Micro$oft
-
1. Linux developers are not poor. This is the real crime with Linux. They have managed to get a bunch of people to buy into this mantra while the top people are making a mint. 2. Free software is about the freedom, not the price. Actually, this is another lie. If you look at the GNU license, it is very very very restrictive. GNU != Freedom. I will never ever use GNU again. I am BSD all the way. 3. free software is forcing the Microsoft to give their software cheaper. So which is it? Free software is about freedom or price? Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.
This is the real crime with Linux. They have managed to get a bunch of people to buy into this mantra while the top people are making a mint. Same with M$. Actually, this is another lie. If you look at the GNU license, it is very very very restrictive. GNU != Freedom. And did I say GNU? And it's not a lie - GNU is a problem only for those who would like to use the software but hide the source for some reason. Like a commercial company trying to use GNU but sell the binaries. GNU doesn't restrict the distribution of the source code - it enforces it. Don't like it - don't use it. Here is your freedom. So which is it? Free software is about freedom or price? It's about freedom, however having a freedom gives in a way a choice of getting it for free price, because you can get the code and compile it.
-
I'm with you guys. My loyalty to MS extends no further than my next paycheck. "But, daddy, that was back in the hippie ages..." My twelve year old son - winning the argument. "Stan, you are an intelligent guy who responds in meaningful ways" Paul Watson 16/10/01
I'm with you guys. My loyalty to MS extends no further than my next paycheck. And here I was thinking you were in it for love Stan. Damn but I am disappointed, the Elders have strayed from the path. What hope have I? :laugh: Michael Martin Pegasystems Pty Ltd Australia martm@pegasystems.com +61 413-004-018 "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace" - Victor Stone
-
I'm not saying that I mind paying for software, I'm saying it costs too damn much. With hardware, if you wait long enough, the price will drop (we can thank AMD for forcing Intel CPU's to start at more sane pricing levels than they used to). Not only that, but hardware has a longer shelf life than software. Lack of competition is the problem. To hell with those thin-skinned pillow-biters. - Me, 10/03/2001
With hardware, if you wait long enough, the price will drop It's the same with software: MS-DOS 6.22 and Windows 3.11 are pretty damn cheap now! :-D Foot-and-Mouth disease is believed to be the first virus unable to spread through Microsoft Outlook
-
Logical, well constructed arguements. Stayed on topic. No mention of goats, latex or guns. I voted "This helped".
Get RadVC today! Play RAD in VC++ http://www.capitolsoft.com
LOL! cheers, Chris Maunder (CodeProject)
-
I’ve seen this a lot in anti Microsoft sites (like Slashdot) or generally not-so-friendly MS sites (like ZDNet), whenever anything related to Microsoft is mentioned, the letter 'S' being transformed magically into a yummy dollar sign ('$'), such as Micro$oft, M$, M$FT, Window$ … I can understand why an anti-Microsoftie like a Linux zealot would use this sign. Something like the following probably go in their minds about Microsoft when they use the sign.. “A monopoli$t company that $uck$ poor($) Window$ users' hard earned money ($) and makes its founder the richest($) person of the world and thus in turn making us, the Linux developers even poorer($), by forcing us to give away our fine software for free($)….” Now that’s understood, but I wonder why loyal Windows developers in a Microsoft friendly site like this need to decorate the ‘S’ letter (see the comments in this article for proof). Does this mean that we’re not as loyal as Microsoft expects us to be, or has it become a fashion to use this decoration to attract others’ attention? Hmm.. How about a genuine reason that can go something like this.. “Micro$oft is fine company that believe$ in innovation and free market economy ($).. a company that helps us keep surviving ($) and even help some of us make big bucks ($) by providing licen$e to develop on a fine operating system we all know as Window$” Hmm, any other thought? // Fazlul
Get RadVC today! Play RAD in VC++ http://www.capitolsoft.com
IMHO a lot of us Micro$oft advocates simply use and evangilise their products because they are very good. Their development tools cannot be beaten, their OS is pretty damned good (especially on the desktop were no other contender is at all competitive), their Office suite is powerful and basically a standard, their browser is excellent and finally they provide a lot of resources, tools, information etc. to us developers which makes developing a charm. Speaking for myself I do not like MS's corporate tactics but then neither do I like BP harming the environment, but I still buy petrol from them. Shoes from Nike who exploit child labour, same thing. I use MS because they earn me a living. I sometimes use M$ beacause they deserve a good ribbing. (hey that rhymes!). If there was a competitor level on the playing field to MS that was ethically more sound then I would use them. But there isn't. There is one thing though that I actually am very impressed and excited about in MS: It is their vision. No other company has the vision and power that they do. regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass Cape Town, South Africa "The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" - Moulin Rouge "In other words, the developer is dealing with an elephant, the accountant is dealing with a bunny rabbit." by Stan Shannon - 16/10/2001
-
IMHO a lot of us Micro$oft advocates simply use and evangilise their products because they are very good. Their development tools cannot be beaten, their OS is pretty damned good (especially on the desktop were no other contender is at all competitive), their Office suite is powerful and basically a standard, their browser is excellent and finally they provide a lot of resources, tools, information etc. to us developers which makes developing a charm. Speaking for myself I do not like MS's corporate tactics but then neither do I like BP harming the environment, but I still buy petrol from them. Shoes from Nike who exploit child labour, same thing. I use MS because they earn me a living. I sometimes use M$ beacause they deserve a good ribbing. (hey that rhymes!). If there was a competitor level on the playing field to MS that was ethically more sound then I would use them. But there isn't. There is one thing though that I actually am very impressed and excited about in MS: It is their vision. No other company has the vision and power that they do. regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass Cape Town, South Africa "The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" - Moulin Rouge "In other words, the developer is dealing with an elephant, the accountant is dealing with a bunny rabbit." by Stan Shannon - 16/10/2001
There is one thing though that I actually am very impressed and excited about in MS: It is their vision. No other company has the vision and power that they do. Yeah, if only I had eaten all those carrots when I was younger like my mother told me. Then we'd see who had vision. None of this short-sighted shit I tell you, none of it. ;P Michael Martin Pegasystems Pty Ltd Australia martm@pegasystems.com +61 413-004-018 "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace" - Victor Stone
-
I’ve seen this a lot in anti Microsoft sites (like Slashdot) or generally not-so-friendly MS sites (like ZDNet), whenever anything related to Microsoft is mentioned, the letter 'S' being transformed magically into a yummy dollar sign ('$'), such as Micro$oft, M$, M$FT, Window$ … I can understand why an anti-Microsoftie like a Linux zealot would use this sign. Something like the following probably go in their minds about Microsoft when they use the sign.. “A monopoli$t company that $uck$ poor($) Window$ users' hard earned money ($) and makes its founder the richest($) person of the world and thus in turn making us, the Linux developers even poorer($), by forcing us to give away our fine software for free($)….” Now that’s understood, but I wonder why loyal Windows developers in a Microsoft friendly site like this need to decorate the ‘S’ letter (see the comments in this article for proof). Does this mean that we’re not as loyal as Microsoft expects us to be, or has it become a fashion to use this decoration to attract others’ attention? Hmm.. How about a genuine reason that can go something like this.. “Micro$oft is fine company that believe$ in innovation and free market economy ($).. a company that helps us keep surviving ($) and even help some of us make big bucks ($) by providing licen$e to develop on a fine operating system we all know as Window$” Hmm, any other thought? // Fazlul
Get RadVC today! Play RAD in VC++ http://www.capitolsoft.com
I hate this f....d eternal MS-Linux discussions! Go make your money; whatever you use! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
-
Logical, well constructed arguements. Stayed on topic. No mention of goats, latex or guns. Have you been hacked again John? Or are you taking your medication? :-D Michael Martin Pegasystems Pty Ltd Australia martm@pegasystems.com +61 413-004-018 "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace" - Victor Stone
-
I hate this f....d eternal MS-Linux discussions! Go make your money; whatever you use! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
