Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Okay...let's sort this GMail thing out...

Okay...let's sort this GMail thing out...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comquestion
31 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    David Stone
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    First off, Gmail invites were not banned from the Lounge. As Mike Mullikin states: _Chris Maunder wrote:
    We're having a moratorium on GMail ending Monday morning.

    The post was dated Friday, August 28 thus the moratorium ended on Monday, August 30. Today is Thursday, September 2 thus the moratorium is over and while still annoying the "GMail Invite" posts are not still banned to the Soapbox. Kapeesh?!_ Chris suggested that he might make a separate Gmail forum just till the hype dies down, but I don't see one. It would be nice if we just moved all these to the Soapbox, but I think the regulars there (Losinger and all the other political activists that like to fight in there) would get a wee bit upset that their arguments were getting bumped by Gmail invite announcements. In other words, stop saying that Gmail invites were banned. They aren't. Anybody who says otherwise clearly does not understand what the word moratorium means...and should go look it up.


    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

    N J S L D 8 Replies Last reply
    0
    • D David Stone

      First off, Gmail invites were not banned from the Lounge. As Mike Mullikin states: _Chris Maunder wrote:
      We're having a moratorium on GMail ending Monday morning.

      The post was dated Friday, August 28 thus the moratorium ended on Monday, August 30. Today is Thursday, September 2 thus the moratorium is over and while still annoying the "GMail Invite" posts are not still banned to the Soapbox. Kapeesh?!_ Chris suggested that he might make a separate Gmail forum just till the hype dies down, but I don't see one. It would be nice if we just moved all these to the Soapbox, but I think the regulars there (Losinger and all the other political activists that like to fight in there) would get a wee bit upset that their arguments were getting bumped by Gmail invite announcements. In other words, stop saying that Gmail invites were banned. They aren't. Anybody who says otherwise clearly does not understand what the word moratorium means...and should go look it up.


      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

      N Offline
      N Offline
      Navin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      moratorium Isn't that a desert country in western Africa? An expert is somebody who learns more and more about less and less, until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Navin

        moratorium Isn't that a desert country in western Africa? An expert is somebody who learns more and more about less and less, until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.

        D Offline
        D Offline
        David Stone
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Perhaps you're thinking Mauritania. :)


        Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

        N 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D David Stone

          First off, Gmail invites were not banned from the Lounge. As Mike Mullikin states: _Chris Maunder wrote:
          We're having a moratorium on GMail ending Monday morning.

          The post was dated Friday, August 28 thus the moratorium ended on Monday, August 30. Today is Thursday, September 2 thus the moratorium is over and while still annoying the "GMail Invite" posts are not still banned to the Soapbox. Kapeesh?!_ Chris suggested that he might make a separate Gmail forum just till the hype dies down, but I don't see one. It would be nice if we just moved all these to the Soapbox, but I think the regulars there (Losinger and all the other political activists that like to fight in there) would get a wee bit upset that their arguments were getting bumped by Gmail invite announcements. In other words, stop saying that Gmail invites were banned. They aren't. Anybody who says otherwise clearly does not understand what the word moratorium means...and should go look it up.


          Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jorgen Sigvardsson
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          moratorium
          n 1: a legally authorized postponement before some obligation
          must be discharged
          2: suspension of an ongoing activity
          [also: moratoria (pl)]

          :) -- ...Coca Cola, sometimes war...

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D David Stone

            First off, Gmail invites were not banned from the Lounge. As Mike Mullikin states: _Chris Maunder wrote:
            We're having a moratorium on GMail ending Monday morning.

            The post was dated Friday, August 28 thus the moratorium ended on Monday, August 30. Today is Thursday, September 2 thus the moratorium is over and while still annoying the "GMail Invite" posts are not still banned to the Soapbox. Kapeesh?!_ Chris suggested that he might make a separate Gmail forum just till the hype dies down, but I don't see one. It would be nice if we just moved all these to the Soapbox, but I think the regulars there (Losinger and all the other political activists that like to fight in there) would get a wee bit upset that their arguments were getting bumped by Gmail invite announcements. In other words, stop saying that Gmail invites were banned. They aren't. Anybody who says otherwise clearly does not understand what the word moratorium means...and should go look it up.


            Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Shog9 0
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            GMail is fun. It's nice of people to want to share. However, to minimize the amount of uninteresting reply posts clogging the forums, it would be courteous of those sharing to do one of the following:

            1. Mandate in your post that only those replying via the [Email] link will receive invites, or
            2. Direct replies to a thread in your bio forum, as Nick did a while back.

            Needless to say, there will still be replies in the primary forums, as some people don't understand English well, and more people don't bother reading past the word "GMail". But at least it might make things manageable. GMail is all well and good, until you have to page to find non-Gmail posts. :)
            You**'re one microscopic cog** in his catastrophic plan...

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D David Stone

              First off, Gmail invites were not banned from the Lounge. As Mike Mullikin states: _Chris Maunder wrote:
              We're having a moratorium on GMail ending Monday morning.

              The post was dated Friday, August 28 thus the moratorium ended on Monday, August 30. Today is Thursday, September 2 thus the moratorium is over and while still annoying the "GMail Invite" posts are not still banned to the Soapbox. Kapeesh?!_ Chris suggested that he might make a separate Gmail forum just till the hype dies down, but I don't see one. It would be nice if we just moved all these to the Soapbox, but I think the regulars there (Losinger and all the other political activists that like to fight in there) would get a wee bit upset that their arguments were getting bumped by Gmail invite announcements. In other words, stop saying that Gmail invites were banned. They aren't. Anybody who says otherwise clearly does not understand what the word moratorium means...and should go look it up.


              Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I've had a GMail account for an entire week and the boys at Google haven't seen fit to give me a single invite yet. I'm chomping at the bit to flood the Lounge with GMail invites, but I'm stuck with no ammo. ;P ;P ;P Seriously though, anybody know how long it takes before Google ponies up a couple invites for a new user? "Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it." Philip K. Dick

              D B R 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                moratorium
                n 1: a legally authorized postponement before some obligation
                must be discharged
                2: suspension of an ongoing activity
                [also: moratoria (pl)]

                :) -- ...Coca Cola, sometimes war...

                D Offline
                D Offline
                David Stone
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I know what moratorium means...but if it ended monday morning, then that means that the onging activity that was suspended can now be resumed... Meaning Gmail is not banned...


                Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  I've had a GMail account for an entire week and the boys at Google haven't seen fit to give me a single invite yet. I'm chomping at the bit to flood the Lounge with GMail invites, but I'm stuck with no ammo. ;P ;P ;P Seriously though, anybody know how long it takes before Google ponies up a couple invites for a new user? "Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it." Philip K. Dick

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  David Stone
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I gave an invite to a friend just yesterday and he already has 6 invites to give away. Mine took a while... Go figure.


                  Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    I've had a GMail account for an entire week and the boys at Google haven't seen fit to give me a single invite yet. I'm chomping at the bit to flood the Lounge with GMail invites, but I'm stuck with no ammo. ;P ;P ;P Seriously though, anybody know how long it takes before Google ponies up a couple invites for a new user? "Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it." Philip K. Dick

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Brian Olej
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    I've had mine for about a week and they have given me about 15 invites. Signature under construction.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D David Stone

                      I know what moratorium means...but if it ended monday morning, then that means that the onging activity that was suspended can now be resumed... Meaning Gmail is not banned...


                      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jorgen Sigvardsson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      I looked up the word in favor for those who don't own a dictionary. :) -- ...Coca Cola, sometimes war...

                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Brian Olej

                        I've had mine for about a week and they have given me about 15 invites. Signature under construction.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Grrrrrr "Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it." Philip K. Dick

                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Grrrrrr "Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it." Philip K. Dick

                          B Offline
                          B Offline
                          Brian Olej
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          How often do you use the account? I think that may have something to do with it. Signature under construction.

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                            I looked up the word in favor for those who don't own a dictionary. :) -- ...Coca Cola, sometimes war...

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            David Stone
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Did you see that my original message linked to the dictionary.com definition? ;P


                            Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

                            J 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Brian Olej

                              How often do you use the account? I think that may have something to do with it. Signature under construction.

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              You might have a point. I have it set as my CodeProject e-mail address so it catches all the replies from my posts, but I haven't used it for very much outgoing mail. Hmmmmm..... I think I'l have to rectify the situation. "Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it." Philip K. Dick

                              B 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                You might have a point. I have it set as my CodeProject e-mail address so it catches all the replies from my posts, but I haven't used it for very much outgoing mail. Hmmmmm..... I think I'l have to rectify the situation. "Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it." Philip K. Dick

                                B Offline
                                B Offline
                                Brian Olej
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Yeah, i've sent quite a few emails with it, that could possibly be why. Signature under construction.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D David Stone

                                  Did you see that my original message linked to the dictionary.com definition? ;P


                                  Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  :doh: I've been playing UT too much tonight, so it seems I can't see straight anylonger. -- ...Coca Cola, sometimes war...

                                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                                    :doh: I've been playing UT too much tonight, so it seems I can't see straight anylonger. -- ...Coca Cola, sometimes war...

                                    D Offline
                                    D Offline
                                    David Stone
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    I've been playing UT too much tonight I've been wondering, how does UT 2k4 on PC compare to Unreal Championship on Xbox? Is it about the same? Or are there things I'm missing out on?


                                    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

                                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D David Stone

                                      I've been playing UT too much tonight I've been wondering, how does UT 2k4 on PC compare to Unreal Championship on Xbox? Is it about the same? Or are there things I'm missing out on?


                                      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      I'm playing the original Unreal Tournament. I have played UT2k4, but I didn't like it as much as I do the original. I have not tried Unreal Championship on the Xbox, and I doubt I ever will. I just can't play FPS games using a game pad. -- ...Coca Cola, sometimes war...

                                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Shog9 0

                                        GMail is fun. It's nice of people to want to share. However, to minimize the amount of uninteresting reply posts clogging the forums, it would be courteous of those sharing to do one of the following:

                                        1. Mandate in your post that only those replying via the [Email] link will receive invites, or
                                        2. Direct replies to a thread in your bio forum, as Nick did a while back.

                                        Needless to say, there will still be replies in the primary forums, as some people don't understand English well, and more people don't bother reading past the word "GMail". But at least it might make things manageable. GMail is all well and good, until you have to page to find non-Gmail posts. :)
                                        You**'re one microscopic cog** in his catastrophic plan...

                                        M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        m_mond
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        GMail is all well and good, until you have to page to find non-Gmail posts.
                                        What's funny is that there are more posts complaining about Gmail posts in the Lounge than there are legitimate Gmail posts offering invites.
                                        In other words, if everyone would just ignore the invites unless you were legitimately interested, it wouldn't be that bad. Just my opinion, especially since I just now got my invite.

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • D David Stone

                                          First off, Gmail invites were not banned from the Lounge. As Mike Mullikin states: _Chris Maunder wrote:
                                          We're having a moratorium on GMail ending Monday morning.

                                          The post was dated Friday, August 28 thus the moratorium ended on Monday, August 30. Today is Thursday, September 2 thus the moratorium is over and while still annoying the "GMail Invite" posts are not still banned to the Soapbox. Kapeesh?!_ Chris suggested that he might make a separate Gmail forum just till the hype dies down, but I don't see one. It would be nice if we just moved all these to the Soapbox, but I think the regulars there (Losinger and all the other political activists that like to fight in there) would get a wee bit upset that their arguments were getting bumped by Gmail invite announcements. In other words, stop saying that Gmail invites were banned. They aren't. Anybody who says otherwise clearly does not understand what the word moratorium means...and should go look it up.


                                          Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          Duncan Edwards Jones
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          This GMAIL thing is the electronic equivalent of a chain letter. :( '--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Merrion Computing Ltd

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups