Will Mono Become the Preferred Platform for Linux Development?
-
And one more thing! [You got me ranting at this point, so feel free to ignore this!] One of the main reasons Mono annoys me so much is that IMHO C++ is a great, kick ass language. Instead of doing the endless repeats of 2nd hand MS knock-offs why not put all that energy and know how into improving C++? Why not make a special version of it (with extensions that you could turn on or off, just like you can with Exception Handling and RTTI) that address these features that people seem so intrigued with in C#? For example, - add first class RTTI to C++ - Add first class Garbage Collection (again, this would be optional, and could be turned off) - Develop a truly kick ass C++ framework to use that is unencumbered by the GPL (hint, hint, VCF :)) - Add first class property and event support, a la C# property and delegate syntax, or something similar. - Come up with a standard ABI and AGRESSIVELY push it to ALL C++ vendors, volunteer help, whatever, to amke this happen, so that we can share components/classes at the binary level. There are TONS of things you could do to make C++ even more of a kick ass langauge. Why wait for the folks on the standards committee to argue, debate, blather, etc why not push the language forward by the very people who actually use the damn thing in the real world!! ( I strongly doubt Bjarne has every written a real world, production level app, I could be wrong though). With all the effort put into Mono we could have had a really kick ass GCC C++ compiler instead of the rather lame clunky thing that currently exists (and yes I have used it - this is coming from experience on both Win32 and linux using 2.95, and the various 3.x series). Instead we have to put all that effort into *starting all over again*!!!!! Sigh... OK I feel better now. ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned
Jim Crafton wrote: Why wait for the folks on the standards committee to argue, debate, blather, etc why not push the language forward by the very people who actually use the damn thing in the real world!! I once worked for a company where I used some non-standard ways of doing things, like a lot of scripting. One of the lead developers from another group was asked if he wanted to join my group (which was very successful, and his was failing and his project was about to be cancelled). Never mind that I didn't want him. His response was, "no. Why would I? I can't exactly put on my resume 'I used the Marc Clifton design methodology and scripting language'!". In other words, people have become efin sheep. Innovation is dead. Standards are "in". Trying to get someone to do something out of the ordinary is like trying to milk a bull. It sucks. Believe me. Which is why I am an independent consultant. So that I can remain an independent thinker. Rant on. It's catching. [edit]and my grammar is degenerating the later it gets[/edit] Marc Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
-
Anyways, it's way too complicated to play the "what-if" game at 10:36 PM on a Friday. Wimp, wimp, wimp, wimp, wimp!!! And you just got me going, you TEASE!! ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned
Jim Crafton wrote: And you just got me going, you TEASE!! LOL! Not too often I get called THAT. Well--go for it. I'm still figuring out these dang bugs in a very complicated state system. Marc Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
-
Anyways, it's way too complicated to play the "what-if" game at 10:36 PM on a Friday. Wimp, wimp, wimp, wimp, wimp!!! And you just got me going, you TEASE!! ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned
Between "Crafton" and "Clifton", it's hard to figure out who's saying what! Anyways, I'm meeting with the Vice President of Development at Microsoft next week. Do you have a message you would like me to convey? (I'm serious--it's an MVP invite). Marc Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
-
Between "Crafton" and "Clifton", it's hard to figure out who's saying what! Anyways, I'm meeting with the Vice President of Development at Microsoft next week. Do you have a message you would like me to convey? (I'm serious--it's an MVP invite). Marc Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
Sure, tell them how superb the VCF is and that they should sponsor it with a small $500,000 grant! :) ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned
-
Jim Crafton wrote: Why wait for the folks on the standards committee to argue, debate, blather, etc why not push the language forward by the very people who actually use the damn thing in the real world!! I once worked for a company where I used some non-standard ways of doing things, like a lot of scripting. One of the lead developers from another group was asked if he wanted to join my group (which was very successful, and his was failing and his project was about to be cancelled). Never mind that I didn't want him. His response was, "no. Why would I? I can't exactly put on my resume 'I used the Marc Clifton design methodology and scripting language'!". In other words, people have become efin sheep. Innovation is dead. Standards are "in". Trying to get someone to do something out of the ordinary is like trying to milk a bull. It sucks. Believe me. Which is why I am an independent consultant. So that I can remain an independent thinker. Rant on. It's catching. [edit]and my grammar is degenerating the later it gets[/edit] Marc Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
In other words, people have become efin sheep. Innovation is dead. Tell me about it. Wanna here something scary? I got really bored at work one day (something that happens alot, but that's another story), and downloaded the GCC source just for yucks. And started looked at the C++ compiler code. And then started to try hacking it. Whew, glad that phase passed. I have notes on what I would consider a really cool end user OS using standard components, but with a lot of tweaks, i.e. the 2.6 Linux kernel, a completely revamped directory tree, some really cool (IMHO) uses for extended file/dir attr's since the FS is 100% Reiser4, DirectFB...I soooo want to drop working on the VCF and pursue this, because it's so fascinating to me, and I see so little actual progress being made in linux land (which the more I see of its community comes as no rela surprise). ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned
-
I just don't have much to say (more accurately, I don't feel much like saying it). I think I've become satisfied with the notion that I'm right and the rest of the world got it all wrong. I have recently developed an overwhelming urge to buy a one-room cabin in the mountains, a high-powered rifle, and sit on the porch all day drinking moonshine and shoot any stupid fucker that so much as shows his pointy little head. The short answer - I'm doing okay. :) Are you still here in the US, or are you back home where the water buffalo roam? You never did come down here and get me drunk and take advantage of me like you promised. :) ------- sig starts "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 "You won't like me when I'm angry..." - Dr. Bruce Banner Please review the Legal Disclaimer in my bio. ------- sig ends
Damn John, I hear you there mate ! I am about a two cent stamp short of going postal myself. Have a better one. The Ten Commandments For C Programmers
-
Damn John, I hear you there mate ! I am about a two cent stamp short of going postal myself. Have a better one. The Ten Commandments For C Programmers
I think that just became by new sig. ;) The Ten Commandments For C Programmers
-
Between "Crafton" and "Clifton", it's hard to figure out who's saying what! Anyways, I'm meeting with the Vice President of Development at Microsoft next week. Do you have a message you would like me to convey? (I'm serious--it's an MVP invite). Marc Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
Tell him that there are still real programmers out here trying to build real apps for windows that need to handle large amounts of data and need to perform more or less in real time. And that there is no way in hell that a scripted / hosted XAML / .NET kludge is ever going to meet that need. Tell him that the .NET / Forms VS Longhorn / Avalon roadmap is f**ked in the head. Tell him that if the kiddies in the Avalon team can't design and build a Tree Control yet alone one with a DATAMODEL rather than scriped data binding. Then he should just fire the whole lot of them and get people that actually have a clue... Tell him that gc just moves the problem to whether you hold a weak or strong reference. It doesn't "solve" any memory management problems. In short tell him to pull his finger out and come up with a development plan for a c++ source code compilable framework to replace MFC.
-
Joel Holdsworth wrote: So that's one user no longer PHPing. Any particular reason besides the fact Microsoft didn't make it? Jeremy Falcon
Well mostly because it is a horrible language. I'm so fed up with dollar signs, and the set of functions although extensive are really badly layed out e.g. horrible function names. The end result code is never pretty or readable. Joel Holdsworth
-
Joel Holdsworth wrote: So that's one user no longer PHPing. Any particular reason besides the fact Microsoft didn't make it? Jeremy Falcon
ASP.NET has far more functionality out of the box than PHP, a factor you used to compare PHP to ASP. I find it a better tool for most of the websites I do than PHP. If I needed a very simple website then I would use ASP as I would not need all the PHP or ASP.NET functionality and it runs on the same hosting as our ASP.NET sites. But use the tool that fits the requirements. regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass South Africa Christopher Duncan quoted: "...that would require my explaining Einstein's Fear of Relatives" Crikey! ain't life grand? Einstein says...
-
Well mostly because it is a horrible language. I'm so fed up with dollar signs, and the set of functions although extensive are really badly layed out e.g. horrible function names. The end result code is never pretty or readable. Joel Holdsworth
Alot of the function names are taken from C. Unless you dislike C, how's that so horrible? Jeremy Falcon
-
ASP.NET has far more functionality out of the box than PHP, a factor you used to compare PHP to ASP. I find it a better tool for most of the websites I do than PHP. If I needed a very simple website then I would use ASP as I would not need all the PHP or ASP.NET functionality and it runs on the same hosting as our ASP.NET sites. But use the tool that fits the requirements. regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass South Africa Christopher Duncan quoted: "...that would require my explaining Einstein's Fear of Relatives" Crikey! ain't life grand? Einstein says...
Paul Watson wrote: ASP.NET has far more functionality out of the box than PHP Are you sure about this? And if so, care to give some examples? Really, I'm being objective and would like to know. One example for PHP is, AFAIK out of the box you can't even write a PDF file with ASP.NET, but with PHP you have been able since 4.0. I haven't started using ASP.NET, and from what I hear it does leaps and bounds over ASP. It's just unnerving when I hear some people (I'm not talking about you) dis PHP or anything - like Macs - when they know little about it. Jeremy Falcon
