To be fair...
-
I'd agree - but I don't think our jobs / whole profession is at risk yet. It is likely affecting this site though: QA is well down on student question numbers, and that's probably them plagiarising ChatGPT code ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
OriginalGriff wrote:
plagiarising ChatGPT code
but is it really plagiarizing? I don't think so. Unless we are now saying that ChatGPT is a sentient being.
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
plagiarising ChatGPT code
but is it really plagiarizing? I don't think so. Unless we are now saying that ChatGPT is a sentient being.
My definition of plagiarism is pretty simple: if you didn't write it, it's not original to you, and that's plagiarism unless you provide adequate references to the original source. Which you definitely don't do when you are too lazy to do your own homework. :-D
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt -
My definition of plagiarism is pretty simple: if you didn't write it, it's not original to you, and that's plagiarism unless you provide adequate references to the original source. Which you definitely don't do when you are too lazy to do your own homework. :-D
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
Quote:
unless you provide adequate references to the original source.
And the original source of something that ChatGPT generates is what? It is not ChatGPT... I hope we can agree that ChatGPT is not capable of any kind of thinking, and I imagine that in the near future we will have a number of similar solutions that generate contents that will be published on the net somewhere. My guess is that these solutions will start to learn from each other, and there will probably be some really weird results.
Espen Harlinn Chief Architect - Seasurveillance AS The competent programmer is fully aware of the strictly limited size of his own skull; therefore he approaches the programming task in full humility, and among other things he avoids clever tricks like the plague.Edsger W.Dijkstra
-
My definition of plagiarism is pretty simple: if you didn't write it, it's not original to you, and that's plagiarism unless you provide adequate references to the original source. Which you definitely don't do when you are too lazy to do your own homework. :-D
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
I didn't write the designer code that Visual Studio generates behind my C# forms. But does anyone doubt that I own the copyright to it?
The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.
-
So Improve means "condense it down" or "add back a line deliberately commented out". I feel like all this "pass it through GPT" is leading everyone in circles. It's absolutely doing a fantastic job of taking text (prose, code, whatever) and producing a version that best matches its training data and bias. It spits out great looking text and generates code that is either the most commonly found code for this text prompt, or the code it was trained to produce. This will just get better and better. But it is still about "most likely". Not "actually correct" and so we generate this great looking code and then spend all this time running around debugging and correcting. Definitely good to start from something that's well structured and fix that, but let's put this in perspective. (and saying that, the fact it can even do this is mind blowing at a conceptual level, but disarmingly trivial at the mathematical level if you're OK with thinking trillion-parameter simultaneous equations are trivial. All in all a proper mind-bend).
cheers Chris Maunder
Until it can do a cost-benefit analysis, it may well write great code but may still be solving the wrong problem. I'm curious if it is of the "put as much as you can into one SQL statement" school of thought.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
-
Until it can do a cost-benefit analysis, it may well write great code but may still be solving the wrong problem. I'm curious if it is of the "put as much as you can into one SQL statement" school of thought.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
Ooohhhh the SQL I've been writing lately...
-
So Improve means "condense it down" or "add back a line deliberately commented out". I feel like all this "pass it through GPT" is leading everyone in circles. It's absolutely doing a fantastic job of taking text (prose, code, whatever) and producing a version that best matches its training data and bias. It spits out great looking text and generates code that is either the most commonly found code for this text prompt, or the code it was trained to produce. This will just get better and better. But it is still about "most likely". Not "actually correct" and so we generate this great looking code and then spend all this time running around debugging and correcting. Definitely good to start from something that's well structured and fix that, but let's put this in perspective. (and saying that, the fact it can even do this is mind blowing at a conceptual level, but disarmingly trivial at the mathematical level if you're OK with thinking trillion-parameter simultaneous equations are trivial. All in all a proper mind-bend).
cheers Chris Maunder
I've been using ChatGPT to help me learn how to write Chrome extensions. Just ask it to do what I want, then take the code and work out what it does. Useful way of learning. This could be used to learn anything, working out where it is wrong is part of the learning.
-
So Improve means "condense it down" or "add back a line deliberately commented out". I feel like all this "pass it through GPT" is leading everyone in circles. It's absolutely doing a fantastic job of taking text (prose, code, whatever) and producing a version that best matches its training data and bias. It spits out great looking text and generates code that is either the most commonly found code for this text prompt, or the code it was trained to produce. This will just get better and better. But it is still about "most likely". Not "actually correct" and so we generate this great looking code and then spend all this time running around debugging and correcting. Definitely good to start from something that's well structured and fix that, but let's put this in perspective. (and saying that, the fact it can even do this is mind blowing at a conceptual level, but disarmingly trivial at the mathematical level if you're OK with thinking trillion-parameter simultaneous equations are trivial. All in all a proper mind-bend).
cheers Chris Maunder
Chris Maunder wrote:
But it is still about "most likely". Not "actually correct" and so we generate this great looking code and then spend all this time running around debugging and correcting.
I think that most people that know how to debug properly are not going to get ChatGPT code for production.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Chris Maunder wrote:
But it is still about "most likely". Not "actually correct" and so we generate this great looking code and then spend all this time running around debugging and correcting.
I think that most people that know how to debug properly are not going to get ChatGPT code for production.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
You'd think, right? ;)
cheers Chris Maunder
-
I didn't write the designer code that Visual Studio generates behind my C# forms. But does anyone doubt that I own the copyright to it?
The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.
Richard Andrew x64 wrote:
But does anyone doubt that I own the copyright to it?
Well, Microsoft might. I'd read that license very carefully... :)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
Chris Maunder wrote:
But it is still about "most likely". Not "actually correct" and so we generate this great looking code and then spend all this time running around debugging and correcting.
I think that most people that know how to debug properly are not going to get ChatGPT code for production.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
Nelek wrote:
most people that know how to debug properly
There's the rub...
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
I've been using ChatGPT to help me learn how to write Chrome extensions. Just ask it to do what I want, then take the code and work out what it does. Useful way of learning. This could be used to learn anything, working out where it is wrong is part of the learning.
It couldn't tell me how to order regiments in a brigade if they were of different sizes. In real life, they are not all 10 companies of 100 each; all the time. Especially during war. It will tell me everything else I already know.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
-
Richard Andrew x64 wrote:
But does anyone doubt that I own the copyright to it?
Well, Microsoft might. I'd read that license very carefully... :)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