I don't believe that this was a MS vs Linux arguement. Fazlul was merely asking why people would use an anti-Microsoft term on a Microsoft developer site. Thought the question was valid myself, even though I don't see a problem with using it. Michael Martin Pegasystems Pty Ltd Australia martm@pegasystems.com +61 413-004-018 "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace" - Victor Stone
-
IMHO a lot of us Micro$oft advocates simply use and evangilise their products because they are very good. Their development tools cannot be beaten, their OS is pretty damned good (especially on the desktop were no other contender is at all competitive), their Office suite is powerful and basically a standard, their browser is excellent and finally they provide a lot of resources, tools, information etc. to us developers which makes developing a charm. Speaking for myself I do not like MS's corporate tactics but then neither do I like BP harming the environment, but I still buy petrol from them. Shoes from Nike who exploit child labour, same thing. I use MS because they earn me a living. I sometimes use M$ beacause they deserve a good ribbing. (hey that rhymes!). If there was a competitor level on the playing field to MS that was ethically more sound then I would use them. But there isn't. There is one thing though that I actually am very impressed and excited about in MS: It is their vision. No other company has the vision and power that they do. regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass Cape Town, South Africa "The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" - Moulin Rouge "In other words, the developer is dealing with an elephant, the accountant is dealing with a bunny rabbit." by Stan Shannon - 16/10/2001
"The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" Eden Ahbez, 1948 (?). From the song "Nature Boy". This song was made famous in the 50's by Nat King Cole and since covered by everyone from John Coltrane to Big Star. I plan to cover it myself someday. :) -c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
-
"The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" Eden Ahbez, 1948 (?). From the song "Nature Boy". This song was made famous in the 50's by Nat King Cole and since covered by everyone from John Coltrane to Big Star. I plan to cover it myself someday. :) -c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com
"The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" Eden Ahbez, 1948 (?). From the song "Nature Boy". This song was made famous in the 50's by Nat King Cole and since covered by everyone from John Coltrane to Big Star. Wow, I did not know that. Thanks for telling me that Chris :) I got it from Moulin Rouge, the movie. I plan to cover it myself someday What "type" of musician are you? And if you do send on over a sample (or were we can buy the CD single) so that we can have a listen :) regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass Cape Town, South Africa "The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" - Moulin Rouge "In other words, the developer is dealing with an elephant, the accountant is dealing with a bunny rabbit." by Stan Shannon - 16/10/2001
-
I hate this f....d eternal MS-Linux discussions! Go make your money; whatever you use! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
-
Man, who pissed in your Wheaties this morning? To hell with those thin-skinned pillow-biters. - Me, 10/03/2001
-
I'm with you guys. My loyalty to MS extends no further than my next paycheck. And here I was thinking you were in it for love Stan. Damn but I am disappointed, the Elders have strayed from the path. What hope have I? :laugh: Michael Martin Pegasystems Pty Ltd Australia martm@pegasystems.com +61 413-004-018 "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace" - Victor Stone
I just hope MS stays on top long enough for me to retire - just so I don't have to completely revamp all my skills *again* just to get my kids through college. After that, I hope they up-chuck-and-die. "But, daddy, that was back in the hippie ages..." My twelve year old son - winning the argument. "Stan, you are an intelligent guy who responds in meaningful ways" Paul Watson 16/10/01
-
You seem to be ignorant in the Open Source matter. 1. Linux developers are not poor. They make a good money and they can afford to make some software for fun and give it for free. Unix/Linux jobs can pay much better than a Windows jobs pretty often, specially if you count all those cheap VB and C# programmers into the pool to count awerage. 2. Free software is about the freedom, not the price. You are allowed to charge for the distribution, support, consultancy, transfer media, whatever. But you can't charge for the software(that is source code) itself - because software is free (but not always free of charge). If you make a changes - you have to show them and often mark those. No hidden API and other dirty tricks we've all seen from Microsoft. 3. It's actually the other way round - free software is forcing the Microsoft to give their software cheaper.
>> You are allowed to charge for the distribution, support, consultancy, transfer media, whatever. Sounds pretty much like "Software as a Service" to me... >> cheap VB and C# programmers How many "Looking for a C# programmer" ads have you seen lately? >> It's actually the other way round - free software is forcing the Microsoft to give their software cheaper. Hopefuly - but doesn't look like, now, does it? Peter
-
That's the fact! It's allways the same: Winodws - Linux!!!!
You're delusional, dude. This article wasn't about Linux vs Windows. The original author was curious as to why Windows developers (with an assumed loyalty to Microsoft) would use the same subtle insult made popular by admitted anti-Windows advocates. Do you have a problem with actually *reading* the words, or do you have a problem *comprehending* what you read? The reason I asked is because I want to make sure I target the more correct description of your mental deficiency before I start making fun of it. To hell with those thin-skinned pillow-biters. - Me, 10/03/2001
-
You're delusional, dude. This article wasn't about Linux vs Windows. The original author was curious as to why Windows developers (with an assumed loyalty to Microsoft) would use the same subtle insult made popular by admitted anti-Windows advocates. Do you have a problem with actually *reading* the words, or do you have a problem *comprehending* what you read? The reason I asked is because I want to make sure I target the more correct description of your mental deficiency before I start making fun of it. To hell with those thin-skinned pillow-biters. - Me, 10/03/2001
****WARNING*****OFF TOPIC POST****** John, you f***ing kill me! :laugh: I have to say that since discovering Code Project I have gotten into the habit of at least skimming the boards each morning, and John has rapidly become part of my morning wake me up. I apologize to everyone else for contributing to John's inflated sense of self, but sometimes I just need a good dose of scathing wit to finish waking up in the morning. ;P I frequently disagree with you John, but I still can not help but choke on my morning caffine quite often. I used to live with several professional grade a**es, and John makes me homesick. :-D We now return you to your regularly sechduled rant... :cool: :eek: :cool: :eek: :cool: :eek: :cool: :eek: :cool: :eek: (^^^Sorry, I just can't get enough of these guys) Jason Jystad Cito Technologies www.citotech.net >----------------------------------------------------------------------------< "Does anybody have a peanut?" -- Fezzik (Andre "The Giant" - The Princess Bride) >----------------------------------------------------------------------------<
-
You're delusional, dude. This article wasn't about Linux vs Windows. The original author was curious as to why Windows developers (with an assumed loyalty to Microsoft) would use the same subtle insult made popular by admitted anti-Windows advocates. Do you have a problem with actually *reading* the words, or do you have a problem *comprehending* what you read? The reason I asked is because I want to make sure I target the more correct description of your mental deficiency before I start making fun of it. To hell with those thin-skinned pillow-biters. - Me, 10/03/2001
To make up for my off topic post here is my on-topic .02 I wrote my first programs on the Commodore Pet, I moved to the C64 and then to the Amiga. I thought the Lisa (Macintosh) was neat when it arrived on the scene, and when Mac users began complaining about Microsoft stealing their idea for a graphical user interface I sat in front of my Amiga GUI and scratched my head in confusion. Then someone offered me a job doing programs for that hideous clunker of a machine, the IBM PC. It paid well, and I took it. The Motorola processors were better, the Intel pay was better. No regrets. The computer industry always has its holy wars, and I guess I have just been an agnostic too long. I primarily do web development these days and I use ASP because that is what my customers want me to use. I like it, I think it is well done. I think PHP is easier to learn if you are starting from scratch (no previous vbscript knowledge) and I like the portability and performance of PHP. I use PHP when I am working in *nix platforms, I use ASP on the MS platforms most of the time. Sometimes I even :eek: combine them. I think MS makes great IDE's, but I really like the Delphi IDE too. Better than VB's in some ways. However, I get paid to do the MS thing more often than not. I work to get paid after all. It takes a particular kind of freak to be a programmer, (just look at John :-P ). Once you are that kind of nut and your brain works in the freaky ways necessary to be a programmer everything else is just a question of using a hammer or a screwdriver. Which tool is right for the job? So you'll see the Micro$oft references even here, because we all have an opinion about things in our industry even when its a negative opinion about something we get paid to work with. Have you bitched about your boss today? I guess that is why I hang around Code Project more that anywhere else, most of the people here realize that and are honest about it. Thanks for the site Chris! Jason Jystad Cito Technologies www.citotech.net >----------------------------------------------------------------------------< "Why are you all so not-perverted?" -- Dick Converse >----------------------------------------------------------------------------<
-
****WARNING*****OFF TOPIC POST****** John, you f***ing kill me! :laugh: I have to say that since discovering Code Project I have gotten into the habit of at least skimming the boards each morning, and John has rapidly become part of my morning wake me up. I apologize to everyone else for contributing to John's inflated sense of self, but sometimes I just need a good dose of scathing wit to finish waking up in the morning. ;P I frequently disagree with you John, but I still can not help but choke on my morning caffine quite often. I used to live with several professional grade a**es, and John makes me homesick. :-D We now return you to your regularly sechduled rant... :cool: :eek: :cool: :eek: :cool: :eek: :cool: :eek: :cool: :eek: (^^^Sorry, I just can't get enough of these guys) Jason Jystad Cito Technologies www.citotech.net >----------------------------------------------------------------------------< "Does anybody have a peanut?" -- Fezzik (Andre "The Giant" - The Princess Bride) >----------------------------------------------------------------------------<
I knew I was helping *somebody*. I also noticed that I finally made it to the "Most Helpful" list, no doubt as a direct result of my apolitical rhetoric, disdain for all organized religions, love of animals (both sexes), the willingness to discharge a firearm regardless of the outcome, not to mention my entrepreneurial (had to check Webster's for that one because the MS Word spell checker didn't know I'd spelled it wrong - so much for spell checkers, eh George?) aspirations where the Latex Appendage Suit is concerned. > I apologize to everyone else for contributing to John's inflated sense of > self, but sometimes I just need a good dose of scathing wit to finish > waking up in the morning. No worries - I don't need someone else to inflate my sense of self. :) I like the "scathing wit" part the best. :) If nothing else, you have to admit that I'm just as willing to laugh at myself as I am at all the rest of you. :) To hell with those thin-skinned pillow-biters. - Me, 10/03/2001
-
I knew I was helping *somebody*. I also noticed that I finally made it to the "Most Helpful" list, no doubt as a direct result of my apolitical rhetoric, disdain for all organized religions, love of animals (both sexes), the willingness to discharge a firearm regardless of the outcome, not to mention my entrepreneurial (had to check Webster's for that one because the MS Word spell checker didn't know I'd spelled it wrong - so much for spell checkers, eh George?) aspirations where the Latex Appendage Suit is concerned. > I apologize to everyone else for contributing to John's inflated sense of > self, but sometimes I just need a good dose of scathing wit to finish > waking up in the morning. No worries - I don't need someone else to inflate my sense of self. :) I like the "scathing wit" part the best. :) If nothing else, you have to admit that I'm just as willing to laugh at myself as I am at all the rest of you. :) To hell with those thin-skinned pillow-biters. - Me, 10/03/2001
> the willingness to discharge a firearm regardless of the outcome ^^^^ This is what does it for me John. > If nothing else, you have to admit that I'm just as willing to laugh at > myself as I am at all the rest of you. I *have* to admit nothing! I *choose* to admit that you do seem to occasionally take potshots at yourself as well. The same as I *choose* not to admit to that thing about the wallaby and Chris's yard.:omg: er, forget I said that. ;P Jason Jystad Cito Technologies www.citotech.net >------------------------------------------------< "Luckily," he went on, "you have come to exactly the right place with your interesting problem, for there is no such word as 'impossible' in my dictionary. In fact," he added, brandishing the abused book, "everything between 'herring' and 'marmalade' seems to be missing." -- Dirk Gently (Douglas Adams) >------------------------------------------------<
