Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. George Boole's Writings

George Boole's Writings

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questiondiscussion
16 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P PIEBALDconsult

    !I

    R Offline
    R Offline
    raddevus
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Succinct

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P PIEBALDconsult

      !I

      Mike HankeyM Offline
      Mike HankeyM Offline
      Mike Hankey
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      PIEBALDconsult wrote:

      !I

      !(1 || 2)

      PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer is finally available for download. JaxCoder.com

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P PIEBALDconsult

        !I

        J Offline
        J Offline
        jmaida
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        !&

        "A little time, a little trouble, your better day" Badfinger

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C C P User 3

          Has anyone here personally read either of these works ? I welcome opinions on them. I'm trying to learn how George Boole was thinking about these things when he wrote the stuff from scratch --- First one is Three Hundred And Forty Four pages... An Investigation of the Laws of Thought by George Boole --- Second one is One Hundred And One pages The Mathematical Analysis of Logic by George Boole

          J Offline
          J Offline
          jmaida
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          No I not have read these books. A little too much homework right now.

          "A little time, a little trouble, your better day" Badfinger

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C C P User 3

            Has anyone here personally read either of these works ? I welcome opinions on them. I'm trying to learn how George Boole was thinking about these things when he wrote the stuff from scratch --- First one is Three Hundred And Forty Four pages... An Investigation of the Laws of Thought by George Boole --- Second one is One Hundred And One pages The Mathematical Analysis of Logic by George Boole

            M Offline
            M Offline
            megaadam
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            To be, or not to be Doesn't get more Boolean than that :suss:

            "If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"

            T K C 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • C C P User 3

              Has anyone here personally read either of these works ? I welcome opinions on them. I'm trying to learn how George Boole was thinking about these things when he wrote the stuff from scratch --- First one is Three Hundred And Forty Four pages... An Investigation of the Laws of Thought by George Boole --- Second one is One Hundred And One pages The Mathematical Analysis of Logic by George Boole

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Rick York
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              I bet there was quite a conundrum when the C++ committee decided to add a type named after him and then they had to decide to spell his name wrong. I guess that extra 'e' was just not concise enough.

              "They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"

              P G 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • R Rick York

                I bet there was quite a conundrum when the C++ committee decided to add a type named after him and then they had to decide to spell his name wrong. I guess that extra 'e' was just not concise enough.

                "They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Peter_in_2780
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Huh? What is this georg of which you speak? ;P

                Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M megaadam

                  To be, or not to be Doesn't get more Boolean than that :suss:

                  "If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  trønderen
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  true

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Peter_in_2780

                    Huh? What is this georg of which you speak? ;P

                    Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Daniel Pfeffer
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    GEOgraphic ReGion It's part of C's localization library.

                    Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Rick York

                      I bet there was quite a conundrum when the C++ committee decided to add a type named after him and then they had to decide to spell his name wrong. I guess that extra 'e' was just not concise enough.

                      "They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      giulicard
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Rick York wrote:

                      I guess that extra 'e' was just not concise enough

                      Same as volts for Alessandro Volta. Alessandro Volta - Wikipedia[^]

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R raddevus

                        Succinct

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        SteakhouseLuke
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        suck WHAT?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M megaadam

                          To be, or not to be Doesn't get more Boolean than that :suss:

                          "If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          Keefer S
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          The salutation that's been on my work emails for years now: “The Ultimate Question: 2b | !2b?”

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C C P User 3

                            Has anyone here personally read either of these works ? I welcome opinions on them. I'm trying to learn how George Boole was thinking about these things when he wrote the stuff from scratch --- First one is Three Hundred And Forty Four pages... An Investigation of the Laws of Thought by George Boole --- Second one is One Hundred And One pages The Mathematical Analysis of Logic by George Boole

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            John Godin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Thank you for this post!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M megaadam

                              To be, or not to be Doesn't get more Boolean than that :suss:

                              "If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              C P User 3
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              megaadam wrote:

                              To be, or not to be

                              That's a negative attitude

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups