Python is bad for you. Proof...
-
Some people also like Visual Basic. But that doesn't make the language alright! ;P -- 20 eyes in my head, they're all the same![^]
ACK, even though this is a personal/philosophical point of view. - Still, google is running python. Well, I must give them an email and ask them to reconsider their overall software strategy / architecture. - Whats really bad about python? strings are immutable. This is getting personal ;) ______________________________ Java: The living proof Moore's law won't solve all your problems
-
ACK, even though this is a personal/philosophical point of view. - Still, google is running python. Well, I must give them an email and ask them to reconsider their overall software strategy / architecture. - Whats really bad about python? strings are immutable. This is getting personal ;) ______________________________ Java: The living proof Moore's law won't solve all your problems
Amanjit Gill wrote: ACK, even though this is a personal/philosophical point of view. :rolleyes: Amanjit Gill wrote: Whats really bad about python? strings are immutable That my friend is a good thing. Immutable strings means many optimizations possibilities. Amanjit Gill wrote: This is getting personal Are you written in Python? :-D -- 20 eyes in my head, they're all the same![^]
-
Some people also like Visual Basic. But that doesn't make the language alright! ;P -- 20 eyes in my head, they're all the same![^]
Ok I'm prepared to risk what little reputation I have :) I find VB very very useful as a prototyping tool when testing COM objects i've written. If it works in VB it's going to work anywhere :) Of course, this statement crystallises the dilemma we all had a few years ago when it was possible (using MS Tools) to create an OCX in C++ but it was almost impossible to create a container for such objects in C++. I've even written complete applications in VB (always for money :) ). Now where's that industrial strength soap? :laugh: Rob Manderson http://www.mindprobes.net **Paul Watson wrote:**What sense would you most dislike loosing? Ian Darling replied. Telepathy Then I'd no longer be able to find out everyones dirty little secrets The Lounge, December 4 2003
-
Amanjit Gill wrote: ACK, even though this is a personal/philosophical point of view. :rolleyes: Amanjit Gill wrote: Whats really bad about python? strings are immutable That my friend is a good thing. Immutable strings means many optimizations possibilities. Amanjit Gill wrote: This is getting personal Are you written in Python? :-D -- 20 eyes in my head, they're all the same![^]
-
Ok I'm prepared to risk what little reputation I have :) I find VB very very useful as a prototyping tool when testing COM objects i've written. If it works in VB it's going to work anywhere :) Of course, this statement crystallises the dilemma we all had a few years ago when it was possible (using MS Tools) to create an OCX in C++ but it was almost impossible to create a container for such objects in C++. I've even written complete applications in VB (always for money :) ). Now where's that industrial strength soap? :laugh: Rob Manderson http://www.mindprobes.net **Paul Watson wrote:**What sense would you most dislike loosing? Ian Darling replied. Telepathy Then I'd no longer be able to find out everyones dirty little secrets The Lounge, December 4 2003
I'm sorry to say this Rob, but you can never pursue a political carreer now that this is out in the open. ;) -- 20 eyes in my head, they're all the same![^]
-
The same people who invented BSTR.. ;) -- 20 eyes in my head, they're all the same![^]
-
Ok I'm prepared to risk what little reputation I have :) I find VB very very useful as a prototyping tool when testing COM objects i've written. If it works in VB it's going to work anywhere :) Of course, this statement crystallises the dilemma we all had a few years ago when it was possible (using MS Tools) to create an OCX in C++ but it was almost impossible to create a container for such objects in C++. I've even written complete applications in VB (always for money :) ). Now where's that industrial strength soap? :laugh: Rob Manderson http://www.mindprobes.net **Paul Watson wrote:**What sense would you most dislike loosing? Ian Darling replied. Telepathy Then I'd no longer be able to find out everyones dirty little secrets The Lounge, December 4 2003
-
I'm sorry to say this Rob, but you can never pursue a political carreer now that this is out in the open. ;) -- 20 eyes in my head, they're all the same![^]
Damn!!! And here I had my eye on changing the constitution so's I could become POTUS :) Who could have imagined an indiscretion with VB could have killed all that :) Rob Manderson http://www.mindprobes.net **Paul Watson wrote:**What sense would you most dislike loosing? Ian Darling replied. Telepathy Then I'd no longer be able to find out everyones dirty little secrets The Lounge, December 4 2003
-
ProffK wrote: I've only ever written complete applications for money :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: I've completed a few :) Always on the totally free unencumbered by a GPL license principle. Rob Manderson http://www.mindprobes.net **Paul Watson wrote:**What sense would you most dislike loosing? Ian Darling replied. Telepathy Then I'd no longer be able to find out everyones dirty little secrets The Lounge, December 4 2003
-
Sorry for you ;) Python obviously isn't bad for those small companies google, ILM and NASA. Yeah, you got me. I like Python. :) ______________________________ Java: The living proof Moore's law won't solve all your problems
Amanjit Gill wrote: Yeah, you got me. I like Python. How?? Anytime you can change the name of a variable and it will still use the old variable name without error is just plain wrong (real experience) Matt Newman If you chose to continue this discussion, I am fully prepared to make you my bitch. I invite you to ask around, and you'll find out that I'm quite capable of doing so - John Simmons on Trolls