Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Social thing... Do you have similar shit discussions in your country?

Social thing... Do you have similar shit discussions in your country?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpquestionloungelearning
60 Posts 24 Posters 4 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 0 0x01AA

    The city of Zurich wants to help parents with questions about raising children: The city's mothers and fathers advice service sends out a newsletter every two months with tips for parents of children up to the age of five. The latest edition is also dedicated to “gender-sensitive education”. And that doesn't go down well with everyone. As a newpaper (“NZZ”) reports, parents are advised, among other things, to avoid using the terms mother and father when talking about other families. There are neutral terms as alternatives. Instead of “Rachel’s mom,” it could be “Rachel’s parent” or “Rachel’s caregiver.” Children are also more neutral than boys or girls. I'm ashamed for my country, Switzerland :(( [Edit] A minority seems to be demanding something here. But I'm pretty sure it's not this minority of people who are uncertain about their gender who are demanding this. It's more the class of politicians who are 'so compatible' with everything and want to appear in the spotlight.

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jeremy Falcon
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    It's everywhere and it's just as ridiculous. People with no life and nothing better to do creating problems where non exist. So just goes to show how many people are brainwashed by TV.

    Jeremy Falcon

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D dan sh

      Nelek wrote:

      3 genders

      It is strange for me. We studies that the gender is an behavioural attribute. Sex is anatomical attribute. So, I would imagine sex would be male, female and anything else that biology approves. Gender could be masculine or feminine. So to me there could be a masculine female or feminine female. And sure give labels to these but they cannot be gender or sex. Orientation is again completely different thing in my little mind. I have no idea if this is acceptable or scientifically correct in today's world.

      "It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[^]

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jeremy Falcon
      wrote on last edited by
      #52

      dan!sh wrote:

      Gender could be masculine or feminine.

      That's what it means now, because someone wanted to change it. And the two concepts are still extremely conflated because it's the _sexes_ that act differently while also partaking in their _gender_ - that the sex does in fact have a large influence over (generally speaking). There have always been masculine chicks and feminine dudes. But, now they want to pretend they are the opposite "gender" as expressed by the opposite sex roles society traditionally embraced. This is called putting the cart before the horse, to honestly pretend that just because you cried while watching Titanic you're now actually the same as a real woman - since the two concepts are clearly conflated on both sides. No, you're just a feminine dude despite your new labels. Doesn't mean you get to pee in the women's bathroom. What makes it worse is they're trying to legally force this pronoun stuff on others.

      Jeremy Falcon

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Vagina rebranded as ‘bonus hole’ by cervical cancer charity[^]

        Quote:

        A charity which advises medics to refer to a vagina as a “bonus hole” to avoid upsetting transgender men has been accused of dehumanising women. Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust offers a guide on its website detailing the appropriate language healthcare professionals should use when dealing with trans men. “Bonus hole” and “front hole” are deemed acceptable alternatives to vagina, a word which could “cause someone to feel hurt or distressed”, it states. The advice features on a section of Jo’s website under the header “Language to use when supporting trans men and/or non-binary people”. The glossary was created in partnership with the LGBT Foundation.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        jschell
        wrote on last edited by
        #53

        That would of course be one of those media outlets claiming that.

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J jschell

          That would of course be one of those media outlets claiming that.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #54

          No, as you can see.

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J jschell

            Slow Eddie wrote:

            definitely NOT the world I grew up in

            I am guess then you didn't grow up in the following world? 1969 Stonewall Riots - Origins, Timeline & Leaders[^]

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Slow Eddie
            wrote on last edited by
            #55

            The world I grew up in was New Orleans, not New York. Not the same by any measure. We were taught tolerance, and respect. I deplored the racial intolerance as well and my family and friends did too. I grew up playing with black kids in my neighborhood and no one there thought anything about it. By the time I was in high school, Gays and Bi-sexual induvial were accepted here as well.

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              No, as you can see.

              J Offline
              J Offline
              jschell
              wrote on last edited by
              #56

              You are claiming that the 'Telegraph' is not in fact a media source but rather is the original source?

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J jschell

                You are claiming that the 'Telegraph' is not in fact a media source but rather is the original source?

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #57

                I am not claiming anything.

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Slow Eddie

                  The world I grew up in was New Orleans, not New York. Not the same by any measure. We were taught tolerance, and respect. I deplored the racial intolerance as well and my family and friends did too. I grew up playing with black kids in my neighborhood and no one there thought anything about it. By the time I was in high school, Gays and Bi-sexual induvial were accepted here as well.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jschell
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #58

                  You might keep in mind though... Louisiana only allowed gay marriage due to the Supreme court decision in 2015. Now in New Orleans they allowed 'unions' in 1999, but those were banned at the state level in 2004. Thus nullifying it in New Orleans.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    I am not claiming anything.

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jschell
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #59

                    Then repeating what I said... "That would of course be one of those media outlets claiming that." Especially with the Telegraph no one should read anything there without skepticism or even outright disbelief.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J jschell

                      Then repeating what I said... "That would of course be one of those media outlets claiming that." Especially with the Telegraph no one should read anything there without skepticism or even outright disbelief.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #60

                      :yawn:

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups