Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. how to typedef array of 4 char to be used in map template

how to typedef array of 4 char to be used in map template

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
tutorialdata-structures
27 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F ForNow

    now I am I am getting this

        \]
    

    1>C:\SYSADATA\SYSADATA\SYSADATA\getnextsource.cpp(213,36): message : Element '1': no conversion from 'ESDID' to 'std::pair'
    1>C:\SYSADATA\SYSADATA\SYSADATA\getnextsource.cpp(213,36): message : Element '2': no conversion from 'syminfo' to 'std::pair'
    1>C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Professional\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.29.30133\include\xtree(1283,10): message : see declaration of 'std::_Tree>::insert'
    1> with
    1> [
    1> _Kty=uint32_t,
    1> _Ty=syminfo,
    1> _Pr=std::less,
    1> _Alloc=std::allocator>
    1> ]

    C Offline
    C Offline
    CPallini
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Did you try

    procpointer->extsymcollector.insert(std::pair(exsympointer->SYMESDID(), *exsympointer ));

    ?

    "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C CPallini

      Did you try

      procpointer->extsymcollector.insert(std::pair(exsympointer->SYMESDID(), *exsympointer ));

      ?

      "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

      F Offline
      F Offline
      ForNow
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      still getting type mismatch will have to look at this after work think it maybe using compare operators in the struct thank you

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C CPallini

        But you need the values of ESDID characters as key for the map. something like this could do the trick

        struct ESDID
        {
        char c[4];
        uint32_t operator()(){return ((c[0] << 24) | (c[1] << 16) | (c[2] << 8) | c[3]); };
        };
        //..
        map m;
        //..
        syminfo s1;
        m.insert( pair(s1.symesdid(), s1) );

        "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

        F Offline
        F Offline
        ForNow
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        The complier was screaming for < operator so I give it what wants hope this works got a clean complie

        const struct ESDID
        {
        char c[4];
        uint32_t operator()() { return ((c[0] << 24) | (c[1] << 16) | (c[2] << 8) | c[3]); };
        BOOL operator< (const ESDID x) const { return c < x.c; }
        };

        C L 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • F ForNow

          The complier was screaming for < operator so I give it what wants hope this works got a clean complie

          const struct ESDID
          {
          char c[4];
          uint32_t operator()() { return ((c[0] << 24) | (c[1] << 16) | (c[2] << 8) | c[3]); };
          BOOL operator< (const ESDID x) const { return c < x.c; }
          };

          C Offline
          C Offline
          CPallini
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          That compiles. However it is probably NOT what you want (both the key of the map and the < operator use the address of the c array). Run

          ESDID e1, e2;
          // init e1, e2 with the same content
          e1.c[0] = e1.c[1] = e1.c[2] = e1.c[3] = 'A';
          e2.c[0] = e2.c[1] = e2.c[2] = e2.c[3] = 'A';

          cout << std::boolalpha;
          cout << "(e1 < e2) " << (e1 < e2) << "\n";
          cout << "(e2 < e1) " << (e2 < e1) << "\n";

          and watch the resulting output. Can you spot the problem? You can do something like this:

          struct ESDID
          {
          char c[4];
          // overload of the cast operator
          operator uint32_t () const { return ((c[0] << 24) | (c[1] << 16) | (c[2] << 8) | c[3]); };
          };
          //...
          syminfo s1;
          map m;
          m.insert( pair(s1.symesdid, s1) );

          Note the key of the map uses the content of the c array.

          "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

          F 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F ForNow

            The complier was screaming for < operator so I give it what wants hope this works got a clean complie

            const struct ESDID
            {
            char c[4];
            uint32_t operator()() { return ((c[0] << 24) | (c[1] << 16) | (c[2] << 8) | c[3]); };
            BOOL operator< (const ESDID x) const { return c < x.c; }
            };

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Alternatively you could use a union?

            const struct ESDID
            {
            union
            {
            char c[4];
            uint32_t i;
            } x;
            bool operator< (const ESDID e) const { return x.i < e.x.i; }
            };

            F 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C CPallini

              That compiles. However it is probably NOT what you want (both the key of the map and the < operator use the address of the c array). Run

              ESDID e1, e2;
              // init e1, e2 with the same content
              e1.c[0] = e1.c[1] = e1.c[2] = e1.c[3] = 'A';
              e2.c[0] = e2.c[1] = e2.c[2] = e2.c[3] = 'A';

              cout << std::boolalpha;
              cout << "(e1 < e2) " << (e1 < e2) << "\n";
              cout << "(e2 < e1) " << (e2 < e1) << "\n";

              and watch the resulting output. Can you spot the problem? You can do something like this:

              struct ESDID
              {
              char c[4];
              // overload of the cast operator
              operator uint32_t () const { return ((c[0] << 24) | (c[1] << 16) | (c[2] << 8) | c[3]); };
              };
              //...
              syminfo s1;
              map m;
              m.insert( pair(s1.symesdid, s1) );

              Note the key of the map uses the content of the c array.

              "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

              F Offline
              F Offline
              ForNow
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              I understand the compare wont work correctly however what I dont see where the cast operator () is being used> Is dynamic cast used with pair i.e <> the same as the () operator ()

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Alternatively you could use a union?

                const struct ESDID
                {
                union
                {
                char c[4];
                uint32_t i;
                } x;
                bool operator< (const ESDID e) const { return x.i < e.x.i; }
                };

                F Offline
                F Offline
                ForNow
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                thanks richard I dont see in the map documentation when using the insert method with key of type struct '<' operator must be overloaded by the user

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F ForNow

                  thanks richard I dont see in the map documentation when using the insert method with key of type struct '<' operator must be overloaded by the user

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  CPallini
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Actually there is (see std::map - cppreference.com[^]):

                  template<
                  class Key,
                  class T,
                  class Compare = std::less,
                  class Allocator = std::allocator>

                  class map;

                  As it should be, because the std::map is a sorted container.

                  "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

                  F 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F ForNow

                    I understand the compare wont work correctly however what I dont see where the cast operator () is being used> Is dynamic cast used with pair i.e <> the same as the () operator ()

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    CPallini
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    The cast is used here:

                    pair(s1.symesdid, s1)

                    The compiler:

                    "Map's key must be a uint32_t, hence s1.symesdid, being an ESDID, does NOT fit. Let's see if there is a suitable cast..."

                    "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C CPallini

                      Actually there is (see std::map - cppreference.com[^]):

                      template<
                      class Key,
                      class T,
                      class Compare = std::less,
                      class Allocator = std::allocator>

                      class map;

                      As it should be, because the std::map is a sorted container.

                      "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

                      F Offline
                      F Offline
                      ForNow
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      That’s not the way the map template is defined by Microsoft map Class | Microsoft Learn[^]

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F ForNow

                        That’s not the way the map template is defined by Microsoft map Class | Microsoft Learn[^]

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        CPallini
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        cppreference.com:

                        template<
                        class Key,
                        class T,
                        class Compare = std::less,
                        class Allocator = std::allocator>

                        class map;

                        Microsoft:

                        template ,
                        class Allocator=allocator>>
                        class map;

                        Do you see significant differences?

                        "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

                        F 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C CPallini

                          cppreference.com:

                          template<
                          class Key,
                          class T,
                          class Compare = std::less,
                          class Allocator = std::allocator>

                          class map;

                          Microsoft:

                          template ,
                          class Allocator=allocator>>
                          class map;

                          Do you see significant differences?

                          "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

                          F Offline
                          F Offline
                          ForNow
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          I see the third parameter to the template in microsoft docs is class traits in the cpp reference its class compare thank you

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F ForNow

                            I see the third parameter to the template in microsoft docs is class traits in the cpp reference its class compare thank you

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            CPallini
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            That's, you know, just a matter of naming... BTW, you are welcome.

                            "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

                            F 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C CPallini

                              That's, you know, just a matter of naming... BTW, you are welcome.

                              "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

                              F Offline
                              F Offline
                              ForNow
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              this is just a general comment I thought MainFrame Assembler was Hard but being a C\C++ proficient coder is a very difficult skill to master as an aside just looked at the retrieval for the map class "AT" method it looks like if not found it generates an exception would of been a lot simpler if they gave back a bad return code Thank

                              L C 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • F ForNow

                                this is just a general comment I thought MainFrame Assembler was Hard but being a C\C++ proficient coder is a very difficult skill to master as an aside just looked at the retrieval for the map class "AT" method it looks like if not found it generates an exception would of been a lot simpler if they gave back a bad return code Thank

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                It is just as easy to catch the exception. Exceptions are another useful feature of OOP languages, and provide more flexibility than simple return codes.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F ForNow

                                  this is just a general comment I thought MainFrame Assembler was Hard but being a C\C++ proficient coder is a very difficult skill to master as an aside just looked at the retrieval for the map class "AT" method it looks like if not found it generates an exception would of been a lot simpler if they gave back a bad return code Thank

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  CPallini
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  You might use find, to the purpose (see std::map<Key,T,Compare,Allocator>::find - cppreference.com[^]).

                                  "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

                                  F 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C CPallini

                                    You might use find, to the purpose (see std::map<Key,T,Compare,Allocator>::find - cppreference.com[^]).

                                    "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

                                    F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    ForNow
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    Thank you again you know I’m an assembler mail framer by birth when I post any question on IBMMAIN no matter how much research I have done I get screamed at wish IBMMAIN could be more like the codeproject thank. Time for to implement my code or actually yours

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups