Carefully
-
I think poverty alone is not the reason. Majorly it is the attitude of the stronger, powerful people towards the weaker one's. No country or people are alone in this regard. Everybody when they have or had the chance discriminated against others. It's the resentment of not considered as an equal which breeds hatred.
There are terrorists throughout the world , each of which has a cause they firmly believe in . Worse still , one mans stand against oppression is another mans terrorism. America is justified in using force to exact revenge and punishment against the people who committed these acts , but I doubt if they can erradicate terrorism by force. I wish to see terrorism in all its forms stamped out , I hope America and the emerging alliance succeeds, but I doubt if force alone will work . Terrorism works because it takes so few people to make it effective , and History shows us that you cannot use force for ever to hold down an entire group let alone country , race or religion. Nor is there a desire to do so , the last man to target an entire race was Hitler , a man I hope we are never tempted to emulate. Dialog alone has also failed in many cases , it is hard to hold rational arguments with anyone who hates . Witness how close Isreal and the Palistinians came to an agreement , witness the hatred in my own backyard of Northern Ireland. So I do not know what the long term answer is . The only possible answer I can come up with in this as in many other areas is equality for all. But that will only stop terrorism if all people throughout the world are treated truly equaly , with equal respect , equal access to opportunity and resources , equal life expectancy and equal quality of life . At this point in time with our current system of governments this is just a pipe dream . I do not know of a system of government that can provide such a system . So in the absence of a feasable alternative I support the use of military force against terrorists . I hope it works .I fear it will not.
-
1/ I don't see the US as a knight in shining armour, witness Vietnam and Korea. However, I do not believe it is the great satan either, or that it acts only in self interest. I also believe nothing can justify this weeks events or detract from the right of the US to act to protect it's citizens. 2/ We can argue religion, but it will probably get ugly. While it is true that most followers of Islam are not war hungry, the Quran itself promises eternal rewards to those who die killing their enemies. Bin Laden has declared holy war on the US - to him, right or wrong, it is a matter of religion. I would temper this by again stating my concern that all Muslims not be punished for actions they would also condemn. 3/ Please provide a list of times the US has killed innocent victums deliberately. I'll give you Nagasaki in advance. It's always easy to hate and be suspicious of the guy with the biggest stick, but I'll ask you one thing - would you prefer it be the US, or Iraq ? Christian As I learn the innermost secrets of the around me, they reward me in many ways to keep quiet. Men with pierced ears are better prepared for marriage. They've experienced pain and bought Jewellery.
> 3/ Please provide a list of times the US has killed innocent victums > deliberately. I'll give you Nagasaki in advance. It's always easy to > hate and be suspicious of the guy with the biggest stick, but I'll ask > you one thing - would you prefer it be the US, or Iraq ? Christian, let me remind you Beograd, Yugoslavia. And don't forget about many thousands of people burned alive with napalm in Vietnam. BTW, have the US apologized for Nagasaki? Regards, Nikolay
-
>> I also believe nothing can justify this weeks events or detract from the right of the US to act to protect it's citizens. Chris, You cannot protect your citizens against a determined terrorist with turning your society into a police state. You need to attack the root causes of the terrorism. As I said in my initial message, there is justification for these acts, but don't that doesn't cloud the issue of looking for the real reason for these attacks. Why did people feel compeled to give up their lives and attack the U.S. ? Reasons mostly tied to religion. I don't believe they have been pushed to this position to an equal or greater degree than the US has been pushed to act as it has in that region for it's own interest. The power of the US is a direct flow on from the fact that without the US we'd all be German colonies. >> Please provide a list of times the US has killed innocent victims deliberately. I'll give you Nagasaki in advance. It's always easy to hate and be suspicious of the guy with the biggest stick, but I'll ask you one thing - would you prefer it be the US, or Iraq ? I feel you are personnally attacking me for asking uncomfortable questions. The world is bigger than the U.S. and Iraq, there are 8 billion of people on this planet. I am a firm believe in 'live and let live'. All i am adovcating is that the guy with the biggest stick not degerate into a school yard bully. You quoted this twice ? My point is I don't see the US acting like a bully, at least not in recent times and not in relation to the region in question. Russia tried to take over Afghanistan, not America. Saddam Hussein is in power by the grace of the US. >> Please provide a list of times the US has killed innocent victims deliberately. Last year, their where several bombings on a american embassies in several african states. Olsma Bin Laden is widely accepted to have been behind this. The U.S. responded by attacking up a phamacticals factory that was 'reportedily' producing incedures for the islamic extremists. It was in fact producing drugs to treat africa's enormous number of A.I.D.S victims. this is the type of response that concerns me. Were you there to know what was being produced ? You think these people will not come back with the claim most likely to embarrass the US and that the US equally would not tread carefully before deciding on such an act ? Christian As I learn the innermost secrets of the around me, they reward me in many ways to keep quiet. Men wi
>> Reasons mostly tied to religion. I don't believe they have been pushed to this position to an equal or greater degree than the US has been pushed to act as it has in that region for it's own interest. It is too easy to write off what has happened to ignorace or religon etc. I can see why people do it, it provides security, it provides an easy reason to explain away what has happened. If only it where so ... The only way to really tackle terrorism is to ask the terrorists what is driving them to this. As unpalatable as it sounds, that is what must be done. We had to do it here and slowily millimeter by millimeter, day after day, week after week, year after year, we are slowily relising peace. >> The power of the US is a direct flow on from the fact that without the US we'd all be German colonies. The power of US comes from its wealth. It has nothing watsoever do with Germany or the World War II. >> Were you there to know what was being produced ? You think these people will not come back with the claim most likely to embarrass the US and that the US equally would not tread carefully before deciding on such an act ? U.N. observers confirmed that the site was used for the manufacture of drugs. I can see your point, however in this particular case the U.S. succeeded in embarassing themselves at cost of innocent lives. Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
-
> 3/ Please provide a list of times the US has killed innocent victums > deliberately. I'll give you Nagasaki in advance. It's always easy to > hate and be suspicious of the guy with the biggest stick, but I'll ask > you one thing - would you prefer it be the US, or Iraq ? Christian, let me remind you Beograd, Yugoslavia. And don't forget about many thousands of people burned alive with napalm in Vietnam. BTW, have the US apologized for Nagasaki? Regards, Nikolay
Apologize for Nagasaki!!!!!!!! :confused: ROFLMAO.
-
>> I also believe nothing can justify this weeks events or detract from the right of the US to act to protect it's citizens. Chris, You cannot protect your citizens against a determined terrorist with turning your society into a police state. You need to attack the root causes of the terrorism. As I said in my initial message, there is justification for these acts, but don't that doesn't cloud the issue of looking for the real reason for these attacks. Why did people feel compeled to give up their lives and attack the U.S. ? >> Please provide a list of times the US has killed innocent victims deliberately. I'll give you Nagasaki in advance. It's always easy to hate and be suspicious of the guy with the biggest stick, but I'll ask you one thing - would you prefer it be the US, or Iraq ? I feel you are personnally attacking me for asking uncomfortable questions. The world is bigger than the U.S. and Iraq, there are 8 billion of people on this planet. I am a firm believe in 'live and let live'. All i am adovcating is that the guy with the biggest stick not degerate into a school yard bully. >> Please provide a list of times the US has killed innocent victims deliberately. Last year, their where several bombings on a american embassies in several african states. Olsma Bin Laden is widely accepted to have been behind this. The U.S. responded by attacking up a phamacticals factory that was 'reportedily' producing incedures for the islamic extremists. It was in fact producing drugs to treat africa's enormous number of A.I.D.S victims. this is the type of response that concerns me. Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
Last year, their where several bombings on a american embassies in several african states. Olsma Bin Laden is widely accepted to have been behind this. The U.S. responded by attacking up a phamacticals factory that was 'reportedily' producing incedures for the islamic extremists. It was in fact producing drugs to treat africa's enormous number of A.I.D.S victims. this is the type of response that concerns me. That response did seem rash and ineffective, and I think the response will be different this time with more time spent on verifying reports where possible. You cannot protect your citizens against a determined terrorist with turning your society into a police state. You need to attack the root causes of the terrorism. As I said in my initial message, there is justification for these acts, but don't that doesn't cloud the issue of looking for the real reason for these attacks. Why did people feel compeled to give up their lives and attack the U.S. ? I think there are two separate and distinct parts to this. First and foremost it needs to be clear that any action will receive a response. In this case I think the response will send a deep and _very_ long lasting message to those who harbor terrorists, or consider it in the future. Precedent will be set here, count on it. I also agree with you that the root causes of terrorism need to be addressed. I think defining those causes is a lot harder than most people would like to believe as well. As we're talking about a worldwide response to this, a police state mentality doesn't seem probable. I don't think the fact that people were willing to give up their lives for this somehow makes their cause majestic, it just makes them stupid, and I for one refuse to allow this tactic to 'engage' me. I think the root causes of terrorism lie in the goals of 3rd world governments who feel their opportunity for empire building is eclipsed by the establishment of the west. It seems clear that the al-Qaeda and the Taliban are, essentially the same group. It seems to me that Bin Laden built the modern Afghan government with his work in organizing against the Soviets hand in hand with Mohammed Omar. It also seems clear that the Pakistani government is also tightly bound in with this. What these cowards have succeeded in doing is galvanizing the entire world, including the moderates, against them, their cause, and the countries that have nurtured them. First they and their comrades will pay the ultimate price for their choice of a method
-
Chris, I will not discuss , this nor any other issue on an unmoderated board. I feel that if cannot conducted themselves in a mature manner, it is not worth talking to them. People resent the U.S. because they feel that the U.S. imposes its style of peace and justice upon the world. You are correct when you say that over the next few months, the U.S. will seek justice for what has happened. I can understand this but it I cannot support it. We have a forum for discussing matters such as this and advocating responses its called the U.N. Nearliy every country in the world is represented at the U.N. and subscribes the U.N. ideal, it is acknowledged worldwide that it is the correct forum to consult when taking these type of steps. But the U.S. won't consult the U.N. it never does. Which is another reason people resent the U.S. People say we have a forumn which we support and all agree to discuss our grievances there, in an effort to prevent another World War. And the U.S. will ignore this and carry on regardless. I am not attacking the U.S. when I say this, for it is not the only country who ignores the counsel of the U.N., all I am saying is, that if every action was taken with U.N. support people would feel less resentment towards the U.S. Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
Subscribe to the U.N. ideal? LOL. Many Americans are not even comfortable subscribing to the notion of a strong federal government in our own country, and you want us to kowtow to a non-democratic pack of European intellectuals? You are going to have to wait a few generations for that, my friend. Basically, you are simply saying that if the U.S. follows U.N. instructions the world would not resent us. And if we would only cooperate and do as we are told people would not be destroying our cities. Hmmm, lets see, freedom vs. world resentment. Sorry, I think I'll take freedom. To most Americans, myself very much included, the U.N. is a waste of time, and basically nothing more than another example of the long sad history of European political imbecility. The U.N. is little more than a club where all the European Marxist (or what do you call it now, "Social Democracy") try to get the African and Asian Marxist to force the U.S. to do all the dirty work and to take all the blame when things go wrong.
-
I am trying to carefully articulate myself, so as not to cause offense. I am very aware of the strong emotions people quite rightly have about this whole affair. I wish to make it clear initally, that there is no justification for terrorism (of any kind, my people have expierenced more than their fair share). I was pleased that the US administration, is taking carefully considered action against the terrorists who commmited this act. However, I feel this is just a first step in resolving the whole issue. One must acknowledge, that the terrorists are extremist wing of a culture. Therefore there must be a larger body of people who share these sentiments and support the actions of the extremists. They believed in something enough to give their lives for it. Therefore, imagine the culture they grew up in, which could instill such deep rooted feelings. Where do these feelings come from ? Mass media is indirectily responsible. Poverty is measured against the Wealthest people. For instance, a family living in country X, has enough food and shelter, to meet their needs. They look at country Y, who also has enough food and shelter, in excess of their needs. The people in country X, naturally jealous of the people in country Y, ask their leaders why this is so, and they are told (for whatever reason) that they are opressed by the people in county Y. This for people of country X is a logically plausible answer, as they can see why the people in country Y would want to protect themselves. And so resentment grows... Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
Don't give into the "What could we have done to make them not want to do this stuff". Read up on the appeasement period before WWII where everyone was giving into Germany's demands in hopes to avoid war. Guess what, it still happened. One thing you said was true, "One must acknowledge, that the terrorists are extremist wing of a culture". Our beef isn't with your average Palestinian. If fact, I don't even consider the people who did this to be Palestinians. They are just a bunch of nuts. You have to remember, this isn't about freeing the Palestinian people, this is about the destruction of enemies. Worse yet, it is about the destruction of their own people just because they do not believe in the same thing the extremists do. The hatred expressed by these extremists isn't limited to just Israel and the US. They also want to destroy countries like Egypt and Saudi Arabia. They don't care for the government systems there and want to see them replaced by revolutionary governments. The whole bit about this being about the freeing of the Palestine people is a smoke screen and a excuse. DON'T FALL FOR IT. If for some stupid reason we decided to take revenge on the Palestinians (your average 'Joe') the people who did this attack would not shed a tear for their lost people. Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.
-
Subscribe to the U.N. ideal? LOL. Many Americans are not even comfortable subscribing to the notion of a strong federal government in our own country, and you want us to kowtow to a non-democratic pack of European intellectuals? You are going to have to wait a few generations for that, my friend. Basically, you are simply saying that if the U.S. follows U.N. instructions the world would not resent us. And if we would only cooperate and do as we are told people would not be destroying our cities. Hmmm, lets see, freedom vs. world resentment. Sorry, I think I'll take freedom. To most Americans, myself very much included, the U.N. is a waste of time, and basically nothing more than another example of the long sad history of European political imbecility. The U.N. is little more than a club where all the European Marxist (or what do you call it now, "Social Democracy") try to get the African and Asian Marxist to force the U.S. to do all the dirty work and to take all the blame when things go wrong.
I hear what you are saying, it really is a bit of a toothless organization. There is however no question that we are very quickly moving toward a one world government, and it will quite likely be some evolution of the U.N. that forms this, 50 or 100 years from now. David
-
>> Reasons mostly tied to religion. I don't believe they have been pushed to this position to an equal or greater degree than the US has been pushed to act as it has in that region for it's own interest. It is too easy to write off what has happened to ignorace or religon etc. I can see why people do it, it provides security, it provides an easy reason to explain away what has happened. If only it where so ... The only way to really tackle terrorism is to ask the terrorists what is driving them to this. As unpalatable as it sounds, that is what must be done. We had to do it here and slowily millimeter by millimeter, day after day, week after week, year after year, we are slowily relising peace. >> The power of the US is a direct flow on from the fact that without the US we'd all be German colonies. The power of US comes from its wealth. It has nothing watsoever do with Germany or the World War II. >> Were you there to know what was being produced ? You think these people will not come back with the claim most likely to embarrass the US and that the US equally would not tread carefully before deciding on such an act ? U.N. observers confirmed that the site was used for the manufacture of drugs. I can see your point, however in this particular case the U.S. succeeded in embarassing themselves at cost of innocent lives. Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
>> Reasons mostly tied to religion. I don't believe they have been pushed to this position to an equal or greater degree than the US has been pushed to act as it has in that region for it's own interest. It is too easy to write off what has happened to ignorace or religon etc. I can see why people do it, it provides security, it provides an easy reason to explain away what has happened. If only it where so ... The only way to really tackle terrorism is to ask the terrorists what is driving them to this. As unpalatable as it sounds, that is what must be done. We had to do it here and slowily millimeter by millimeter, day after day, week after week, year after year, we are slowily relising peace. Sounds great - let's invite them over for coffee and a chat. >> The power of the US is a direct flow on from the fact that without the US we'd all be German colonies. The power of US comes from its wealth. It has nothing watsoever do with Germany or the World War II. The US grew into a super power because the rest of the world was made poor by WWII and the US got rich, through industry and so on. The amount that the US poured into Europe through the Marshall plan has been noted already. Howabout the cost of the massive airlift required to keep Berlin alive during the Russian blockade ? No-one remembers those things, do they ? ( I read a lot of history before I got back into programming ) >> Were you there to know what was being produced ? You think these people will not come back with the claim most likely to embarrass the US and that the US equally would not tread carefully before deciding on such an act ? U.N. observers confirmed that the site was used for the manufacture of drugs. I can see your point, however in this particular case the U.S. succeeded in embarassing themselves at cost of innocent lives. Maybe, I don't know the specifics. Christian As I learn the innermost secrets of the around me, they reward me in many ways to keep quiet. Men with pierced ears are better prepared for marriage. They've experienced pain and bought Jewellery.
-
> 3/ Please provide a list of times the US has killed innocent victums > deliberately. I'll give you Nagasaki in advance. It's always easy to > hate and be suspicious of the guy with the biggest stick, but I'll ask > you one thing - would you prefer it be the US, or Iraq ? Christian, let me remind you Beograd, Yugoslavia. And don't forget about many thousands of people burned alive with napalm in Vietnam. BTW, have the US apologized for Nagasaki? Regards, Nikolay
Christian, let me remind you Beograd, Yugoslavia. Please do - what where when why how ? And don't forget about many thousands of people burned alive with napalm in Vietnam. Vietnam was a hell of a thing. There is no doubt the US should not have been there. But being there, they fought an enemy who was hidden by the people you are talking about. They didn't set out to kill civilians, they found themselves in a situation where the civilians were helping the enemy kill *them*, and they fought back. BTW, have the US apologized for Nagasaki? No, and I doubt they will. There is no doubt that Nagakasi was a gruesome science experiment. Has Japan apologised for the terrible way they treated POW's ? The knife cuts both ways, and the incident is 56 years ago. It has little bearing on the events of today. Christian As I learn the innermost secrets of the around me, they reward me in many ways to keep quiet. Men with pierced ears are better prepared for marriage. They've experienced pain and bought Jewellery.
-
I hear what you are saying, it really is a bit of a toothless organization. There is however no question that we are very quickly moving toward a one world government, and it will quite likely be some evolution of the U.N. that forms this, 50 or 100 years from now. David
Yeah, but you got to admit that their Secretaries all seem to have had great sounding names. Michael Martin Pegasystems Pty Ltd Australia martm@pegasystems.com +61 413-004-018 "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace" - Victor Stone
-
>> I also believe nothing can justify this weeks events or detract from the right of the US to act to protect it's citizens. Chris, You cannot protect your citizens against a determined terrorist with turning your society into a police state. You need to attack the root causes of the terrorism. As I said in my initial message, there is justification for these acts, but don't that doesn't cloud the issue of looking for the real reason for these attacks. Why did people feel compeled to give up their lives and attack the U.S. ? >> Please provide a list of times the US has killed innocent victims deliberately. I'll give you Nagasaki in advance. It's always easy to hate and be suspicious of the guy with the biggest stick, but I'll ask you one thing - would you prefer it be the US, or Iraq ? I feel you are personnally attacking me for asking uncomfortable questions. The world is bigger than the U.S. and Iraq, there are 8 billion of people on this planet. I am a firm believe in 'live and let live'. All i am adovcating is that the guy with the biggest stick not degerate into a school yard bully. >> Please provide a list of times the US has killed innocent victims deliberately. Last year, their where several bombings on a american embassies in several african states. Olsma Bin Laden is widely accepted to have been behind this. The U.S. responded by attacking up a phamacticals factory that was 'reportedily' producing incedures for the islamic extremists. It was in fact producing drugs to treat africa's enormous number of A.I.D.S victims. this is the type of response that concerns me. Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
List of the countries bombed by the United States after World War II China 1945-46 Korea 1950-53 China 1950-53 Guatemala 1954 Indonesia 1958 Cuba 1959-60 Guatemala 1960 Congo 1964 Peru 1965 Laos 1964-73 Vietnam 1961-73 Guatemala 1967-69 Cambodia 1969-70 Grenada 1983 Libya 1986 El Salvador 1980s Nicaragua 1980s Panama 1989 Iraq 1991-1999 Bosnia 1995 Sudan 1998 Afghanistan 1998 Yugoslavia 1999
-
I hear what you are saying, it really is a bit of a toothless organization. There is however no question that we are very quickly moving toward a one world government, and it will quite likely be some evolution of the U.N. that forms this, 50 or 100 years from now. David
Well, yes, I certainly agree with that. History clearly shows that rapid political revolution follows on the heels of slow economic evolution. We certainly today have evolved into a one world economy. The question is, what will be the nature of the government that ulitimately forms to control that economy? The leaders of the islamic world clearly see that and are manuevering to be that government. *That* is what this "act of terrorism" is all about. The Europeans want a U.N. controlled social democracy of some kind. And I just want a simple Jeffersonian Democracy where I can continue to live my own life in my own way. Who will win? I'm afraid it is going to be one hell of a bloody century.
-
Christian, let me remind you Beograd, Yugoslavia. Please do - what where when why how ? And don't forget about many thousands of people burned alive with napalm in Vietnam. Vietnam was a hell of a thing. There is no doubt the US should not have been there. But being there, they fought an enemy who was hidden by the people you are talking about. They didn't set out to kill civilians, they found themselves in a situation where the civilians were helping the enemy kill *them*, and they fought back. BTW, have the US apologized for Nagasaki? No, and I doubt they will. There is no doubt that Nagakasi was a gruesome science experiment. Has Japan apologised for the terrible way they treated POW's ? The knife cuts both ways, and the incident is 56 years ago. It has little bearing on the events of today. Christian As I learn the innermost secrets of the around me, they reward me in many ways to keep quiet. Men with pierced ears are better prepared for marriage. They've experienced pain and bought Jewellery.
> Please do - what where when why how ? Please don't play the innocent! Hundreds of civil people were killed by NATO (==US) in 1999. The country was demolished. What was the reason for it? Who has entitled the US to bomb Yugoslavia? The only legitimate authority I know of is the Security Council of UN. > Vietnam was a hell of a thing. There is no doubt the US should > not have been there. But being there, they fought an enemy who > was hidden by the people you are talking about. They didn't set > out to kill civilians, they found themselves in a situation where > the civilians were helping the enemy kill *them*, and they fought back. What a poor logic! What would you do, if your bitterest enemy would be hidden by his mother/wife/daughter? Kill them all? And who has invited American troops to come to Vietnam? > No, and I doubt they will. There is no doubt that Nagakasi was a > gruesome science experiment. Has Japan apologised for the terrible > way they treated POW's ? The knife cuts both ways, and the incident > is 56 years ago. It has little bearing on the events of today. IMO, there is no statute of limitation for such inhuman actions and it's never too late to say "sorry", especially if you're pretending to be more civilized and moral than anybody else on this planet. Nikolay
-
Apologize for Nagasaki!!!!!!!! :confused: ROFLMAO.
ROFLMAO? Do you think it's funny? Bad sense of humour!
-
Chris, I will not discuss , this nor any other issue on an unmoderated board. I feel that if cannot conducted themselves in a mature manner, it is not worth talking to them. People resent the U.S. because they feel that the U.S. imposes its style of peace and justice upon the world. You are correct when you say that over the next few months, the U.S. will seek justice for what has happened. I can understand this but it I cannot support it. We have a forum for discussing matters such as this and advocating responses its called the U.N. Nearliy every country in the world is represented at the U.N. and subscribes the U.N. ideal, it is acknowledged worldwide that it is the correct forum to consult when taking these type of steps. But the U.S. won't consult the U.N. it never does. Which is another reason people resent the U.S. People say we have a forumn which we support and all agree to discuss our grievances there, in an effort to prevent another World War. And the U.S. will ignore this and carry on regardless. I am not attacking the U.S. when I say this, for it is not the only country who ignores the counsel of the U.N., all I am saying is, that if every action was taken with U.N. support people would feel less resentment towards the U.S. Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
People resent the U.S. because they feel that the U.S. imposes its style of peace and justice upon the world. I'm actually on the other side of the fence. I live in the US and I resent it for not doing nearly enough to impose its style of peace and justice upon the world. If it had, we wouldn't be having countries like Cuba (where I was born) with a totalitarian dictator, in power for 42 years, who has kept his people leaving in terror and exported it to most other countries in Latin America. All this just 90 miles South of the Florida Keys! IMO the whole argument of people resenting the US for imposing its style of peace and justice is a bunch of crap. I don't think there's anyone who wouldn't want to live in a free and democratic society like or similar to ours. Those who don't, deserve to be nuked, plain and simple. When you think of how many people have risked and given their lives to reach this country... Regards, Alvaro
-
People resent the U.S. because they feel that the U.S. imposes its style of peace and justice upon the world. I'm actually on the other side of the fence. I live in the US and I resent it for not doing nearly enough to impose its style of peace and justice upon the world. If it had, we wouldn't be having countries like Cuba (where I was born) with a totalitarian dictator, in power for 42 years, who has kept his people leaving in terror and exported it to most other countries in Latin America. All this just 90 miles South of the Florida Keys! IMO the whole argument of people resenting the US for imposing its style of peace and justice is a bunch of crap. I don't think there's anyone who wouldn't want to live in a free and democratic society like or similar to ours. Those who don't, deserve to be nuked, plain and simple. When you think of how many people have risked and given their lives to reach this country... Regards, Alvaro
Thank you, Alvaro. I often wonder if the critics of the U.S. could pick another country to possess our current level of hegemony, who it would be?
-
Chris, I will not discuss , this nor any other issue on an unmoderated board. I feel that if cannot conducted themselves in a mature manner, it is not worth talking to them. People resent the U.S. because they feel that the U.S. imposes its style of peace and justice upon the world. You are correct when you say that over the next few months, the U.S. will seek justice for what has happened. I can understand this but it I cannot support it. We have a forum for discussing matters such as this and advocating responses its called the U.N. Nearliy every country in the world is represented at the U.N. and subscribes the U.N. ideal, it is acknowledged worldwide that it is the correct forum to consult when taking these type of steps. But the U.S. won't consult the U.N. it never does. Which is another reason people resent the U.S. People say we have a forumn which we support and all agree to discuss our grievances there, in an effort to prevent another World War. And the U.S. will ignore this and carry on regardless. I am not attacking the U.S. when I say this, for it is not the only country who ignores the counsel of the U.N., all I am saying is, that if every action was taken with U.N. support people would feel less resentment towards the U.S. Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"
...is a tea party. did the people who did this go through the UN with their grievances? maybe. but since nobody is taking responsibility, we can assume the answer is "no". -c ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
-
ROFLMAO? Do you think it's funny? Bad sense of humour!
I think the notion that we should apologize for it is damned funny. I would ask you to observe that Japan has been a peaceful, democratic nation since that time. Hmmm, what historic lessons does that teach us?
-
Thank you, Alvaro. I often wonder if the critics of the U.S. could pick another country to possess our current level of hegemony, who it would be?
Unfortunately there is no other country in the world with the U.S. 's level of authority, if the was another Super State (to coin a phrase), I don't think we would as many problems as we do. Perhaps, with some luck in a few years we will have a Federal Europe and then perhaps the world will return to balance. Not to rival the U.S. but to provide an alternative to the U.S. Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire"