I give up
-
I'll let the solution speak for itself: (Using Haskell set logic)
solution :: [(Int, Int)] solution = [ (apples, oranges) | apples <- [0..100], oranges <- [0..100], apples * 29 + oranges * 39 == 1999 ]Result:[(38,23)]
Hence, the answer must be 38 apples. Haskell really shines sometimes. I don't think solutions really get more elegant than this. :-D
That's cheating. ;) -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!
-
29a + 39o = 1999 29a ≤ 1999 ⇒ 0 ≤ a ≤ 68 39o ≤ 1999 ⇒ 0 ≤ o ≤ 51 29a + 39o ≡ 9a + 9o = 9(a + o) ≡ 9 (mod 10) ∴ a + o ≡ 1 (mod 10) Since 29 and 39 do not divide 1999, 29(a + o) < 29a + 39o < 39(a + 0) ⇒ 51 < a + o < 68. ∴ a + o = 61. a + o = 61 and 29a + 39o = 1999 ⇒ a = 38 and o = 23. "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog
This is exactly the method I used to solve the problem. (congruency and equivalence relations). Ahh, the good old days of discrete mathematics! -Sean ---- Shag a Lizard
-
This is exactly the method I used to solve the problem. (congruency and equivalence relations). Ahh, the good old days of discrete mathematics! -Sean ---- Shag a Lizard
Gotta love Mathematics. Nothing you can't prove or counter-prove with it. :-D "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog
-
Gotta love Mathematics. Nothing you can't prove or counter-prove with it. :-D "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog
Especially Goedel's theorem.;P
I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon
-
Especially Goedel's theorem.;P
I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon
Reminds me of a cousin of mine who used to say, if God is all-powerful, why can't he create a rock that is so big, that even he can't lift it, and if he can't lift it, how is he so powerful? I think that Goedel's theorem would fall under the prove that we can't prove it, in which case we have a proof (of sorts). :) And yes, you're a smart-ass. :-D "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog
-
Reminds me of a cousin of mine who used to say, if God is all-powerful, why can't he create a rock that is so big, that even he can't lift it, and if he can't lift it, how is he so powerful? I think that Goedel's theorem would fall under the prove that we can't prove it, in which case we have a proof (of sorts). :) And yes, you're a smart-ass. :-D "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: And yes, you're a smart-ass. Sorry, I just couldn't resist.:-D
I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon
-
a for apple, o for orange 29a + 39o = 1999 29(a + o) + 10o = 1999 lets call a + o = t (total) 29t + 10o = 1999 we know o is a whole number, o = (1999 - 29t)/10, for this to be a whole number 29t would be ***9 (has 9 in units place) so t would be *1 (has 1 in units place) so our probable answer set (for total fruits) are 1, 11, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71 ... for lower limit a=0, so t = o (all fruits are oranges, since oranges are costlier) 39t = 1999, t = 1999/39 = 51.256 (just more than 51) for upper limit o = 0, so t =a (all fruits are apples, since apples are cheaper) 29t = 1999, t = 1999/29 = 68.931 (just less than 70). the only number that ends with *1 in this range is 61, so t = 61. so, 29*61 + 10o = 1999, 10o = 1999 - 1769, o = 230/10 = 23. a = 61- 23 = 38.
Amazing! :omg: What's even more amazing is that your very first post has garnered 11 5 votes and still counting. :cool: Vikram.
http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "It's like hitting water with your fist. There's all sorts of motion and noise at impact, and no impression left whatsoever shortly thereafter." — gantww.
-
Especially Goedel's theorem.;P
I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon
You beat me to it. :-D Vikram.
http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "It's like hitting water with your fist. There's all sorts of motion and noise at impact, and no impression left whatsoever shortly thereafter." — gantww.
-
a for apple, o for orange 29a + 39o = 1999 29(a + o) + 10o = 1999 lets call a + o = t (total) 29t + 10o = 1999 we know o is a whole number, o = (1999 - 29t)/10, for this to be a whole number 29t would be ***9 (has 9 in units place) so t would be *1 (has 1 in units place) so our probable answer set (for total fruits) are 1, 11, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71 ... for lower limit a=0, so t = o (all fruits are oranges, since oranges are costlier) 39t = 1999, t = 1999/39 = 51.256 (just more than 51) for upper limit o = 0, so t =a (all fruits are apples, since apples are cheaper) 29t = 1999, t = 1999/29 = 68.931 (just less than 70). the only number that ends with *1 in this range is 61, so t = 61. so, 29*61 + 10o = 1999, 10o = 1999 - 1769, o = 230/10 = 23. a = 61- 23 = 38.
-
29a + 39o = 1999 29a ≤ 1999 ⇒ 0 ≤ a ≤ 68 39o ≤ 1999 ⇒ 0 ≤ o ≤ 51 29a + 39o ≡ 9a + 9o = 9(a + o) ≡ 9 (mod 10) ∴ a + o ≡ 1 (mod 10) Since 29 and 39 do not divide 1999, 29(a + o) < 29a + 39o < 39(a + 0) ⇒ 51 < a + o < 68. ∴ a + o = 61. a + o = 61 and 29a + 39o = 1999 ⇒ a = 38 and o = 23. "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog
The solution is quite elegant. seems to me that I should go back and refine my discrete mathematics and modern algebra. Blood, Sweat and Code
-
Today I realised that math is definitively not for me. For fun I was trying to solve some puzzles, and I've been stuck with this one for about an hour. I know some of you really get it, so could I ask for some help? Thanks! A fruitstand in my neighborhood sells apples for 29 cents apiece, and oranges for 39 cents apiece. One day I went there and filled a basket with a mixture of apples and oranges. When I paid for them I handed the clerk a $20 bill, and she handed me back my change ... one penny. How many apples did I buy? (Assume there was no sales tax charged.) Matias
In .net and C#.... int apple,orange = 0; //surely apple wont be more than 69 for(apple=0;apple<69;apple++) { long temp1,temp2 = 0; temp1 = Math.DivRem((1999-39*apple),29,out temp2); if(temp2 == 0) { orange = (int)temp1; break; } } //Get the ornage and apple here! :-D
-
Amazing! :omg: What's even more amazing is that your very first post has garnered 11 5 votes and still counting. :cool: Vikram.
http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "It's like hitting water with your fist. There's all sorts of motion and noise at impact, and no impression left whatsoever shortly thereafter." — gantww.
Vikram A Punathambekar wrote: garnered 11 5 votes 18th is mine! ;P
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
cheers, Alok Gupta
-
The solution is quite elegant. seems to me that I should go back and refine my discrete mathematics and modern algebra. Blood, Sweat and Code
Yours was the equivalent of mine, just a bit more wordy. Don't get many mathematical problems on CP, so I quickly jumped into the solution. Little did I know that I was 3 hours late in supplying the first correct one. :( Whch is why I only got 3 votes. :-D "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog
-
Let a = number of apples bought, and o = number of oranges bought. Then you have: 29_a_ + 39_o_ = 1999 You can't solve this equation in isolation, because to solve for 2 unknowns you need 2 equations. You have the restriction that both a and o must be integers, but I can't think of an equation for that in the 30 seconds I've been considering this problem ;) --Mike-- Visual C++ MVP :cool: LINKS~! Ericahist | 1ClickPicGrabber | CP SearchBar v2.0.2 | C++ Forum FAQ Strange things are afoot at the U+004B U+20DD
Michael Dunn wrote: 29a + 39o = 1999 This is a perfect problem to be solved by computers, like the following: #include <stdio.h> void main() { for(int a=0;a<100;a++) for(int o=0;o<100;o++) if(29*a+39*o==1999) printf("Solution: a=%d, o=%d\n",a, o); } :-D[
My articles and software tools