Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. The criticism starts already

The criticism starts already

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
javacomhelpquestionannouncement
59 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D David Wulff

    Jeremy Falcon wrote: But it is. People continually insult the US (whether or not you believe it's in my head) Yes, I do believe you are finding insults where there are none. It is just that; nothing more. If you respond to a genuine insult then fine, I won't join in, but with the frequency of this sort of thing it comes across very strongly that you are looking for cause to complain rather than wanting to address any legitimate complaints (and yes - there are some here occasionally). It isn't just me that thinks this, more often than not I am introduced to one of these threads by other people IM'ing me and saying "is it just me?" Jeremy Falcon wrote: All things considered most of those complaints are plainly stated. It's kinda difficult (but not impossible) to misunderstand them. And yet this conversation has happened how many times now? And how many more times will it happen again? You say can't be bothered to, but maybe we do need to adopt a system of asking for clarification on all points before inferring things... because right now (as every time before) you are not addressing what I am asking you and I am not getting anything new from you to ask about. It is as if we are having two entirely different conversations. Every reply from either of us should be "Yes, I know" by now. :wtf:


    David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum

    Everybody is entitled to my opinion

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jeremy Falcon
    wrote on last edited by
    #49

    because right now (as every time before) you are not addressing what I am asking you and I am not getting anything new from you to ask about. Well, from what I understand of it, you're saying "Jeremy you could be wrong sometimes." And, I'm saying the same thing; "David you could be wrong sometimes." So, if we agree on that, I'm willing to wager both of our hard heads can come to a succssful conclusion here. :) Jeremy Falcon

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jeremy Falcon

      because right now (as every time before) you are not addressing what I am asking you and I am not getting anything new from you to ask about. Well, from what I understand of it, you're saying "Jeremy you could be wrong sometimes." And, I'm saying the same thing; "David you could be wrong sometimes." So, if we agree on that, I'm willing to wager both of our hard heads can come to a succssful conclusion here. :) Jeremy Falcon

      D Offline
      D Offline
      David Wulff
      wrote on last edited by
      #50

      Yes, I know. ;)


      David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum

      Everybody is entitled to my opinion

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Colin Angus Mackay

        Just trying to be pragmatic about the whole thing here, but what if all the figures about who gives what and who writes of what debt are expressed as a percentage of GDP. That way, it becomes clear who is paying their share and who isn't.


        Do you want to know more? WDevs.com - Open Source Code Hosting, Blogs, FTP, Mail and Forums

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jeremy Falcon
        wrote on last edited by
        #51

        That'd be ok, but the amount is not really what this was about for me. From what I understood of it, it seemed the US was being attacked in this article because of my lack of understanding of the word "western" in this context. I've already been straightened out on it though. Of course, not without the usual turmoil we so cherish here on CP. :) Jeremy Falcon

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D David Wulff

          Yes, I know. ;)


          David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum

          Everybody is entitled to my opinion

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jeremy Falcon
          wrote on last edited by
          #52

          LOL! Jeremy Falcon

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Losinger

            that article doesn't actually say that this one UN worker singled-out the US as being "stingy". from the quotes given, it sounds more like this person was saying all western nations are "stingy". maybe some other remarks singled-out the US... but they aren't in this article. and, in the NYT's[^] piece on this, they say:

            Today, Mr. Egeland said his remarks had been misinterpreted, that he was not referring to any particular country, and that the initial American contribution "is one of the most generous pledges so far."

            and, if you want to put things in perspective ... W's inauguration festival[^] is expected to cost, without security, 30 to 40 million dollars. so, we can do more, easily; and from what Powell said, we plan to. so, good for us. Software | Cleek

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jerry Hammond
            wrote on last edited by
            #53

            Chris Losinger wrote: that article doesn't actually say that this one UN worker I think characterizing Jan as a UN worker is misleading. See my link above to get an idea of who this "worker" is and what role he plays in the UN. He said this was like painstakingly assembling the first layer of a house of cards, then boasting that the next 15,000 layers were a mere formality.--The Code Book, pp. 331 Toasty0.com The Recipe Project

