About VC.NET
-
Both have their own purposes. C++ is best suited for web applications, scripts, and corporate business applications C# shines for system programming, scientific apps, CAD, games and embedded programming. (Gosh, that was evil. :rolleyes: )
My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it.
-
Both have their own purposes. C++ is best suited for web applications, scripts, and corporate business applications C# shines for system programming, scientific apps, CAD, games and embedded programming. (Gosh, that was evil. :rolleyes: )
My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it.
Oh lordy! :laugh:
Contrary to the cliche, genuinely nice guys most often finish first or very near it.--Malcolm Forbes
-
Both have their own purposes. C++ is best suited for web applications, scripts, and corporate business applications C# shines for system programming, scientific apps, CAD, games and embedded programming. (Gosh, that was evil. :rolleyes: )
My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it.
-
U serious ? I always thought the other way :) Have a great day ahead! Regards, Sohail Kadiwala
Re-read the post and pay attention to the small chars :) Yes, even I am blogging now!
-
sohailkadiwala wrote: Also are people widely using VC++.NET like VC++ 6.0? I only have one project that I still use VC++ 6 for. It uses too many third party libraries for me to spend the time and money to convert it. All my other C++ projects (4) have been converted to use VS.NET 2003. All new stuff is being developed in C# apart from my CTI technology which is still C++ because TAPI and the other various CTI apis are much easier to use native. However all my apps that use CTI are C# apps, either using COM interop or a IP listener to receive and set CTI events. I don't know if C# is better than say C++/MFC, but I find it quicker and easier to develop with. Not to mention it gives me access to great technology like MyXaml and ASP.NET Michael CP Blog [^]
-
sohailkadiwala wrote: Also are people widely using VC++.NET like VC++ 6.0? I only have one project that I still use VC++ 6 for. It uses too many third party libraries for me to spend the time and money to convert it. All my other C++ projects (4) have been converted to use VS.NET 2003. All new stuff is being developed in C# apart from my CTI technology which is still C++ because TAPI and the other various CTI apis are much easier to use native. However all my apps that use CTI are C# apps, either using COM interop or a IP listener to receive and set CTI events. I don't know if C# is better than say C++/MFC, but I find it quicker and easier to develop with. Not to mention it gives me access to great technology like MyXaml and ASP.NET Michael CP Blog [^]
-
Both have their own purposes. C++ is best suited for web applications, scripts, and corporate business applications C# shines for system programming, scientific apps, CAD, games and embedded programming. (Gosh, that was evil. :rolleyes: )
My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it.
That was sneaky, underhanded and devious. Well done ! :laugh: Elaine (admiring fluffy tigress) The tigress is here :-D
-
Hey Carlos, Good to hear that. Even I can't stop using VC++ 6.0 Would definately like to work on VC.NET. But what I am concerned with is "What is the future of VC++"? Will other technologies take over it? Have a great day ahead! Regards, Sohail Kadiwala
I believe that VC++ never will die. The visual Studio will improve but only to other languages like something called VB.NET, ASP.NET, ADO.NET, VC++ is too standard to change. The problem will be if MS starts to hide the new versions of the c compilers, for example a compiler to 64bits or greater. I believe that the evolution in VC++ are in the classes. Here in Code Project we are helping with that VC++ Improvement.;) I think that microsoft feels the same becuase the Redmond guys published the VC toolkit, that include the last versión of the compiler. Regards Carlos Antollini Do you know piFive[^] ?
-
sohailkadiwala wrote: Also are people widely using VC++.NET like VC++ 6.0? I only have one project that I still use VC++ 6 for. It uses too many third party libraries for me to spend the time and money to convert it. All my other C++ projects (4) have been converted to use VS.NET 2003. All new stuff is being developed in C# apart from my CTI technology which is still C++ because TAPI and the other various CTI apis are much easier to use native. However all my apps that use CTI are C# apps, either using COM interop or a IP listener to receive and set CTI events. I don't know if C# is better than say C++/MFC, but I find it quicker and easier to develop with. Not to mention it gives me access to great technology like MyXaml and ASP.NET Michael CP Blog [^]
Michael P Butler wrote: I don't know if C# is better than say C++/MFC, but I find it quicker and easier to develop with. Not to mention it gives me access to great technology like MyXaml and ASP.NET Ooo Ooo Ooo.. And MUCH less debugging :) Rocky <>< www.HintsAndTips.com www.MyQuickPoll.com - 2004 Election poll is #33 www.GotTheAnswerToSpam.com "We plan for the future, we learn from the past, we live life in the present!"
-
Michael P Butler wrote: I don't know if C# is better than say C++/MFC, but I find it quicker and easier to develop with. Not to mention it gives me access to great technology like MyXaml and ASP.NET Ooo Ooo Ooo.. And MUCH less debugging :) Rocky <>< www.HintsAndTips.com www.MyQuickPoll.com - 2004 Election poll is #33 www.GotTheAnswerToSpam.com "We plan for the future, we learn from the past, we live life in the present!"