Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. I give up

I give up

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpsalesquestion
36 Posts 23 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Sean Cundiff

    This is exactly the method I used to solve the problem. (congruency and equivalence relations). Ahh, the good old days of discrete mathematics! -Sean ---- Shag a Lizard

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Bassam Abdul Baki
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Gotta love Mathematics. Nothing you can't prove or counter-prove with it. :-D "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Bassam Abdul Baki

      Gotta love Mathematics. Nothing you can't prove or counter-prove with it. :-D "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Andy Brummer
      wrote on last edited by
      #26

      Especially Goedel's theorem.;P


      I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon

      B V 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • A Andy Brummer

        Especially Goedel's theorem.;P


        I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon

        B Offline
        B Offline
        Bassam Abdul Baki
        wrote on last edited by
        #27

        Reminds me of a cousin of mine who used to say, if God is all-powerful, why can't he create a rock that is so big, that even he can't lift it, and if he can't lift it, how is he so powerful? I think that Goedel's theorem would fall under the prove that we can't prove it, in which case we have a proof (of sorts). :) And yes, you're a smart-ass. :-D "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B Bassam Abdul Baki

          Reminds me of a cousin of mine who used to say, if God is all-powerful, why can't he create a rock that is so big, that even he can't lift it, and if he can't lift it, how is he so powerful? I think that Goedel's theorem would fall under the prove that we can't prove it, in which case we have a proof (of sorts). :) And yes, you're a smart-ass. :-D "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Andy Brummer
          wrote on last edited by
          #28

          Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: And yes, you're a smart-ass. Sorry, I just couldn't resist.:-D


          I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Srikanth Remani

            a for apple, o for orange 29a + 39o = 1999 29(a + o) + 10o = 1999 lets call a + o = t (total) 29t + 10o = 1999 we know o is a whole number, o = (1999 - 29t)/10, for this to be a whole number 29t would be ***9 (has 9 in units place) so t would be *1 (has 1 in units place) so our probable answer set (for total fruits) are 1, 11, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71 ... for lower limit a=0, so t = o (all fruits are oranges, since oranges are costlier) 39t = 1999, t = 1999/39 = 51.256 (just more than 51) for upper limit o = 0, so t =a (all fruits are apples, since apples are cheaper) 29t = 1999, t = 1999/29 = 68.931 (just less than 70). the only number that ends with *1 in this range is 61, so t = 61. so, 29*61 + 10o = 1999, 10o = 1999 - 1769, o = 230/10 = 23. a = 61- 23 = 38.

            V Offline
            V Offline
            Vikram A Punathambekar
            wrote on last edited by
            #29

            Amazing! :omg: What's even more amazing is that your very first post has garnered 11 5 votes and still counting. :cool: Vikram.


            http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "It's like hitting water with your fist. There's all sorts of motion and noise at impact, and no impression left whatsoever shortly thereafter." — gantww.

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Andy Brummer

              Especially Goedel's theorem.;P


              I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon

              V Offline
              V Offline
              Vikram A Punathambekar
              wrote on last edited by
              #30

              You beat me to it. :-D Vikram.


              http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "It's like hitting water with your fist. There's all sorts of motion and noise at impact, and no impression left whatsoever shortly thereafter." — gantww.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Srikanth Remani

                a for apple, o for orange 29a + 39o = 1999 29(a + o) + 10o = 1999 lets call a + o = t (total) 29t + 10o = 1999 we know o is a whole number, o = (1999 - 29t)/10, for this to be a whole number 29t would be ***9 (has 9 in units place) so t would be *1 (has 1 in units place) so our probable answer set (for total fruits) are 1, 11, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71 ... for lower limit a=0, so t = o (all fruits are oranges, since oranges are costlier) 39t = 1999, t = 1999/39 = 51.256 (just more than 51) for upper limit o = 0, so t =a (all fruits are apples, since apples are cheaper) 29t = 1999, t = 1999/29 = 68.931 (just less than 70). the only number that ends with *1 in this range is 61, so t = 61. so, 29*61 + 10o = 1999, 10o = 1999 - 1769, o = 230/10 = 23. a = 61- 23 = 38.

                Y Offline
                Y Offline
                Yulianto
                wrote on last edited by
                #31

                Wow for the solution and the number of 5 vote. :)


                Work hard, Work effectively.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Bassam Abdul Baki

                  29a + 39o = 1999 29a ≤ 1999 ⇒ 0 ≤ a ≤ 68 39o ≤ 1999 ⇒ 0 ≤ o ≤ 51 29a + 39o ≡ 9a + 9o = 9(a + o) ≡ 9 (mod 10) ∴ a + o ≡ 1 (mod 10) Since 29 and 39 do not divide 1999, 29(a + o) < 29a + 39o < 39(a + 0) ⇒ 51 < a + o < 68. ∴ a + o = 61. a + o = 61 and 29a + 39o = 1999 ⇒ a = 38 and o = 23. "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Srikanth Remani
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  The solution is quite elegant. seems to me that I should go back and refine my discrete mathematics and modern algebra. Blood, Sweat and Code

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Matias Szulman

                    Today I realised that math is definitively not for me. For fun I was trying to solve some puzzles, and I've been stuck with this one for about an hour. I know some of you really get it, so could I ask for some help? Thanks! A fruitstand in my neighborhood sells apples for 29 cents apiece, and oranges for 39 cents apiece. One day I went there and filled a basket with a mixture of apples and oranges. When I paid for them I handed the clerk a $20 bill, and she handed me back my change ... one penny. How many apples did I buy? (Assume there was no sales tax charged.) Matias

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Chester Ragel
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    In .net and C#.... int apple,orange = 0; //surely apple wont be more than 69 for(apple=0;apple<69;apple++) { long temp1,temp2 = 0; temp1 = Math.DivRem((1999-39*apple),29,out temp2); if(temp2 == 0) { orange = (int)temp1; break; } } //Get the ornage and apple here! :-D

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                      Amazing! :omg: What's even more amazing is that your very first post has garnered 11 5 votes and still counting. :cool: Vikram.


                      http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar "It's like hitting water with your fist. There's all sorts of motion and noise at impact, and no impression left whatsoever shortly thereafter." — gantww.

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      ThatsAlok
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      Vikram A Punathambekar wrote: garnered 11 5 votes 18th is mine! ;P

                      "Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow

                      cheers, Alok Gupta

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Srikanth Remani

                        The solution is quite elegant. seems to me that I should go back and refine my discrete mathematics and modern algebra. Blood, Sweat and Code

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        Bassam Abdul Baki
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #35

                        Yours was the equivalent of mine, just a bit more wordy. Don't get many mathematical problems on CP, so I quickly jumped into the solution. Little did I know that I was 3 hours late in supplying the first correct one. :( Whch is why I only got 3 votes. :-D "For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) Web - Blog

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Michael Dunn

                          Let a = number of apples bought, and o = number of oranges bought. Then you have: 29_a_ + 39_o_ = 1999 You can't solve this equation in isolation, because to solve for 2 unknowns you need 2 equations. You have the restriction that both a and o must be integers, but I can't think of an equation for that in the 30 seconds I've been considering this problem ;) --Mike-- Visual C++ MVP :cool: LINKS~! Ericahist | 1ClickPicGrabber | CP SearchBar v2.0.2 | C++ Forum FAQ Strange things are afoot at the U+004B U+20DD

                          X Offline
                          X Offline
                          Xiangyang Liu
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #36

                          Michael Dunn wrote: 29a + 39o = 1999 This is a perfect problem to be solved by computers, like the following: #include <stdio.h> void main() {   for(int a=0;a<100;a++)     for(int o=0;o<100;o++)       if(29*a+39*o==1999) printf("Solution: a=%d, o=%d\n",a, o); } :-D[

                          My articles and software tools

                          ](http://mysite.verizon.net/XiangYangL/index.htm)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups