Google Managment rules right link
-
Here is a correct link for Google Golden Rules Article: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10296177/site/newsweek/[^]. An overview[^]on my blog. :-D Eduardo Diaz site | english blog | spanish blog
-
Here is a correct link for Google Golden Rules Article: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10296177/site/newsweek/[^]. An overview[^]on my blog. :-D Eduardo Diaz site | english blog | spanish blog
That is a great article. This comment got me ROTFLMAO. "But nobody throws chairs at Google, unlike management practices used at some other well-known technology companies." :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] Remember that in Texas, Gun Control is hitting what you aim at. [Richard Stringer] Nice sig! [Tim Deveaux on Matt Newman's sig with a quote from me]
-
Here is a correct link for Google Golden Rules Article: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10296177/site/newsweek/[^]. An overview[^]on my blog. :-D Eduardo Diaz site | english blog | spanish blog
Great rules, until they get axed when profits vanish. It's nice to see what a company does when the corporate machine is well oiled (read funded). But history shows over and over again that these kind of "rules" are the first to go when funds start dwindling. Marc VS2005 Tips & Tricks -- contributions welcome!
-
Great rules, until they get axed when profits vanish. It's nice to see what a company does when the corporate machine is well oiled (read funded). But history shows over and over again that these kind of "rules" are the first to go when funds start dwindling. Marc VS2005 Tips & Tricks -- contributions welcome!
Marc Clifton wrote:
But history shows over and over again that these kind of "rules" are the first to go when funds start dwindling.
Damn History! Always so negative. It should once and for all focus at the achievements... ;)
We say "get a life" to each other, disappointed or jokingly. What we forget, though, is that this is possibly the most destructive advice you can give to a geek.
boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist -
Marc Clifton wrote:
But history shows over and over again that these kind of "rules" are the first to go when funds start dwindling.
Damn History! Always so negative. It should once and for all focus at the achievements... ;)
We say "get a life" to each other, disappointed or jokingly. What we forget, though, is that this is possibly the most destructive advice you can give to a geek.
boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighistpeterchen wrote:
It should once and for all focus at the achievements...
Nobody's interested in achievements (contrary to what your manager will say). They like failures. If people were interested in achievements, do you think the news would be full of rape, murder, and mayhem? Well, I guess those are achievements of a sort too. :~ Marc VS2005 Tips & Tricks -- contributions welcome!
-
Great rules, until they get axed when profits vanish. It's nice to see what a company does when the corporate machine is well oiled (read funded). But history shows over and over again that these kind of "rules" are the first to go when funds start dwindling. Marc VS2005 Tips & Tricks -- contributions welcome!
Marc Clifton wrote:
But history shows over and over again that these kind of "rules" are the first to go when funds start dwindling
I Agree! Sad there are not more businesses that would hold on to their companies and not be bound to investors.... Rocky <>< Latest Post: SQL2005 Server Managemnet Studio timeouts! Blog: www.RockyMoore.com/TheCoder/[^]