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Doug Goulden

              Being a UN official maybe the guy could speak to Kofi Annan and some of the other UN micreants who embezzled money from the Oil for Food program and pass a few bucks to these poor folks....... Just a thought <edit> In all fairness after looking at this site though, Norway where this guy is from does seem to contribute what seems to be generously based on their population. http://www.norway-un.org/NorwayandtheUN/NorwegianContributions/Norwegian+contributions+to+the+UN.htm[^] </edit> Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Chris Losinger
              wrote on last edited by
              #54

              [edit] careful there. some might be tempted to think you're getting a lot of mileage out of those corpses. IMO, now's not the best time to use this situation for political points. [/edit] that's not intended to be a cheap shot. Software | Cleek

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                David Wulff wrote: ...the USA just isn't that important in most people's lives... I've been told on many occassions here in the CP Soapbox by non-Americans (including Brits, Aussies and a certain South African) that the US and the POTUS have a significant affect on their daily lives. I tend to agree with you. I hope you'll jump in and set them straight the next time it arises. ;) [EDIT] Score: 1.0 (1 vote). It's stupid shit like this that makes me wonder why I even bother. :mad: Whomever voted this a one... be an adult and post a reply!!! [/EDIT] "Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it." Philip K. Dick

                C Offline
                C Offline
                ColinDavies
                wrote on last edited by
                #55

                In my opinion the POTUS has more effect on my daily life than my Prime Minister does. However the effect the PM has is miniscule since it doesn't matter which party is elected the PM will behave mostly the same. The POTUS however does have the power of the BUTTON, so I like to be informed who this power is being transfered to. - In day to day stuff Bush or Kerry would make pretty much the same decisions, although Bush will help me put money in my bank account by not creating as many new Tarrifs as Kerry. Bush also may have the ability to change the SC Justices in the US, and my country is likely to take a lead from their interpretations. - Thus I believe what we need to remember is what President we have now will effect future POTUSes day to day decisions. Regardz Colin J Davies Attention: It's finally arrived, The worlds first DSP.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D David Wulff

                  Ok. I was taught the continents of North and South America are referred to as the Americas, and the Western World refers to any country that isn't poor and/or communist. I assumed these were dictionary definitions, I didn't realise they were open for interpretation.


                  David Wulff The Royal Woofle Museum

                  Everybody is entitled to my opinion

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Paul Watson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #56

                  South Africa is poor, communist inclined and yet considered a western country. I think it is more about how you conduct business, the media you have, the entertainment you import and your relations with the world. regards, Paul Watson South Africa The Code Project South-East Asia Disaster: How you can help Pope Pius II said "The only prescription is more cowbell. "

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Colin Angus Mackay

                    Just trying to be pragmatic about the whole thing here, but what if all the figures about who gives what and who writes of what debt are expressed as a percentage of GDP. That way, it becomes clear who is paying their share and who isn't.


                    Do you want to know more? WDevs.com - Open Source Code Hosting, Blogs, FTP, Mail and Forums

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mike Gaskey
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #57

                    Colin Angus Mackay wrote: That way, it becomes clear who is paying their share and who isn't. Their share? Come on Colin, just who is assessing? Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Mike Gaskey

                      Colin Angus Mackay wrote: That way, it becomes clear who is paying their share and who isn't. Their share? Come on Colin, just who is assessing? Mike "liberals were driven crazy by Bush." Me To: Dixie Sluts, M. Moore, the Boss, Bon Jovi, Clooney, Penn, Babs, Soros, Redford, Gore, Daschle - "bye bye" Me "I voted for W." Me "There you go again." RR "Flushed the Johns" Me

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Colin Angus Mackay
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #58

                      Mike Gaskey wrote: Their share? Come on Colin, just who is assessing? :confused:


                      Do you want to know more? WDevs.com - Open Source Code Hosting, Blogs, FTP, Mail and Forums

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris Losinger

                        [edit] careful there. some might be tempted to think you're getting a lot of mileage out of those corpses. IMO, now's not the best time to use this situation for political points. [/edit] that's not intended to be a cheap shot. Software | Cleek

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Doug Goulden
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #59

                        I agree... I just think this guy was speaking out of turn. In general the US has a pretty good record for antying up when help is needed. I don't think we needed to be mentioned as one of the guys examples. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups