Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Driving through intersections when the traffic lights are out

Driving through intersections when the traffic lights are out

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questioncsharpcomarchitecture
24 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Steve Mayfield

    I always thought that "right of way" meant that the person on the right went first :confused: (confirmed by a co-worker whos wife is a policewoman) Steve

    J Offline
    J Offline
    JohnnyG
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Absolutely incorrect. From Dictionary.com:

    right of way also right-of-way (rtv-w)
    n. pl. rights of way or right of ways also rights-of-way (rts-) or right-of-ways (-wz)

    The right to pass over property owned by another party.

    The path or thoroughfare on which such passage is made.

    The strip of land over which facilities such as highways, railroads, or power lines are built.

    The customary or legal right of a person, vessel, or vehicle to pass in front of another

    I never heard that explanation before (the one you mentioned) but I could see where that could be misunderstood to mean what you thought. Interesting. But, I always thought that "right of way" meant the "right" to do something like the "right" to go first.

    R S 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • J JohnnyG

      Absolutely incorrect. From Dictionary.com:

      right of way also right-of-way (rtv-w)
      n. pl. rights of way or right of ways also rights-of-way (rts-) or right-of-ways (-wz)

      The right to pass over property owned by another party.

      The path or thoroughfare on which such passage is made.

      The strip of land over which facilities such as highways, railroads, or power lines are built.

      The customary or legal right of a person, vessel, or vehicle to pass in front of another

      I never heard that explanation before (the one you mentioned) but I could see where that could be misunderstood to mean what you thought. Interesting. But, I always thought that "right of way" meant the "right" to do something like the "right" to go first.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Roger Wright
      wrote on last edited by
      #16

      But he is correct about who goes first. If two vehicles arrive simultaneously at the intersection, the right to proceed passes clockwise. It's a wonder that anyone remembers that, though, since so many people are not required to take driver training classes. We had to spend a semester of classroom instruction in the laws and proper behavior, then a semester of driving - first in expensive simulators, then behind the wheel with an instructor - before we were allowed to apply to take a driving test for a license. I don't know what the local kids get by way of instruction, but there's no simulators or actual driving experience involved. Too expensive, I'm told...:suss: Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Colin Angus Mackay

        Diane Capewell wrote: As far as I can tell, the rules in the bit of California I'm currently visiting (Marina Del Rey, near LA) are "Get really confused" and "Let the Wookiee (or biggest SUV) win". :laugh::laugh: It kind of reminds me of a time when I hired a car in Denver. It was only the second time I'd driven in the US and the 4-way stop signs scared me the previous time, so I thought I'd ask the rental clerk what the rule was. Apparently, in Colorado at least, the rule is that the person with the biggest gun rack gets to go first. :eek:


        "You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want." --Zig Ziglar The Second EuroCPian Event will be in Brussels on the 4th of September Can't manage to P/Invoke that Win32 API in .NET? Why not do interop the wiki way!

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Roger Wright
        wrote on last edited by
        #17

        Colin Angus Mackay wrote: the person with the biggest gun rack gets to go first :laugh::laugh: Same here!:-D Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Diane Capewell

          Marc Clifton wrote: In CA, the rule was, treat the intersection as if it were a 4 way stop sign. Isn't that the same in all the states? Really? As far as I can tell, the rules in the bit of California I'm currently visiting (Marina Del Rey, near LA) are "Get really confused" and "Let the Wookiee (or biggest SUV) win". I didn't know there was an actual official rule. :) (I may never complain about Boston drivers again after this place...) -- "Half of the American people have never read a newspaper. Half never voted for President. One hopes it is the same half." Gore Vidal

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Roger Wright
          wrote on last edited by
          #18

          When I was growing up in California (pre-PRC) the drivers there were among the most courteous and alert anywhere. That started changing in the early 80s, as the Left Coast became gruesomely overcrowded, and impatient people became more engrossed in beating some imaginary timeline that laws and courtesy went out the passenger window. There was also a huge influx of foreigners who were untrained in our ways, and who came from very different cultures, at the same time. Traffic laws became optional about then, though we all still maintained our tradition of driving very, very fast on wide open highways.:-D Here in Arizona, almost no one actually stops at a stop sign; they do what has long been called (incorrectly) a California stop. It's sort of a rolling gesture intended to allow the driver to make a sudden stop if he happens to spot a cop, but otherwise run the stop sign whether it's safe to do so or not. It wasn't like that in CA long ago, but now it's nearly universal - Arizonans and the tourists from the PRC alike. Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group.

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Roger Wright

            But he is correct about who goes first. If two vehicles arrive simultaneously at the intersection, the right to proceed passes clockwise. It's a wonder that anyone remembers that, though, since so many people are not required to take driver training classes. We had to spend a semester of classroom instruction in the laws and proper behavior, then a semester of driving - first in expensive simulators, then behind the wheel with an instructor - before we were allowed to apply to take a driving test for a license. I don't know what the local kids get by way of instruction, but there's no simulators or actual driving experience involved. Too expensive, I'm told...:suss: Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            JohnnyG
            wrote on last edited by
            #19

            Yup. You're right, I had it wrong. :-O I got my driver's license when I was 16 and I remembered it being something like "the person on the right yields to the person on the left" but actually after looking it up, it basically says "You should yield to the driver on the right if you both arrive at the same time".

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J JohnnyG

              Yup. You're right, I had it wrong. :-O I got my driver's license when I was 16 and I remembered it being something like "the person on the right yields to the person on the left" but actually after looking it up, it basically says "You should yield to the driver on the right if you both arrive at the same time".

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Roger Wright
              wrote on last edited by
              #20

              In recent years I've found it prudent to yield to the most aggressive idiot. The general rule still applies, but there's no point in trying to win that one against a moron who is determined to run the stop. Sadly, such imbeciles seem to be becoming the majority rather than the genetic fluke they used to be.:( Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Roger Wright

                When I was growing up in California (pre-PRC) the drivers there were among the most courteous and alert anywhere. That started changing in the early 80s, as the Left Coast became gruesomely overcrowded, and impatient people became more engrossed in beating some imaginary timeline that laws and courtesy went out the passenger window. There was also a huge influx of foreigners who were untrained in our ways, and who came from very different cultures, at the same time. Traffic laws became optional about then, though we all still maintained our tradition of driving very, very fast on wide open highways.:-D Here in Arizona, almost no one actually stops at a stop sign; they do what has long been called (incorrectly) a California stop. It's sort of a rolling gesture intended to allow the driver to make a sudden stop if he happens to spot a cop, but otherwise run the stop sign whether it's safe to do so or not. It wasn't like that in CA long ago, but now it's nearly universal - Arizonans and the tourists from the PRC alike. Some people think of it as a six-pack; I consider it more of a support group.

                J Offline
                J Offline
                JohnnyG
                wrote on last edited by
                #21

                Heh-heh. We sort of do something similar in New Jersey in regards to a rolling stop. Except we do actually stop but just for about a full second or two. If there's a cop you just keep your foot on the brake a couple of seconds longer. Not the typical (lawful) three or four seconds average. You come up on a stop sign at a faster speed than normal, hit your brakes to stop for a second, then go if it's safe. Obviously a habit designed to get you through the intersection faster. In Minnesota they go through yellow lights to red consistently so that when it turns red everyone knows to wait about two seconds if you're stopped at a light and it turns green. When I first got to New Jersey, I kept up the behavior for a while until my native New Jerseyan passengers kept complaining.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J JohnnyG

                  Absolutely incorrect. From Dictionary.com:

                  right of way also right-of-way (rtv-w)
                  n. pl. rights of way or right of ways also rights-of-way (rts-) or right-of-ways (-wz)

                  The right to pass over property owned by another party.

                  The path or thoroughfare on which such passage is made.

                  The strip of land over which facilities such as highways, railroads, or power lines are built.

                  The customary or legal right of a person, vessel, or vehicle to pass in front of another

                  I never heard that explanation before (the one you mentioned) but I could see where that could be misunderstood to mean what you thought. Interesting. But, I always thought that "right of way" meant the "right" to do something like the "right" to go first.

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Steve Mayfield
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #22

                  This is how I associated right of way with who goes first in an intersection [^] Steve

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Marc Clifton

                    So, what is it with people here in Rhode Island? The lights are out, the traffic lights are out, and people zoom through intersections at 40-50 MPH!!! In CA, the rule was, treat the intersection as if it were a 4 way stop sign. Isn't that the same in all the states? Marc Microsoft MVP, Visual C# MyXaml MyXaml Blog

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Steve Mayfield
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #23

                    I came across this - maybe is helps to explain things: LAW: It is required by law that you make a loud noise when passing a car on the left. COUNTRY: USA / STATE: Rhode Island CITATION: §31-15-4 Overtaking on left. ACTUAL: The following rules shall govern the overtaking and passing of vehicles proceeding in the same direction, subject to those limitations, exceptions, and special rules stated in this section: (1) The driver of a vehicle overtaking another vehicle proceeding in the same direction shall give a timely, audible signal and shall pass to the left at a safe distance and shall not again drive to the right side of the roadway until safely clear of the overtaken vehicle. (2) Except when overtaking and passing on the right is permitted, the driver of the front vehicle on the audible signal of the overtaking vehicle shall give way to the right, and shall not increase speed until completely passed by the overtaking vehicle. Steve

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Steve Mayfield

                      I came across this - maybe is helps to explain things: LAW: It is required by law that you make a loud noise when passing a car on the left. COUNTRY: USA / STATE: Rhode Island CITATION: §31-15-4 Overtaking on left. ACTUAL: The following rules shall govern the overtaking and passing of vehicles proceeding in the same direction, subject to those limitations, exceptions, and special rules stated in this section: (1) The driver of a vehicle overtaking another vehicle proceeding in the same direction shall give a timely, audible signal and shall pass to the left at a safe distance and shall not again drive to the right side of the roadway until safely clear of the overtaken vehicle. (2) Except when overtaking and passing on the right is permitted, the driver of the front vehicle on the audible signal of the overtaking vehicle shall give way to the right, and shall not increase speed until completely passed by the overtaking vehicle. Steve

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Marc Clifton
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #24

                      :omg: Where did you find that? You mean I'm supposed to honk my horn when passing someone? Geez, I might as well just keep it constantly blaring then! Marc Microsoft MVP, Visual C# MyXaml MyXaml Blog

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups