Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. A Different Question

A Different Question

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questiondiscussion
33 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Daniel Ferguson

    We've had a few religious threads today, but I want to ask a slightly different question. Obviously different people have different beliefs and we are not going to change each other's minds with a simple discussion in the Lounge. I have my own beliefs and I don't agree with some other people, but I accept that as a normal part of life. (I'm also not so uncertain of my beliefs that I need others to validate them.) So here is my question: What about religious people (of any religion) who feel the need to preach to and convert others? The sort of people who are so closed minded that they think that only they are right and everyone else should change (or perhaps they are merely trying to convince themselves)? Some of these people take it to the extreme. Some kill others in the name of their religion. Some hijack planes. Some brainwash others with their own beliefs. Some just go door to door. And some just try to convert their friends. Where do you draw the line? "Let me burn you down." -"Religion" by Front 242

    K Offline
    K Offline
    Kevnar
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    "Hey that dude's house is burning down! Do you think we should wake him up?" "Nah. Leave him alone. He's asleep because he believes there is no fire. Who are we to impose our ideas on his beliefs?" "I guess so." :confused:

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Daniel Ferguson

      We've had a few religious threads today, but I want to ask a slightly different question. Obviously different people have different beliefs and we are not going to change each other's minds with a simple discussion in the Lounge. I have my own beliefs and I don't agree with some other people, but I accept that as a normal part of life. (I'm also not so uncertain of my beliefs that I need others to validate them.) So here is my question: What about religious people (of any religion) who feel the need to preach to and convert others? The sort of people who are so closed minded that they think that only they are right and everyone else should change (or perhaps they are merely trying to convince themselves)? Some of these people take it to the extreme. Some kill others in the name of their religion. Some hijack planes. Some brainwash others with their own beliefs. Some just go door to door. And some just try to convert their friends. Where do you draw the line? "Let me burn you down." -"Religion" by Front 242

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jon Sagara
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      It's called recruitment. Every religious organization (any organization, for that matter) needs to replace departing members, so they preach to their constituents that they must "spread the word of God/Allah/John Travolta." At the simplest level, it all boils down to one thing: money. *ducks to avoid a hurtling Book of Mormon* Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Daniel Ferguson

        We've had a few religious threads today, but I want to ask a slightly different question. Obviously different people have different beliefs and we are not going to change each other's minds with a simple discussion in the Lounge. I have my own beliefs and I don't agree with some other people, but I accept that as a normal part of life. (I'm also not so uncertain of my beliefs that I need others to validate them.) So here is my question: What about religious people (of any religion) who feel the need to preach to and convert others? The sort of people who are so closed minded that they think that only they are right and everyone else should change (or perhaps they are merely trying to convince themselves)? Some of these people take it to the extreme. Some kill others in the name of their religion. Some hijack planes. Some brainwash others with their own beliefs. Some just go door to door. And some just try to convert their friends. Where do you draw the line? "Let me burn you down." -"Religion" by Front 242

        T Offline
        T Offline
        Tim Smith
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        The same holds true for skeptics and atheists/agnostics. Well, only a small portion, but then again, only a small portion of religious people try to convert others. All types of these assholes really erk me. Tim Smith Descartes Systems Sciences, Inc.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Kevnar

          "Hey that dude's house is burning down! Do you think we should wake him up?" "Nah. Leave him alone. He's asleep because he believes there is no fire. Who are we to impose our ideas on his beliefs?" "I guess so." :confused:

          H Offline
          H Offline
          Henry Jacobs
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          "How can you have order in a state without religion? For, when one man is dying of hunger near another who is ill of surfeit, he cannot resign himself to this difference unless there is an authority which declares, 'God wills it thus.' Religion is excellent stuff for keeping people quiet." -- Napoleon

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H Henry Jacobs

            "How can you have order in a state without religion? For, when one man is dying of hunger near another who is ill of surfeit, he cannot resign himself to this difference unless there is an authority which declares, 'God wills it thus.' Religion is excellent stuff for keeping people quiet." -- Napoleon

            K Offline
            K Offline
            Kevnar
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            "For I take no pleasure in the death of anyone." -God, Ezekiel 18:32 Obviously Napolean didn't know too much about God. But it's true, "religion" is good stuff for keeping people quiet. I'll take God over religion anyday.

            H 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • D Daniel Ferguson

              We've had a few religious threads today, but I want to ask a slightly different question. Obviously different people have different beliefs and we are not going to change each other's minds with a simple discussion in the Lounge. I have my own beliefs and I don't agree with some other people, but I accept that as a normal part of life. (I'm also not so uncertain of my beliefs that I need others to validate them.) So here is my question: What about religious people (of any religion) who feel the need to preach to and convert others? The sort of people who are so closed minded that they think that only they are right and everyone else should change (or perhaps they are merely trying to convince themselves)? Some of these people take it to the extreme. Some kill others in the name of their religion. Some hijack planes. Some brainwash others with their own beliefs. Some just go door to door. And some just try to convert their friends. Where do you draw the line? "Let me burn you down." -"Religion" by Front 242

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Christian Graus
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Daniel Ferguson wrote: What about religious people (of any religion) who feel the need to preach to and convert others? I get annoyed by people who come to my door and are less interested in me than in earning their passport to their personal views of heaven, but surely there is nothing wrong with having something good to tell your friends ? If you found a website that sent you free money, would you tell anyone ? Assuming the money doesn't run out, that is. Daniel Ferguson wrote: sort of people who are so closed minded that they think that only they are right and everyone else should change If there *is* a God, then to the degree I am right about Him, anyone who disagrees is wrong, and to the degree someone else is right, I am wrong. If there is no God outside our imagination, then all gods exist equally. Daniel Ferguson wrote: (or perhaps they are merely trying to convince themselves)? That may be the case for some people, but anyone who takes the 'I believe this, but it's OK for you to believe that' approach does not believe in God at all. Daniel Ferguson wrote: Some kill others in the name of their religion. Some hijack planes. These people are not looking to convert anyone, they are after access to virgins. Daniel Ferguson wrote: Where do you draw the line? I don't walk around shoving things in peoples face for the sake of it, but if it comes up in conversation I am not ashamed to tell people what I have experienced, and I do that because I'd prefer my friends experience the same good things that I have. Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

              Sonork ID 100.10002:MeanManOz

              I live in Bob's HungOut now

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Jon Sagara

                It's called recruitment. Every religious organization (any organization, for that matter) needs to replace departing members, so they preach to their constituents that they must "spread the word of God/Allah/John Travolta." At the simplest level, it all boils down to one thing: money. *ducks to avoid a hurtling Book of Mormon* Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Christian Graus
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Jon Sagara wrote: /John Travolta Isn't he a Scientologist ? Man, I can tell some stories about *those* guys. Jon Sagara wrote: At the simplest level, it all boils down to one thing: money. Generally, you are right - witness TV 'evangelism'. What's your answer for a religion not after your money ? I admit in our church we have a collection ( we need to pay for power, the mortgage, etc. ), it is NEVER emphasised, no-one knows or watches who puts money in and I've never in 12 years heard anyone try to put pressure on people to pay any amount in any context. Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

                Sonork ID 100.10002:MeanManOz

                I live in Bob's HungOut now

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Kevnar

                  "For I take no pleasure in the death of anyone." -God, Ezekiel 18:32 Obviously Napolean didn't know too much about God. But it's true, "religion" is good stuff for keeping people quiet. I'll take God over religion anyday.

                  H Offline
                  H Offline
                  Henry Jacobs
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  “But on the morrow all the congregation of the children of Israel murmured against Moses and against Aaron, saying, Ye have killed the people of the Lord. . . . And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, Get you up from among this congregation, that I may consume them as in a moment. And they fell upon their faces... for there is wrath gone out from the Lord; the plague is begun. ... Now they that died in the plague were fourteen thousand and seven hundred, beside them that died about the matter of Korah.” Numbers 16:41-49 No pleasure? Sure. He kills of 14000+ of his followers for questioning Moses; for using the free thought that he endowed them with. The god in the bible reminds me of an conceded, childish immoral using is omnipotent powers to amuse himself. Personally, I think the we don't see miracles any more because he got bored of playing with his humans and started playing with one of his other toys.

                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Christian Graus

                    Jon Sagara wrote: /John Travolta Isn't he a Scientologist ? Man, I can tell some stories about *those* guys. Jon Sagara wrote: At the simplest level, it all boils down to one thing: money. Generally, you are right - witness TV 'evangelism'. What's your answer for a religion not after your money ? I admit in our church we have a collection ( we need to pay for power, the mortgage, etc. ), it is NEVER emphasised, no-one knows or watches who puts money in and I've never in 12 years heard anyone try to put pressure on people to pay any amount in any context. Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

                    Sonork ID 100.10002:MeanManOz

                    I live in Bob's HungOut now

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jon Sagara
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    ****Christian Graus wrote: What's your answer for a religion not after your money ? The solicitation of money is not always overt, but every organization needs money in order to function: * Places of worship - who will build them, and how will they pay for them? Parishioners. If not, then you must *recruit* a wealthy investor who is willing to put forth some serious coin. * Religious materials - who will pay to print them? where does the money come from? * Religious leaders - certainly their supreme being should sustain them, for they are doing "His" work. But this is obviously not the case. Pastors/Bishops/Padres/you-name-it all must make a living, too. They either hold side jobs or they get money from their constituents, directly or indirectly. In order to fund a movement, you need to have people who believe in it and are willing to support it. Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • H Henry Jacobs

                      “But on the morrow all the congregation of the children of Israel murmured against Moses and against Aaron, saying, Ye have killed the people of the Lord. . . . And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, Get you up from among this congregation, that I may consume them as in a moment. And they fell upon their faces... for there is wrath gone out from the Lord; the plague is begun. ... Now they that died in the plague were fourteen thousand and seven hundred, beside them that died about the matter of Korah.” Numbers 16:41-49 No pleasure? Sure. He kills of 14000+ of his followers for questioning Moses; for using the free thought that he endowed them with. The god in the bible reminds me of an conceded, childish immoral using is omnipotent powers to amuse himself. Personally, I think the we don't see miracles any more because he got bored of playing with his humans and started playing with one of his other toys.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Christian Graus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Henry Jacobs wrote: The god in the bible reminds me of an conceded, childish immoral using is omnipotent powers to amuse himself. Personally, I think the we don't see miracles any more because he got bored of playing with his humans and started playing with one of his other toys. Miracles continue to occur today. There's much fun for the naysayers in taking the Old Testament out of all context, but no concrete points to be made. Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

                      Sonork ID 100.10002:MeanManOz

                      I live in Bob's HungOut now

                      H 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Jon Sagara

                        ****Christian Graus wrote: What's your answer for a religion not after your money ? The solicitation of money is not always overt, but every organization needs money in order to function: * Places of worship - who will build them, and how will they pay for them? Parishioners. If not, then you must *recruit* a wealthy investor who is willing to put forth some serious coin. * Religious materials - who will pay to print them? where does the money come from? * Religious leaders - certainly their supreme being should sustain them, for they are doing "His" work. But this is obviously not the case. Pastors/Bishops/Padres/you-name-it all must make a living, too. They either hold side jobs or they get money from their constituents, directly or indirectly. In order to fund a movement, you need to have people who believe in it and are willing to support it. Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Christian Graus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Jon Sagara wrote: The solicitation of money is not always overt, but every organization needs money in order to function: I thought I made that point. Our church needs money to function, but any individual is free to come as long as they like and will never be pressured to pay *anything*. Nor is the concept pushed in any way beyond the bag being passed around ( a bag so that no-one can see if/what people put in, unlike a plate ). Jon Sagara wrote: Places of worship - who will build them, and how will they pay for them? Parishioners. If not, then you must *recruit* a wealthy investor who is willing to put forth some serious coin. That's the example I gave. Jon Sagara wrote: Religious materials - who will pay to print them? where does the money come from? People buy their own Bibles. What else do they need ? Jon Sagara wrote: Religious leaders - certainly their supreme being should sustain them, for they are doing "His" work. But this is obviously not the case. Pastors/Bishops/Padres/you-name-it all must make a living, too. They either hold side jobs or they get money from their constituents, directly or indirectly. Our leaders are unpaid. Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

                        Sonork ID 100.10002:MeanManOz

                        I live in Bob's HungOut now

                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • K Kevnar

                          "For I take no pleasure in the death of anyone." -God, Ezekiel 18:32 Obviously Napolean didn't know too much about God. But it's true, "religion" is good stuff for keeping people quiet. I'll take God over religion anyday.

                          H Offline
                          H Offline
                          Henry Jacobs
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Kevin Ranville wrote: But it's true, "religion" is good stuff for keeping people quiet. I'll take God over religion anyday. I think a lot of people get God and religion confused. (Not meant personally. :))

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Christian Graus

                            Jon Sagara wrote: The solicitation of money is not always overt, but every organization needs money in order to function: I thought I made that point. Our church needs money to function, but any individual is free to come as long as they like and will never be pressured to pay *anything*. Nor is the concept pushed in any way beyond the bag being passed around ( a bag so that no-one can see if/what people put in, unlike a plate ). Jon Sagara wrote: Places of worship - who will build them, and how will they pay for them? Parishioners. If not, then you must *recruit* a wealthy investor who is willing to put forth some serious coin. That's the example I gave. Jon Sagara wrote: Religious materials - who will pay to print them? where does the money come from? People buy their own Bibles. What else do they need ? Jon Sagara wrote: Religious leaders - certainly their supreme being should sustain them, for they are doing "His" work. But this is obviously not the case. Pastors/Bishops/Padres/you-name-it all must make a living, too. They either hold side jobs or they get money from their constituents, directly or indirectly. Our leaders are unpaid. Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

                            Sonork ID 100.10002:MeanManOz

                            I live in Bob's HungOut now

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jon Sagara
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Please excuse me, I have a ton of fantastic ideas in my little nogin, but some of them never seem to make it past my fingertips, onto the keyboard, and into digital nirvana. I wasn't perfectly clear in my original post. When I said it was about money, I didn't mean that these peddlers come door-to-door asking for money. Most of the time they are not that shallow. However, they believe they are part of a greater cause ("saving" human kind from sin), and hence go fervently about their duties of attracting more people to their cause. Whether or not they realize it, it is *this* act that is about money at the most basic level. More people, more money. No people, no money. Organized religion can't exist without money. Therefore, recruit as many people as you can. If they believe they are saving peoples' souls, fine, but that doesn't change the basic nature of what they're doing - trying to get more money. I think I have just broken one of those "lounge rules" posted a while back. :) Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Jon Sagara

                              Please excuse me, I have a ton of fantastic ideas in my little nogin, but some of them never seem to make it past my fingertips, onto the keyboard, and into digital nirvana. I wasn't perfectly clear in my original post. When I said it was about money, I didn't mean that these peddlers come door-to-door asking for money. Most of the time they are not that shallow. However, they believe they are part of a greater cause ("saving" human kind from sin), and hence go fervently about their duties of attracting more people to their cause. Whether or not they realize it, it is *this* act that is about money at the most basic level. More people, more money. No people, no money. Organized religion can't exist without money. Therefore, recruit as many people as you can. If they believe they are saving peoples' souls, fine, but that doesn't change the basic nature of what they're doing - trying to get more money. I think I have just broken one of those "lounge rules" posted a while back. :) Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Christian Graus
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              I'm not sure why my point remains so unclear, but every organisation from the cricket club on requires money to survive. More people = more money if people HAVE to pay, otherwise it may well mean more cost. Who is getting more money, if the money in question is in trust and is used solely to provide for the needs of the people ( a hall, firewood, coffee, etc. ) ? Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

                              Sonork ID 100.10002:MeanManOz

                              I live in Bob's HungOut now

                              J 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Christian Graus

                                Henry Jacobs wrote: The god in the bible reminds me of an conceded, childish immoral using is omnipotent powers to amuse himself. Personally, I think the we don't see miracles any more because he got bored of playing with his humans and started playing with one of his other toys. Miracles continue to occur today. There's much fun for the naysayers in taking the Old Testament out of all context, but no concrete points to be made. Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

                                Sonork ID 100.10002:MeanManOz

                                I live in Bob's HungOut now

                                H Offline
                                H Offline
                                Henry Jacobs
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                I mean science defying miracles like parting the red sea, not child birth and the like. I do not consider finding god, peace, or whatever a miracle. A miracle is an extremely outstanding or unusual event (source: mw). I hope this opportunity is available to everyone.

                                C 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • H Henry Jacobs

                                  I mean science defying miracles like parting the red sea, not child birth and the like. I do not consider finding god, peace, or whatever a miracle. A miracle is an extremely outstanding or unusual event (source: mw). I hope this opportunity is available to everyone.

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Christian Graus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  Henry Jacobs wrote: I mean science defying miracles like parting the red sea, not child birth and the like. So do I. Henry Jacobs wrote: I do not consider finding god, peace, or whatever a miracle. It's not, it's an emotional experience caused by chemical reactions in our minds. That's why so many people experience it in so many different contexts, void of real proof. Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

                                  Sonork ID 100.10002:MeanManOz

                                  I live in Bob's HungOut now

                                  H 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C Christian Graus

                                    I'm not sure why my point remains so unclear, but every organisation from the cricket club on requires money to survive. More people = more money if people HAVE to pay, otherwise it may well mean more cost. Who is getting more money, if the money in question is in trust and is used solely to provide for the needs of the people ( a hall, firewood, coffee, etc. ) ? Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

                                    Sonork ID 100.10002:MeanManOz

                                    I live in Bob's HungOut now

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    Jon Sagara
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    ****Christian Graus wrote: I'm not sure why my point remains so unclear, but every organisation from the cricket club on requires money to survive. We've both been arguing the same point. ****Christian Graus wrote: Who is getting more money, if the money in question is in trust and is used solely to provide for the needs of the people ( a hall, firewood, coffee, etc. ) ? The church, which was my point to begin with. And how do you know that the money is used for "good and right purposes" only? Prime example: the Vatican contains priceless art. What religious purpose does that serve? I know this doesn't directly affect churches at the local level, but do remember that your leaders are human, too, and are subject to frivolity. I see this turning into another "God vs. No god" pissing contest. It's like being floored in neutral - the engine is revved up, but you're just wasting gas. I think this "simple" argument can be further broken down into: "You believe in God. I don't." We've been there and done that before, so no need to do it again. Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

                                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J Jon Sagara

                                      ****Christian Graus wrote: I'm not sure why my point remains so unclear, but every organisation from the cricket club on requires money to survive. We've both been arguing the same point. ****Christian Graus wrote: Who is getting more money, if the money in question is in trust and is used solely to provide for the needs of the people ( a hall, firewood, coffee, etc. ) ? The church, which was my point to begin with. And how do you know that the money is used for "good and right purposes" only? Prime example: the Vatican contains priceless art. What religious purpose does that serve? I know this doesn't directly affect churches at the local level, but do remember that your leaders are human, too, and are subject to frivolity. I see this turning into another "God vs. No god" pissing contest. It's like being floored in neutral - the engine is revved up, but you're just wasting gas. I think this "simple" argument can be further broken down into: "You believe in God. I don't." We've been there and done that before, so no need to do it again. Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      John McIlroy
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      Jon... Are you serious? What religious purpose does the priceless art in the Vatican serve? You gotta be kidding? The best way to look at the priceless art in the Vatican is to consider it part of the family's heirlooms, bequeathed to future generations of Christians for their pleasure and edification. But your whole "it is for the money" argument doesn't hold water. Most local churhes are shockingly poor. And even historically, the norm of a celibate priesthood might very well have been to ensure that the priestly class weren't building treasure up to enrich the family through generations (not that some of that didn't occur anyway, but it helped minimize it). If Christianity was about the money I doubt twelve confused, misguided and fumbling men, parked in the backwater of first century Palestine, would have been able to start something that ended up dominating the western world for the next 20 centuries.

                                      H J C 3 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J John McIlroy

                                        Jon... Are you serious? What religious purpose does the priceless art in the Vatican serve? You gotta be kidding? The best way to look at the priceless art in the Vatican is to consider it part of the family's heirlooms, bequeathed to future generations of Christians for their pleasure and edification. But your whole "it is for the money" argument doesn't hold water. Most local churhes are shockingly poor. And even historically, the norm of a celibate priesthood might very well have been to ensure that the priestly class weren't building treasure up to enrich the family through generations (not that some of that didn't occur anyway, but it helped minimize it). If Christianity was about the money I doubt twelve confused, misguided and fumbling men, parked in the backwater of first century Palestine, would have been able to start something that ended up dominating the western world for the next 20 centuries.

                                        H Offline
                                        H Offline
                                        Henry Jacobs
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        John McIlroy wrote: If Christianity was about the money I doubt twelve confused, misguided and fumbling men, parked in the backwater of first century Palestine, would have been able to start something that ended up dominating the western world for the next 20 centuries. A lot of really successful corporations began in a garage. I'm sure Christianity will make it some day too. ;P

                                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J John McIlroy

                                          Jon... Are you serious? What religious purpose does the priceless art in the Vatican serve? You gotta be kidding? The best way to look at the priceless art in the Vatican is to consider it part of the family's heirlooms, bequeathed to future generations of Christians for their pleasure and edification. But your whole "it is for the money" argument doesn't hold water. Most local churhes are shockingly poor. And even historically, the norm of a celibate priesthood might very well have been to ensure that the priestly class weren't building treasure up to enrich the family through generations (not that some of that didn't occur anyway, but it helped minimize it). If Christianity was about the money I doubt twelve confused, misguided and fumbling men, parked in the backwater of first century Palestine, would have been able to start something that ended up dominating the western world for the next 20 centuries.

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          Jon Sagara
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          *sigh* I thought I was done, but... John McIlroy wrote: Are you serious? What religious purpose does the priceless art in the Vatican serve? You gotta be kidding? The best way to look at the priceless art in the Vatican is to consider it part of the family's heirlooms, bequeathed to future generations of Christians for their pleasure and edification. I fail to see how art fosters edification. Art is a material object and has nothing to do with virtue and piety. Art may inspire people, sure, but there is nothing holy about art itself. Why don't they sell this priceless art to feed the poor? Because the day after, the poor would still be hungry, so selling the art is a waste of *money*. The art will not make people go to heaven. The art will not save souls. The art only increases the financial value of the Vatican. Art is for pleasure, not edification. John McIlroy wrote: But your whole "it is for the money" argument doesn't hold water. Most local churhes are shockingly poor. Right. But they would be non-existent without a congregation. Therefore, they need people because they need money to survive. John McIlroy wrote: If Christianity was about the money I doubt twelve confused, misguided and fumbling men, parked in the backwater of first century Palestine, would have been able to start something that ended up dominating the western world for the next 20 centuries. That's based on the huge assumption that you hold the Bible to be true. I don't. Jon Sagara "Ninety percent of baseball is mental, the other half is physical." -- Yogi Bera

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups