Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. sub-humans at it again

sub-humans at it again

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestionannouncement
74 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Terry ONolley

    Mike Gaskey wrote: at least based on my reading of the basis for the religion And a groovy religion it is too! Since the mullahs are beieved to be endowed with holy powers, anything they say carries the weight of god. So they tell you to slaughter thousands of innocent people and you'll go to an afterlife where you get to bone dozens of virgins. Sounds like a group of gentlement who don't plan on living at peace with their neighbors. And when you combine that mindset with the economic, scientific and military powers of an oil-rich nation-state then you have the recipe for disaster. Only a naive ferf would think that nations founded on those beliefs wouldn't do their "holy duty" by nuking America if we were just stupid enough to allow them to get their hands on one. And of course several euro "powers" choose the appeasemnet route - buying their own safety by selling those terror states the knowledge and hardware they need to kill us.



    M Offline
    M Offline
    Mike Gaskey
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    yes! Mike

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K KaRl

      Terry O`Nolley wrote: you side with those that slaughter children on purpose Utter BS. I don't side with any of them, neither palestinian no israeli. neither on the side of the killers of 900 israeli, nor on the side of the killers of 3000 palestinian.


      New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

      T Offline
      T Offline
      Terry ONolley
      wrote on last edited by
      #33

      KaЯl wrote: I don't side with any of them, neither palestinian no israeli. neither on the side of the killers of 900 israeli, nor on the side of the killers of 3000 palestinian You can claim you don't support the terrorists, but every comment you make shows your true feelings. Take this little nugget above. You make a point to show that Israel has killed more Palestinians. You don't tell the real story - the Israelis killed were mostly innocents - murdered by terrorists. The palestinians were mainly killed in military operations against terrorists.



      K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Terry ONolley

        KaЯl wrote: and promote genocide? I take it you are talking about the Palestinians pledge to drive all jews into the sea?



        K Offline
        K Offline
        KaRl
        wrote on last edited by
        #34

        You took it the wrong way.


        New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Terry ONolley

          KaЯl wrote: I don't side with any of them, neither palestinian no israeli. neither on the side of the killers of 900 israeli, nor on the side of the killers of 3000 palestinian You can claim you don't support the terrorists, but every comment you make shows your true feelings. Take this little nugget above. You make a point to show that Israel has killed more Palestinians. You don't tell the real story - the Israelis killed were mostly innocents - murdered by terrorists. The palestinians were mainly killed in military operations against terrorists.



          K Offline
          K Offline
          KaRl
          wrote on last edited by
          #35

          Terry O`Nolley wrote: but every comment you make shows your true feelings So we have another Freud there. Terry O`Nolley wrote: You make a point to show that Israel has killed more Palestinians I make a point that on both sides innocent where killed. Terry O`Nolley wrote: The palestinians were mainly killed in military operations against terrorists. Exact figures? Or is it just another affirmation?


          New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mike Gaskey

            KaЯl wrote: It that part of free expression to call to murder and promote genocide? Not sure. Let's check with Arafat, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hizbollah, Al Aqusa, PLO - and see what they think. But yes. If you murder one of mine then your's are fair game. However, I did suggest a solution you just don't like it. I'll try once more --> declare a nation (it doesn't matter a squat that you're "occupied", you'll always be "occupied" as long as it is necessary for ,"my" protection.) Mike

            K Offline
            K Offline
            KaRl
            wrote on last edited by
            #36

            Mike Gaskey wrote: you just don't like it I didn't argue about this solution because for the moment I have no firm opinion about it. I just don't see how a formal declaration of statehood could change the situation. Do you think the US and Israel are ready to recognize such a state? :confused:


            New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

            M T 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • K KaRl

              Mike Gaskey wrote: you just don't like it I didn't argue about this solution because for the moment I have no firm opinion about it. I just don't see how a formal declaration of statehood could change the situation. Do you think the US and Israel are ready to recognize such a state? :confused:


              New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mike Gaskey
              wrote on last edited by
              #37

              KaЯl wrote: Do you think the US and Israel are ready to recognize such a state? The US would be one of the last, then Israel. The point is, once it is declared the rest of the world has no choice - especially given what I believe to be the majority of world opinion. Mike

              K T 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • M Mike Gaskey

                KaЯl wrote: Do you think the US and Israel are ready to recognize such a state? The US would be one of the last, then Israel. The point is, once it is declared the rest of the world has no choice - especially given what I believe to be the majority of world opinion. Mike

                K Offline
                K Offline
                KaRl
                wrote on last edited by
                #38

                Mike Gaskey wrote: The point is, once it is declared the rest of the world has no choice I don't understand. No choice of what? Recognize a palestinian state? COuld you please also develop why an official declaration of statehood would solve the problem?


                New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D David Wulff

                  Good grief Stan, how many Muslims do you actually know? I'll wager there are none... :wtf:


                  David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum

                  "I live very much in the real world, it's just not the same world shared by most other people"

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stan Shannon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #39

                  How many do I need to know? If I knew a thousand and they were all the nicest people on the planet what significance would that have? My first thought would be: "Geez, if you people are so nice why don't you go back to your own contries and take care of those murderous bastards that are killing in the name of your religion." The fact that they don't seem inclined to do that tells me every thing I need to know about "nice" Muslims. Sorry, but I'm just not inclined to be generous towards such people. I want them to proove to me that they are worthy of my civilization, because it is lightyears better than their's.

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K KaRl

                    Mike Gaskey wrote: The point is, once it is declared the rest of the world has no choice I don't understand. No choice of what? Recognize a palestinian state? COuld you please also develop why an official declaration of statehood would solve the problem?


                    New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mike Gaskey
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #40

                    KaЯl wrote: No choice of what? Recognize a palestinian state? precisely. KaЯl wrote: why an official declaration of statehood would solve the problem? puts everything on a different plane. A physcological gambit that I believe works for the Palestinians, as long as they stop the terror. It then all comes down to negotiations that would be monitored by the rest of the world. At that point warriors no longer have a role, Arafat and Sharon and similar types are marginalized and it is a diplomatic game from then on. Mike

                    K 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Stan Shannon

                      How many do I need to know? If I knew a thousand and they were all the nicest people on the planet what significance would that have? My first thought would be: "Geez, if you people are so nice why don't you go back to your own contries and take care of those murderous bastards that are killing in the name of your religion." The fact that they don't seem inclined to do that tells me every thing I need to know about "nice" Muslims. Sorry, but I'm just not inclined to be generous towards such people. I want them to proove to me that they are worthy of my civilization, because it is lightyears better than their's.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      David Wulff
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #41

                      Stan Shannon wrote: How many do I need to know? Just one would be enough, and then you may actually be able to gain an understanding for the basis of their religion that did not come from CNN. :| Go on a visit to your local Mosque - they will be more than happy to welcome you in and answer all the questions you may have. I didn't want to have to say this because I find it astonishing it even needs mentioning, but doing something in the name of a religion and doing something as disposed through a religion are not the same thing. I should not need to remind anyone that every atrocity and every war ever fought has been done in the name of one religion or ideal or another by people with strength of belief on par with those in the limelight today. That's what religion does: it allows individuals to justify decisions through their own interpretations of its teachings (just look at the bigger groups in Christianity) - but the decisions are up to them to make. Stan Shannon wrote: My first thought would be: "Geez, if you people are so nice why don't you go back to your own contries and take care of those murderous bastards that are killing in the name of your religion." That I think is probably where we are disagreeing from - you seem to be coming from an 'us' and 'them' standpoint, rather than merely an 'us'. That is a major hurdle in this country with immigrants trying to settle here; and that leads to deeper puddles of shit than merely going round murdering children. :(


                      David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum

                      "I live very much in the real world, it's just not the same world shared by most other people"

                      T S 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • T Terry ONolley

                        Mike Gaskey wrote: at least based on my reading of the basis for the religion And a groovy religion it is too! Since the mullahs are beieved to be endowed with holy powers, anything they say carries the weight of god. So they tell you to slaughter thousands of innocent people and you'll go to an afterlife where you get to bone dozens of virgins. Sounds like a group of gentlement who don't plan on living at peace with their neighbors. And when you combine that mindset with the economic, scientific and military powers of an oil-rich nation-state then you have the recipe for disaster. Only a naive ferf would think that nations founded on those beliefs wouldn't do their "holy duty" by nuking America if we were just stupid enough to allow them to get their hands on one. And of course several euro "powers" choose the appeasemnet route - buying their own safety by selling those terror states the knowledge and hardware they need to kill us.



                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Chris Losinger
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #42

                        Terry O`Nolley wrote: the mullahs are beieved to be endowed with holy powers, anything they say carries the weight of god. how unusual. i can't think of any other religion that works like that. ImgSource | CheeseWeasle

                        M T 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • K KaRl

                          Mike Gaskey wrote: you just don't like it I didn't argue about this solution because for the moment I have no firm opinion about it. I just don't see how a formal declaration of statehood could change the situation. Do you think the US and Israel are ready to recognize such a state? :confused:


                          New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                          T Offline
                          T Offline
                          Terry ONolley
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #43

                          KaЯl wrote: I just don't see how a formal declaration of statehood could change the situation. If the Palestinians accepted their borders, renounced terrorism, acknowledged Israel's right to exist and then declared statehood a lot of nations would recognize their existence. KaЯl wrote: Do you think the US and Israel are ready to recognize such a state? First off, it wouldn't matter. Such an issue would be settled in the general assembly of the UN, not the security council. I have no doubt that membership to the UN would be granted to the new state of Palestine. Israel and the US's choice to not recognize that state would have no bearing on the matter. But I believe that Israel and the US would recognize such a state because to not do so would look quite bad - seeing as that is what we have been trying to accomplish for decades. The only ones who don't want a Palestinian state that recognizes Israel's right to exist are Iran, Syria, Libya, Egypt and a minority of the Palestinians who are terrorists.



                          K 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Mike Gaskey

                            John Carson wrote: What have you been smoking? Too early in the morning. John Carson wrote: Declaring a nation won't get rid of the Israelis. No, they're not going anywhere. After being hounded by the rest of humanity for 2,000 years they intent to both survive and succeed. That isn't the point I attempted to make and apparently not clear enough. If the Palestinians had the cojones to declare a nation, 95% of the UN member nations would recognize them as a nation. Then they would, as I said earlier, be drowned in aid and opportunity. Again, the only thing I see holding them back is the fact they would then be forced to succeed as a nation and couldn't whine that, :the Israelis won't let us have our own country". Both would have to negotiate and neither could turn down UN/EU/US/Russian monitors o guarantee some degree of real peace. The real fact is the Palestinians DO NOT WANT A NATION, they want the death of Israeli. Screw'em I say. Mike

                            T Offline
                            T Offline
                            Terry ONolley
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #44

                            Mike Gaskey wrote: The real fact is the Palestinians DO NOT WANT A NATION, they want the death of Israeli. And the Palestinians are merely meat-puppet marionettes whose mouths are being moved by Iranians and Syrians.



                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D David Wulff

                              Stan Shannon wrote: How many do I need to know? Just one would be enough, and then you may actually be able to gain an understanding for the basis of their religion that did not come from CNN. :| Go on a visit to your local Mosque - they will be more than happy to welcome you in and answer all the questions you may have. I didn't want to have to say this because I find it astonishing it even needs mentioning, but doing something in the name of a religion and doing something as disposed through a religion are not the same thing. I should not need to remind anyone that every atrocity and every war ever fought has been done in the name of one religion or ideal or another by people with strength of belief on par with those in the limelight today. That's what religion does: it allows individuals to justify decisions through their own interpretations of its teachings (just look at the bigger groups in Christianity) - but the decisions are up to them to make. Stan Shannon wrote: My first thought would be: "Geez, if you people are so nice why don't you go back to your own contries and take care of those murderous bastards that are killing in the name of your religion." That I think is probably where we are disagreeing from - you seem to be coming from an 'us' and 'them' standpoint, rather than merely an 'us'. That is a major hurdle in this country with immigrants trying to settle here; and that leads to deeper puddles of shit than merely going round murdering children. :(


                              David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum

                              "I live very much in the real world, it's just not the same world shared by most other people"

                              T Offline
                              T Offline
                              Terry ONolley
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #45

                              David Wulff wrote: That I think is probably where we are disagreeing from - you seem to be coming from an 'us' and 'them' standpoint, rather than merely an 'us'. That is a major hurdle in this country with immigrants trying to settle here; and that leads to deeper puddles of sh*t than merely going round murdering children I think "merely" murdering children is worse than being suspicious of a religious group who commits terrorist acts every day in the name of that religion.



                              D 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T Terry ONolley

                                David Wulff wrote: That I think is probably where we are disagreeing from - you seem to be coming from an 'us' and 'them' standpoint, rather than merely an 'us'. That is a major hurdle in this country with immigrants trying to settle here; and that leads to deeper puddles of sh*t than merely going round murdering children I think "merely" murdering children is worse than being suspicious of a religious group who commits terrorist acts every day in the name of that religion.



                                D Offline
                                D Offline
                                David Wulff
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #46

                                People are murdered, children too if you like emotive language... should we tackle the effects or the cause? Suspicion, a lack of trust, destroys far more lives than bullets and bombs.


                                David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum

                                "I live very much in the real world, it's just not the same world shared by most other people"

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • T Terry ONolley

                                  KaЯl wrote: I just don't see how a formal declaration of statehood could change the situation. If the Palestinians accepted their borders, renounced terrorism, acknowledged Israel's right to exist and then declared statehood a lot of nations would recognize their existence. KaЯl wrote: Do you think the US and Israel are ready to recognize such a state? First off, it wouldn't matter. Such an issue would be settled in the general assembly of the UN, not the security council. I have no doubt that membership to the UN would be granted to the new state of Palestine. Israel and the US's choice to not recognize that state would have no bearing on the matter. But I believe that Israel and the US would recognize such a state because to not do so would look quite bad - seeing as that is what we have been trying to accomplish for decades. The only ones who don't want a Palestinian state that recognizes Israel's right to exist are Iran, Syria, Libya, Egypt and a minority of the Palestinians who are terrorists.



                                  K Offline
                                  K Offline
                                  KaRl
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #47

                                  Terry O`Nolley wrote: If the Palestinians accepted their borders The ones drawn by Israel? Terry O`Nolley wrote: acknowledged Israel's right to exist They already have. Terry O`Nolley wrote: renounced terrorism They should Terry O`Nolley wrote: I believe that Israel and the US would recognize such a state because to not do so would look quite bad the Israeli governement doesn't want a palestinian state: "All of this is achievable only if we stop expressing any agreement for a Palestinian state in wide swaths of Judea, Samaria, and Gaza. There must not be a state such as this, and therefore, there must not be any talk encouraging it. Local leaders with local autonomy, yes. But a state? No! " Terry O`Nolley wrote: minority of the Palestinians who are terrorists. These ones really believe they are winning the war and don't understand their are crushing their cause.


                                  New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Mike Gaskey

                                    KaЯl wrote: Israel will retaliate in a few days And what else would you suggest, Israel to open her arms, bare her throat and say, "here, do what you will"? Once again, I'll contend: 1) Palestinians do not want a nation, they want the death of Israel, 2) Palestinians could have their own nation simply by declaring it - the EU and the UN would trip all over themselves trying to fill Palestinian pockets with Euros. And both side would be under world pressure to negotiate. Mike

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #48

                                    Mike Gaskey wrote: 1) Palestinians do not want a nation, they want the death of Israel Uhm. Now you're generalizing quite a bit! I know there are people in the south of the US who just loves dragging colored people behind their trucks. Am I to believe that all white people in the US loves doing this? Have you ever talked to a palestinian? Most of them just wants to go about their own business, just like you do every day. But they can't! And some of these people resort to extreme violence. If the US was equivalent to Palestinia, and Canadia was Israel, I'm sure terrorist cells would pop up everywhere in the US. Mike Gaskey wrote: 2) Palestinians could have their own nation simply by declaring it And how the hell would that be possible? Israel wouldn't let them. You can't just declare a nation within the borders of another nation. -- Stukas! Stukas im Visier!

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • K KaRl

                                      Mike Gaskey wrote: Israeli leaders are obligated to defend their people and they have my sympathy. Defend their people, yes, help the settlers, no.


                                      New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      Terry ONolley
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #49

                                      KaЯl wrote: Defend their people, yes, help the settlers, no. I agree with this. Israel's settlement activity has always disturbed me. It erodes their credibility. Israel should leave the occupied territories, remove all settlements and finish that fence. THey should help push for Palestinian statehood so that when the next terrorist blows up an Israeli day-care center they can declare war on Palestine and finish it once and for all.



                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Mike Gaskey

                                        KaЯl wrote: No choice of what? Recognize a palestinian state? precisely. KaЯl wrote: why an official declaration of statehood would solve the problem? puts everything on a different plane. A physcological gambit that I believe works for the Palestinians, as long as they stop the terror. It then all comes down to negotiations that would be monitored by the rest of the world. At that point warriors no longer have a role, Arafat and Sharon and similar types are marginalized and it is a diplomatic game from then on. Mike

                                        K Offline
                                        K Offline
                                        KaRl
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #50

                                        So why what that refused by Clinton? :confused: http://www.focus-on-israel.org/news144.htm[^] "In the clearest terms since the meltdown at Camp David, Arafat reiterated during a stopover in Saudi Arabia that he will declare a Palestinian state next month despite threats and objections from the US [...] Clinton also has been personally lobbying European Union members not to give the Palestinians a green light for statehood by pledging to recognize it [...]


                                        New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • K KaRl

                                          So why what that refused by Clinton? :confused: http://www.focus-on-israel.org/news144.htm[^] "In the clearest terms since the meltdown at Camp David, Arafat reiterated during a stopover in Saudi Arabia that he will declare a Palestinian state next month despite threats and objections from the US [...] Clinton also has been personally lobbying European Union members not to give the Palestinians a green light for statehood by pledging to recognize it [...]


                                          New, what do you own the world? How do you own disorder?

                                          M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mike Gaskey
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #51

                                          KaЯl wrote: So why what that refused by Clinton? Wrong question. The question should be, "why didn't Arafat do it?" The answer is encapsulated in my earlier statements. The Palestinians, leadership at lest, have no desire to do anything except wipe out Israel. As long as that is true, Israel has my support, the support of the US government and I would guess a majority of Americans. Frankly, I would applaud the most drastic action possible on the part of Israelis from today on. My statement, "sub-humans" was not chosen lightly. Mike

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups