w000t 100 days uptime!
-
Daniel Turini wrote: My RH 7.2 CVS server, K6 400Mhz, 128Mb RAM. Imagine a serviceless MS box staying up that long on that hardware, NOT! :) leppie::AllocCPArticle(Generic DFA State Machine for .NET);
leppie wrote: Imagine a serviceless MS box staying up that long on that hardware, NOT! I've done it with my dev/desktop/game box Matt Newman
Sonork: 100:11179 "Two things have come out of Berkley, Unix and Acid, we do not belive this to be a coincidence"
Linux sucks twice as fast and 10 times more reliably, and since you have the source, it's your fault. -Ca1v1n Post best viewed with lynx -
leppie wrote: Imagine a serviceless MS box staying up that long on that hardware, NOT! I've done it with my dev/desktop/game box Matt Newman
Sonork: 100:11179 "Two things have come out of Berkley, Unix and Acid, we do not belive this to be a coincidence"
Linux sucks twice as fast and 10 times more reliably, and since you have the source, it's your fault. -Ca1v1n Post best viewed with lynxMatt Newman wrote: I've done it with my dev/desktop/game box OK, you dev/game/desktop on a K6-400? :eek: leppie::AllocCPArticle(Generic DFA State Machine for .NET);
-
Nice... This CVS server just for your own use or in an office? Regards, Brian Dela :-)
Brian Delahunty wrote: Nice... This CVS server just for your own use or in an office? It's for my office. The staff was about 10 people working with that machine during an year, now it's only 4. ORACLE One Real A$#h%le Called Lary Ellison
-
Daniel Turini wrote: My RH 7.2 CVS server, K6 400Mhz, 128Mb RAM. Imagine a serviceless MS box staying up that long on that hardware, NOT! :) leppie::AllocCPArticle(Generic DFA State Machine for .NET);
leppie wrote: Imagine a serviceless MS box staying up that long on that hardware, NOT! Actually, we run Windows 2000 on some servers here and they usually stay up for about 500h~1000h. After that, normally a reboot is necessary, cause there's always a new service pack or hot fix that needs a reboot. [edit]What's really impressive about Linux, is that, contrary to common belief, I managed to get such a stable machine without knowing lots of Linux stuff. Actually, it was my first server installation. But to get similar uptimes on Windows, you need to know lots about Windows.[/edit] ORACLE One Real A$#h%le Called Lary Ellison
-
Matt Newman wrote: I've done it with my dev/desktop/game box OK, you dev/game/desktop on a K6-400? :eek: leppie::AllocCPArticle(Generic DFA State Machine for .NET);
ohh, no I meant with windows, I'm on an Athlon XP 1800+ Matt Newman
Sonork: 100:11179 "Two things have come out of Berkley, Unix and Acid, we do not belive this to be a coincidence"
Linux sucks twice as fast and 10 times more reliably, and since you have the source, it's your fault. -Ca1v1n Post best viewed with lynx -
My Linux router p133 64mb. 8:34pm up 100 days, 1 min, 0 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00 :) leppie::AllocCPArticle(Generic DFA State Machine for .NET);
-
My Linux router p133 64mb. 8:34pm up 100 days, 1 min, 0 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00 :) leppie::AllocCPArticle(Generic DFA State Machine for .NET);
-
Daniel Turini wrote: My RH 7.2 CVS server, K6 400Mhz, 128Mb RAM. Imagine a serviceless MS box staying up that long on that hardware, NOT! :) leppie::AllocCPArticle(Generic DFA State Machine for .NET);
One of the local newspaper's has a Win2K server set up for file sharing. It too is a K6 400, but I think it has 192MB of RAM. Its uptime was 483 days the last I got to check it. A week or week and a half later, a day long power outage wiped out that record :(( At least now I can install patches and not feel guilty about ruining a perfectly good uptime :) James "I despise the city and much prefer being where a traffic jam means a line-up at McDonald's" Me when telling a friend why I wouldn't want to live with him
-
I used to be a Novell CNE and it wasn't unsual to see Novell servers that had been up for 3 years or more. ------------
John Cardinal wrote: Novell servers that had been up for 3 years or more. Novell.. cool :-D Regards, Brian Dela :-)
-
John Cardinal wrote: Novell servers that had been up for 3 years or more. Novell.. cool :-D Regards, Brian Dela :-)
They had a *very* well protected kernel in memory and you could just about crash anything on it without bringing down the server. We used to joke that you could take an axe to a netware server and it would keep on running. They also have a very ahead of it's time system for backup redundant servers that was super fault tolerant. We had one client out in the country who was a big time logging contractor and up time was so important to them they had a fault tolerant Netware server inside a steel shipping container literally buried in the ground behind the office with backup generators etc etc. It was our only token ring network and it was always interesting working on it. Now there's probably hardly anyone using Novell anymore (they decided to really stop supporting smaller clients by changing pricing and licensing policies and so we went to recommending NT), but it was the best there was for small to large business for nearly a decade. ------------
-
$ssh root@linux
Last login: Wed Jul 9 13:36:21 2003
[root@linux /root]# uptime
3:37pm up 232 days, 2:40, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
[root@linux /root]#My RH 7.2 CVS server, K6 400Mhz, 128Mb RAM. I was with an uptime of about 200 days when there was a power loss. If there was no power loss, the uptime should be showing over 400 days, now! ORACLE One Real A$#h%le Called Lary Ellison
Daniel Turini wrote: over 400 days :omg: Damn... I haven't even lived in the same place for over 100 days in the last 4 years! :omg: I prefer to wear gloves when using it, but that's merely a matter of personal hygiene [Roger Wright on VB] Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. [Rich Cook]
-
I used to be a Novell CNE and it wasn't unsual to see Novell servers that had been up for 3 years or more. ------------
-
But it was more usual to see them in the trash after having to reboot them every few days. Then again, our sysadmin was an idiot. Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.
-
$ssh root@linux
Last login: Wed Jul 9 13:36:21 2003
[root@linux /root]# uptime
3:37pm up 232 days, 2:40, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
[root@linux /root]#My RH 7.2 CVS server, K6 400Mhz, 128Mb RAM. I was with an uptime of about 200 days when there was a power loss. If there was no power loss, the uptime should be showing over 400 days, now! ORACLE One Real A$#h%le Called Lary Ellison
$ uptime 16:12:18 up 428 days, 59 min, 6 users, load average: 2.06, 2.06, 2.01 $ -Jack
There are 10 types of people in this world, those that understand binary and those who don't.
-
Novell servers? Your sysadmin must have been an idiot, they were bulletproof (at least versions 2-4 were, after that I quit working on them). ------------
John Cardinal wrote: Your sysadmin must have been an idiot :) Absolutely. Novell is almost indestructible. John Cardinal wrote: at least versions 2-4 were, after that I quit working on them I stopped with version 5, and that was just as reliable. It may have been more so, except that our v4 server never failed :)
Ryan
"Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"