Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. I thought it was a cardinal sin to force a server to reboot...?

I thought it was a cardinal sin to force a server to reboot...?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
sysadminquestion
60 Posts 18 Posters 69 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C charlieg

    But as the OP asked, is it appropriate to just reboot servers "because"? And the answer is no. Never. And it got so bad with these idiots they had to put enterprise hooks in to turn this off. One writes software to be stable. Microsoft has deliberately engineered a sporadic reboot that none of my customers would ever tolerate. It's criminal. Let me give you one simple example. I need to be able to run soak tests for weeks/months at a time. I have multiple UPS', I am very careful with my hardware, etc. I've developed under openVMS, Solaris, HPUX, IBM AIX, Linux and Microsoft. The only company and OS that forces reboots is Microsoft. So, I'm not sure what the point of your comment is. The OP asked a simple question, and the answer is no. No OS should ever just reboot itself. So, I picked bologna to avoid profanity. You really don't want me speaking what I'm really thinking.

    Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

    J Offline
    J Offline
    jschell
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    charlieg wrote:

    No OS should ever just reboot itself

    I can remember my surprise when running on a Solaris system when it would do a cold boot when I attempted to run Netscape. Every single time. Pretty sure the OS and/or the hardware was in fact in charge of doing the cold boot. Myself I design for failure. Boxes will go down. Doesn't matter why.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H hevisko

      You mean Windows servers have UPtime???? I usually reboot them every couple of days to make sure they are actually able to boot again

      J Offline
      J Offline
      jschell
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      hevisko wrote:

      I usually reboot them every couple of days to make sure they are actually able to boot again

      Standard large system support. If one plans on doing dynamic sizing one needs to provide for boxes going up and going down due to load. Netflix has a running application that takes deliberately takes servers down to test for system reliability. And you can use it to if you want. Home - Chaos Monkey[^]

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D dandy72

        ...hence why I used Server 2022 when I built my latest dev VM. I got tired of finding out my previous Windows 10 dev VM had rebooted right after Patch Tuesday. But no, my dev machine rebooted last night at 00:45am. Lost an awful lot of context. Meanwhile, the VM *host*, running Server 2012 R2, back when it was still supported and getting updates, would patiently wait for months if I just let it. Surely server admins aren't putting up with this. Surely MS hasn't changed the default behavior so a server OS can now reboot if it just feels like it.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        jschell
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        dandy72 wrote:

        Surely server admins aren't putting up with this

        You can take your computers entirely offline. Then certainly Microsoft cannot be the problem.

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B BryanFazekas

          Mark Starr wrote:

          If that works, can you please post a followup comment about it?

          Will do. The process I used is: 1. Launch the Run command (Win + R). Type in "gpedit.msc" and hit Enter to open the group policy editor. 2. Drill down through Computer Configuration | Administrative Templates | Windows Components | Windows Update 3. In the right pane, select Configure Automatic Updates [I had to sort by name, as there are many options in no obvious sort order] 4. Click Disabled to select it, then click Apply and then OK The descriptions in the Configure Automatic Updates dialog talk about Windows XP, so this is old. I did this on my laptop, but not my desktop. I'm going to watch on a daily basis to see what happens. Note 1: When I go into Windows Update in red it reads "*Some settings are managed by your organization" Below the Check for Updates button it reads "*Your organization has turned off automatic updates" I have hopes it will work, but fear it just can't be this easy. We are dealing with MS, after all. Note 2: If Enabled is clicked, options can be set to "3 - Auto download and notify for install". If the above works, I may try this, as I have no problem with updates being downloaded. My objection is automatic updates and especially being forced to reboot.

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mark Starr
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          >. 2. Drill down through Computer Configuration | Administrative Templates | Windows Components | Windows Update >. 3. In the right pane, select Configure Automatic Updates [I had to sort by name, as there are many options in no obvious sort order] That’s the piece I needed. You’re right: there are so many flags and switches now it’s mind numbing to go through them. Thanks!

          Time is the differentiation of eternity devised by man to measure the passage of human events. - Manly P. Hall Mark Just another cog in the wheel

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J jschell

            dandy72 wrote:

            Surely server admins aren't putting up with this

            You can take your computers entirely offline. Then certainly Microsoft cannot be the problem.

            D Offline
            D Offline
            dandy72
            wrote on last edited by
            #45

            That's not the problem at all. I want the updates. As a matter of fact, I use WSUS, which allows me to approve/reject individual updates. I installed the updates. Now I want the system to wait for me to tell it when to reboot, even if I were to choose to wait a month before clicking on the OK button on that prompt. Just like the aforementioned 2012 R2 did. Windows Server used to work that way. It no longer does. That is what I'm complaining about.

            T J 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • J jschell

              BryanFazekas wrote:

              We are talking about an outside third party intentionally rebooting a server at its whim

              The OP did not state that.

              BryanFazekas wrote:

              (AWS) gives notice to the tenants that maintenance is required, and acts when a deadline has been reached.

              And yet in my experience people are still surprised when it happens. The notice was given but they did not see it so they do not understand why it happened.

              BryanFazekas wrote:

              Similarly, all computers and major systems at my employer undergo periodic maintenance.

              In my experience I have had to debug production server problems because someone did an update without telling anyone. Sometimes without even documenting it. Even when documented often without documenting what the exact update did. And then when I am tasked with determining the problem, no one on the call is even aware that an update happened.

              B Offline
              B Offline
              BryanFazekas
              wrote on last edited by
              #46

              jschell wrote:

              The OP did not state that.

              It was not stated clearly, but who else can reboot his server after Patch Tuesday other than Microsoft? The fact that with Win10 Microsoft DOES force reboots following an update, plus the context of the post indicate it's MS.

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D dandy72

                That's not the problem at all. I want the updates. As a matter of fact, I use WSUS, which allows me to approve/reject individual updates. I installed the updates. Now I want the system to wait for me to tell it when to reboot, even if I were to choose to wait a month before clicking on the OK button on that prompt. Just like the aforementioned 2012 R2 did. Windows Server used to work that way. It no longer does. That is what I'm complaining about.

                T Offline
                T Offline
                trønderen
                wrote on last edited by
                #47

                "I want updates, even those requiring restarts. I just don't want the restarts."

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T trønderen

                  "I want updates, even those requiring restarts. I just don't want the restarts."

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  dandy72
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #48

                  I'm okay with the restarts. I just want to be the one who decides when they happen. Is it so hard for you to comprehend that previous versions of Windows Server worked exactly that way? And it no longer does?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J jschell

                    charlieg wrote:

                    No OS should ever just reboot itself

                    I can remember my surprise when running on a Solaris system when it would do a cold boot when I attempted to run Netscape. Every single time. Pretty sure the OS and/or the hardware was in fact in charge of doing the cold boot. Myself I design for failure. Boxes will go down. Doesn't matter why.

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    charlieg
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #49

                    that's a bug and I think you are going way, way back :). It's annoying but completely different from a corporate policy that says FU.

                    Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T trønderen

                      Sounds like a pair of scissors may be the best alternative for you. The only problem is that then we won't have the opportunity to hear what came out of it.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      charlieg
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #50

                      Fair comment. But some soak tests are doing network stuff. So, I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't. I'd be content with MS pestering me. I'm not sure how MS decides the computer is not in use. Keyboard activity? Mouse? It just makes no rational sense.

                      Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • H hevisko

                        You mean Windows servers have UPtime???? I usually reboot them every couple of days to make sure they are actually able to boot again

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        charlieg
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #51

                        They actually do. I have a Windows server that hosts an emulation system. It can easily stay up for a year or more. BUT. if you choose to reboot, your decision. If I come into your cube and reboot your machine, I think we're going to have fisty cuffs :)

                        Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P PIEBALDconsult

                          Dunno. My Win 10 desktop system keeps chugging along waiting patiently for me to apply updates when I'm good and ready.

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          MikeCO10
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #52

                          Mine does as well. It does download the updates, but the system continues to run the loaded OS version till I tell it to update. From a dev perspective, that doesn't always play well if you use Visual Studio, but I've trained myself to check the update badge prior to doing anything with VS.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D dandy72

                            That's not the problem at all. I want the updates. As a matter of fact, I use WSUS, which allows me to approve/reject individual updates. I installed the updates. Now I want the system to wait for me to tell it when to reboot, even if I were to choose to wait a month before clicking on the OK button on that prompt. Just like the aforementioned 2012 R2 did. Windows Server used to work that way. It no longer does. That is what I'm complaining about.

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            jschell
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #53

                            dandy72 wrote:

                            I want the updates

                            That doesn't change what I said though. Take it offline. Then the process is every two weeks or once a month, you take specific time to look for updates and do the update.

                            D 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C charlieg

                              that's a bug and I think you are going way, way back :). It's annoying but completely different from a corporate policy that says FU.

                              Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              jschell
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #54

                              charlieg wrote:

                              but completely different from a corporate policy that says FU.

                              Not at all. Microsoft sells to consumers. It is nice and all that there is also a large scale professional server usage but that is not the primary market. And as it has been proven with all OSes, not just Microsoft, people ignore updates. So now Microsoft is just forcing it. Just to enforce that - linux has had multiple security bugs with patches already provided but which professionals failed to install until criminals started using them. Some of them were known for years. Perhaps those same people that think the server should be up for years. (I have worked for multiple companies where managing even certs is a problem. They know the cert will expire on a certain date yet every time there is a mad scramble the morning after it expires to figure out what is going on.)

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B BryanFazekas

                                jschell wrote:

                                The OP did not state that.

                                It was not stated clearly, but who else can reboot his server after Patch Tuesday other than Microsoft? The fact that with Win10 Microsoft DOES force reboots following an update, plus the context of the post indicate it's MS.

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                jschell
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #55

                                BryanFazekas wrote:

                                who else can reboot his server after Patch Tuesday other than Microsoft

                                There are multiple reasons a server can reboot. I provided a list in another reply. And any of those others would result in the same problem, because the person is expecting the server to never do that.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J jschell

                                  dandy72 wrote:

                                  I want the updates

                                  That doesn't change what I said though. Take it offline. Then the process is every two weeks or once a month, you take specific time to look for updates and do the update.

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  dandy72
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #56

                                  You keep your belief system, I'll keep mine.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B BryanFazekas

                                    Mark Starr wrote:

                                    If that works, can you please post a followup comment about it?

                                    Will do. The process I used is: 1. Launch the Run command (Win + R). Type in "gpedit.msc" and hit Enter to open the group policy editor. 2. Drill down through Computer Configuration | Administrative Templates | Windows Components | Windows Update 3. In the right pane, select Configure Automatic Updates [I had to sort by name, as there are many options in no obvious sort order] 4. Click Disabled to select it, then click Apply and then OK The descriptions in the Configure Automatic Updates dialog talk about Windows XP, so this is old. I did this on my laptop, but not my desktop. I'm going to watch on a daily basis to see what happens. Note 1: When I go into Windows Update in red it reads "*Some settings are managed by your organization" Below the Check for Updates button it reads "*Your organization has turned off automatic updates" I have hopes it will work, but fear it just can't be this easy. We are dealing with MS, after all. Note 2: If Enabled is clicked, options can be set to "3 - Auto download and notify for install". If the above works, I may try this, as I have no problem with updates being downloaded. My objection is automatic updates and especially being forced to reboot.

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mark Starr
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #57

                                    Yes, my update dialog also said something about the organization and updates. Win 10. I left mine as auto-download but not to update.

                                    Time is the differentiation of eternity devised by man to measure the passage of human events. - Manly P. Hall Mark Just another cog in the wheel

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J jschell

                                      charlieg wrote:

                                      but completely different from a corporate policy that says FU.

                                      Not at all. Microsoft sells to consumers. It is nice and all that there is also a large scale professional server usage but that is not the primary market. And as it has been proven with all OSes, not just Microsoft, people ignore updates. So now Microsoft is just forcing it. Just to enforce that - linux has had multiple security bugs with patches already provided but which professionals failed to install until criminals started using them. Some of them were known for years. Perhaps those same people that think the server should be up for years. (I have worked for multiple companies where managing even certs is a problem. They know the cert will expire on a certain date yet every time there is a mad scramble the morning after it expires to figure out what is going on.)

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      charlieg
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #58

                                      If I'm running a professional version of a product, why do I think I should be treated like a professional? The op did admit he's running server OS, but again, why do I need to write a utility to fool microsoft into thinking a computer is in use? "people ignore updates" Because Microsoft does two things: they write more security bugs then they should and they push out useless updates. Rebooting my machine, and all my VMs, because they insist I need a new feature is utter nonsense.

                                      Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • G Gary Wheeler

                                        Ah, the advantages of living in an area where the infrastructure (like power and broadband) are... unreliable. At work the IT gestapo reboot your machine at will, fortunately after working hours. If you are on the company network it will happen. The power can be iffy as well. We have a massive generator for backup power, but it only runs our de-ionized water system. The offices can suck it. Home is slightly different. Both power and Internet can be unreliable, mainly due to the weather. My town has major outages at least once a year, and minor ones a couple of times. When I'm not actively using my machines, I've exited all apps except for my mail client (Outlook at work, Thunderbird at home). The boxes can reboot to their hearts content. I've always done this, because it's just safer. I don't see the value in having your development machine sitting there with a bunch of things running, breakpoints set, processes waiting. You're going to leave it like that at the end of the day and expect to remember all that context when you start again in the morning, or after a weekend? You're smarter folks than I am if you make that work. It's funny to me when people bitch about stuff like this when the solution is so utterly simple.

                                        Software Zen: delete this;

                                        C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        charlieg
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #59

                                        Well my example was related to soak tests where we're collecting data and monitoring app performance. As for the debugger and what not - yes, picking up in the morning happens all the time where I work.

                                        Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Mark Starr

                                          Yes, my update dialog also said something about the organization and updates. Win 10. I left mine as auto-download but not to update.

                                          Time is the differentiation of eternity devised by man to measure the passage of human events. - Manly P. Hall Mark Just another cog in the wheel

                                          B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          BryanFazekas
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #60

                                          I had to wait until there was a Windows update on my desktop to test if the policy change works. The laptop, which I used the policy change on, said it was up-to-date, but when I clicked the "Check" button it found 2 updates and is installing them. So the change works on Win10. Since posting in this thread I replaced my aged Lenovo laptop with a Surface running Win11 Home. I am girding myself to replace Win11 Home with Pro ...

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups