Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. sub-humans at it again

sub-humans at it again

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestionannouncement
74 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Mike Gaskey

    KaЯl wrote: help the settlers, no. Rumor has it that the settlers are people. This is conquered land, not occupied, but conquered. If what I propose were done, this would be a part of the negotiations. Mike

    K Offline
    K Offline
    KaRl
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    Mike Gaskey wrote: This is conquered land, not occupied, but conquered Oh, that's part of the Great Israel, then. You're right, let's promote the use of force and territorial annexions. May the stronger win. Vive la Guerre!


    New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K KaRl

      Mike Gaskey wrote: This is conquered land, not occupied, but conquered Oh, that's part of the Great Israel, then. You're right, let's promote the use of force and territorial annexions. May the stronger win. Vive la Guerre!


      New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mike Gaskey
      wrote on last edited by
      #24

      KaЯl wrote: You're right, let's promote the use of force and territorial annexions. Nah. Let's hug'em to death. Mike

      K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mike Gaskey

        KaЯl wrote: You're right, let's promote the use of force and territorial annexions. Nah. Let's hug'em to death. Mike

        K Offline
        K Offline
        KaRl
        wrote on last edited by
        #25

        It that part of free expression to call to murder and promote genocide?


        New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

        T M 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • M Mike Gaskey

          51 injured, 18 dead 5 of which were children. Israel shouldn't build a fence, they should borrow a couple of MOABs and put them to use. UN sympathy with the Palestinians == one more reason the organization is worthless. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&u=/nm/20031004/ts_nm/mideast_dc_30[^] Mike

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Stan Shannon
          wrote on last edited by
          #26

          Reading the responses to your post it is absolutely incredible how many westerners just cannot bring themselves to blame the Islamic world for the violence going on in the middle east. It seems to all be about moral equivalency: "Everyone's to blame, so no one's to blame" Personally, I don't care if Israel is destroyed. They never should have been there in the first place, and I don't blame the Palestinians for being angry about the situation. But all of that is beside the point. The point is that Islam is a culture of voilence, hatred and intolerance, and becomeing increasingly more so. The reason has nothing at all to do with anything we have ever done to them. That is simply the way their culture is, always has been, and always will be. We in the west have got to get it through our heads that when it comes to Islam we have two choices - submit to it or destroy it.

          D M P 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • K KaRl

            It that part of free expression to call to murder and promote genocide?


            New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

            T Offline
            T Offline
            Terry ONolley
            wrote on last edited by
            #27

            KaЯl wrote: and promote genocide? I take it you are talking about the Palestinians pledge to drive all jews into the sea?



            K 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Stan Shannon

              Reading the responses to your post it is absolutely incredible how many westerners just cannot bring themselves to blame the Islamic world for the violence going on in the middle east. It seems to all be about moral equivalency: "Everyone's to blame, so no one's to blame" Personally, I don't care if Israel is destroyed. They never should have been there in the first place, and I don't blame the Palestinians for being angry about the situation. But all of that is beside the point. The point is that Islam is a culture of voilence, hatred and intolerance, and becomeing increasingly more so. The reason has nothing at all to do with anything we have ever done to them. That is simply the way their culture is, always has been, and always will be. We in the west have got to get it through our heads that when it comes to Islam we have two choices - submit to it or destroy it.

              D Offline
              D Offline
              David Wulff
              wrote on last edited by
              #28

              Good grief Stan, how many Muslims do you actually know? I'll wager there are none... :wtf:


              David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum

              "I live very much in the real world, it's just not the same world shared by most other people"

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K KaRl

                It that part of free expression to call to murder and promote genocide?


                New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Mike Gaskey
                wrote on last edited by
                #29

                KaЯl wrote: It that part of free expression to call to murder and promote genocide? Not sure. Let's check with Arafat, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hizbollah, Al Aqusa, PLO - and see what they think. But yes. If you murder one of mine then your's are fair game. However, I did suggest a solution you just don't like it. I'll try once more --> declare a nation (it doesn't matter a squat that you're "occupied", you'll always be "occupied" as long as it is necessary for ,"my" protection.) Mike

                K 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Stan Shannon

                  Reading the responses to your post it is absolutely incredible how many westerners just cannot bring themselves to blame the Islamic world for the violence going on in the middle east. It seems to all be about moral equivalency: "Everyone's to blame, so no one's to blame" Personally, I don't care if Israel is destroyed. They never should have been there in the first place, and I don't blame the Palestinians for being angry about the situation. But all of that is beside the point. The point is that Islam is a culture of voilence, hatred and intolerance, and becomeing increasingly more so. The reason has nothing at all to do with anything we have ever done to them. That is simply the way their culture is, always has been, and always will be. We in the west have got to get it through our heads that when it comes to Islam we have two choices - submit to it or destroy it.

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mike Gaskey
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #30

                  Stan Shannon wrote: We in the west have got to get it through our heads that when it comes to Islam we have two choices - submit to it or destroy it. I agree, at least based on my reading of the basis for the religion. Mike

                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Mike Gaskey

                    Stan Shannon wrote: We in the west have got to get it through our heads that when it comes to Islam we have two choices - submit to it or destroy it. I agree, at least based on my reading of the basis for the religion. Mike

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    Terry ONolley
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #31

                    Mike Gaskey wrote: at least based on my reading of the basis for the religion And a groovy religion it is too! Since the mullahs are beieved to be endowed with holy powers, anything they say carries the weight of god. So they tell you to slaughter thousands of innocent people and you'll go to an afterlife where you get to bone dozens of virgins. Sounds like a group of gentlement who don't plan on living at peace with their neighbors. And when you combine that mindset with the economic, scientific and military powers of an oil-rich nation-state then you have the recipe for disaster. Only a naive ferf would think that nations founded on those beliefs wouldn't do their "holy duty" by nuking America if we were just stupid enough to allow them to get their hands on one. And of course several euro "powers" choose the appeasemnet route - buying their own safety by selling those terror states the knowledge and hardware they need to kill us.



                    M C 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • T Terry ONolley

                      Mike Gaskey wrote: at least based on my reading of the basis for the religion And a groovy religion it is too! Since the mullahs are beieved to be endowed with holy powers, anything they say carries the weight of god. So they tell you to slaughter thousands of innocent people and you'll go to an afterlife where you get to bone dozens of virgins. Sounds like a group of gentlement who don't plan on living at peace with their neighbors. And when you combine that mindset with the economic, scientific and military powers of an oil-rich nation-state then you have the recipe for disaster. Only a naive ferf would think that nations founded on those beliefs wouldn't do their "holy duty" by nuking America if we were just stupid enough to allow them to get their hands on one. And of course several euro "powers" choose the appeasemnet route - buying their own safety by selling those terror states the knowledge and hardware they need to kill us.



                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mike Gaskey
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #32

                      yes! Mike

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K KaRl

                        Terry O`Nolley wrote: you side with those that slaughter children on purpose Utter BS. I don't side with any of them, neither palestinian no israeli. neither on the side of the killers of 900 israeli, nor on the side of the killers of 3000 palestinian.


                        New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        Terry ONolley
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #33

                        KaЯl wrote: I don't side with any of them, neither palestinian no israeli. neither on the side of the killers of 900 israeli, nor on the side of the killers of 3000 palestinian You can claim you don't support the terrorists, but every comment you make shows your true feelings. Take this little nugget above. You make a point to show that Israel has killed more Palestinians. You don't tell the real story - the Israelis killed were mostly innocents - murdered by terrorists. The palestinians were mainly killed in military operations against terrorists.



                        K 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T Terry ONolley

                          KaЯl wrote: and promote genocide? I take it you are talking about the Palestinians pledge to drive all jews into the sea?



                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          KaRl
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #34

                          You took it the wrong way.


                          New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T Terry ONolley

                            KaЯl wrote: I don't side with any of them, neither palestinian no israeli. neither on the side of the killers of 900 israeli, nor on the side of the killers of 3000 palestinian You can claim you don't support the terrorists, but every comment you make shows your true feelings. Take this little nugget above. You make a point to show that Israel has killed more Palestinians. You don't tell the real story - the Israelis killed were mostly innocents - murdered by terrorists. The palestinians were mainly killed in military operations against terrorists.



                            K Offline
                            K Offline
                            KaRl
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #35

                            Terry O`Nolley wrote: but every comment you make shows your true feelings So we have another Freud there. Terry O`Nolley wrote: You make a point to show that Israel has killed more Palestinians I make a point that on both sides innocent where killed. Terry O`Nolley wrote: The palestinians were mainly killed in military operations against terrorists. Exact figures? Or is it just another affirmation?


                            New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Mike Gaskey

                              KaЯl wrote: It that part of free expression to call to murder and promote genocide? Not sure. Let's check with Arafat, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hizbollah, Al Aqusa, PLO - and see what they think. But yes. If you murder one of mine then your's are fair game. However, I did suggest a solution you just don't like it. I'll try once more --> declare a nation (it doesn't matter a squat that you're "occupied", you'll always be "occupied" as long as it is necessary for ,"my" protection.) Mike

                              K Offline
                              K Offline
                              KaRl
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #36

                              Mike Gaskey wrote: you just don't like it I didn't argue about this solution because for the moment I have no firm opinion about it. I just don't see how a formal declaration of statehood could change the situation. Do you think the US and Israel are ready to recognize such a state? :confused:


                              New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                              M T 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • K KaRl

                                Mike Gaskey wrote: you just don't like it I didn't argue about this solution because for the moment I have no firm opinion about it. I just don't see how a formal declaration of statehood could change the situation. Do you think the US and Israel are ready to recognize such a state? :confused:


                                New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mike Gaskey
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #37

                                KaЯl wrote: Do you think the US and Israel are ready to recognize such a state? The US would be one of the last, then Israel. The point is, once it is declared the rest of the world has no choice - especially given what I believe to be the majority of world opinion. Mike

                                K T 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • M Mike Gaskey

                                  KaЯl wrote: Do you think the US and Israel are ready to recognize such a state? The US would be one of the last, then Israel. The point is, once it is declared the rest of the world has no choice - especially given what I believe to be the majority of world opinion. Mike

                                  K Offline
                                  K Offline
                                  KaRl
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #38

                                  Mike Gaskey wrote: The point is, once it is declared the rest of the world has no choice I don't understand. No choice of what? Recognize a palestinian state? COuld you please also develop why an official declaration of statehood would solve the problem?


                                  New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D David Wulff

                                    Good grief Stan, how many Muslims do you actually know? I'll wager there are none... :wtf:


                                    David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum

                                    "I live very much in the real world, it's just not the same world shared by most other people"

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Stan Shannon
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #39

                                    How many do I need to know? If I knew a thousand and they were all the nicest people on the planet what significance would that have? My first thought would be: "Geez, if you people are so nice why don't you go back to your own contries and take care of those murderous bastards that are killing in the name of your religion." The fact that they don't seem inclined to do that tells me every thing I need to know about "nice" Muslims. Sorry, but I'm just not inclined to be generous towards such people. I want them to proove to me that they are worthy of my civilization, because it is lightyears better than their's.

                                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • K KaRl

                                      Mike Gaskey wrote: The point is, once it is declared the rest of the world has no choice I don't understand. No choice of what? Recognize a palestinian state? COuld you please also develop why an official declaration of statehood would solve the problem?


                                      New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mike Gaskey
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #40

                                      KaЯl wrote: No choice of what? Recognize a palestinian state? precisely. KaЯl wrote: why an official declaration of statehood would solve the problem? puts everything on a different plane. A physcological gambit that I believe works for the Palestinians, as long as they stop the terror. It then all comes down to negotiations that would be monitored by the rest of the world. At that point warriors no longer have a role, Arafat and Sharon and similar types are marginalized and it is a diplomatic game from then on. Mike

                                      K 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Stan Shannon

                                        How many do I need to know? If I knew a thousand and they were all the nicest people on the planet what significance would that have? My first thought would be: "Geez, if you people are so nice why don't you go back to your own contries and take care of those murderous bastards that are killing in the name of your religion." The fact that they don't seem inclined to do that tells me every thing I need to know about "nice" Muslims. Sorry, but I'm just not inclined to be generous towards such people. I want them to proove to me that they are worthy of my civilization, because it is lightyears better than their's.

                                        D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        David Wulff
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #41

                                        Stan Shannon wrote: How many do I need to know? Just one would be enough, and then you may actually be able to gain an understanding for the basis of their religion that did not come from CNN. :| Go on a visit to your local Mosque - they will be more than happy to welcome you in and answer all the questions you may have. I didn't want to have to say this because I find it astonishing it even needs mentioning, but doing something in the name of a religion and doing something as disposed through a religion are not the same thing. I should not need to remind anyone that every atrocity and every war ever fought has been done in the name of one religion or ideal or another by people with strength of belief on par with those in the limelight today. That's what religion does: it allows individuals to justify decisions through their own interpretations of its teachings (just look at the bigger groups in Christianity) - but the decisions are up to them to make. Stan Shannon wrote: My first thought would be: "Geez, if you people are so nice why don't you go back to your own contries and take care of those murderous bastards that are killing in the name of your religion." That I think is probably where we are disagreeing from - you seem to be coming from an 'us' and 'them' standpoint, rather than merely an 'us'. That is a major hurdle in this country with immigrants trying to settle here; and that leads to deeper puddles of shit than merely going round murdering children. :(


                                        David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum

                                        "I live very much in the real world, it's just not the same world shared by most other people"

                                        T S 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T Terry ONolley

                                          Mike Gaskey wrote: at least based on my reading of the basis for the religion And a groovy religion it is too! Since the mullahs are beieved to be endowed with holy powers, anything they say carries the weight of god. So they tell you to slaughter thousands of innocent people and you'll go to an afterlife where you get to bone dozens of virgins. Sounds like a group of gentlement who don't plan on living at peace with their neighbors. And when you combine that mindset with the economic, scientific and military powers of an oil-rich nation-state then you have the recipe for disaster. Only a naive ferf would think that nations founded on those beliefs wouldn't do their "holy duty" by nuking America if we were just stupid enough to allow them to get their hands on one. And of course several euro "powers" choose the appeasemnet route - buying their own safety by selling those terror states the knowledge and hardware they need to kill us.



                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          Chris Losinger
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #42

                                          Terry O`Nolley wrote: the mullahs are beieved to be endowed with holy powers, anything they say carries the weight of god. how unusual. i can't think of any other religion that works like that. ImgSource | CheeseWeasle

                                          M T 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups