Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. We have a contender to exceed Microsoft's stupidity... and it is....

We have a contender to exceed Microsoft's stupidity... and it is....

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
58 Posts 39 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C charlieg

    HP. Yes Hewlett Packard who has decided you cannot using what you just bought without an online account _and_ an internet connection. Imagine - you need to scan a document. The laptop is 10' away from the printer. I have to login to an account to be able to scan. wtf? And their s/w is absolutely terrible. They call it HP Smart but it's really HP dumb, clearly designed by a bunch of monkeys beating on keyboards with bananas. Apologies to monkeys everywhere. I should not drag them down to HP's level.

    Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

    M Offline
    M Offline
    maze3
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    Printers first be like 90s, i got a personal printer at home. oh no, my computer does not have that specific port 😞 early 2000s, USB printer 😲, nice, plug and noooo, driver not work, install this, and download this, and then maybe. win 7 2000s, USB printer that drivers just work 🫡 win 8, nah just kidding. 2000-2010s - wifi printer 😲, and find and connect to printer on network without fuss win 10 - ha ha, you thought things just going to work. also we change the find printer menu to match the UI of rest of Windows, not necessary making UI intuitive late 2010s, internet enabled printer. 😲 make print so easy 2020, in a cold cold bunker, the 3 only printer companies (all others subsidiaries of them), realise they can remotely commander printers, thus course correcting the annoyance by the leak of printer ink not actually low

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C charlieg

      HP. Yes Hewlett Packard who has decided you cannot using what you just bought without an online account _and_ an internet connection. Imagine - you need to scan a document. The laptop is 10' away from the printer. I have to login to an account to be able to scan. wtf? And their s/w is absolutely terrible. They call it HP Smart but it's really HP dumb, clearly designed by a bunch of monkeys beating on keyboards with bananas. Apologies to monkeys everywhere. I should not drag them down to HP's level.

      Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

      P Offline
      P Offline
      PSU Steve
      wrote on last edited by
      #34

      I work for the US Air Force and we've had HP printers as long as I can remember (20+ years). It'll be interesting to see what the govt ends up doing because we have a LOT of printers that are on classified networks that obviously have no Internet access. It always amazes me when companies make decisions like this that they just have to know is going to alienate them from many of their customers. Baffling...

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C charlieg

        Oh man, I get you. Here in America, most of the houses could have been designed by 5 yos. Whatever you can slap together in 30 days, and if we slide enough cash to the "inspectors"... My biggest beef is that there are no real range vents. If the vent over the stove sends the air back into the kitchen, it's a joke. So, when we decided to redo the kitchen, there were two non-negotiables. I wanted a gas range and I wanted a REAL range vent. I paid for both. And we are foodies, sorry, electric/induction is cute but it just does not cut it. But about your stove. Why the heck would a gas stove need to have electricity (looking at mine now)? Sure it has electronic ignition, but :) wait one...... well crap, I need to go turn off a breaker - I'll have to test it later. The only reason we have electronic ignition is to avoid pilot lights. But seriously, friends shaming you for cooking on gas? Stop feeding them. ;P tell them the induction part is broken.

        Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

        S Offline
        S Offline
        snorkie
        wrote on last edited by
        #35

        I rented a house over Thanksgiving and cooked with gas for the first time. Actually hated it. While it responds quickly to temperature changes, it was always slow/questionable to light with the electric clicker and never really seemed to get as hot as my electric at home. I'll keep my electric stove. I also have an external vent over my stove that I wouldn't go without!

        Hogan

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C charlieg

          HP. Yes Hewlett Packard who has decided you cannot using what you just bought without an online account _and_ an internet connection. Imagine - you need to scan a document. The laptop is 10' away from the printer. I have to login to an account to be able to scan. wtf? And their s/w is absolutely terrible. They call it HP Smart but it's really HP dumb, clearly designed by a bunch of monkeys beating on keyboards with bananas. Apologies to monkeys everywhere. I should not drag them down to HP's level.

          Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Member 9167057
          wrote on last edited by
          #36

          That's not new. Smart doorlocks failing because of an internet outage ain't even news anymore. The HP one is harmless by comparison.

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C charlieg

            I'm okay if they want to change their business model, etc. What I am not okay with is when the printer won't print. And it does not tell you why. And the software doesn't tell you why. Or they make a trivial process harder than it needs to be. It's like Windows 11 and Microsoft's rape of the menus and what not. They *say* it was for a better user experience, but I challenge anyone from MS to justify it. Now I read that one of the later updates reduces file transfer performance by 40%. Huh? HOW DO YOU BREAK THAT? :)

            Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

            T Offline
            T Offline
            TNCaver
            wrote on last edited by
            #37

            charlieg wrote:

            Now I read that one of the later updates reduces file transfer performance by 40%.

            They accomplished that with the release of Windows 7, IIRC, and never fixed it in any subsequent version.

            If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C charlieg

              HP. Yes Hewlett Packard who has decided you cannot using what you just bought without an online account _and_ an internet connection. Imagine - you need to scan a document. The laptop is 10' away from the printer. I have to login to an account to be able to scan. wtf? And their s/w is absolutely terrible. They call it HP Smart but it's really HP dumb, clearly designed by a bunch of monkeys beating on keyboards with bananas. Apologies to monkeys everywhere. I should not drag them down to HP's level.

              Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Dan Neely
              wrote on last edited by
              #38

              All you need to know about HPs crapware stack is that at one point it was bigger than the OS it infected. Rumor is that they were really :elephant:ing mad when microsoft's Vista team outbloated them in '06.

              Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius

              F 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P PSU Steve

                I work for the US Air Force and we've had HP printers as long as I can remember (20+ years). It'll be interesting to see what the govt ends up doing because we have a LOT of printers that are on classified networks that obviously have no Internet access. It always amazes me when companies make decisions like this that they just have to know is going to alienate them from many of their customers. Baffling...

                C Offline
                C Offline
                charlieg
                wrote on last edited by
                #39

                You can buy a non-internet printer from HP. It's just twice the price clearly pointing at small office. The internet required ones tend to be the cheap versions.

                Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Member 9167057

                  That's not new. Smart doorlocks failing because of an internet outage ain't even news anymore. The HP one is harmless by comparison.

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  charlieg
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #40

                  Failed as in would not unlock? I know it's almost semantics, but the printer is not failing. It disables itself until it can phone home.

                  Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C charlieg

                    Failed as in would not unlock? I know it's almost semantics, but the printer is not failing. It disables itself until it can phone home.

                    Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Member 9167057
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #41

                    I consider a lock failed if it doesn't let me bloody in (and apparently, safety overrides weren't in place) and yup, that's what happened.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K Kate X257

                      I just scanned a document without creating an account or logging in, using HP Smart, to verify this. And as I expected, you don't have to create an account, you can cancel out of it and still scan documents. It just looks like you need to create an account, but you technically don't have to agree with that. After that, it doesn't prompt you again, as far as I can tell.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      charlieg
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #42

                      model #?

                      Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Dan Neely

                        All you need to know about HPs crapware stack is that at one point it was bigger than the OS it infected. Rumor is that they were really :elephant:ing mad when microsoft's Vista team outbloated them in '06.

                        Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius

                        F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgs1963
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #43

                        Dan Neely wrote:

                        All you need to know about HPs crapware stack is that at one point it was bigger than the OS it infected.

                        Yep. I "experienced" that personally. Well... semi-personally. Years ago, my sister-in-law (against my advice) bought a cheap HP laptop on black Friday. Out of the box she complained about how slow it was. Begged me to "fix" it on Christmas day while at the in-laws. It took me several hours but the result was a decently fast, lean machine. A week later she called HP support because she couldn't get a USB printer to work. They had her insert the system DVD to run some app and it re-installed the whole bloody mess (and still didn't fix the printer issue). This time I had her bring me the laptop, printer and DVD. In my leisure, over the next week I de-crapified the laptop (again), got the printer to work and threw away the DVD :laugh:. It ran fine for about 4 years before one of her kids poured Kool-Aid into it and let the smoke out. I considered that a merciful death.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C charlieg

                          HP. Yes Hewlett Packard who has decided you cannot using what you just bought without an online account _and_ an internet connection. Imagine - you need to scan a document. The laptop is 10' away from the printer. I have to login to an account to be able to scan. wtf? And their s/w is absolutely terrible. They call it HP Smart but it's really HP dumb, clearly designed by a bunch of monkeys beating on keyboards with bananas. Apologies to monkeys everywhere. I should not drag them down to HP's level.

                          Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Member 4603457
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #44

                          You have to take an historical average. In the ‘70s, I bought an HP 10c calculator. I was so enamored of RPN that I bought another so I could carry one in my briefcase (we used those, too). I do not remember if I ever had to even change the batteries except once when I was fiddling with it and dropped one of the buttons under my desk. I still use both of them, even for *date* calculations. And then there is the CP2025 laser I bought in 2008, which has never even jammed. HP is just making up for accidentally making unprofitably reliable things for years.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C charlieg

                            HP. Yes Hewlett Packard who has decided you cannot using what you just bought without an online account _and_ an internet connection. Imagine - you need to scan a document. The laptop is 10' away from the printer. I have to login to an account to be able to scan. wtf? And their s/w is absolutely terrible. They call it HP Smart but it's really HP dumb, clearly designed by a bunch of monkeys beating on keyboards with bananas. Apologies to monkeys everywhere. I should not drag them down to HP's level.

                            Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Steve Naidamast
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #45

                            I only use Cannon printers and with one exception, in all these years have had no issues with them. They just work and last... Since Carly Fiorina destroyed HP, I never considered their equipment...

                            Steve Naidamast Sr. Software Engineer Black Falcon Software, Inc. blackfalconsoftware@outlook.com

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S snorkie

                              I rented a house over Thanksgiving and cooked with gas for the first time. Actually hated it. While it responds quickly to temperature changes, it was always slow/questionable to light with the electric clicker and never really seemed to get as hot as my electric at home. I'll keep my electric stove. I also have an external vent over my stove that I wouldn't go without!

                              Hogan

                              T Offline
                              T Offline
                              trønderen
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #46

                              When shopping for a gas stove, I too noticed that a great deal of them are significantly lower power that I am used to from electric stoves, which are typically 2000W, the smaller ones 1500W. Typical gas stoves are 1200-1500W, some down to 1000W. So I specifically looked for a high-powered one. The one I settled on has burners of 1900W and 2800W. You are right: Most gas burners are lower effect than modern electrical cooking tops. I don't know why, except that in my childhood, typical electrical stoves were 1000 / 1200 / 1500W. Around here 2000W became the standard maybe 45-50 years ago. Maybe the typical gas stove customer never experienced the convenience of having high power available when you need it.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S steve tabler

                                At one house I had, with it's shiny new appliances, I looked into getting a gas range instead of the white electric glass top that came with the house and promptly turned brown. I was told that in case of electric power loss, I would need to have the gas stove plugged into a UPS in order to light it, and that matches wouldn't work becuase of the 'patented sealed-burner design' that has finally made gas stoves 'safe'. I kept the electric glass-top. I did have a prolonged power-outage (7-days) in the middle of a snowstorm. An underground transformer blew, and I ate out a lot, did some homework by candle and PDA (I was working on my Master's), got extensions on some assignments, and a letter in the mail from the electric company espousing their efficiency to get everyone's power back on in 2 days. Standing their without power reading how they had the power back on really was ... irritating, and I sent them a letter in response to their nonsense, and another letter to the regulating agency. The electric company sent me a greenbar printout to 'prove' they had everyone's power back on in only 2 days, and chastised me for contacting the regulating agency.

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                JudyL_MD
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #47

                                Find a different gas stove that doesn't have that patented hoohaa. We intentionally have our gas stove's breaker switched off because we have always had issues with the electric igniters and have a little plasma lighter sitting next to the stove top. I don't have kids and the cats don't jump on the stove top, so I'm not worried about the gas getting turned on accidentally.

                                Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors - and miss. Lazarus Long, "Time Enough For Love" by Robert A. Heinlein

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S steve tabler

                                  At one house I had, with it's shiny new appliances, I looked into getting a gas range instead of the white electric glass top that came with the house and promptly turned brown. I was told that in case of electric power loss, I would need to have the gas stove plugged into a UPS in order to light it, and that matches wouldn't work becuase of the 'patented sealed-burner design' that has finally made gas stoves 'safe'. I kept the electric glass-top. I did have a prolonged power-outage (7-days) in the middle of a snowstorm. An underground transformer blew, and I ate out a lot, did some homework by candle and PDA (I was working on my Master's), got extensions on some assignments, and a letter in the mail from the electric company espousing their efficiency to get everyone's power back on in 2 days. Standing their without power reading how they had the power back on really was ... irritating, and I sent them a letter in response to their nonsense, and another letter to the regulating agency. The electric company sent me a greenbar printout to 'prove' they had everyone's power back on in only 2 days, and chastised me for contacting the regulating agency.

                                  T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  trønderen
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #48

                                  Since we got these 'smart meters' a few years ago, we can easily retrieve over internet the hour-by-hour electricity consumption, to prove the length of a blackout (although only with hour resolution). If your bill says that you have had zero consumption for seven days, and the power company tries to say: That is only you turning everything off for the last five of those seven days - then no one will believe them. Here in Norway, you could demand an economic compensation for being without electricity for a week, and if customers insist on compensation for seven days, the power company for two, the quarrel could end up in court. It never would go so far, though. The smart meters would provide proof, and there are web pages presenting maps with all blackouts drawn in, along with estimates for how long it will take to fix the problem. If the map for five days says 'No problems in this area!' but none of the customers have any power available, then the power company won't get much peace through those five days!

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C charlieg

                                    Oh man, I get you. Here in America, most of the houses could have been designed by 5 yos. Whatever you can slap together in 30 days, and if we slide enough cash to the "inspectors"... My biggest beef is that there are no real range vents. If the vent over the stove sends the air back into the kitchen, it's a joke. So, when we decided to redo the kitchen, there were two non-negotiables. I wanted a gas range and I wanted a REAL range vent. I paid for both. And we are foodies, sorry, electric/induction is cute but it just does not cut it. But about your stove. Why the heck would a gas stove need to have electricity (looking at mine now)? Sure it has electronic ignition, but :) wait one...... well crap, I need to go turn off a breaker - I'll have to test it later. The only reason we have electronic ignition is to avoid pilot lights. But seriously, friends shaming you for cooking on gas? Stop feeding them. ;P tell them the induction part is broken.

                                    Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                                    T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    trønderen
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #49

                                    charlieg wrote:

                                    But seriously, friends shaming you for cooking on gas? Stop feeding them. ;-P tell them the induction part is broken.

                                    Norway is a country where you are expected to be "modern" in all aspects. Throw out all the old shit. You are shamed even for cooking on a ceramic top, "Why haven't you replaced that with an induction top?". You are shamed for using a CD or DVD player; today everything is available at streaming services. No, I say: Look at this movie, this, this and this. Or off-mainstream music. Besides, I've got my music when the network goes down (similar to having a cooking stove during a blackout). You are shamed for using a compact camera, SLR or traditional video camera, rather than your mobile. You are shamed for sending an email rather than texting. For buying a diesel car rather than an electric one. And so on. If you do things the old ways, because you know them to work well, you are ignorant. Or maybe plainly poor, you cannot afford to buy what you really want. Of course everyone really want induction stoves and streaming and all your life in your smartphone and electric cars. Why wouldn't they, when it is soooo much better?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C charlieg

                                      HP. Yes Hewlett Packard who has decided you cannot using what you just bought without an online account _and_ an internet connection. Imagine - you need to scan a document. The laptop is 10' away from the printer. I have to login to an account to be able to scan. wtf? And their s/w is absolutely terrible. They call it HP Smart but it's really HP dumb, clearly designed by a bunch of monkeys beating on keyboards with bananas. Apologies to monkeys everywhere. I should not drag them down to HP's level.

                                      Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      SeattleC
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #50

                                      I have owned several HP printers over a lifetime. One I accidentally murdered while trying to clean. That was my fault. A second, perfectly functional HP all-in-one had to be discarded because HP decided to stop producing ink cartridges. You couldn't even refill them because they had a microchip that said how old they were. Another seized up and it cost the same amount to have repaired as to buy another one. HPs installation software has always been a nightmare. I wonder how my grandma with no MS CS and no 40 years of experience could possibly install one. Ink cartridges way overpriced, and they know it, because they attempt to defeat refilling. I bought a brother all-in-one b&w laser printer for less than the cost of either of the last two HP printers I've owned. Easy install, zero hassle, no problems in over a year. And (I hear) the toner cartridges are refillable. I wouldn't know for sure though, I'm still on my first one. Bought an HP computer once. Obsolete the day I purchased it, wouldn't run Win8. I have finally learned my lesson. The only reason I gave HP so many chances is because their test equipment was well regarded (I used to work for a competitor).

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C charlieg

                                        HP. Yes Hewlett Packard who has decided you cannot using what you just bought without an online account _and_ an internet connection. Imagine - you need to scan a document. The laptop is 10' away from the printer. I have to login to an account to be able to scan. wtf? And their s/w is absolutely terrible. They call it HP Smart but it's really HP dumb, clearly designed by a bunch of monkeys beating on keyboards with bananas. Apologies to monkeys everywhere. I should not drag them down to HP's level.

                                        Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        sasadler
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #51

                                        I'd never buy any HP scanner or printer after they were borking printers that used third party ink cartridges. Just get yourself a Canon scanner (I've got a LiDE 400). It works under Windows and in Linux (I use VueScan software on both OSes).

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T trønderen

                                          Since we got these 'smart meters' a few years ago, we can easily retrieve over internet the hour-by-hour electricity consumption, to prove the length of a blackout (although only with hour resolution). If your bill says that you have had zero consumption for seven days, and the power company tries to say: That is only you turning everything off for the last five of those seven days - then no one will believe them. Here in Norway, you could demand an economic compensation for being without electricity for a week, and if customers insist on compensation for seven days, the power company for two, the quarrel could end up in court. It never would go so far, though. The smart meters would provide proof, and there are web pages presenting maps with all blackouts drawn in, along with estimates for how long it will take to fix the problem. If the map for five days says 'No problems in this area!' but none of the customers have any power available, then the power company won't get much peace through those five days!

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          steve tabler
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #52

                                          Interesting. But my incident was pre-2006, and I didn't have a SmartMeter there at that time. I had not actively shopped for gas stoves up until then, and instead always accepted what came with the house. And at that time it wasn't possible to purchase a gas range that didn't have the sealed-burner design. I understand about cats and children....never the issue for me, though. My previous home was a house built in 1925, and the gas stove that came with it was probably of similar vintage, with standing-pilots on the burners that didn't want to say lit, and an oven that didn't have a pilot. I generally had to use matches to light a burner or the oven with every usage. But I never endured a lengthy power outage there.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups