Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Linux on Missiles?

Linux on Missiles?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharphtmllinuxtestingbeta-testing
26 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Offline
    I Offline
    inphone
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    RedHawk Linux[^] selected for Lockheed Martin for missile testing X|

    E R J 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • I inphone

      RedHawk Linux[^] selected for Lockheed Martin for missile testing X|

      E Offline
      E Offline
      El Corazon
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      inphone wrote:

      RedHawk Linux[^] selected for Lockheed Martin for missile testing

      Actually, it is not all that bad. Remember a missile is in a dedicated and very localized environment with specific hardware (that almost never changes) attached. It is extremely embedded with minimal changes over time. It's not like a missile has a wifi connection to the internet streaming music from iTunes and downloading updates as it flies. So most OS's are extremely stable in a very tightly closed environment. You would rather they make their own OS still? _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

      R L 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • E El Corazon

        inphone wrote:

        RedHawk Linux[^] selected for Lockheed Martin for missile testing

        Actually, it is not all that bad. Remember a missile is in a dedicated and very localized environment with specific hardware (that almost never changes) attached. It is extremely embedded with minimal changes over time. It's not like a missile has a wifi connection to the internet streaming music from iTunes and downloading updates as it flies. So most OS's are extremely stable in a very tightly closed environment. You would rather they make their own OS still? _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Roger Alsing 0
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Goddamnit boy! ofcourse they should run win longhorn so they can use avalon on a display on the missile side.. kinda like the goodyear blimp..

        E 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I inphone

          RedHawk Linux[^] selected for Lockheed Martin for missile testing X|

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Roger Wright
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          It's gotta be better than the garbage produced by Northrop for managing the IMU in Peacekeeper. Hell, they couldn't even get ATLAS right! Can you imagine running missile tests using Windows? Believe me, when the job requires real-time management of flight control systems, you don't want a buggy, pre-emptive multi-tasking operating system running the show. That's just asking for test birds landing in downtown Encino. They might not be carrying a payload of HE, but they still pack a lot of kinetic energy, and it could ruin the day for a lot of rent-controlled living valley girls on the first BSOD. Linux is a bitch to use for those of us spoiled by the Fisher-Price interface of Windows, but it's rock solid in performance and very reliable. For certain applications it's hard to beat, and this sounds like one of them. The right tool for the job is the rule here, and I think it was a good choice for the price. I wish we'd something as good to select when I was in the missile racket. "...a photo album is like Life, but flat and stuck to pages." - Shog9

          V A J N R 5 Replies Last reply
          0
          • R Roger Alsing 0

            Goddamnit boy! ofcourse they should run win longhorn so they can use avalon on a display on the missile side.. kinda like the goodyear blimp..

            E Offline
            E Offline
            El Corazon
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Roger J wrote:

            ofcourse they should run win longhorn so they can use avalon on a display on the missile side.. kinda like the goodyear blimp..

            uh... yeah... THAAD advertising.... high altitude intercept with a flair... advertise on the side of our failing missile today.... ;) _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E El Corazon

              Roger J wrote:

              ofcourse they should run win longhorn so they can use avalon on a display on the missile side.. kinda like the goodyear blimp..

              uh... yeah... THAAD advertising.... high altitude intercept with a flair... advertise on the side of our failing missile today.... ;) _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

              P Offline
              P Offline
              peterchen
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              "If YOU had bought me, you wouldn't die now"


              We say "get a life" to each other, disappointed or jokingly. What we forget, though, is that this is possibly the most destructive advice you can give to a geek.
              boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Roger Wright

                It's gotta be better than the garbage produced by Northrop for managing the IMU in Peacekeeper. Hell, they couldn't even get ATLAS right! Can you imagine running missile tests using Windows? Believe me, when the job requires real-time management of flight control systems, you don't want a buggy, pre-emptive multi-tasking operating system running the show. That's just asking for test birds landing in downtown Encino. They might not be carrying a payload of HE, but they still pack a lot of kinetic energy, and it could ruin the day for a lot of rent-controlled living valley girls on the first BSOD. Linux is a bitch to use for those of us spoiled by the Fisher-Price interface of Windows, but it's rock solid in performance and very reliable. For certain applications it's hard to beat, and this sounds like one of them. The right tool for the job is the rule here, and I think it was a good choice for the price. I wish we'd something as good to select when I was in the missile racket. "...a photo album is like Life, but flat and stuck to pages." - Shog9

                V Offline
                V Offline
                Vikram A Punathambekar
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Yup, I can imagine what would happen if a Windows-controlled missile were to get a BSOD. :omg: Only, I can't *stop* imagining the frightening scenarios. :rolleyes: Cheers, Vikram.


                "When I read in books about a "base class", I figured this was the class that was at the bottom of the inheritence tree. It's the "base", right? Like the base of a pyramid." - Marc Clifton.

                E L 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                  Yup, I can imagine what would happen if a Windows-controlled missile were to get a BSOD. :omg: Only, I can't *stop* imagining the frightening scenarios. :rolleyes: Cheers, Vikram.


                  "When I read in books about a "base class", I figured this was the class that was at the bottom of the inheritence tree. It's the "base", right? Like the base of a pyramid." - Marc Clifton.

                  E Offline
                  E Offline
                  Eytukan
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:

                  I can imagine what would happen if a Windows-controlled missile were to get a BSOD

                  After firing the missile, Everybody'd be asked clear off the control room.:laugh:


                  "But your mind is very complex, very tricky. It makes simple things complicated. -- that's its work. And for centuries it has been trained for only one thing: to make things so complicated that your life becomes impossible."- Osho

                  --[V]--

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                    Yup, I can imagine what would happen if a Windows-controlled missile were to get a BSOD. :omg: Only, I can't *stop* imagining the frightening scenarios. :rolleyes: Cheers, Vikram.


                    "When I read in books about a "base class", I figured this was the class that was at the bottom of the inheritence tree. It's the "base", right? Like the base of a pyramid." - Marc Clifton.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    logicaldna
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    it will say Bad target name. Press F1 to continue .:-D ------------------------------ Its not the fall that kills you; it's the sudden stop at the end.

                    V 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Roger Wright

                      It's gotta be better than the garbage produced by Northrop for managing the IMU in Peacekeeper. Hell, they couldn't even get ATLAS right! Can you imagine running missile tests using Windows? Believe me, when the job requires real-time management of flight control systems, you don't want a buggy, pre-emptive multi-tasking operating system running the show. That's just asking for test birds landing in downtown Encino. They might not be carrying a payload of HE, but they still pack a lot of kinetic energy, and it could ruin the day for a lot of rent-controlled living valley girls on the first BSOD. Linux is a bitch to use for those of us spoiled by the Fisher-Price interface of Windows, but it's rock solid in performance and very reliable. For certain applications it's hard to beat, and this sounds like one of them. The right tool for the job is the rule here, and I think it was a good choice for the price. I wish we'd something as good to select when I was in the missile racket. "...a photo album is like Life, but flat and stuck to pages." - Shog9

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      I couldn't have put it better myself. 5. Anna :rose: Riverblade Ltd - Software Consultancy Services Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "Be yourself - not what others think you should be" - Marcia Graesch "Anna's just a sexy-looking lesbian tart" - A friend, trying to wind me up. It didn't work.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Roger Wright

                        It's gotta be better than the garbage produced by Northrop for managing the IMU in Peacekeeper. Hell, they couldn't even get ATLAS right! Can you imagine running missile tests using Windows? Believe me, when the job requires real-time management of flight control systems, you don't want a buggy, pre-emptive multi-tasking operating system running the show. That's just asking for test birds landing in downtown Encino. They might not be carrying a payload of HE, but they still pack a lot of kinetic energy, and it could ruin the day for a lot of rent-controlled living valley girls on the first BSOD. Linux is a bitch to use for those of us spoiled by the Fisher-Price interface of Windows, but it's rock solid in performance and very reliable. For certain applications it's hard to beat, and this sounds like one of them. The right tool for the job is the rule here, and I think it was a good choice for the price. I wish we'd something as good to select when I was in the missile racket. "...a photo album is like Life, but flat and stuck to pages." - Shog9

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Jorgen Sigvardsson
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        > Linux is a bitch to use for those of us spoiled by the Fisher-Price interface of Windows :omg: I thought it was a *trembling voice* Lego/Duplo interface. My world is now shattered in pieces. :rolleyes: -- Pictures[^] from my Japan trip.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L logicaldna

                          it will say Bad target name. Press F1 to continue .:-D ------------------------------ Its not the fall that kills you; it's the sudden stop at the end.

                          V Offline
                          V Offline
                          Vikram A Punathambekar
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          You cannot recover from a BSOD. :-D Cheers, Vikram.


                          "When I read in books about a "base class", I figured this was the class that was at the bottom of the inheritence tree. It's the "base", right? Like the base of a pyramid." - Marc Clifton.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • E El Corazon

                            inphone wrote:

                            RedHawk Linux[^] selected for Lockheed Martin for missile testing

                            Actually, it is not all that bad. Remember a missile is in a dedicated and very localized environment with specific hardware (that almost never changes) attached. It is extremely embedded with minimal changes over time. It's not like a missile has a wifi connection to the internet streaming music from iTunes and downloading updates as it flies. So most OS's are extremely stable in a very tightly closed environment. You would rather they make their own OS still? _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:

                            very localized environment with specific hardware (that almost never changes)

                            Well, at least once :rolleyes: The tigress is here :-D

                            E 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:

                              very localized environment with specific hardware (that almost never changes)

                              Well, at least once :rolleyes: The tigress is here :-D

                              E Offline
                              E Offline
                              El Corazon
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Trollslayer wrote:

                              Well, at least once

                              This is THAAD we're talking about.... Though hopefully they have fixed their seeker problem, THAAD missed 9 out of 10 times. ;P Maybe that is why they are changing the OS.... They were getting BSOD.... _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                              N 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • R Roger Wright

                                It's gotta be better than the garbage produced by Northrop for managing the IMU in Peacekeeper. Hell, they couldn't even get ATLAS right! Can you imagine running missile tests using Windows? Believe me, when the job requires real-time management of flight control systems, you don't want a buggy, pre-emptive multi-tasking operating system running the show. That's just asking for test birds landing in downtown Encino. They might not be carrying a payload of HE, but they still pack a lot of kinetic energy, and it could ruin the day for a lot of rent-controlled living valley girls on the first BSOD. Linux is a bitch to use for those of us spoiled by the Fisher-Price interface of Windows, but it's rock solid in performance and very reliable. For certain applications it's hard to beat, and this sounds like one of them. The right tool for the job is the rule here, and I think it was a good choice for the price. I wish we'd something as good to select when I was in the missile racket. "...a photo album is like Life, but flat and stuck to pages." - Shog9

                                N Offline
                                N Offline
                                Nic Rowan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Roger Wright wrote:

                                and it could ruin the day for a lot of rent-controlled living valley girls on the first BSOD.

                                Would definately redefine Blue Screen Of Death. While I'm not a *nix fan I agree that when it comes to stuff like missiles, Linux is a lot better than other things.


                                The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone he can blame it on. If you tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe, he'll believe you. But if you tell him a bench has just been painted, he'll have to touch it to be sure.


                                E 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Roger Wright

                                  It's gotta be better than the garbage produced by Northrop for managing the IMU in Peacekeeper. Hell, they couldn't even get ATLAS right! Can you imagine running missile tests using Windows? Believe me, when the job requires real-time management of flight control systems, you don't want a buggy, pre-emptive multi-tasking operating system running the show. That's just asking for test birds landing in downtown Encino. They might not be carrying a payload of HE, but they still pack a lot of kinetic energy, and it could ruin the day for a lot of rent-controlled living valley girls on the first BSOD. Linux is a bitch to use for those of us spoiled by the Fisher-Price interface of Windows, but it's rock solid in performance and very reliable. For certain applications it's hard to beat, and this sounds like one of them. The right tool for the job is the rule here, and I think it was a good choice for the price. I wish we'd something as good to select when I was in the missile racket. "...a photo album is like Life, but flat and stuck to pages." - Shog9

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Ryan Roberts
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Roger Wright wrote:

                                  you don't want a buggy, pre-emptive multi-tasking operating system running the show.

                                  Er, isn't Linux a pre-emptive multitasking operating system (with bugs)? It certainly isn't a rate monotonic real time operating system. I believe they were using for simulation, not flight control. More suitable OSS for that kind of thing would probably be RTEMS[^]. Worked on an "electronic nose" system based on it a fair few years ago. (Grandmother, suck eggs, but coudln't resist) Ryan

                                  O fools, awake! The rites you sacred hold Are but a cheat contrived by men of old, Who lusted after wealth and gained their lust And died in baseness—and their law is dust. al-Ma'arri (973-1057)

                                  B E R 3 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R Ryan Roberts

                                    Roger Wright wrote:

                                    you don't want a buggy, pre-emptive multi-tasking operating system running the show.

                                    Er, isn't Linux a pre-emptive multitasking operating system (with bugs)? It certainly isn't a rate monotonic real time operating system. I believe they were using for simulation, not flight control. More suitable OSS for that kind of thing would probably be RTEMS[^]. Worked on an "electronic nose" system based on it a fair few years ago. (Grandmother, suck eggs, but coudln't resist) Ryan

                                    O fools, awake! The rites you sacred hold Are but a cheat contrived by men of old, Who lusted after wealth and gained their lust And died in baseness—and their law is dust. al-Ma'arri (973-1057)

                                    B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    Baconbutty
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    What would happen if you used a pre-emptive OS in a missile system that could be used in a pre-emptive strike? Would the missile blast off without any consideration of the political/military climate at the time, as it thought it could get a strike in before the other side had even thought there was a problem? I still remember having to write your own code in FORTRAN rather than be a cut and paste merchant being pampered by colour coded Intellisense - ahh proper programming - those were the days :) -- modified at 9:13 Tuesday 29th November, 2005

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B Baconbutty

                                      What would happen if you used a pre-emptive OS in a missile system that could be used in a pre-emptive strike? Would the missile blast off without any consideration of the political/military climate at the time, as it thought it could get a strike in before the other side had even thought there was a problem? I still remember having to write your own code in FORTRAN rather than be a cut and paste merchant being pampered by colour coded Intellisense - ahh proper programming - those were the days :) -- modified at 9:13 Tuesday 29th November, 2005

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      Ryan Roberts
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      I think that would be precognitive sheduling. Would be revolutionary. Maybe we should start a working group. Now I'm sounding like my schizophrenic ex boss. Ryan

                                      O fools, awake! The rites you sacred hold Are but a cheat contrived by men of old, Who lusted after wealth and gained their lust And died in baseness—and their law is dust. al-Ma'arri (973-1057)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Nic Rowan

                                        Roger Wright wrote:

                                        and it could ruin the day for a lot of rent-controlled living valley girls on the first BSOD.

                                        Would definately redefine Blue Screen Of Death. While I'm not a *nix fan I agree that when it comes to stuff like missiles, Linux is a lot better than other things.


                                        The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone he can blame it on. If you tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe, he'll believe you. But if you tell him a bench has just been painted, he'll have to touch it to be sure.


                                        E Offline
                                        E Offline
                                        Eytukan
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        launching missles, firing Artilleries, Dropping bombs and many more can be done with Windows XP operating system, but you should also have a joystick attached and a nice graphics card.


                                        "But your mind is very complex, very tricky. It makes simple things complicated. -- that's its work. And for centuries it has been trained for only one thing: to make things so complicated that your life becomes impossible."- Osho

                                        --[V]--

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Ryan Roberts

                                          Roger Wright wrote:

                                          you don't want a buggy, pre-emptive multi-tasking operating system running the show.

                                          Er, isn't Linux a pre-emptive multitasking operating system (with bugs)? It certainly isn't a rate monotonic real time operating system. I believe they were using for simulation, not flight control. More suitable OSS for that kind of thing would probably be RTEMS[^]. Worked on an "electronic nose" system based on it a fair few years ago. (Grandmother, suck eggs, but coudln't resist) Ryan

                                          O fools, awake! The rites you sacred hold Are but a cheat contrived by men of old, Who lusted after wealth and gained their lust And died in baseness—and their law is dust. al-Ma'arri (973-1057)

                                          E Offline
                                          E Offline
                                          El Corazon
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Ryan Roberts wrote:

                                          Er, isn't Linux a pre-emptive multitasking operating system (with bugs)? It certainly isn't a rate monotonic real time operating system.

                                          RedHawk Linux, not RedHat. I have not measured the OS, we don't have a copy yet, though I am considering it now. There are several ways to increase determinism on an OS. Minimize its interruptions is one. If you can guarentee that windows receives one interrupt at a time and never receives an over-lapping interrupt, you remove it from a network, minimize processes, and run a processor 10x faster than you need, it is extremely deterministic (otherwise known as soft-real-time). However the best way is to replace a core kernel with a deterministic one (hard-real-time). Concurrent Computer Corporation's RedHawk™ Linux® is an industry-standard, POSIX-compliant, real-time version of the open source Linux operating system. RedHawk Linux, compatible with the popular Red Hat® Linux distribution, provides high I/O throughput, guaranteed fast response to external events, and optimized interprocess communication. RedHawk is the ideal Linux environment for the complex real-time applications found in simulation, data acquisition, and industrial systems control. RedHawk Linux user-level commands, utilities and system administration are standard Red Hat. **RedHawk achieves real-time performance by replacing the Red Hat kernel with a multithreaded, fully-preemptable kernel with low-latency enhancements. RedHawk's true symmetric multiprocessing support includes load-balancing and CPU shielding to maximize determinism and real-time performance in mission-critical solutions.** _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups