Blasphemous question
-
If I remember correctly its: www.MyCustomersAreMasochists.com :-D "Thank you, thank you very much" Elvis.
www.MyCustomersAreMasochists.com? Hmmm it's redirected to www.microsoft.com ... any hints? :-P ..have fun.. jk :cool:
-
Blasphemous question: what's the 'java' opposite to CodeProject? ..have fun.. jk :cool:
www.SlowAndIhopePortableSite.com/default.jsp Crivo Automated Credit Assessment
-
www.MyCustomersAreMasochists.com? Hmmm it's redirected to www.microsoft.com ... any hints? :-P ..have fun.. jk :cool:
Actually it's the Oracle site :cool:
-
www.MyCustomersAreMasochists.com? Hmmm it's redirected to www.microsoft.com ... any hints? :-P ..have fun.. jk :cool:
The site must have been hacked again. Damn, those Linux guys!:) "Thank you, thank you very much" Elvis.
-
Blasphemous question: what's the 'java' opposite to CodeProject? ..have fun.. jk :cool:
www.NudeCelebsWhoKnowJava.com and www.IfIRunThisNowIGetResultsAfter1000years.com Nish Nish was here, now Nish has gone; He left his soul, to turn you on; Those who knew Nish, knew him well; Those who didn't, can go to hell. I like to :jig: on the Code Project Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain www.busterboy.org
-
Blasphemous question: what's the 'java' opposite to CodeProject? ..have fun.. jk :cool:
Gamelan.com is a good one. I was a Java developer for a while, and I like it. ;P J
-
Blasphemous question: what's the 'java' opposite to CodeProject? ..have fun.. jk :cool:
www.jGuru.com is a good site. Don't let them get to ya! Java is a nice language (with minor speed issues) :) ---- xian
-
Blasphemous question: what's the 'java' opposite to CodeProject? ..have fun.. jk :cool:
welll...welll.welll......................................................... ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ just dunno my proggie is not still up thru' the JVM..:-D www.JustTryJavaOrElse.fud Atul Sonork 100.13714 netdiva
-
www.jGuru.com is a good site. Don't let them get to ya! Java is a nice language (with minor speed issues) :) ---- xian
Why does anyone harp about speed issues anymore? Java is interpreted, but the CPUs and RAM today are so ridiculously fast that it hardly seems to be an issue! Back when we thought a 1 MHz clock was smokin' it definitely would have been noticable - real time stuff was written in assembly for that reason, but these new machines we take for granted are awesome... I can think of a few applications where C++ would be preferable to Java, but not many. And a language that is simpler to code is likely to have fewer errors, given all other factors remain the same. I vote "Simple."
-
Why does anyone harp about speed issues anymore? Java is interpreted, but the CPUs and RAM today are so ridiculously fast that it hardly seems to be an issue! Back when we thought a 1 MHz clock was smokin' it definitely would have been noticable - real time stuff was written in assembly for that reason, but these new machines we take for granted are awesome... I can think of a few applications where C++ would be preferable to Java, but not many. And a language that is simpler to code is likely to have fewer errors, given all other factors remain the same. I vote "Simple."
That's strange... a lot of the arguments you present in favour of Java are also used to flog C#... :suss: "Why kill time, when you can kill yourself?" - Cabaret Voltaire
-
Why does anyone harp about speed issues anymore? Java is interpreted, but the CPUs and RAM today are so ridiculously fast that it hardly seems to be an issue! Back when we thought a 1 MHz clock was smokin' it definitely would have been noticable - real time stuff was written in assembly for that reason, but these new machines we take for granted are awesome... I can think of a few applications where C++ would be preferable to Java, but not many. And a language that is simpler to code is likely to have fewer errors, given all other factors remain the same. I vote "Simple."
Roger Wright wrote: Why does anyone harp about speed issues anymore? Java is interpreted, but the CPUs and RAM today are so ridiculously fast that it hardly seems to be an issue! Back when we thought a 1 MHz clock was smokin' it definitely would have been noticable - real time stuff was written in assembly for that reason, but these new machines we take for granted are awesome... I can think of a few applications where C++ would be preferable to Java, but not many. And a language that is simpler to code is likely to have fewer errors, given all other factors remain the same. I vote "Simple." Java is wrong, C++ is correct, It's that simple Roger, I say this and many others say similar stuff, we can not be wrong together. Two wrongs do not make a wright ! Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
28 th Law of Computing: Anything that can go wr# Segmentation violation -- Core dumped
-
Roger Wright wrote: Why does anyone harp about speed issues anymore? Java is interpreted, but the CPUs and RAM today are so ridiculously fast that it hardly seems to be an issue! Back when we thought a 1 MHz clock was smokin' it definitely would have been noticable - real time stuff was written in assembly for that reason, but these new machines we take for granted are awesome... I can think of a few applications where C++ would be preferable to Java, but not many. And a language that is simpler to code is likely to have fewer errors, given all other factors remain the same. I vote "Simple." Java is wrong, C++ is correct, It's that simple Roger, I say this and many others say similar stuff, we can not be wrong together. Two wrongs do not make a wright ! Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
28 th Law of Computing: Anything that can go wr# Segmentation violation -- Core dumped
Colin Davies wrote: Two wrongs do not make a wright ! My parents did!:-D Thanks for the simple, cogent explanation, Colin... I think for my next project I'll build a MBASIC interpreter using Java; Since the target machine will be a Cray, maybe I'll do the JVM for it in C#. Seems appropriate. I can use Netscape for the text output, and vi for the IDE.