Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. C++ is fun

C++ is fun

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
c++htmlcomtoolsquestion
31 Posts 19 Posters 6 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P peterchen

    I need a T-Shirt: "Obfuscating and proud!"


    Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
    aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
    boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

    C Offline
    C Offline
    Chris Meech
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    How's about, "C++ coders Obfuscate regularly" :) Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Remember that in Texas, Gun Control is hitting what you aim at. [Richard Stringer] Nice sig! [Tim Deveaux on Matt Newman's sig with a quote from me]

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Roland Pibinger

      peterchen wrote: just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. :suss:

      E Offline
      E Offline
      eggie5
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Isn't Perl obfuscated in real time? /\ |_ E X E GG

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Roland Pibinger

        peterchen wrote: just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. :suss:

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nemanja Trifunovic
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Roland Pibinger wrote: C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. Man, you have obviously never tried Perl. Not to mention APL[^] or BF[^](kid sister - safe variant of its name). Having said that, I agree that all C-like languages have too expressive syntax. Who needs that with today's IDEs and monitors? Bjarne Stroustrup himself wrote he would have prefered to use Algol68 as a base for his language rather than C. Then we would have had Algol++ and Algol# - I just wonder how Java would be called. Maybe Alcohol :~


        My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it.

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P peterchen

          just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows


          Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
          aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
          boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Member 96
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          I wrote probably over 10 million lines of code in c++ but the more I use c# the more C++ starts to look like Greek to me!:)


          "In our civilization, and under our republican form of government, intelligence is so highly honored that it is rewarded by exemption from the cares of office." - Ambrose Bierce

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Roland Pibinger

            peterchen wrote: just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. :suss:

            E Offline
            E Offline
            Eddie Velasquez
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Roland Pibinger wrote: C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. You obviously have never had the "pleasure" of coding in Perl!


            A complex system that does not work is invariably found to have evolved from a simpler system that worked just fine. - Murphy's Law of Computing

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P peterchen

              just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows


              Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
              aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
              boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

              T Offline
              T Offline
              Turtle Hand
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              I agree C++ is cool in a Brain Teaser kind of way. It's good to live, Josef Wainz Software Developer

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P peterchen

                just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows


                Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
                aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
                boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Judah Gabriel Himango
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                It's been awhile since I coded in C, I'm trying to decipher what that even means... some variable named "this_" is dereferenced, and is used to access m_obj, which is dereferenced to access the pointer to ... a function?

                Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Horrific Minnesota Radio Judah Himango

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P peterchen

                  just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows


                  Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
                  aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
                  boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  Tim Ranker
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  I hope those pointers are not NULL... :)

                  N 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T Tim Ranker

                    I hope those pointers are not NULL... :)

                    N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Nemanja Trifunovic
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Do you think it would be better if they were 0x000001 instead ;P


                    My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it.

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P peterchen

                      just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows


                      Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
                      aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
                      boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      Tad McClellan
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      And we wonder why people think programers are boring.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P peterchen

                        just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows


                        Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
                        aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
                        boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

                        N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Navin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        peterchen wrote: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); You disgust me. The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.

                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Bruce Duncan

                          Don't forget about PERL, specifically when using regex's :)

                          Searching the web without Google is like straining sewage with your teeth.
                          Userfriendly, 2003/06/07

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Roland Pibinger
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          Bruce Duncan wrote: Don't forget about PERL, specifically when using regex's Fortunately C++ will have a regex lib in the future. Imagine regex, STL, Boost libraries, and MFC/COM/ATL/WTL in one program. Unbeatable!

                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • E Eddie Velasquez

                            Roland Pibinger wrote: C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. You obviously have never had the "pleasure" of coding in Perl!


                            A complex system that does not work is invariably found to have evolved from a simpler system that worked just fine. - Murphy's Law of Computing

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Roland Pibinger
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            Eddie Velasquez wrote: You obviously have never had the "pleasure" of coding in Perl! From the CUJ newsletter May 2, 2005

                            4. Coming Up in the July 2005 Issue

                            *** Java and C/C++ ***
                            ...
                            Perl, C++, & Java: Making it easy to execute Perl subroutines from
                            within C++
                            ...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Judah Gabriel Himango

                              It's been awhile since I coded in C, I'm trying to decipher what that even means... some variable named "this_" is dereferenced, and is used to access m_obj, which is dereferenced to access the pointer to ... a function?

                              Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Horrific Minnesota Radio Judah Himango

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              peterchen
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              It's redirecting an Async procedure call to another object's member function. this_ is a ptr to the proxy object (passed to APCProc as ULONG_PTR), and contains an instance pointer m_obj and a member function pointer m_func


                              Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
                              aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
                              boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D Daniel Turini

                                Nishant S wrote: It's not the this pointer, it's a pointer variable named this_ And you call this fun??? I see dead pixels Yes, even I am blogging now!

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                Of course it's fun. :) -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Roland Pibinger

                                  Bruce Duncan wrote: Don't forget about PERL, specifically when using regex's Fortunately C++ will have a regex lib in the future. Imagine regex, STL, Boost libraries, and MFC/COM/ATL/WTL in one program. Unbeatable!

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  Are you talking about the project I'm currently working on? Well.. hm.. I don't have MFC in it, so it's pretty tidy. :) -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R Roland Pibinger

                                    peterchen wrote: just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. :suss:

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    C++ is expressive and quite orthogonal, compared to other half assed languages. Besides, it's what you make of it that counts. -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • N Nemanja Trifunovic

                                      Roland Pibinger wrote: C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. Man, you have obviously never tried Perl. Not to mention APL[^] or BF[^](kid sister - safe variant of its name). Having said that, I agree that all C-like languages have too expressive syntax. Who needs that with today's IDEs and monitors? Bjarne Stroustrup himself wrote he would have prefered to use Algol68 as a base for his language rather than C. Then we would have had Algol++ and Algol# - I just wonder how Java would be called. Maybe Alcohol :~


                                      My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it.

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      Nemanja Trifunovic wrote: Maybe Alcohol Alcohol usually gets you in a good mood. Java don't. But then again, too much alcohol makes you sick, just like java. ;) -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Nemanja Trifunovic

                                        Do you think it would be better if they were 0x000001 instead ;P


                                        My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it.

                                        J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        It's when you get such pointer values, that you know you're [potentially] in trouble. :) -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • N Navin

                                          peterchen wrote: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); You disgust me. The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #30

                                          m_obj is not this_'s private parts, so you can relax now. ;P -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups