Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. C++ is fun

C++ is fun

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
c++htmlcomtoolsquestion
31 Posts 19 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P peterchen

    just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows


    Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
    aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
    boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Member 96
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    I wrote probably over 10 million lines of code in c++ but the more I use c# the more C++ starts to look like Greek to me!:)


    "In our civilization, and under our republican form of government, intelligence is so highly honored that it is rewarded by exemption from the cares of office." - Ambrose Bierce

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Roland Pibinger

      peterchen wrote: just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. :suss:

      E Offline
      E Offline
      Eddie Velasquez
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      Roland Pibinger wrote: C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. You obviously have never had the "pleasure" of coding in Perl!


      A complex system that does not work is invariably found to have evolved from a simpler system that worked just fine. - Murphy's Law of Computing

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P peterchen

        just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows


        Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
        aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
        boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

        T Offline
        T Offline
        Turtle Hand
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        I agree C++ is cool in a Brain Teaser kind of way. It's good to live, Josef Wainz Software Developer

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P peterchen

          just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows


          Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
          aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
          boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Judah Gabriel Himango
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          It's been awhile since I coded in C, I'm trying to decipher what that even means... some variable named "this_" is dereferenced, and is used to access m_obj, which is dereferenced to access the pointer to ... a function?

          Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Horrific Minnesota Radio Judah Himango

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P peterchen

            just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows


            Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
            aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
            boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

            T Offline
            T Offline
            Tim Ranker
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            I hope those pointers are not NULL... :)

            N 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Tim Ranker

              I hope those pointers are not NULL... :)

              N Offline
              N Offline
              Nemanja Trifunovic
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              Do you think it would be better if they were 0x000001 instead ;P


              My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it.

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P peterchen

                just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows


                Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
                aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
                boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Tad McClellan
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                And we wonder why people think programers are boring.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P peterchen

                  just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows


                  Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
                  aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
                  boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Navin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  peterchen wrote: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); You disgust me. The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Bruce Duncan

                    Don't forget about PERL, specifically when using regex's :)

                    Searching the web without Google is like straining sewage with your teeth.
                    Userfriendly, 2003/06/07

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Roland Pibinger
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    Bruce Duncan wrote: Don't forget about PERL, specifically when using regex's Fortunately C++ will have a regex lib in the future. Imagine regex, STL, Boost libraries, and MFC/COM/ATL/WTL in one program. Unbeatable!

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • E Eddie Velasquez

                      Roland Pibinger wrote: C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. You obviously have never had the "pleasure" of coding in Perl!


                      A complex system that does not work is invariably found to have evolved from a simpler system that worked just fine. - Murphy's Law of Computing

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Roland Pibinger
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      Eddie Velasquez wrote: You obviously have never had the "pleasure" of coding in Perl! From the CUJ newsletter May 2, 2005

                      4. Coming Up in the July 2005 Issue

                      *** Java and C/C++ ***
                      ...
                      Perl, C++, & Java: Making it easy to execute Perl subroutines from
                      within C++
                      ...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Judah Gabriel Himango

                        It's been awhile since I coded in C, I'm trying to decipher what that even means... some variable named "this_" is dereferenced, and is used to access m_obj, which is dereferenced to access the pointer to ... a function?

                        Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Horrific Minnesota Radio Judah Himango

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        peterchen
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        It's redirecting an Async procedure call to another object's member function. this_ is a ptr to the proxy object (passed to APCProc as ULONG_PTR), and contains an instance pointer m_obj and a member function pointer m_func


                        Pandoras Gift #44: Hope. The one that keeps you on suffering.
                        aber.. "Wie gesagt, der Scheiss is' Therapie"
                        boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist | doxygen

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Daniel Turini

                          Nishant S wrote: It's not the this pointer, it's a pointer variable named this_ And you call this fun??? I see dead pixels Yes, even I am blogging now!

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Jorgen Sigvardsson
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25

                          Of course it's fun. :) -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Roland Pibinger

                            Bruce Duncan wrote: Don't forget about PERL, specifically when using regex's Fortunately C++ will have a regex lib in the future. Imagine regex, STL, Boost libraries, and MFC/COM/ATL/WTL in one program. Unbeatable!

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jorgen Sigvardsson
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #26

                            Are you talking about the project I'm currently working on? Well.. hm.. I don't have MFC in it, so it's pretty tidy. :) -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Roland Pibinger

                              peterchen wrote: just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. :suss:

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              Jorgen Sigvardsson
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #27

                              C++ is expressive and quite orthogonal, compared to other half assed languages. Besides, it's what you make of it that counts. -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N Nemanja Trifunovic

                                Roland Pibinger wrote: C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. Man, you have obviously never tried Perl. Not to mention APL[^] or BF[^](kid sister - safe variant of its name). Having said that, I agree that all C-like languages have too expressive syntax. Who needs that with today's IDEs and monitors? Bjarne Stroustrup himself wrote he would have prefered to use Algol68 as a base for his language rather than C. Then we would have had Algol++ and Algol# - I just wonder how Java would be called. Maybe Alcohol :~


                                My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it.

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                Nemanja Trifunovic wrote: Maybe Alcohol Alcohol usually gets you in a good mood. Java don't. But then again, too much alcohol makes you sick, just like java. ;) -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Nemanja Trifunovic

                                  Do you think it would be better if they were 0x000001 instead ;P


                                  My programming blahblahblah blog. If you ever find anything useful here, please let me know to remove it.

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #29

                                  It's when you get such pointer values, that you know you're [potentially] in trouble. :) -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • N Navin

                                    peterchen wrote: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); You disgust me. The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #30

                                    m_obj is not this_'s private parts, so you can relax now. ;P -- Schni Schna Schnappi! Schnappi Schnappi Schnapp!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Roland Pibinger

                                      peterchen wrote: just wrote this: (this_->m_obj->*(this_->m_func))(); Nothing exceptional, but I enjoy th arrows C++, the only language with a built-in code obfuscater. :suss:

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      Rick York
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #31

                                      Actually, it's self-obfuscating if one allows it to be.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups