena, you're crazy. They already don't readily support Java, and the latest version of MSIE doesn't support netscape style plug-ins. Where do you think all of this is going?

                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        Tim Smith
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Whos fault is that? Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • realJSOPR realJSOP

                          I'm not talking about browsers or email clients or any of the top-level stuff. I'm talking about the underlying protocols and proprietary technologies. If you think they're going to willingly help Linux/Unix into the .NET arena, you're crazy. They already don't readily support Java, and the latest version of MSIE doesn't support netscape style plug-ins. Where do you think all of this is going?

                          T Offline
                          T Offline
                          Tomasz Sowinski
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Where do you think all of this is going? It is said that IE 7 will display subliminal messages. Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • realJSOPR realJSOP

                            I'm not talking about browsers or email clients or any of the top-level stuff. I'm talking about the underlying protocols and proprietary technologies. If you think they're going to willingly help Linux/Unix into the .NET arena, you're crazy. They already don't readily support Java, and the latest version of MSIE doesn't support netscape style plug-ins. Where do you think all of this is going?

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Andrew Peace
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Several points to consider really. I don't expect them to write .NET libraries for Linux themselves but why should they? However, they are making all the standards open so they aren't stopping anyone else from doing so. In fact, I seem to remember coming across a group who'd already started doing such a thing. Secondly, if there are no competitors that doesn't mean that they should stop trying to advance their technology. Many people seemed to think that they should've waited for the competition to catch up when it came to the browser wars - how riduculous is that? Thirdly - I hated Java to be frank - at least in terms of usage when downloading from the Internet. As a 56K dial-up modem user, I had to wait ages for applets to download. Most of the time I just couldn't be bothered. Maybe removing support for Newtscape style plugins is a bit of a tactical move, but it's not out of their bounds. I don't mean to make Microsoft completely innocent of ANY crimes, but I just think that people are way too quick to judge. > Andrew     "Do you like my mask, it raises the dead...!"     -- Buffy (season 3, Giles)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • realJSOPR realJSOP

                              I'm not talking about browsers or email clients or any of the top-level stuff. I'm talking about the underlying protocols and proprietary technologies. If you think they're going to willingly help Linux/Unix into the .NET arena, you're crazy. They already don't readily support Java, and the latest version of MSIE doesn't support netscape style plug-ins. Where do you think all of this is going?

                              D Offline
                              D Offline
                              David Wulff
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              If you think they're going to willingly help Linux/Unix into the .NET arena, you're crazy Microsoft are jointly developing the .NET runtime for BeOs. That may not be based on Unix, but it is a non-MS OS. Besides which, they don't need to as others have already picked up the ball with regard to Linux. They already don't readily support Java So? I have net yet seen one legitimate use of java in an internet browser that could'nt be acheived with an animated GIF file. Okay, there are some client-side uses, and certainly server-side, but .NET would also be a solution in those areas, as are a whole host of currently released technologies and platforms. the latest version of MSIE doesn't support netscape style plug-ins The sooner the world get's over Netscape, the better. More and more often nowadays you find people - even expereinced computer users - asking "What's Netscape?". It had it's day, just like the monarchy, but now we should just move on and forget about it. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com

                              J M C 3 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • D David Wulff

                                If you think they're going to willingly help Linux/Unix into the .NET arena, you're crazy Microsoft are jointly developing the .NET runtime for BeOs. That may not be based on Unix, but it is a non-MS OS. Besides which, they don't need to as others have already picked up the ball with regard to Linux. They already don't readily support Java So? I have net yet seen one legitimate use of java in an internet browser that could'nt be acheived with an animated GIF file. Okay, there are some client-side uses, and certainly server-side, but .NET would also be a solution in those areas, as are a whole host of currently released technologies and platforms. the latest version of MSIE doesn't support netscape style plug-ins The sooner the world get's over Netscape, the better. More and more often nowadays you find people - even expereinced computer users - asking "What's Netscape?". It had it's day, just like the monarchy, but now we should just move on and forget about it. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jim A Johnson
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                > Microsoft are (sic) jointly developing the .NET runtime for BeOs. What could be less relevant than BeOS? Amiga? Both are dead.

                                D C 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • D David Wulff

                                  If you think they're going to willingly help Linux/Unix into the .NET arena, you're crazy Microsoft are jointly developing the .NET runtime for BeOs. That may not be based on Unix, but it is a non-MS OS. Besides which, they don't need to as others have already picked up the ball with regard to Linux. They already don't readily support Java So? I have net yet seen one legitimate use of java in an internet browser that could'nt be acheived with an animated GIF file. Okay, there are some client-side uses, and certainly server-side, but .NET would also be a solution in those areas, as are a whole host of currently released technologies and platforms. the latest version of MSIE doesn't support netscape style plug-ins The sooner the world get's over Netscape, the better. More and more often nowadays you find people - even expereinced computer users - asking "What's Netscape?". It had it's day, just like the monarchy, but now we should just move on and forget about it. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mike Burston
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  >>... just like the monarchy, ... Her royal highness is not amused. Please do not associate the House Of Windsor with Netscape and/or Java. "Phillip, release the corgies ..." "On the tenth day, god and Bon Jovi settled out of court."

                                  D P 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J Jim A Johnson

                                    > Microsoft are (sic) jointly developing the .NET runtime for BeOs. What could be less relevant than BeOS? Amiga? Both are dead.

                                    D Offline
                                    D Offline
                                    David Wulff
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    That wasn't the point I was trying to make, I was merely pointing out that they are helping devlopment on other platforms. The issue as stake was specifically regarding linux/unix and I jsut used BeOs as a run-in to my answer. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Mike Burston

                                      >>... just like the monarchy, ... Her royal highness is not amused. Please do not associate the House Of Windsor with Netscape and/or Java. "Phillip, release the corgies ..." "On the tenth day, god and Bon Jovi settled out of court."

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      David Wulff
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      I didn't say which monarchy now did I? David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J Jim A Johnson

                                        > Microsoft are (sic) jointly developing the .NET runtime for BeOs. What could be less relevant than BeOS? Amiga? Both are dead.

                                        C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        Christian Graus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Hey - don't knock the Amiga !! Actually I suspect the Amiga has MORE life than BeOS, it at least has zealots who support it without thought or reason. Never met a BeOS user, let alone zealot. Christian As I learn the innermost secrets of the around me, they reward me in many ways to keep quiet. Men with pierced ears are better prepared for marriage. They've experienced pain and bought Jewellery.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • D David Wulff

                                          If you think they're going to willingly help Linux/Unix into the .NET arena, you're crazy Microsoft are jointly developing the .NET runtime for BeOs. That may not be based on Unix, but it is a non-MS OS. Besides which, they don't need to as others have already picked up the ball with regard to Linux. They already don't readily support Java So? I have net yet seen one legitimate use of java in an internet browser that could'nt be acheived with an animated GIF file. Okay, there are some client-side uses, and certainly server-side, but .NET would also be a solution in those areas, as are a whole host of currently released technologies and platforms. the latest version of MSIE doesn't support netscape style plug-ins The sooner the world get's over Netscape, the better. More and more often nowadays you find people - even expereinced computer users - asking "What's Netscape?". It had it's day, just like the monarchy, but now we should just move on and forget about it. David Wulff dwulff@battleaxesoftware.com

                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          Christian Graus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          If you think they're going to willingly help Linux/Unix into the .NET arena, you're crazy Microsoft are jointly developing the .NET runtime for BeOs. That may not be based on Unix, but it is a non-MS OS. Besides which, they don't need to as others have already picked up the ball with regard to Linux. The beauty of this is, M$ can CLAIM to have written .NET for BeOS, and who's gonna know if they did or not ? Have you ever met anyone who runs BeOS ? They already don't readily support Java So? I have net yet seen one legitimate use of java in an internet browser that could'nt be acheived with an animated GIF file. Okay, there are some client-side uses, and certainly server-side, but .NET would also be a solution in those areas, as are a whole host of currently released technologies and platforms. Really ? You've not lived until you've visited a virtual arcade - 80's video games like Donkey Kong and Asteroids as Java Applets. the latest version of MSIE doesn't support netscape style plug-ins The sooner the world get's over Netscape, the better. More and more often nowadays you find people - even expereinced computer users - asking "What's Netscape?". It had it's day, just like the monarchy, but now we should just move on and forget about it. On this I agree. As a former Netscape fan I must admit they dropped the ball long ago. Christian As I learn the innermost secrets of the around me, they reward me in many ways to keep quiet. Men with pierced ears are better prepared for marriage. They've experienced pain and bought Jewellery.

                                          D 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups