Whideby
-
Does .Net framework 2.0 come with Whidbey or Whidbey is with Longhorn or both or neither? :-D Mazy "Improvisation is the touchstone of wit." - Molière
Whidbey is the next version of VS.NET...which comes with .NET v1.2 Longhorn comes with .NET 1.2...but not Whidbey. :)
youd ebtter bnot be taki8ng agvantage o f my mental abilites!1 -David Wulff one night over MSN while totally plastered
-
Whidbey is the next version of VS.NET...which comes with .NET v1.2 Longhorn comes with .NET 1.2...but not Whidbey. :)
youd ebtter bnot be taki8ng agvantage o f my mental abilites!1 -David Wulff one night over MSN while totally plastered
David Stone wrote: .NET v1.2 1.2? I thought next version will be 2. I think Heath said that somewhere in C# forum. 1.2 means that it won't have so much major changeing/adding.yah? and do you know when it will release? After coming Longhorn or before? Mazy "Improvisation is the touchstone of wit." - Molière
-
David Stone wrote: .NET v1.2 1.2? I thought next version will be 2. I think Heath said that somewhere in C# forum. 1.2 means that it won't have so much major changeing/adding.yah? and do you know when it will release? After coming Longhorn or before? Mazy "Improvisation is the touchstone of wit." - Molière
Yukon uses the next CLR and it is v1.2 in the Betas. Cheers Mike Epprecht, MVP (SQL Server) Johannesburg, South Africa
-
David Stone wrote: .NET v1.2 1.2? I thought next version will be 2. I think Heath said that somewhere in C# forum. 1.2 means that it won't have so much major changeing/adding.yah? and do you know when it will release? After coming Longhorn or before? Mazy "Improvisation is the touchstone of wit." - Molière
I've read that it will be 2.0 as well. And it supposed to be released later this year. Whereas Longhorn is a couple years out. Dan Morris
-
David Stone wrote: .NET v1.2 1.2? I thought next version will be 2. I think Heath said that somewhere in C# forum. 1.2 means that it won't have so much major changeing/adding.yah? and do you know when it will release? After coming Longhorn or before? Mazy "Improvisation is the touchstone of wit." - Molière
1.2 is the next version of the FRAMEWORK, which is the .NET virtual machine and SDK. 2.0 is the next version of the development LANGUAGES, which include new version of C# and ASP.NET and run off of the new framework 1.2. WHIDBEY is the new version of Visual Studio, which will use the new languages (2.0) and run off of the .NET framework (1.2). LONGHORN is the new version of the OS (very far away) which will include whatever the newest version of the framework is at the time (possibly 1.2) but does not include Visual Studio. I think that about does it... Also, the new versions of the languages and Studio are supposed to have some pretty major changes, additions, etc. but most of the feedback (especially with regards to the new ASP.NET have been very positive).
-
1.2 is the next version of the FRAMEWORK, which is the .NET virtual machine and SDK. 2.0 is the next version of the development LANGUAGES, which include new version of C# and ASP.NET and run off of the new framework 1.2. WHIDBEY is the new version of Visual Studio, which will use the new languages (2.0) and run off of the .NET framework (1.2). LONGHORN is the new version of the OS (very far away) which will include whatever the newest version of the framework is at the time (possibly 1.2) but does not include Visual Studio. I think that about does it... Also, the new versions of the languages and Studio are supposed to have some pretty major changes, additions, etc. but most of the feedback (especially with regards to the new ASP.NET have been very positive).
-
David Stone wrote: .NET v1.2 1.2? I thought next version will be 2. I think Heath said that somewhere in C# forum. 1.2 means that it won't have so much major changeing/adding.yah? and do you know when it will release? After coming Longhorn or before? Mazy "Improvisation is the touchstone of wit." - Molière
I'm on the Alpha for Whidbey, and though the next Framework version is currently numbered 1.2, I can tell you that there are a LOT of changes introduced since version 1.1. I'm also hoping to write some upcoming CP articles about Whidbey, so if there's anything you'd like to see, please let me know. Datagrid Girl
-
I'm on the Alpha for Whidbey, and though the next Framework version is currently numbered 1.2, I can tell you that there are a LOT of changes introduced since version 1.1. I'm also hoping to write some upcoming CP articles about Whidbey, so if there's anything you'd like to see, please let me know. Datagrid Girl
Thanks Marcie for reply. I recently get MCP on C# application and next weak I'll take an exam on ASP.NET. To tell the truth I was wondering will my certified will usefull for up coming versions too or not. I search on MS site and there were not plan for expiration for current version of .net and no exam for upcoming too. I was looking to know if changes are as much as that MS wants to expose new certified or not. Anyway, thank again . :-) Mazy "Improvisation is the touchstone of wit." - Molière
-
Thanks Marcie for reply. I recently get MCP on C# application and next weak I'll take an exam on ASP.NET. To tell the truth I was wondering will my certified will usefull for up coming versions too or not. I search on MS site and there were not plan for expiration for current version of .net and no exam for upcoming too. I was looking to know if changes are as much as that MS wants to expose new certified or not. Anyway, thank again . :-) Mazy "Improvisation is the touchstone of wit." - Molière
Hi Mazy, They're just now retiring the VB6 exams in June of this year, so I wouldn't expect .NET 1.0 exams to go out of date for quite some years in the future. Since .NET 2.0 is only in Alpha at this point, I wouldn't expect to see the first 2.0 exams for at least a year and a half or 2 years from now. Plus, much of the 1.0 material will still be relevant, since version 2.0 is compatible with 1.x, just with a lot of new objects and classes added in. So, I wouldn't worry about it much at this point, and good luck with your exam next week. I took the VB.NET version of the ASP.NET exam last year, and didn't find it too difficult. Good luck! Marcie
-
Hi Mazy, They're just now retiring the VB6 exams in June of this year, so I wouldn't expect .NET 1.0 exams to go out of date for quite some years in the future. Since .NET 2.0 is only in Alpha at this point, I wouldn't expect to see the first 2.0 exams for at least a year and a half or 2 years from now. Plus, much of the 1.0 material will still be relevant, since version 2.0 is compatible with 1.x, just with a lot of new objects and classes added in. So, I wouldn't worry about it much at this point, and good luck with your exam next week. I took the VB.NET version of the ASP.NET exam last year, and didn't find it too difficult. Good luck! Marcie
-
I do think they would rename the framework version to 2.0, It was 1.2 cause of the alpha nature of it (I read it somewhere in the MS blogs...) Regards, Kannan