Needs a Virtual Reality reboot.

It retains conversation data only for that conversation, but not cross-conversation... In other worlds it does not learn from it's chat partner, and that is because in previous versions learning from chat partner made the AI to represent extremists opinions, based on deliberate misinformation... Also remembers that ChatGPT is an implementation of a language model, that try to mimic human conversation and not a all purpose AI... "If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization." ― Gerald Weinberg

Occasionally, I game. A current intrest of mine is MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries. Someone took all the protagonist's voice lines and re-did them with AI based text-to-speech, so you can play as a female protagonist instead. The result is actually very impressive, and kinda sold me on AI based text-to-speech. If feel like this could open the door for generated content with full AI-generated voice acting. Since none of it needs to be done in real time, you could basically let GPT decide the mission parameters and backstory, with fully spoken dialogue, and maybe the occasional multi-mission sub-plot.

Guess you are wrong mate. Not a single result so far posted. "If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"

I think it was Lenin who said that the Capitalists will sell the proletariat the rope by which they will hang. :sigh: Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

Daniel Pfeffer wrote: Star Trek-style transporter is a long way off. One small step at a time. :) Kevin

Chris Maunder wrote: You mention people moving away from Windows and I feel that's an easy problem to fix by focussing on the customer After MS pulled the plug on their phones, they stated they're no longer necessarily interested in keeping people on Windows (as that strategy clearly wasn't working, at least as far as their phones were concerned), but rather, *they* were going to their customers instead, "wherever they may be", whether that's on Android or iOS or Linux or, yes, even Windows. Someone on Android changing his default search engine to Bing, because it provides ChatGPT results, would definitely be a big win from MS's perspective. It remains to be seen whether there's enough people to do just that. Depends on how easy it is--"path of least resistance" type of thing. Chris Maunder wrote: coming up with a name that can be verb'd, "Bing it" definitely isn't as catchy... Chris Maunder wrote: and stopping this stupidity. Oh, gawd... Marketing people at MS "experimenting". I say, fire the whole lot, and anyone else while they're at it who thinks of Windows as an "ad-delivery platform". :mad: That's exactly how I'm going to end up bailing on them and going to Linux.

My nephew finished the game but found that he couldn't save his progress once he completed it. He's playing it on an XBox Series X. He said he googled the issue and stated that others are experiencing the save game issue as well. He's a huge Harry Potter fan (understatement of the decade) and he is pissed due to that bug and he's been talking my ear off about it. Kelly Herald Software Developer

Graeme_Grant wrote: and run a D&D game That's ruddy mysterious.

Not sure what you are suggesting at this point. The updates are delivered automatically. The OP was about Edge being in the latest update. So the following two parts, at a minimum, exist 1. Reporting (english and other language text) that Edge would not be in it. 2. The code where it was still there. So in terms of process some person (not code) decided it would no longer be there. Then some person (step 1) reported that. And very likely a different person then the one above. Then some other person (definitely a different person) might have either included it or forgot to exclude it. So it showed up. And realistically I bet there are more steps in the above process in which humans, not software, are involved and which software would never be involved. Why do I say 'might' above? Because maybe the first person that I mentioned above changed their mind but the second person didn't get the notice. Or some other person not even mentioned above told the third person to put it in regardless.

Axiom noun 1. a self-evident truth that requires no proof. 2. a universally accepted principle or rule. 3. Logic, Mathematics. a proposition that is assumed without proof for the sake of studying the consequences that follow from it. "A little time, a little trouble, your better day" Badfinger

Kent Sharkey wrote: When in doubt, blame the drivers windows updates FTFY M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

No, I was accounting for imperial/metric units. The U values are given in [W/m2*K] while the R values are in [K*ft2/W]. When given in metric units, R values are usually called RSI (like R in SI). Given that 1sq m ≈ 10sq ft, I multiplied the 1/R values by 10. Mircea

Is this supposed to be a question or a statement of intent? I have deleted your reposts of this question; please do not spam the forums.